JUDICIAL DECISIONS WITHOUT EVIDENCE — THIS ENDS NOW.


JUDICIAL DECISIONS WITHOUT EVIDENCE — THIS ENDS NOW.
The Issue
JUDICIAL DECISIONS WITHOUT EVIDENCE — THIS ENDS NOW.
Families destroyed. Children separated. Court rulings made without a shred of evidence.
This message is for the Canadian people, elected officials, judges, lawyers — and anyone who refuses to stay silent while human rights are being violated in this country’s courthouses.
WHAT WE'RE CALLING OUT:
In Canada, court decisions are made every day without any real evidence.
Children are taken from their parents based on one-sided allegations, written in sworn statements filed without proof.
Judges can issue rulings in just minutes — without any debate.
Lawyers refuse to defend their clients from the beginning, citing “strategy.”
Defence evidence is ignored under the pretext of respecting court procedures.
Children are cut off from a parent, placed under supervised visits in unknown locations, subjected to psychological evaluations, and alienated by one side.
Most of them don’t come out of it unharmed — and neither do half of the parents.
This justice system doesn’t protect children.
It doesn’t protect the innocent, the truth, or even its own fundamental principles.
It protects lies, bias, stereotypes, manipulators — and fake victims.
THEN THEY HIDE BEHIND JUDICIAL DISCRETION.
❌ ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. FOR THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILDREN!
WE DEMAND:
An end to court decisions made without evidence. We demand clear, enforceable, and mandatory laws.
1.Default 50/50 shared custody between parents upon first court appearance2. A presumption of equal shared custody (50/50) as the default temporary parenting arrangement at first appearance unless credible, admissible evidence justifies deviation.
Required legal changes to the Divorce Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. 3 (2nd Supp.))
Section 16.1: Deals with parenting orders and decision-making responsibility.
Section 16.2: Talks about maximum contact principle with both parents.
Section 16(6): Says courts must base decisions on the best interests of the child without presumption of shared custody.
2. Mandatory submission of all evidence with the initial claim
No motion should be accepted without material evidence. No parent should ever be suspended, pushed aside, or cut off from their child based only on words.
Required legal changes to:
Quebec Code of Civil Procedure (C-25.01) — Articles 23, 46, 65, 85, 313 and 322
Divorce Act (RSC 1985, c. 3 [2nd Supp.]) — Section 16(8)
Rules of Practice of the Superior Court of Québec in family matters
3. End of rulings without adversarial hearings
No temporary order, safeguard measure, or access suspension should be issued unless both parties have been heard and their evidence presented and analyzed.
Required legal changes to:
Quebec Code of Civil Procedure — Articles 23, 49 and 85
Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms — Article 23
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Sections 7 and 11(d)
4. Accountability for sworn statements
Anyone who signs a sworn declaration making serious accusations without direct supporting evidence must face criminal penalties.
Required legal changes to the Criminal Code of Canada:
Section 131 (Perjury)
Section 137 (False statement to a person in authority)
Create a new offence: Judicial Abuse in Family Law Contexts
5. Immediate ethical obligation for lawyers to defend
No more delaying the defence under the excuse of “strategy.” Full, honest, and immediate defence must be a duty, not an option.
Required legal changes to:
Code of Ethics of Advocates (Barreau du Québec) — Articles 33, 36, 59, 69, 71, 85, 92 and 95
Family Procedure Regulations
Superior Court of Québec’s Rules of Practice
6. Strict limits on “judicial discretion”
No judge should ever have the right to suspend a parent-child relationship without clear proof, no more vague appeals to “prudence” or “the best interest of the child” without fact-checking.
Required legal changes to:
Quebec Code of Civil Procedure — Article 23
Divorce Act — Section 16(8)
New legislation to define and limit judicial discretion in family law cases
WHY THIS VIOLATES INTERNATIONAL LAW
These practices break Canada's commitments under the following international conventions:
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
Article 9: A child cannot be separated from their parents without a fair hearing
Article 12: The right of the child to be heard
Article 18: Recognition of joint parental responsibility
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (UN)
Article 14: Right to a fair trial
Article 17: Right to privacy and family life
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 7: Right to life, liberty and security
Section 11(d): Presumption of innocence
If you’ve lived through this injustice, if someone you love has suffered it, or if you refuse to let justice be stripped of truth and evidence, sign now.
SIGN FOR A FUTURE OF REAL JUSTICE.

27
The Issue
JUDICIAL DECISIONS WITHOUT EVIDENCE — THIS ENDS NOW.
Families destroyed. Children separated. Court rulings made without a shred of evidence.
This message is for the Canadian people, elected officials, judges, lawyers — and anyone who refuses to stay silent while human rights are being violated in this country’s courthouses.
WHAT WE'RE CALLING OUT:
In Canada, court decisions are made every day without any real evidence.
Children are taken from their parents based on one-sided allegations, written in sworn statements filed without proof.
Judges can issue rulings in just minutes — without any debate.
Lawyers refuse to defend their clients from the beginning, citing “strategy.”
Defence evidence is ignored under the pretext of respecting court procedures.
Children are cut off from a parent, placed under supervised visits in unknown locations, subjected to psychological evaluations, and alienated by one side.
Most of them don’t come out of it unharmed — and neither do half of the parents.
This justice system doesn’t protect children.
It doesn’t protect the innocent, the truth, or even its own fundamental principles.
It protects lies, bias, stereotypes, manipulators — and fake victims.
THEN THEY HIDE BEHIND JUDICIAL DISCRETION.
❌ ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. FOR THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILDREN!
WE DEMAND:
An end to court decisions made without evidence. We demand clear, enforceable, and mandatory laws.
1.Default 50/50 shared custody between parents upon first court appearance2. A presumption of equal shared custody (50/50) as the default temporary parenting arrangement at first appearance unless credible, admissible evidence justifies deviation.
Required legal changes to the Divorce Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. 3 (2nd Supp.))
Section 16.1: Deals with parenting orders and decision-making responsibility.
Section 16.2: Talks about maximum contact principle with both parents.
Section 16(6): Says courts must base decisions on the best interests of the child without presumption of shared custody.
2. Mandatory submission of all evidence with the initial claim
No motion should be accepted without material evidence. No parent should ever be suspended, pushed aside, or cut off from their child based only on words.
Required legal changes to:
Quebec Code of Civil Procedure (C-25.01) — Articles 23, 46, 65, 85, 313 and 322
Divorce Act (RSC 1985, c. 3 [2nd Supp.]) — Section 16(8)
Rules of Practice of the Superior Court of Québec in family matters
3. End of rulings without adversarial hearings
No temporary order, safeguard measure, or access suspension should be issued unless both parties have been heard and their evidence presented and analyzed.
Required legal changes to:
Quebec Code of Civil Procedure — Articles 23, 49 and 85
Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms — Article 23
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Sections 7 and 11(d)
4. Accountability for sworn statements
Anyone who signs a sworn declaration making serious accusations without direct supporting evidence must face criminal penalties.
Required legal changes to the Criminal Code of Canada:
Section 131 (Perjury)
Section 137 (False statement to a person in authority)
Create a new offence: Judicial Abuse in Family Law Contexts
5. Immediate ethical obligation for lawyers to defend
No more delaying the defence under the excuse of “strategy.” Full, honest, and immediate defence must be a duty, not an option.
Required legal changes to:
Code of Ethics of Advocates (Barreau du Québec) — Articles 33, 36, 59, 69, 71, 85, 92 and 95
Family Procedure Regulations
Superior Court of Québec’s Rules of Practice
6. Strict limits on “judicial discretion”
No judge should ever have the right to suspend a parent-child relationship without clear proof, no more vague appeals to “prudence” or “the best interest of the child” without fact-checking.
Required legal changes to:
Quebec Code of Civil Procedure — Article 23
Divorce Act — Section 16(8)
New legislation to define and limit judicial discretion in family law cases
WHY THIS VIOLATES INTERNATIONAL LAW
These practices break Canada's commitments under the following international conventions:
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
Article 9: A child cannot be separated from their parents without a fair hearing
Article 12: The right of the child to be heard
Article 18: Recognition of joint parental responsibility
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (UN)
Article 14: Right to a fair trial
Article 17: Right to privacy and family life
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Section 7: Right to life, liberty and security
Section 11(d): Presumption of innocence
If you’ve lived through this injustice, if someone you love has suffered it, or if you refuse to let justice be stripped of truth and evidence, sign now.
SIGN FOR A FUTURE OF REAL JUSTICE.

27
The Decision Makers
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on June 15, 2025