OU Teacher Punished for Following a Rubric on Bible-Themed Essay — Defend Educators Now


OU Teacher Punished for Following a Rubric on Bible-Themed Essay — Defend Educators Now
The Issue
A graduate instructor at the University of Oklahoma is now on leave after giving a zero to a student essay that attacked nonbinary gender identities and framed gender roles as part of “God’s original plan.” The student, Samantha Fulnecky, quoted Scripture and referred to the idea of multiple genders as demonic. The instructor found the essay offensive and lacking academic support. The grade reflected the rubric, not the student’s personal beliefs.
Now, political pressure is mounting. Some are calling this religious discrimination. Others are demanding the university punish the instructor. But academic freedom means educators must be allowed to grade based on clearly defined criteria — not public outcry.
Instructors should not be forced into silence or discipline for applying academic standards. If public universities begin punishing faculty for their grading decisions, it sets a dangerous precedent for education in America.
We call on the University of Oklahoma to:
- Reinstate the instructor and respect their right to evaluate academic work
- Reaffirm its commitment to academic freedom and educator protections
- Ensure that grading remains based on structure, clarity, and evidence — not political or religious pressure
This case is not just about one essay. It is about preserving the freedom of educators to do their jobs without fear.
Sign this petition if you believe in protecting academic freedom and defending the integrity of public education.
163
The Issue
A graduate instructor at the University of Oklahoma is now on leave after giving a zero to a student essay that attacked nonbinary gender identities and framed gender roles as part of “God’s original plan.” The student, Samantha Fulnecky, quoted Scripture and referred to the idea of multiple genders as demonic. The instructor found the essay offensive and lacking academic support. The grade reflected the rubric, not the student’s personal beliefs.
Now, political pressure is mounting. Some are calling this religious discrimination. Others are demanding the university punish the instructor. But academic freedom means educators must be allowed to grade based on clearly defined criteria — not public outcry.
Instructors should not be forced into silence or discipline for applying academic standards. If public universities begin punishing faculty for their grading decisions, it sets a dangerous precedent for education in America.
We call on the University of Oklahoma to:
- Reinstate the instructor and respect their right to evaluate academic work
- Reaffirm its commitment to academic freedom and educator protections
- Ensure that grading remains based on structure, clarity, and evidence — not political or religious pressure
This case is not just about one essay. It is about preserving the freedom of educators to do their jobs without fear.
Sign this petition if you believe in protecting academic freedom and defending the integrity of public education.
163
The Decision Makers
Supporter Voices
Share this petition
Petition created on December 2, 2025