Save Lamu, a coalition of 36 Community-Based Organisations in Lamu County have undertaken a review of the ESIA Study Report of the Construction of the First Three Berths of the Proposed Lamu Port and Associated Infrastructure in Manda Bay, Lamu County, Kenya.
In response to a notice by NEMA in the Daily Nation dated 19th March, 2013 that informs the public of the opportunity to submit comments on an ESIA report, we have submitted the following letter to NEMA that summarizes all issues of concern, which can be downloaded from http://www.savelamu.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/EIA-Comment-Save-Lamu-FINAL.pdf.
Having read the report, it is clear that significant irreversible environmental and social impacts will be expected. Unfortunately, no alternatives outside of a 50km from the site are proposed. Instead only sites in Manda Island and Lamu Island, which both fall inside the UNESCO World Heritage Site are considered. Considering that the ecology in Lamu is widely recognized as one of the richest along the entire coast of East Africa and its ecosystems have worldwide recognition. It’s preservation and protection is therefore not only of national significance but are important internationally, and as such alternatives must be considered using thorough evidence and expertise.
Unfortunately, the methodology is highly lacking where the Researchers themselves acknowledge that the study was carried in great haste, where numerous steps were overlooked during the obtaining of baseline information on the environmental status of the region. The report states that some marine surveys were not undertaken due to financial constraints of the Ministry of Transport. Only cross-sectional observation techniques were used to assess birdlife, and only the impacts on the immediate vicinity around the port site were assessed.
Furthermore only questionnaires, key-informant interviews, focus group discussions, and direct observation were utilized, thereby not having the three public meetings required by Section 17 of the Environmental (Impact Assessment and Audit) Regulations, 2003. Considering that the ESIA is available only in English, a majority of the affected communities cannot review the said document.
Despite these gaps, the report stipulates significant impacts including:
1. The loss of fishing grounds and landing sites
2. The closure of “Mkanda” (channel) during port operation which is the only route utilized by fishermen, traders, school children, tourists and the community traveling from Lamu East and to Lamu town
4. Agricultural land and land owners have already been displaced in Kililana and will continue to be displaced
5. Coral reef of Iweni Conservation area will be completely lost due to the adverse effects caused by dredging.
7. Overpopulation and expected influx of migrants into Lamu County which will lead to pollution, displacement, increase crime and drug abuse.
8. The report admits that the lifestyle of the minority communities, including the hunter-gatherer Boni community will be disrupted and threatened by increase land speculation; and
9. Unresolved land issues and skewed allocations of title deeds.
While the EIA openly describes disastrous negative impacts, it fails to provide meaningful resolution to the issues raised thereby leading us to speculate on the ecological and social soundness of the project.On analysis of the above concerns, we firmly believe that the Lamu Port will have significant and irreparable damage to the people of Lamu and their environment if implemented as is, and hereby request you to write to NEMA to refuse the issuance of an environmental impact assessment licence under the Act and advise the proponent to provide comprehensive and independent analysis of alternate sites proposed outside of those indicated in the report and their expected impacts through a strategic environmental assessment.
Thank you for your support.
The Researchers themselves acknowledge that the study was carried in great haste, where numerous steps were overlooked. The report states that some marine surveys were not undertaken due to financial constraints of the Ministry of Transport. Only cross-sectional observation techniques were used to assess birdlife, and only the impacts on the immediate vicinity around the port site were assessed.
Furthermore, considering that the associated infrastructure of the three berths is already being constructed despite the ESIA license not being issued, I am gravely concerned over the legitimacy of the ESIA Report to prescribe advice on the best alternatives. I therefore expect NEMA to halt the on-going construction until the above gaps are addressed effectively and in consultation with the community and take the necessary legal action on the matter as prescribed in section 45(1) of the EMCA 1999 which states that, "any person who commences, proceeds with, executes, or conducts, or causes to commence, proceed with, execute or conduct any project without approval granted under these regulations commits an offence and on conviction is liable to the penalty prescribed under the Act."
The ESIA report indicates that there will be significant and irreparable damage to the people of Lamu and their environment if implemented as is. I there also request NEMA to refuse the issuance of an environmental impact assessment licence under the EMCA 1999 and advise the proponent to provide comprehensive and independent analysis of all alternate sites proposed outside of those indicated in the report and their expected impacts through a strategic environmental assessment.
In carrying out the ESIA, I would like to request that comprehensive public consultation be carried out as stipulated in the Environmental (Impact Assessment and Audit) Regulations, 2003, as well as the document be made available in Swahili and a public hearing be conducted for the above in Kiswahili so as to afford reasonable opportunity for the persons unable to read and write to comment on the report orally.
As the custodian of the natural environment in Kenya, and Lamu, I hope you will take responsibility of the above with great urgency so as to ensure due process is followed in the construction of a sustainable, and effective second port for Kenya.