Re-develop The Drummonds Centre, Feering, Colchester, Essex, rather than close it.

The Issue

Scope is proposing to close 8 of its' residential care centres rather than re-develop/modernise facilities.  This will force approx 150 people to have to move; live with strangers in either very small supported living enviroments,  or on their own with a domicialiary care package.

Claire Wills is 51yrs of age, has lived at The Drummonds Centre in Feering, Colchester for the past 12yrs.  She has 39 other people in her community and enjoys a full life with on-site social, leisure and educational activities.  She has been supported to hold 3 public art exhibitions in the past 2yrs and to marry, even though she cannot speak or do anything for herself.  The Drummonds centre has enabled Claire to experiene a rich and fulfilling life and now, because someone somewhere says 'all disabled people have the right to live independently', she and her community face being disabanded across the country and being moved away from all that they know.

Six of the 41 people where Claire lives have expressed an interest in living independently, the rest are grief stricken at the thought of losing thier home.  Parents of these people are predominately in their 80's and facing very uncertain and stressful times as their sons and daughters are facing closure of what is a very valued and person-centred service.

Scope has widended its' remit to now encompass all people with all levels of disability, seemingly turning its' back on the most vulnerable and people with complex cerebral palsy for whom it was first established.  Telling relatives and carers that 'your family member will have a choice about where they live but it won't be within a Scope residential centre' is not choice.  The reality is, there is no dedicated provision in existence for people with cerebral palsy and funding local authorities do not have a portfolio of care centres to choose from.  The reality is that when these homes close,  people will be forced to accept whatever's on offer and if recent research is anything to go by, this will mean small bungalows in communities that have poor wheelchair access and high staff turnover.  These small community based homes also rely on accessible community based activities to stimulate and entertain their 'residents' and if only two staff are on per shift - how do individuals get to have an individualised, tailor made care plan?  In the larger residential centres, sheer volumes of staff on-site and choice of activities on-site, enable 'residents' (or 'customers' as Scope now labels people' to choose what they wish to do and have it there, on-site at their finger tips.  If staff go off sick, other staff can easily work across groups ensuring continuity of care, unlike in the 'wider community' where care agency's are relied upon and often send unskilled and unfamiliar staff (highly dangerours for non-verbal and profoundly disabled people).

Scope is seeking to lose its' most vulnerable members but we cannot let them do this,  as the UN Convention says, 'disabled people have the right to choose where they live' and Scope withdrawing its' residential provision, is forcing people to have a very limited choice about their lives.

Please help us fight to keep The Drummonds Centre open for those people who are choosing to remain living in their community, the one that works for them.

This petition had 1,135 supporters

The Issue

Scope is proposing to close 8 of its' residential care centres rather than re-develop/modernise facilities.  This will force approx 150 people to have to move; live with strangers in either very small supported living enviroments,  or on their own with a domicialiary care package.

Claire Wills is 51yrs of age, has lived at The Drummonds Centre in Feering, Colchester for the past 12yrs.  She has 39 other people in her community and enjoys a full life with on-site social, leisure and educational activities.  She has been supported to hold 3 public art exhibitions in the past 2yrs and to marry, even though she cannot speak or do anything for herself.  The Drummonds centre has enabled Claire to experiene a rich and fulfilling life and now, because someone somewhere says 'all disabled people have the right to live independently', she and her community face being disabanded across the country and being moved away from all that they know.

Six of the 41 people where Claire lives have expressed an interest in living independently, the rest are grief stricken at the thought of losing thier home.  Parents of these people are predominately in their 80's and facing very uncertain and stressful times as their sons and daughters are facing closure of what is a very valued and person-centred service.

Scope has widended its' remit to now encompass all people with all levels of disability, seemingly turning its' back on the most vulnerable and people with complex cerebral palsy for whom it was first established.  Telling relatives and carers that 'your family member will have a choice about where they live but it won't be within a Scope residential centre' is not choice.  The reality is, there is no dedicated provision in existence for people with cerebral palsy and funding local authorities do not have a portfolio of care centres to choose from.  The reality is that when these homes close,  people will be forced to accept whatever's on offer and if recent research is anything to go by, this will mean small bungalows in communities that have poor wheelchair access and high staff turnover.  These small community based homes also rely on accessible community based activities to stimulate and entertain their 'residents' and if only two staff are on per shift - how do individuals get to have an individualised, tailor made care plan?  In the larger residential centres, sheer volumes of staff on-site and choice of activities on-site, enable 'residents' (or 'customers' as Scope now labels people' to choose what they wish to do and have it there, on-site at their finger tips.  If staff go off sick, other staff can easily work across groups ensuring continuity of care, unlike in the 'wider community' where care agency's are relied upon and often send unskilled and unfamiliar staff (highly dangerours for non-verbal and profoundly disabled people).

Scope is seeking to lose its' most vulnerable members but we cannot let them do this,  as the UN Convention says, 'disabled people have the right to choose where they live' and Scope withdrawing its' residential provision, is forcing people to have a very limited choice about their lives.

Please help us fight to keep The Drummonds Centre open for those people who are choosing to remain living in their community, the one that works for them.

The Decision Makers

James Watson-O'Neill
James Watson-O'Neill
Director of Transformation
Responded
We understand that our announcement in October of proposals to close or significantly change 11 of our care homes has caused a lot of concern for residents and their families – and we are sorry for that. There are two main things we’d really like to reassure people on at the moment: 1. no final decision has been taken about the futures of any of the services, including Drummonds 2. we will consult everyone openly and fully on the proposals before making a final decision. However, we can’t do this properly (offering people independent advocacy and investing people and time in the consultation process) in 11 places at one time, so the consultations will take place over the course of the next three years. In the case of Drummonds, the consultation is due to happen in 2015/16. Our staff (including those addressed in the petition) have been meeting with families individually – including Claire’s family – to explain this and will continue to do this in order to provide as much reassurance as possible. The proposals were influenced by changes in the way disabled people are being supported – with more and more opting to live within their communities, supported by staff they choose and using personal budgets. In the future, we believe there will be less and less demand for services like Drummonds – and we believe we need to respond to that now. We also believe that the society we live in will be a better place if disabled people are fully included. However, we recognise that independent living may not be the right choice for all of our existing residents. If we do go ahead with the proposals after consultation, we will support everyone to move onto somewhere that is suitable for them and meets their needs. During the consultation, we would be very willing to hear from families and others about potential alternatives to closure and we will give serious consideration to all the options. We wouldn’t have committed to consulting (nor communicated this so widely) if we had any other intention. We absolutely understand why people are concerned. We know this has created a lot of uncertainly and entirely respect the right of families to express their feelings and views, including through this petition. We are committed to putting forward and consulting people on these proposals, but will always ensure this is done with openness, sensitivity and respect. The CEO and Trustees of Scope
Grethe Ridgway (Trustee and Chair of the Development Committee)
Grethe Ridgway (Trustee and Chair of the Development Committee)
Trustee and Chair of the Development Committee
Hilary Samson Barry (Trustee, Chair of the Audit Committee and member of the Development Committee)
Hilary Samson Barry (Trustee, Chair of the Audit Committee and member of the Development Committee)
Trustee, Chair of the Audit Committee and member of the Development Committee
Richard Hawkes
Richard Hawkes
Chief Executive SCOPE
Gavin Poole (Trustee SCOPE)
Gavin Poole (Trustee SCOPE)
Trustee SCOPE
Petition updates