Context: Rule <R25> limits plastic to twelve pieces within 4"x8" dimensions, and restricts custom 3D-printed decorations, including items like license plates.

Concerns: While we understand the intent to create a level playing field, the new limitations on plastic usage may unintentionally hinder innovation. Engineering thrives on creativity and experimentation, and capping teams at twelve small plastic pieces restricts opportunities to develop lightweight, custom components such as unique mechanisms or mounting solutions. Providing more flexibility would better reflect real-world engineering practices, similar to what’s seen in other student competitions like FRC and FTC.

The restrictions may also raise concerns about equity. Many teams rely on cost-effective, commercially available plastic to build essential robot parts. With fewer plastic options, teams may be compelled to use more VEX-branded aluminum, which could increase costs and create access barriers for less-resourced programs.

Additionally, the ban on 3D-printed decorative elements—even those that don’t affect gameplay—limits students' ability to express team identity and creativity. Custom branding and aesthetic design foster team spirit and help develop digital fabrication skills that are valuable in STEM fields. Notably, no significant issues were reported in the previous season under more flexible guidelines, so the need for these new restrictions is unclear.

Request: We respectfully urge a reconsideration of rule <R25>, specifically parts a, b, and h. We also encourage revisiting plastic restrictions—such as allowing 1/8" thick plastic and/or expanding the size limit to 24" x 24"—to better support creativity, affordability, and authentic engineering experiences.