Dear Valued Supporters,
Today on 15 June 2019 it is exactly THIRTEEN years since Australia Post identified us as the victims of my Identity Theft. Indonesian Passport on my name, that was fraudulently obtained and successfully used at Australia Post outlets as a PHOTO ID to Redirect my entire family’s mail to a fraudulently opened PO Box on my name at Haymarket in Sydney was a serious matter. Australia Post is covering up the TRUTH from us despite trying our best to use all the democratic processes to get justice and the truth revealed behind these activities.
Today’s image posted here is the LCD display of my home telephone/fax with the telephone number 02 92077913 clearly appearing on this display. This is Australia Post’s number and I have also provided the transcript of the message left by Steve (Mr. Steve Gabell) on 14 June 2006.
This number was used many times on the following day on 15 June 2006 as well by Mr Steve Gabell and my family member. On this day the fraudulent activity was confirmed and matter was handed over to Australia Post’s Corporate Security Group-CSG NSW/ACT. The cover ups started immediately to hide the crimes and fraudulent activities to date.
The following is a sample of how Australia Post was helped by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal-AAT to cover up the truth and hiding the REAL documents involved in these activities. The Telephone number in question is important in this matter and all the secrecy around its use on this day is to cover up the REAL crimes is my allegation.
All the Corporate Lawyers of Australia Post that are involved and the External Lawyer involved remained silent about the blatant fabrication as indicated below of the Tribunal’s Senior Member Ms Geri Ettinger in her decision while declining my request to summons Telstra to get the details of calls made and received on this number on particular days in June 2006. This request was made only after Australia Post refused to provide details. This number in my view was used to call my imposter as well.
The cover ups have continued. Ms Holgate’s silence therefore on these matters is very concerning. As a leader it is her responsibility to address our concerns to resolve the matters.
Her failure so far to give me a meeting is not acceptable at all.
This type of conduct involving Australia Post’s Own Lawyers deserves national condemnation and thorough investigations is my view.
To all my current and future supports, there is a sincere request to ask questions to Ms Holgate about her silence on this matter after dismal failure of her predecessor Mr Ahmed Fahour to tell us the truth.
Ms Holgate’s email is as follows:
christine.holgate@auspost.com.au
The following is the evidence of how AAT helped Australia Post to hide the TRUTH from my family. Corruption and cover ups have continued after 2008.
MR WAGH’S REQUEST THAT A SUMMONS BE ISSUED TO MR SOL TRUJILLO, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TELSTRA CORPORATION LTD
68. In his letter dated 14 July 2008, Mr Wagh requested that the Tribunal issue a Summons to the Chief Executive Officer of Telstra Corporation Ltd to lodge all “documents” made in relation to telephone calls to and from an Australia Post Sydney number on 15 June 2006. He included a definition of “documents”.
My Comment: Correct but the Telephone number is missing from here which was (02) 92077913
69. Mr Batskos told me that the number is a direct line to a staff member of Australia Post who has been using that telephone for a year only (indicating that person was not using the number on 15 June 2006). He told me that numerous people had used that number over the period. Mr Batskos referred me to the reasons Mr Wagh has given for wanting the “documents”.
My Comment: Alleged COMPLETE FABRICATION. There is no evidence of Mr Batskos saying anything like this at the hearing.
70. I noted that Mr Wagh wrote that for the following reasons but not limited to those, he required the “documents” : CORRECT
“1) In order to properly prepare his application pursuant to Section 21A of the AAT Act seeking reconstitution of the Tribunal (which will be seeking the removal of Senior Member Ms. Geri Ettinger from any further involvement in these proceedings).
2) In order to properly prepare his response to the Respondent’s 10-page dismissal application dated 18 February 2008.
3) In order to prove that his application for review is NOT frivolous or vexatious.”
71. Mr Batskos submitted that from the Respondent’s point of view the purpose for seeking the documents was unclear, and that they would in any case not provide any probative evidence in the substantive matter. He submitted that the Respondent opposed the issue of the Summons.
My Comment: This telephone number records are with Australia Post is my view. Revealing those will expose the cover ups that are ongoing for the past 13 years.
73.Accordingly, I now find that to permit further delays in finalising the interlocutory stages of this matter by issuing a further Summons to Telstra does not fit well with the objectives of the Tribunal to provide a mechanism of review that is fair, just, economical, informal and quick. I do not find a Summons to Telstra relevant to the proceedings before the Tribunal. I decline to issue the Summons to Telstra which Mr Wagh has requested.
My Comment: Baseless excuse. This matter was with the AAT (Administrative Appeals Tribunal) for one and a half years. Few weeks to get the Telstra records would not have made any difference at all is my view.
Please help us by signing this petition and making comments to ask questions and explanation as to why we have been treated like this. After all we, as the owners, have a right to know because this is a national and international public interest issue.
I have been informed by AAT that Ms Geri Ettinger is no longer with AAT some time ago. They wrote to me that she did not seek re-appointment.
People leaving jobs does not resolve this matter. I hope Ms Holgate will not keep this matter unresolved anymore.
Thanks for your support.
Vasant Wagh