Stop Johnson and Johnson from testing on animals
Stop Johnson and Johnson from testing on animals
The Issue
I want to stop animal testing because I am not okay with the inhumane treatment of animals when there are much safer and more humane methods for this. I believe that animals actually do have feelings and I have proof. First, a group of highly esteemed scientists has recently signed a document saying that animals do have feelings. Second, Scientists do have ample, detailed, empirical facts to declare that nonhuman animals are sentient beings and with each study, there are fewer and fewer skeptics. Last of all, the Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness in Non-Human Animals was publicly proclaimed in Cambridge, UK, on July 7, 2012, at the conclusion of the Conference, at Churchill College, University of Cambridge, by Philip Low, David Edelman and Christof Koch. … The Declaration was signed by the conference participants that very evening, in the presence of Stephen Hawking, in the Balfour Room at the Hotel du Vin in Cambridge, UK. The signing ceremony was memorialized by CBS 60 Minutes.
Nearly fifty alternatives to animal testing have been made including the following:
The 3T3 Neutral Red Uptake Phototoxicity Test can replace the use of mice and other animals in the testing of medicines and other products for their potential to cause sunlight induced "photo-toxicity.
Regulatory agencies in the United States and in Europe recently approved another sort of replacement test. This involves the use of a "synthetic skin”, called Corrositex, which can be used in place of animals to test chemicals for skin corrositivity.
There are also benefits to non-animal testing:
Animal testing actually is not very reliable because animals have such different bodies than we do. Almost 40% of all animal tests actually come up wrong.
Cruelty-free products are much more cost effective, more expedient, and much better for the environment.

The Issue
I want to stop animal testing because I am not okay with the inhumane treatment of animals when there are much safer and more humane methods for this. I believe that animals actually do have feelings and I have proof. First, a group of highly esteemed scientists has recently signed a document saying that animals do have feelings. Second, Scientists do have ample, detailed, empirical facts to declare that nonhuman animals are sentient beings and with each study, there are fewer and fewer skeptics. Last of all, the Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness in Non-Human Animals was publicly proclaimed in Cambridge, UK, on July 7, 2012, at the conclusion of the Conference, at Churchill College, University of Cambridge, by Philip Low, David Edelman and Christof Koch. … The Declaration was signed by the conference participants that very evening, in the presence of Stephen Hawking, in the Balfour Room at the Hotel du Vin in Cambridge, UK. The signing ceremony was memorialized by CBS 60 Minutes.
Nearly fifty alternatives to animal testing have been made including the following:
The 3T3 Neutral Red Uptake Phototoxicity Test can replace the use of mice and other animals in the testing of medicines and other products for their potential to cause sunlight induced "photo-toxicity.
Regulatory agencies in the United States and in Europe recently approved another sort of replacement test. This involves the use of a "synthetic skin”, called Corrositex, which can be used in place of animals to test chemicals for skin corrositivity.
There are also benefits to non-animal testing:
Animal testing actually is not very reliable because animals have such different bodies than we do. Almost 40% of all animal tests actually come up wrong.
Cruelty-free products are much more cost effective, more expedient, and much better for the environment.

Petition Closed
Share this petition
The Decision Makers
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on March 11, 2016
