!!!STOP Ontarios Radical Sex Ed Curriculum NOW!!!
This petition had 1,899 supporters
**PLEASE READ, SIGN AND SHARE**
●WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD AND TO HAVE A SAY ON WHAT WILL OUR WILL NOT BE TAUGHT TO OUR CHILDREN!!!
●THE AGE OF SEXUAL CONSENT SHOULD NOT BE CHANGED TO 6 YEARS OLD!!!
**TOO MANY PARENTS OPPOSE THIS NEW CURRICULUM**
Ontario's Radical Sex Ed Curriculum
Now that the Ontario Liberal Party has a majority in government and no election is in sight, Premier Kathleen Wynne has "coincidentally" announced that in the fall of 2015, she will reintroduce the graphic Sex Ed Curriculum that had outraged parents in 2010.
Back then, parents and religious leaders came out angrily against Liberal plans to teach early grades about age-inappropriate topics like masturbation, anal sex, vaginal lubrication, and the idea that being male or female is merely a “social construct”.
So strong was the backlash that McGuinty “shelved” the curriculum after only 3 days of public outcry.
At the time, CLC warned that the curriculum was only “temporarily” shelved and would return. Kathleen Wynne proved us right by putting this at the top of her agenda at a time when this won't hurt her at the voting booth.
Below are some shocking excerpts from the 2010 curriculum that the Education Ministry had posted online, before the onslaught by parents and religious leaders forced Premier McGuinty to retract it. It is widely believed that the new curriculum will be very similar to the original version. In fact, Liz Sandals, the current Education Minister has stated several times the original "expert consultations" conducted for the 2010 version will still form a basis for what Liberals are planning to impose on classrooms in 2015.
Grade 1 (age 6)
- Graphic lesson on sexual body parts including "penis", "testicles", "vagina", "vulva" and more
Grade 3 (age 8): Homosexuality
-Will normalize homosexual family structures and homosexual "marriage" in the minds of 8-year-olds, without regard for the religious/moral beliefs of families
Grade 3: Gender as a changeable social construct
-Will teach the disputed theory of "gender identity" as if it were fact. This is the notion that whether you're a boy or a girl does not necessarily relate to your physical anatomy. It is merely a "social construct". Gender is "fluid" according to this theory, and any little boy can decide that he is actually a girl, if that's the way he feels in his mind, or vice-versa.
Note: The potential for causing serious sexual confusion in the minds of children is very real with this teaching
-This is not science-based teaching, but rather a dangerous socio-political ideology that seeks to normalize a mental disorder recognized by the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic & Statistics Manual. This ideology being foisted on school children by the Wynne government aims to intdoctrinate the next generation into believing that transgenderism/transsexualism is an innate, genetic characteristic just like skin colour or race.
Grade 4: Romantic dating
-Will introduce children to the idea of being “more than just friends” and “going out” with classmates whom they may “like”. See excerpt below from the actual 2010 curriculum.
-Many parents would find that introducing this idea of dating at age 9 is not age-appropriate. On its own this content might not seem too serious, but in the context of the other controversial lessons, plus the curriculum’s connections to an alleged child pornographer (jump to link) and to unsavoury groups who promote anal play, group sex, S&M, and bondage (jump to link), parents are prudent to see a red flag here.
Grade 6 (age 12): Masturbation
-Encourages masturbation as a "pleasurable" way for children to learn about their bodies, that is "not harmful"
-In addition to promoting the practice of masturbation, the curriculum will teach about "vaginal lubrication".
Grade 7 (age 13): Anal & Oral Sex
Under the pretext of encouraging abstinence from behaviours associated with high risk for STDs, the curriculum uses a sleight of hand to sneakily introduce to children the concepts of "anal intercourse" and "oral-genital contact". Those are ideas that many of these 12-13 year old kids might not be aware of, or at least, have never seriously considered as an act they could be taking part in now. In another sleight of hand, "anal intercourse" is lumped in as a sexual act of the same kind as vaginal intercourse, with no differentiation between the two types of sexual acts, either morally or with respect to risk for sexually transmitted disease, for which the former carries dramatically higher risk.
Was the goal in this sneaky introduction of graphic sex acts to avoid the accusation that the Minister was promoting a gay agenda, seeking to normalize gay sex in the minds of kids? By claiming that this curriculum is about encouraging kids to "delay" these high risk sexual activities, many casual readers won't notice that what has actually occurred is that the teacher has planted ideas in the minds of children that might not otherwise be present, regarding "anal intercourse", "oral-genital contact", etc.
Anal intercourse is not an activity to which the government should be giving any semblance of approval whatsoever. It is the most efficient method of transmitting the AIDS virus, so much so, that despite all the "safe sex" and condom education over the past 20 years, epidemiologists still predict that 50% of men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) will eventually contract HIV.
In fact, the Ontario government's chief epidemiologist publishes a report on the spread of HIV every 4 years. In the most recent study, collecting data between 2005 to 2008, it found that almost 1 in 4 MSM who live in Toronto (21.9%), are currently infected with HIV. See chart below. Extrapolating the current growth rate for infection tells us that by the time 2012 public health data becomes available, almost 1 out of every 3 actively gay men in Toronto will be infected with HIV. So, why exactly does Premier Kathleen Wynne want to get 12 and 13 year olds thinking about 'anal intercourse'?
If the government's going to talk about anal sex at all, it should be at older ages and the message should be "That's a risky, potentially fatal activity. Don't do it". The curriculum makes no mention that anal intercourse, in the context of male-on-male sex, leads directly to the death of a large percentage of those who practice it, and is generally unhealthy for all practicioners. People have a right to know about serious health risks before they choose to engage in it. Withholding such vital information is an inexcusable moral failure. In fact, Kathleen Wynne's Sex Ed curriculum leaves 12 and 13 year olds with a distinct impression that "communicating clearly with each other when making decisions" is all that's required for this activity to be "responsible and safe".
It's important to consider the fact that this curriculum was also written under the direction of an alleged child pornographer, Mr. Benjamin Levin. He was the Deputy Education Minister at the time, serving under then Education Minister Kathleen Wynne. Levin was charged by police with 7 counts of making and distributing child pornography.
Levin was charged by police with 7 counts of making and distributing child pornography. Although the man has not yet been proven guilty in a court of law, many people are questioning whether "grooming" could have been a reason for introducing these explicit subjects at such delicate ages. If the allegations are true, could it be that the curriculum was designed to “prime” children, so as to make them sexually available?
When it is found that an alleged pedophile was in charge of writing what many parents perceive to be graphic, age-inappropriate Sex Ed curriculum, parents cannot be blamed for wanting no part of the curriculum. Should warning bells be going off when we learn that an alleged pedophile oversaw the writing of curriculum which gets 6 year olds talking about their genitals, encourages kids to masturbate, and wants to get 13 year olds thinking about oral sex and anal sex?
The safety of children is too important to ignore Levin's hand in this curriculum.
It's not average moms and dads who are asking for this curriculum to return. In fact 28,000 Ontario parents have signed a petition against it. So who is actually pressuring the Liberals to bring back the controversial curriculum?
Several radical organizations, or those with ties to radical groups have been publicly lobbying the Liberals to bring back the 2010 curriculum since it was first retracted by Premier McGuinty. These include:
- OPHEA (The Ontario Physical & Health Education Association): partners with a "sex education expert" called Sexpressions which offers explicit, classroom teaching aids like "The Guide To Getting It On Book"
- Planned Parenthood Toronto: promotes abortion, anal play (e.g. fisting), sex toys, and the viewing of pornography. See excerpts below from Planned Parenthood's educational resources for 13-year-olds.
- Queer Ontario: promotes bondage, sadism/masochism, casual sex and group sex (see below from their website)
- Communist Party of Canada (Ontario): like all communists, it seeks to throw off "the shackles" of God's moral laws in society and bring about an atheist utopia where virtually all areas of public and private life are dominated by an all-powerful state.
When groups who advocate for the normalization of sadism, group sex, anal play and viewing pornography are demanding the return of the 2010 Sex Ed curriculum, parents cannot be blamed for believing that these classroom lessons will have the effect of sexualizing young children.
Help us warn parents
Due to biased and poor media coverage of this controversial Sex Ed curriculum, most Ontario families are unaware that this dangerous curriculum update will be imposed on their children and grandchildren starting in the fall 2015 school year. Although Campaign Life Coalition and other pro-family groups have been trying to educate the public about the harmful nature of this curriculum, our reach is limited. What's missing education by clergy from the pulpit. To help make it easy for clergy to inform their congregation members about the looming Sex Ed changes, we have provided a sample bulletin announcement and sample pulpit announcement for pastors. Click here to download it in PDF format, then give it to your pastor or church secretary and respectfully ask if they would include it over the coming weeks and months. Handouts for small group discussion are available as well as a Powerpoint presentation from Campaign Life Coalition.
Today: Stand Up is counting on you
Stand Up For Our Children needs your help with “Kathleen Wynne: !!!STOP Ontarios Radical Sex Ed Curriculum NOW!!!”. Join Stand Up and 1,898 supporters today.