

Make Dog Attacks a Criminal Offence in Australia


Make Dog Attacks a Criminal Offence in Australia
The issue
3 weeks ago, our beloved dog was tragically attacked in our own backyard. Despite our desperate attempts to save him, the injuries were too severe, and we faced the devastating decision to put him down. The pain of losing a cherished family member is compounded by the knowledge that the attack could have been prevented. This is not just my story—it could happen to anyone, anywhere, and it must stop.
Currently, negligent dog owners often face no serious legal repercussions for allowing their aggressive dogs to be kept in yards without adequate fencing, supervision, or containment. When dogs capable of causing harm are left unattended in poorly secured environments, the risk extends far beyond the owner’s property line. A yard is not a guarantee of safety when the fencing is weak, or the owner fails to correct dangerous behaviour.
Without proper accountability, these unsafe situations continue—placing neighbouring families, pets, and even children at risk. A dog kept in a yard is still the full responsibility of its owner, especially when that dog has the strength or history to break through boundaries. Pet owners must ensure their animals cannot dig under, jump over, or force their way through fences.
Our tragedy is a direct example of what happens when this responsibility is ignored.
We believe that stronger rules must be put in place—and enforced—so that dogs in yards are securely contained, monitored, and prevented from causing harm. No family should lose a beloved pet because a neighbour failed to provide safe and responsible conditions for their own dog.
This lack of accountability leaves victims with emotional trauma and financial burdens of costly veterinary bills—not to mention the heart-wrenching decisions that owners may have to make, like saying goodbye to their beloved pets.
Additionally, local councils must do more to support those affected by dog attacks. This includes taking decisive action when a dog has caused severe harm or demonstrated clear aggression. In cases where a dog has fatally attacked another animal, entered another property, or poses an ongoing risk to the community, councils must have the authority—and the willingness—to intervene. This may involve removing the dog from the owner, placing the dog under strict control orders, or, in extreme and unavoidable circumstances, humanely euthanising the dog to prevent further tragedies. Families and pets deserve protection, and strong, consistent enforcement is essential to ensure that dangerous animals are not allowed to remain in situations where they can cause more damage, fear, or loss.
I urge lawmakers, local councils, and community leaders to take this issue seriously and implement the necessary changes to improve the safety and well-being of both humans and animals.
Please join me in signing this petition to make a real difference in the fight against dog attacks.
479
The issue
3 weeks ago, our beloved dog was tragically attacked in our own backyard. Despite our desperate attempts to save him, the injuries were too severe, and we faced the devastating decision to put him down. The pain of losing a cherished family member is compounded by the knowledge that the attack could have been prevented. This is not just my story—it could happen to anyone, anywhere, and it must stop.
Currently, negligent dog owners often face no serious legal repercussions for allowing their aggressive dogs to be kept in yards without adequate fencing, supervision, or containment. When dogs capable of causing harm are left unattended in poorly secured environments, the risk extends far beyond the owner’s property line. A yard is not a guarantee of safety when the fencing is weak, or the owner fails to correct dangerous behaviour.
Without proper accountability, these unsafe situations continue—placing neighbouring families, pets, and even children at risk. A dog kept in a yard is still the full responsibility of its owner, especially when that dog has the strength or history to break through boundaries. Pet owners must ensure their animals cannot dig under, jump over, or force their way through fences.
Our tragedy is a direct example of what happens when this responsibility is ignored.
We believe that stronger rules must be put in place—and enforced—so that dogs in yards are securely contained, monitored, and prevented from causing harm. No family should lose a beloved pet because a neighbour failed to provide safe and responsible conditions for their own dog.
This lack of accountability leaves victims with emotional trauma and financial burdens of costly veterinary bills—not to mention the heart-wrenching decisions that owners may have to make, like saying goodbye to their beloved pets.
Additionally, local councils must do more to support those affected by dog attacks. This includes taking decisive action when a dog has caused severe harm or demonstrated clear aggression. In cases where a dog has fatally attacked another animal, entered another property, or poses an ongoing risk to the community, councils must have the authority—and the willingness—to intervene. This may involve removing the dog from the owner, placing the dog under strict control orders, or, in extreme and unavoidable circumstances, humanely euthanising the dog to prevent further tragedies. Families and pets deserve protection, and strong, consistent enforcement is essential to ensure that dangerous animals are not allowed to remain in situations where they can cause more damage, fear, or loss.
I urge lawmakers, local councils, and community leaders to take this issue seriously and implement the necessary changes to improve the safety and well-being of both humans and animals.
Please join me in signing this petition to make a real difference in the fight against dog attacks.
479
Supporter voices
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on 18 November 2025