Pause the rollout of the rewritten Y0 - Y8 maths and stats curriculum (2025) in NZ


Pause the rollout of the rewritten Y0 - Y8 maths and stats curriculum (2025) in NZ
The issue
We are writing this open letter as a community of educators and researchers who want all children to succeed in mathematics and statistics. We are deeply concerned with the October 2025 changes to the mathematics and statistics curriculum and the process used for its development.
Careful benchmarking was undertaken in writing both the 2023 and 2024 versions of the mathematics and statistics curriculum to align expectations against those from similar countries in our region and to detail a more explicit sequence of mathematical learning. These changes served an educational purpose and responded to feedback on past curricula. The October 2025 changes seem more political than educational. This is unfair to teachers, but, more importantly, it is potentially damaging to learners.
Why has the curriculum been re-written for a third time in three years?
Our concerns about the October 2025 curriculum are as follows:
1. Waste of money: A huge amount of money and time has been wasted on unnecessary multiple rewrites, professional learning and texts and resources that are unaligned with the curriculum. Spending more money and time implementing a new, unjustified, unexpected and unexplained curriculum is a waste of taxpayer funds and professionals’ time and energy.
2. Mistakes: The speed of the rewrite and lack of consultation has resulted in the publication of a curriculum with multiple errors.
3. Overcrowded: There are an unrealistic number of learning objectives. In the first year of schooling, there are 86 objectives (across knowledge and practices). This compares with 30 objectives in the 2024 version of the NZ curriculum and contrasts with the United Kingdom, Singapore, and Australia curricula which have between 12 to 28 objectives. Too many objectives means that children will not be able to learn core concepts due to cognitive overload and insufficient time for practice.
4. Misaligned: The significantly higher expectations in the 2025 mathematics and statistics curriculum exceed developmental realities. This is misaligned with international curricula and may result in the introduction of new and complex topics before students have learned foundational skills needed to succeed. Some objectives are directly copied from the Australian curriculum and used at the same year level without the consideration that Australian students are one year older with an extra year of schooling given a different level year system (their system is kindergarten to year 12 rather than year 1-13).
5. Key ideas missing: The change in structure of the 2025 mathematics and statistics curriculum puts us out of step with other countries that explicitly acknowledge throughout their documents the need for statistical investigations and mathematical processes such as problem solving, reasoning, and explaining and communicating ideas.
6. Unrealistic implementation: Inadequate preparation time for teachers to learn, resource, and teach a new mathematics and statistics curriculum which has been significantly changed - bearing in mind that the same thing happened this time last year too.
We call for an immediate pause to this latest curriculum roll out. We ask for due process and transparency before any further steps are taken. Only last week ERO released a review suggesting that the 2024 curriculum was working. We want clarity on why we even need another version of the mathematics curriculum.
Only through genuine and thorough consultation with the education community in New Zealand will we be able to shape a mathematics and statistics curriculum that is fit for purpose for all New Zealanders.
Mathematics and statistics educators and researchers in New Zealand including:
Jodie Hunter, Professor, Massey University
Glenda Anthony, Emeritus Professor, Massey University
Bobbie Hunter, Emeritus Professor, Massey University
Fiona Ell, Associate Professor, University of Auckland
Joanna Higgins, Associate Professor, Victoria University of Wellington Te Herenga Waka
Naomi Ingram, Associate Professor, University of Otago
Pania Te Maro, Associate Professor, Massey University
Caroline Yoon, Associate Professor, University of Auckland
Robin Averill, Associate Professor, Victoria University of Wellington Te Herenga Waka
Linda Bonne, Senior Lecturer, Victoria University of Wellington Te Herenga Waka
Lisa Darragh, Senior Lecturer, University of Auckland
Raewyn Eden, Senior Lecturer, Massey University
Jyoti Jhagroo, Senior Lecturer, Auckland University of Technology
Ofer Marmur, Senior Lecturer, University of Auckland
Jane McChesney, Senior Lecturer, University of Canterbury
Pamela Perger, Senior Lecturer, Auckland University of Technology
David Pomeroy, Senior Lecturer, University of Canterbury
Brian Tweed, Senior Lecturer, Massey University
Sue Wilson, Senior Lecturer, University of Canterbury
Julie Roberts, Kairangahau Matua | Senior Researcher, NZCER
Anna Fergusson, Lecturer, University of Auckland
Louise Fitzgerald, Lecturer, Massey University.
Generosa Leach, Lecturer, Massey University
Martha McFaul, Lecturer, Auckland University of Technology
Alli McKenzie, Lecturer, University of Otago
Bilinda Offen, Lecturer, University of Otago
Jessie Shuker, Lecturer, University of Canterbury
Pamela Vale, Lecturer, University of Waikato
Bronwyn Gibbs, Kairangahau | Researcher, New Zealand Council for Educational Research
Belinda Haig, Senior Professional Practice Fellow, University of Otago
Julia Milligan, Senior Professional Practice Fellow, University of Otago
Olivia Wheeler, Senior Professional Practice Fellow, University of Otago
Pip Arnold, Professional Teaching Fellow, University of Auckland
Megan Clune, Professional Teaching Fellow, University of Auckland
Kim Locke, Professional Teaching Fellow, University of Auckland
Anne Patel, Professional Teaching Fellow, University of Auckland
Melina Marama Waite, University of Auckland
Jules Coup, University of Auckland
Kim Madden, Mathematics Mentor, Massey University
Emily Pearce, Mentor in Mathematics, Massey University
Selina Chittenden-O’Leary, Deputy Principal, President Manawatu Mathematics’ Teachers Association
Rose Golds, Head of Mathematics, Northcross Intermediate
Jody Hayes, Curriculum Lead, Grey Lynn School, Auckland
Mike Camden, Wellington
2,433
The issue
We are writing this open letter as a community of educators and researchers who want all children to succeed in mathematics and statistics. We are deeply concerned with the October 2025 changes to the mathematics and statistics curriculum and the process used for its development.
Careful benchmarking was undertaken in writing both the 2023 and 2024 versions of the mathematics and statistics curriculum to align expectations against those from similar countries in our region and to detail a more explicit sequence of mathematical learning. These changes served an educational purpose and responded to feedback on past curricula. The October 2025 changes seem more political than educational. This is unfair to teachers, but, more importantly, it is potentially damaging to learners.
Why has the curriculum been re-written for a third time in three years?
Our concerns about the October 2025 curriculum are as follows:
1. Waste of money: A huge amount of money and time has been wasted on unnecessary multiple rewrites, professional learning and texts and resources that are unaligned with the curriculum. Spending more money and time implementing a new, unjustified, unexpected and unexplained curriculum is a waste of taxpayer funds and professionals’ time and energy.
2. Mistakes: The speed of the rewrite and lack of consultation has resulted in the publication of a curriculum with multiple errors.
3. Overcrowded: There are an unrealistic number of learning objectives. In the first year of schooling, there are 86 objectives (across knowledge and practices). This compares with 30 objectives in the 2024 version of the NZ curriculum and contrasts with the United Kingdom, Singapore, and Australia curricula which have between 12 to 28 objectives. Too many objectives means that children will not be able to learn core concepts due to cognitive overload and insufficient time for practice.
4. Misaligned: The significantly higher expectations in the 2025 mathematics and statistics curriculum exceed developmental realities. This is misaligned with international curricula and may result in the introduction of new and complex topics before students have learned foundational skills needed to succeed. Some objectives are directly copied from the Australian curriculum and used at the same year level without the consideration that Australian students are one year older with an extra year of schooling given a different level year system (their system is kindergarten to year 12 rather than year 1-13).
5. Key ideas missing: The change in structure of the 2025 mathematics and statistics curriculum puts us out of step with other countries that explicitly acknowledge throughout their documents the need for statistical investigations and mathematical processes such as problem solving, reasoning, and explaining and communicating ideas.
6. Unrealistic implementation: Inadequate preparation time for teachers to learn, resource, and teach a new mathematics and statistics curriculum which has been significantly changed - bearing in mind that the same thing happened this time last year too.
We call for an immediate pause to this latest curriculum roll out. We ask for due process and transparency before any further steps are taken. Only last week ERO released a review suggesting that the 2024 curriculum was working. We want clarity on why we even need another version of the mathematics curriculum.
Only through genuine and thorough consultation with the education community in New Zealand will we be able to shape a mathematics and statistics curriculum that is fit for purpose for all New Zealanders.
Mathematics and statistics educators and researchers in New Zealand including:
Jodie Hunter, Professor, Massey University
Glenda Anthony, Emeritus Professor, Massey University
Bobbie Hunter, Emeritus Professor, Massey University
Fiona Ell, Associate Professor, University of Auckland
Joanna Higgins, Associate Professor, Victoria University of Wellington Te Herenga Waka
Naomi Ingram, Associate Professor, University of Otago
Pania Te Maro, Associate Professor, Massey University
Caroline Yoon, Associate Professor, University of Auckland
Robin Averill, Associate Professor, Victoria University of Wellington Te Herenga Waka
Linda Bonne, Senior Lecturer, Victoria University of Wellington Te Herenga Waka
Lisa Darragh, Senior Lecturer, University of Auckland
Raewyn Eden, Senior Lecturer, Massey University
Jyoti Jhagroo, Senior Lecturer, Auckland University of Technology
Ofer Marmur, Senior Lecturer, University of Auckland
Jane McChesney, Senior Lecturer, University of Canterbury
Pamela Perger, Senior Lecturer, Auckland University of Technology
David Pomeroy, Senior Lecturer, University of Canterbury
Brian Tweed, Senior Lecturer, Massey University
Sue Wilson, Senior Lecturer, University of Canterbury
Julie Roberts, Kairangahau Matua | Senior Researcher, NZCER
Anna Fergusson, Lecturer, University of Auckland
Louise Fitzgerald, Lecturer, Massey University.
Generosa Leach, Lecturer, Massey University
Martha McFaul, Lecturer, Auckland University of Technology
Alli McKenzie, Lecturer, University of Otago
Bilinda Offen, Lecturer, University of Otago
Jessie Shuker, Lecturer, University of Canterbury
Pamela Vale, Lecturer, University of Waikato
Bronwyn Gibbs, Kairangahau | Researcher, New Zealand Council for Educational Research
Belinda Haig, Senior Professional Practice Fellow, University of Otago
Julia Milligan, Senior Professional Practice Fellow, University of Otago
Olivia Wheeler, Senior Professional Practice Fellow, University of Otago
Pip Arnold, Professional Teaching Fellow, University of Auckland
Megan Clune, Professional Teaching Fellow, University of Auckland
Kim Locke, Professional Teaching Fellow, University of Auckland
Anne Patel, Professional Teaching Fellow, University of Auckland
Melina Marama Waite, University of Auckland
Jules Coup, University of Auckland
Kim Madden, Mathematics Mentor, Massey University
Emily Pearce, Mentor in Mathematics, Massey University
Selina Chittenden-O’Leary, Deputy Principal, President Manawatu Mathematics’ Teachers Association
Rose Golds, Head of Mathematics, Northcross Intermediate
Jody Hayes, Curriculum Lead, Grey Lynn School, Auckland
Mike Camden, Wellington
2,433
Petition created on 27 October 2025