Rodney K. Stanberry is an innocent man serving time in prison in Alabama for crimes he did not commit. He was arrested in 1992, convicted in 1995, and began serving a prison sentence in 1997 for crimes he did not commit. On March 25th, 2013, he will begin his 17th year of incarceration.
Rodney was convicted solely based on victim eyewitness testimony. He was convicted even as another individual confessed in front of the prosecutor two years before the start of Rodney's trial that he, not Rodney, was at the victim's home when she was shot (the jury NEVER heard this confession), even as work documents and the testimony of his supervisor and co-workers placed him at work when the crimes were committed, and even as there was no physical evidence that placed him at the scene of the crime. Rodney also passed a polygraph test. He did everything a law abiding citizen should do in helping law enforcement and in turn, they arrested and accused him of committing what was a violent crime.
Rodney’s father is 78 and his mother died on September 8, 2012. As you can imagine, there wasn’t a day that his parents did not yearn to be with their son. Rodney’s parents have been married for as long as Rodney, who is now 43, has been alive. Rodney’s father brought his son and family from New York to Mobile to get away from the criminal element, not imagining what the Mobile District Attorney’s Office would do to convict an innocent man and to maintain the conviction at all cost. The Mobile District Attorney’s Office, now under your leadership, District Attorney Ashley Rich, stated in an article written by journalist Kirsten West Savali on January 19th, 2012 that the jury has spoken and that you will not reopen Rodney’s case without “new and compelling evidence.” (http://newsone.com/1809115/rodney-k-stanberry-is-alabama-still-the-land-of-jim-crow/)
Here is a link to the full petition letter: http://freerodneystanberry.com/blog/2012/11/13/143/
1) A CONFESSION the Mobile District Attorney’s Office had more than two years before Rodney’s trial. (what Moore said in his confession was something that only someone present at the crime scene would know)- http://www.freerodneystanberry.com/the_confession-_testimonial_immunity_agreement and/or http://freerodneystanberry.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/20100914155256.256155350.pdf The prosecutor has said on record that HE never believed Moore was involved or at the victim’s house and never will believe it. It doesn’t fit his theory.
2) The Mobile District Attorney’s Office never attempted to convict anyone else, even as they told the media and the jury that they would. Convicting someone else would further lead to what is the truth, that Rodney is an innocent man.
3) The prosecutor who prosecuted Rodney travelled to Rikers Island prison in New York from Mobile, Alabama to visit the person he says was the shooter before Rodney’s trial. The prosecutor claims that he was on vacation when he visited the prison, thus he did not take notes. If this were an official trip and he took notes, this is withholding exculpatory evidence, something that you said during your campaign for your current position you would not tolerate (http://freerodneystanberry.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/u7am0916AshleyRich1.mp3) . The Texas State Bar is suing the prosecutor who withheld exculpatory evidence that led the 25 year imprisonment of Michael Morton, for crimes he did not commit (http://www.kulturekritic.com/2012/10/news/prosecutor-sued-for-withholding-evidence-keeping-a-man-in-prison-for-25-years/) and see http://www.freerodneystanberry.com/the_shooter-_what_they_want_to_wish_away. This is worth investigating so as to uphold the integrity of your office.
These and many other reasons are grounds for you to reopen and reinvestigate Rodney’s case.
Mobile District Attorney Ashley Rich, you can continue to be a strong district attorney, you can continue to be tough on crime, pro-victim, and a protector of the community without letting this travesty of justice to go on. But the reality is that prosecutors won’t change without the public demanding it; they have no incentive to do so. Our voice is needed, we hope you will respond. This is about justice for all, not conviction rates for some.