Open Cases that Hid Evidence in Public Interest Immunity (PII) Ex Parte & O.S.A
Open Cases that Hid Evidence in Public Interest Immunity (PII) Ex Parte & O.S.A
The Issue
The Human Rights Act of 1998 firmly establishes the right of all individuals to be treated equitably by the police, courts, and legal system. It is the cornerstone of democracy to ensure that the rule of law is transparent.
This petition demands the reopening of all criminal cases affected by the wrongful application of the ex-parte Public Interest Immunity (P.I.I.) clause. P.I.I.s should only be used when the defendant is a terrorist or a police informant.
This petition advocates for transparency and the end of illegal use of ex-parte Public Interest Immunities (P.I.I.s). It aims to uphold justice for victims who have been denied it due to the misuse of ex-parte P.I.I.s, which have shielded corrupt police informants and their cohorts from legal consequences and imprisonment.
In the interest of public trust in the legal system, it is imperative to provide open access to P.I.I. documents for the welfare of the community and the betterment of society.
We are asking for the hidden evidence in the Public Interest Immunity Clauses to be opened up. The juries never got to see all the evidence or information, so how can they judge fairly when they have only been given a partial picture
The misuse of the P.I.I. ex-parte clause and the Official Secrets Act constitutes a violation of Article 6 of the Human Rights Act, which stipulates 'The Right to a Fair Trial.’
Without a fair trial, the risks of wrongful imprisonment of innocent individuals is high. Why should the real culprits obtain unlawful protection from the law through P.I.I.s?
The Public Interest Immunity (P.I.I.) ex-parte doctrine often stirs political and constitutional debate due to its association with police informer privilege in criminal cases.
This privilege leads to the withholding of pertinent evidence, which can result in the wrongful conviction of innocent individuals.
In R. v Morris (David George) [2002; 2006; 2007 WL 2456926 (2007)], the legal system was criticized for not upholding the rule of law.
The application of Public Interest Immunity (PII) ex-parte legislation was deemed illegal, and the law was misused.
Evidence concealed from the jury and the public in R. v Morris (David George) [2002; 2006; 2007 WL 2456926 (2007)] led to two unjust trials and a disregard for the murder victims.
The appellant in R. v Morris (David George) [2002; 2006; 2007 WL 2456926 (2007)] passed away in prison in 2021. He was unable to seek justice for himself or the other silenced victims. The lingering impact of this injustice on all victims remains apparent in society, even 25 years after the murders.
It is argued that the state should not legally entrap a citizen by withholding evidence from the judicial process.
Every victim of crime is deserving of justice.
Any cases that used ex parte P.I.I., including Jeremy Bamber’s case, should be appealed back to the Supreme Court and revisited with all evidence available for scrutiny.
Jeremy Bamber was also not a terrorist or police informer. Jeremy Bamber has served 40 years in jail. Evidence which proves his innocence is withheld by the police for what purpose do their actions serve society?
All that is asked for is a fair hearing.
In cases of murder, there are no time limits if new information suggests accessory liability through undisclosed documents. The Supreme Court's intervention is requested to thoroughly review the legal procedures used in this case, which have failed to protect the appellant's legal rights. The lower appellate court made a legal error by not adhering to the relevant statutes.
The lower courts' decisions have caused irreparable damage to society at large, undermining public interest and creating numerous additional victims in this deeply troubling case. The public interest has suffered due to the deliberate actions of the crown, which denied the rights to the appellant.
We urge the Supreme Court to uphold the rule of law, administer legislation, and implement the Human Rights Act (1998), by accepting our petition which aligns with the statute's public interest stance. The Supreme Court represents the pursuit of justice.
We call upon the Supreme Court to demonstrate transparency, integrity, and honesty by revisiting cases that have misapplied ex-parte Public Interest Immunity documents. This aligns with the "Golden Rule," ensuring the Court's role as an impartial adjudicator in these matters.
What we must achieve by the petition:
1) Open up the hidden evidence in David Morris’ case, Jeremy Bamber’s case and any others where evidence was hidden from the jury. No harm should come from the state's withholding of evidence against an individual at risk of losing that liberty of freedom.
2) It is necessary to prohibit the misuse of the public interest immunity ex-parte for illicit purposes. While the lower courts may not always respect or adhere to the HRA unlawful practices that stop individuals from accessing justice through the denial of their right to a fair trial, should be made illegal.
3) The invocation of ex-parte public interest immunity clauses to obscure and protect individuals guilty of murder, paedophilia, and other crimes should be prohibited. Justice must prevail without the constraints of rigid time limits or deadlines that fail to consider the substantial time required to collect research evidence. Justice should be timely, but it is never too late to be served.
4) Although the CCRC is a Government agency, it operates under Government direction, challenging its role as an independent justice arbiter. The perceived betrayal of its mandate to ensure justice that is fair, balanced and accountable to the public interest calls for reform of the body to ensure autonomy from ministerial objectives.
5) Open up the illegal and misused Public Interest Immunity ex parte clause that was wrongly applied in Criminal Cases where the appellant was not a terrorist or police informer. Hidden evidence contained in misused P.I.I. ex parte would clear Jeremy Bamber's and David Morris' name.
We hope you will join us in adding your name to our petition.
Thank you.
Attached:
1) BBC 2020 Documentary The Clydach Murders
https://youtu.be/SIugNYZ14dg?si=pWzAGL12D2t2fC8G
2) Interview with Cllr. Louise Pugh
3) David Morris' daughter supports Cllr Louise Pugh's petition and shares with the David George Morris Facebook supporters.
4) Michael O'Brien supports Cllr Pugh's petition.
5) Jeremy Bamber lends his supports to the petition
6) Janet Willicott supports Louise's petition and speaks about LGBTQ+ bias in the Clydach Murders case.
7) Jodie Davies - ACEs Advocate, Peer Supporter and Child Abuse Survivor Stands with Louise Pugh. Jodie is an expert by lived experience. Watch her video here.
8) Steve Fettah stands against police bullying and corruption with Louise Pugh.
9) Delyth Jones supports the petition. as she shares her own painful experience.
10) John Morris, the author of the Clydach Murders signs, shares and supports the petition to open up the public interest immunity documents which were used unlawfully to hide away crucial evidence away from all members of the jury in David Morris' both trials.
11) Heidi Blake, investigative journalist of the New Yorker supports the campaign to free an innocent Jeremy Bamber. Read or listen to Heidi Blake's research article below. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/08/05/did-the-uks-most-infamous-family-massacre-end-in-a-wrongful-conviction
12) We respectfully remember David Morris, who died in prison three years ago, an innocent man and a victim of corporate manslaughter.
13) Jeremy Bamber speaks from prison. Until the prey tells their side of the story, the narrative will always glorify the hunter.
14) This week’s update encourages and directs you to check out the wealth of expertise, primary evidence, material and research on the Jeremy Bamber Campaign Official Website. We applaud the extensive long term work of their loyal committed team. They also have their own petition which we encourage you all to sign.
https://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/
15) Investigative journalist, David Rose of The Mail on Sunday revealed extraordinary evidence that cast grave doubt on David Morris' conviction, asking the key question - 'Who REALLY murdered married WPC's lesbian lover?' This article is still relevant today. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2845510/Who-REALLY-murdered-married-WPC-s-lesbian-lover.html
16) Psychologist and TV presenter Emma Kenny, has recently turned her attention to the R v Bamber case. Emma Kenny has changed her mind and her stance, as she recently revisited the evidence, exploring some of the starling discrepancies in this case. Emma presents a powerful argument to open up the undisclosed documents in the P.I.I./Official Secrets Act. Please watch these videos and examine some of the discrepancies for yourself:
https://youtu.be/yLoZhczoXEM?si=mxomvWwzTzxWO5Dr
https://youtu.be/VLvxbb2Nq2g?si=DyFnFdZ_cvzCaCd2
17) Lord Kilner in 1952 acknowledged the importance of truth, honesty and transparency in criminal cases. Murder suspects should have access to ALL documentation, especially documentation that contains proof of innocence. If these vital documents have been hidden under unlawful P.I.I. (public interest immunity) clauses and fabricated evidence has replaced these documents to deliberately entrap an individual, then the higher courts need to step in. Unlawful use of P.I.I. not only damages the public interest. but leads to an unfair trial which in turn results in an unsafe convictions. Courts that do not uphold the purity of the law, but instead engage in unethical means to secure a conviction at all costs as a vehicle to protect their other interests insult the public tax payers, the public interest and victims.
18) We have been fortunate to speak to Satish Sekar, the most authoritative voice on the Lynette White case, and in our opinion, his work completely aligns with the judicial principles highlighted in this petition. It was his research that led to the largest police corruption trial in 2011. Read more about the police corruption case and the key players involved to make your own informed decision based on the facts.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a82d6cd40f0b6230269cfa0/mouncher_report_web_accessible_july_2017.pdf
19) Former South Wales Police officer Tony Roach supports Louise Pugh’s petition. Tony Roach continues to fight for justice for himself and other police officers who have been mistreated by their employer, South Wales police.
Hear his story below:
https://youtu.be/Jbln5pAfVcM?feature=shared
20) Lawyers Ethics to be examined after Post Office Scandal. Lawyers ethics are now being questioned following the ethical failures highlighted in the Post Office scandal. What drives ethical error? Watch this video and apply the knowledge to the cases we are championing within our petition.
https://youtu.be/i7DXnrmUCQQ?si=ZJDzy5frRWIsl06J
21) Jen’s Justice supports Louise Pugh’s petition. Jen is a well respected advocate who wants victims of police perpetrated threats or abuse to know they are not on their own. Jen’s Justice supports all female victims of police perpetrated abuse which is often hidden from public view and covered up. She is well connected, working closely with and recommends charities such as Woman’s Aid, Victims of Support and Centre of Woman’s Justice. CWJ is currently dealing with cases and reviewing police perpetrated crime against woman. There’s a team of solicitors specifically chosen to help women. Jen’s Justice seeks to drive forward a change for woman who’ve been affected by police abuse of power. No one should have to live in fear. Please share this information - these links could save someone’s life. Things could have been very different, if these support groups existed 25 years ago when just weeks before her murder, Mandy received a death threat off a police officer
https://m.facebook.com/JusticeForJen1/
https://m.facebook.com/PPDAUK/
https://www.centreforwomensjustice.org.uk/
https://www.victimsupport.org.uk/
https://www.rightsofwomen.org.uk/
22) On the fiftieth anniversary of the IRA pub bombings in Birmingham, the family of the victims are still seeking truth and justice. In 2018, I was privileged to sit next to Paddy Hill, one of the Birmingham Six. I listened intently to his story of being the victim of entrapment and police abuse while sharing an Indian meal with Steve Fettah, Michael O’Brien and Martin Shipman. I recommend reading his story in his book. The CCRC was established because of the horrific abuses towards Birmingham 6. We remember all the victims & wish the families well in their plight for justice.
23) In her podcasts, Annette Hewins daughter, Nicole Jacob teaches us about the lifelong impact of trauma upon her mum. Annette Hewins, a miscarriages of justice victim was imprinted by trauma from being falsely accused and her daughter talks about the generational impact upon her children. Well done Nicole. We respectfully remember both your mum & Donna Clarke.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0hgxtt5
24) Sarah Champion, MP for Rotherham, has been campaigning on child protection for over a decade. Yesterday in Parliament, she held a pledging meeting to end child sexual abuse in the UK, which was supported by nearly 100 cross-party MPs, Peers, victims and survivors.
25) Fact checking John Morris’ latest Clydach Murders book.
Of course we want justice for Doris, Mandy and the girls, and David Morris, but what we don’t want is any more victims. Myself and my research team are currently fact checking the latest John Morris, Clydach Murders book.
For years I have been fighting for justice for all the families involved.
Over the past few years, I’ve been involved in multi-disciplinary in-depth postgraduate research combining criminal law and violence against women and girls, which uncovered the truth about the murders. From my own pursuit of justice, there is currently an investigation undertaken by the IOPC towards South Wales retired policemen, DC Phil Rees, DC Christopher Coutts and Phil Noble for their involvement in police corruption and abuse of power.
Following John Morris’ publication, myself and my postgraduate research team will be publishing our own trauma informed book about our wealth of research and my personal experience written in our own words, including police abuse towards myself, women and girls very shortly.
I met my postgraduate researcher in April 2022, and she helped me process and we pieced the hidden truth behind the murders.
Together, we wrote and sent the subject access requests June 2022, then in Autumn 2022, drove to West Mercia police and West Midlands police to give full in-depth written and verbal statements. At this time, my written statements were sent to Gloucester police and after the publication of the Master’s in laws dissertation about the Clydach Murders July 2023, my case was presented to Belfast police officers at Musgrave police station on my behalf, 11th December 2023.
Security cameras were bought to keep my family safe and South Wales police were informed of their breaches in the law towards myself and my family. As my postgraduate researcher was completing her masters in laws degree which focused on the Clydach Murders’ case, together we were able to combine qualitative user-led research, with quantitative research. We pieced together the historical context, uncovered the public domain abuse in the police interviews published by South Wales police in Sky’s Murders in the Valleys, exposed the lies told by a local councillor and the unlawful public interest immunity (PIIs) which was a central research question and focus of the postgraduate research (2019-2023), amongst other things. The unethical use of PIIs later became the focus of this petition, which I published 26th June 2024 from London, in remembrance of the 25th anniversary of my four friends’ murders.
My book will be following ethical research guidelines of obtaining full written consent before publishing anyone’s highly personal and sensitive information into the public domain, such as names and addresses, CSA and legal statements. This case has already claimed too many victims.
I am very mindful that putting highly sensitive information without a person’s full written consent into the public domain runs the risk of either causing significant harm/damage to the person and their wider family, the information might not be accurate and the authors run the risk of being sued for breaches in the law.
I look forward to telling my story and putting the record straight.
More details to follow…
26) We remember the three Scottish soldiers who were shot dead in the 1971 honeytrap 54 years ago today. https://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/politics/ira-man-who-helped-trigger-internment-without-trial-should-be-questioned-about-the-murder-of-six-soldiers-in-belfast-says-cousin-of-honey-trap-victim-5024384
Listen to David speak at the event of the 1971 honeytrap at Stormont Northern Ireland today. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2g4j3qeg9o
--------------------------------------
PS. Please be aware that 'change.org' has a donation option attached to all their petitions as standard, this is for advertising purposes within the internal 'change.org' system. Please do not feel pressurised to donate to this.
Your most important contribution is your voice.
1,019
The Issue
The Human Rights Act of 1998 firmly establishes the right of all individuals to be treated equitably by the police, courts, and legal system. It is the cornerstone of democracy to ensure that the rule of law is transparent.
This petition demands the reopening of all criminal cases affected by the wrongful application of the ex-parte Public Interest Immunity (P.I.I.) clause. P.I.I.s should only be used when the defendant is a terrorist or a police informant.
This petition advocates for transparency and the end of illegal use of ex-parte Public Interest Immunities (P.I.I.s). It aims to uphold justice for victims who have been denied it due to the misuse of ex-parte P.I.I.s, which have shielded corrupt police informants and their cohorts from legal consequences and imprisonment.
In the interest of public trust in the legal system, it is imperative to provide open access to P.I.I. documents for the welfare of the community and the betterment of society.
We are asking for the hidden evidence in the Public Interest Immunity Clauses to be opened up. The juries never got to see all the evidence or information, so how can they judge fairly when they have only been given a partial picture
The misuse of the P.I.I. ex-parte clause and the Official Secrets Act constitutes a violation of Article 6 of the Human Rights Act, which stipulates 'The Right to a Fair Trial.’
Without a fair trial, the risks of wrongful imprisonment of innocent individuals is high. Why should the real culprits obtain unlawful protection from the law through P.I.I.s?
The Public Interest Immunity (P.I.I.) ex-parte doctrine often stirs political and constitutional debate due to its association with police informer privilege in criminal cases.
This privilege leads to the withholding of pertinent evidence, which can result in the wrongful conviction of innocent individuals.
In R. v Morris (David George) [2002; 2006; 2007 WL 2456926 (2007)], the legal system was criticized for not upholding the rule of law.
The application of Public Interest Immunity (PII) ex-parte legislation was deemed illegal, and the law was misused.
Evidence concealed from the jury and the public in R. v Morris (David George) [2002; 2006; 2007 WL 2456926 (2007)] led to two unjust trials and a disregard for the murder victims.
The appellant in R. v Morris (David George) [2002; 2006; 2007 WL 2456926 (2007)] passed away in prison in 2021. He was unable to seek justice for himself or the other silenced victims. The lingering impact of this injustice on all victims remains apparent in society, even 25 years after the murders.
It is argued that the state should not legally entrap a citizen by withholding evidence from the judicial process.
Every victim of crime is deserving of justice.
Any cases that used ex parte P.I.I., including Jeremy Bamber’s case, should be appealed back to the Supreme Court and revisited with all evidence available for scrutiny.
Jeremy Bamber was also not a terrorist or police informer. Jeremy Bamber has served 40 years in jail. Evidence which proves his innocence is withheld by the police for what purpose do their actions serve society?
All that is asked for is a fair hearing.
In cases of murder, there are no time limits if new information suggests accessory liability through undisclosed documents. The Supreme Court's intervention is requested to thoroughly review the legal procedures used in this case, which have failed to protect the appellant's legal rights. The lower appellate court made a legal error by not adhering to the relevant statutes.
The lower courts' decisions have caused irreparable damage to society at large, undermining public interest and creating numerous additional victims in this deeply troubling case. The public interest has suffered due to the deliberate actions of the crown, which denied the rights to the appellant.
We urge the Supreme Court to uphold the rule of law, administer legislation, and implement the Human Rights Act (1998), by accepting our petition which aligns with the statute's public interest stance. The Supreme Court represents the pursuit of justice.
We call upon the Supreme Court to demonstrate transparency, integrity, and honesty by revisiting cases that have misapplied ex-parte Public Interest Immunity documents. This aligns with the "Golden Rule," ensuring the Court's role as an impartial adjudicator in these matters.
What we must achieve by the petition:
1) Open up the hidden evidence in David Morris’ case, Jeremy Bamber’s case and any others where evidence was hidden from the jury. No harm should come from the state's withholding of evidence against an individual at risk of losing that liberty of freedom.
2) It is necessary to prohibit the misuse of the public interest immunity ex-parte for illicit purposes. While the lower courts may not always respect or adhere to the HRA unlawful practices that stop individuals from accessing justice through the denial of their right to a fair trial, should be made illegal.
3) The invocation of ex-parte public interest immunity clauses to obscure and protect individuals guilty of murder, paedophilia, and other crimes should be prohibited. Justice must prevail without the constraints of rigid time limits or deadlines that fail to consider the substantial time required to collect research evidence. Justice should be timely, but it is never too late to be served.
4) Although the CCRC is a Government agency, it operates under Government direction, challenging its role as an independent justice arbiter. The perceived betrayal of its mandate to ensure justice that is fair, balanced and accountable to the public interest calls for reform of the body to ensure autonomy from ministerial objectives.
5) Open up the illegal and misused Public Interest Immunity ex parte clause that was wrongly applied in Criminal Cases where the appellant was not a terrorist or police informer. Hidden evidence contained in misused P.I.I. ex parte would clear Jeremy Bamber's and David Morris' name.
We hope you will join us in adding your name to our petition.
Thank you.
Attached:
1) BBC 2020 Documentary The Clydach Murders
https://youtu.be/SIugNYZ14dg?si=pWzAGL12D2t2fC8G
2) Interview with Cllr. Louise Pugh
3) David Morris' daughter supports Cllr Louise Pugh's petition and shares with the David George Morris Facebook supporters.
4) Michael O'Brien supports Cllr Pugh's petition.
5) Jeremy Bamber lends his supports to the petition
6) Janet Willicott supports Louise's petition and speaks about LGBTQ+ bias in the Clydach Murders case.
7) Jodie Davies - ACEs Advocate, Peer Supporter and Child Abuse Survivor Stands with Louise Pugh. Jodie is an expert by lived experience. Watch her video here.
8) Steve Fettah stands against police bullying and corruption with Louise Pugh.
9) Delyth Jones supports the petition. as she shares her own painful experience.
10) John Morris, the author of the Clydach Murders signs, shares and supports the petition to open up the public interest immunity documents which were used unlawfully to hide away crucial evidence away from all members of the jury in David Morris' both trials.
11) Heidi Blake, investigative journalist of the New Yorker supports the campaign to free an innocent Jeremy Bamber. Read or listen to Heidi Blake's research article below. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/08/05/did-the-uks-most-infamous-family-massacre-end-in-a-wrongful-conviction
12) We respectfully remember David Morris, who died in prison three years ago, an innocent man and a victim of corporate manslaughter.
13) Jeremy Bamber speaks from prison. Until the prey tells their side of the story, the narrative will always glorify the hunter.
14) This week’s update encourages and directs you to check out the wealth of expertise, primary evidence, material and research on the Jeremy Bamber Campaign Official Website. We applaud the extensive long term work of their loyal committed team. They also have their own petition which we encourage you all to sign.
https://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/
15) Investigative journalist, David Rose of The Mail on Sunday revealed extraordinary evidence that cast grave doubt on David Morris' conviction, asking the key question - 'Who REALLY murdered married WPC's lesbian lover?' This article is still relevant today. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2845510/Who-REALLY-murdered-married-WPC-s-lesbian-lover.html
16) Psychologist and TV presenter Emma Kenny, has recently turned her attention to the R v Bamber case. Emma Kenny has changed her mind and her stance, as she recently revisited the evidence, exploring some of the starling discrepancies in this case. Emma presents a powerful argument to open up the undisclosed documents in the P.I.I./Official Secrets Act. Please watch these videos and examine some of the discrepancies for yourself:
https://youtu.be/yLoZhczoXEM?si=mxomvWwzTzxWO5Dr
https://youtu.be/VLvxbb2Nq2g?si=DyFnFdZ_cvzCaCd2
17) Lord Kilner in 1952 acknowledged the importance of truth, honesty and transparency in criminal cases. Murder suspects should have access to ALL documentation, especially documentation that contains proof of innocence. If these vital documents have been hidden under unlawful P.I.I. (public interest immunity) clauses and fabricated evidence has replaced these documents to deliberately entrap an individual, then the higher courts need to step in. Unlawful use of P.I.I. not only damages the public interest. but leads to an unfair trial which in turn results in an unsafe convictions. Courts that do not uphold the purity of the law, but instead engage in unethical means to secure a conviction at all costs as a vehicle to protect their other interests insult the public tax payers, the public interest and victims.
18) We have been fortunate to speak to Satish Sekar, the most authoritative voice on the Lynette White case, and in our opinion, his work completely aligns with the judicial principles highlighted in this petition. It was his research that led to the largest police corruption trial in 2011. Read more about the police corruption case and the key players involved to make your own informed decision based on the facts.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a82d6cd40f0b6230269cfa0/mouncher_report_web_accessible_july_2017.pdf
19) Former South Wales Police officer Tony Roach supports Louise Pugh’s petition. Tony Roach continues to fight for justice for himself and other police officers who have been mistreated by their employer, South Wales police.
Hear his story below:
https://youtu.be/Jbln5pAfVcM?feature=shared
20) Lawyers Ethics to be examined after Post Office Scandal. Lawyers ethics are now being questioned following the ethical failures highlighted in the Post Office scandal. What drives ethical error? Watch this video and apply the knowledge to the cases we are championing within our petition.
https://youtu.be/i7DXnrmUCQQ?si=ZJDzy5frRWIsl06J
21) Jen’s Justice supports Louise Pugh’s petition. Jen is a well respected advocate who wants victims of police perpetrated threats or abuse to know they are not on their own. Jen’s Justice supports all female victims of police perpetrated abuse which is often hidden from public view and covered up. She is well connected, working closely with and recommends charities such as Woman’s Aid, Victims of Support and Centre of Woman’s Justice. CWJ is currently dealing with cases and reviewing police perpetrated crime against woman. There’s a team of solicitors specifically chosen to help women. Jen’s Justice seeks to drive forward a change for woman who’ve been affected by police abuse of power. No one should have to live in fear. Please share this information - these links could save someone’s life. Things could have been very different, if these support groups existed 25 years ago when just weeks before her murder, Mandy received a death threat off a police officer
https://m.facebook.com/JusticeForJen1/
https://m.facebook.com/PPDAUK/
https://www.centreforwomensjustice.org.uk/
https://www.victimsupport.org.uk/
https://www.rightsofwomen.org.uk/
22) On the fiftieth anniversary of the IRA pub bombings in Birmingham, the family of the victims are still seeking truth and justice. In 2018, I was privileged to sit next to Paddy Hill, one of the Birmingham Six. I listened intently to his story of being the victim of entrapment and police abuse while sharing an Indian meal with Steve Fettah, Michael O’Brien and Martin Shipman. I recommend reading his story in his book. The CCRC was established because of the horrific abuses towards Birmingham 6. We remember all the victims & wish the families well in their plight for justice.
23) In her podcasts, Annette Hewins daughter, Nicole Jacob teaches us about the lifelong impact of trauma upon her mum. Annette Hewins, a miscarriages of justice victim was imprinted by trauma from being falsely accused and her daughter talks about the generational impact upon her children. Well done Nicole. We respectfully remember both your mum & Donna Clarke.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0hgxtt5
24) Sarah Champion, MP for Rotherham, has been campaigning on child protection for over a decade. Yesterday in Parliament, she held a pledging meeting to end child sexual abuse in the UK, which was supported by nearly 100 cross-party MPs, Peers, victims and survivors.
25) Fact checking John Morris’ latest Clydach Murders book.
Of course we want justice for Doris, Mandy and the girls, and David Morris, but what we don’t want is any more victims. Myself and my research team are currently fact checking the latest John Morris, Clydach Murders book.
For years I have been fighting for justice for all the families involved.
Over the past few years, I’ve been involved in multi-disciplinary in-depth postgraduate research combining criminal law and violence against women and girls, which uncovered the truth about the murders. From my own pursuit of justice, there is currently an investigation undertaken by the IOPC towards South Wales retired policemen, DC Phil Rees, DC Christopher Coutts and Phil Noble for their involvement in police corruption and abuse of power.
Following John Morris’ publication, myself and my postgraduate research team will be publishing our own trauma informed book about our wealth of research and my personal experience written in our own words, including police abuse towards myself, women and girls very shortly.
I met my postgraduate researcher in April 2022, and she helped me process and we pieced the hidden truth behind the murders.
Together, we wrote and sent the subject access requests June 2022, then in Autumn 2022, drove to West Mercia police and West Midlands police to give full in-depth written and verbal statements. At this time, my written statements were sent to Gloucester police and after the publication of the Master’s in laws dissertation about the Clydach Murders July 2023, my case was presented to Belfast police officers at Musgrave police station on my behalf, 11th December 2023.
Security cameras were bought to keep my family safe and South Wales police were informed of their breaches in the law towards myself and my family. As my postgraduate researcher was completing her masters in laws degree which focused on the Clydach Murders’ case, together we were able to combine qualitative user-led research, with quantitative research. We pieced together the historical context, uncovered the public domain abuse in the police interviews published by South Wales police in Sky’s Murders in the Valleys, exposed the lies told by a local councillor and the unlawful public interest immunity (PIIs) which was a central research question and focus of the postgraduate research (2019-2023), amongst other things. The unethical use of PIIs later became the focus of this petition, which I published 26th June 2024 from London, in remembrance of the 25th anniversary of my four friends’ murders.
My book will be following ethical research guidelines of obtaining full written consent before publishing anyone’s highly personal and sensitive information into the public domain, such as names and addresses, CSA and legal statements. This case has already claimed too many victims.
I am very mindful that putting highly sensitive information without a person’s full written consent into the public domain runs the risk of either causing significant harm/damage to the person and their wider family, the information might not be accurate and the authors run the risk of being sued for breaches in the law.
I look forward to telling my story and putting the record straight.
More details to follow…
26) We remember the three Scottish soldiers who were shot dead in the 1971 honeytrap 54 years ago today. https://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/politics/ira-man-who-helped-trigger-internment-without-trial-should-be-questioned-about-the-murder-of-six-soldiers-in-belfast-says-cousin-of-honey-trap-victim-5024384
Listen to David speak at the event of the 1971 honeytrap at Stormont Northern Ireland today. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2g4j3qeg9o
--------------------------------------
PS. Please be aware that 'change.org' has a donation option attached to all their petitions as standard, this is for advertising purposes within the internal 'change.org' system. Please do not feel pressurised to donate to this.
Your most important contribution is your voice.
1,019
The Decision Makers
Supporter Voices
Petition created on 26 June 2024