HELP make the Canadian Judicial System accountable for our Childrens Rights and Freedoms.

HELP make the Canadian Judicial System accountable for our Childrens Rights and Freedoms.

0 have signed. Let’s get to 15,000!
At 15,000 signatures, this petition becomes one of the top signed on Change.org!
Tim Barth started this petition to Canadian Judicial and Justice Ministers

Scharstein Gibbings Walen and Fisher LLP believes it is right to perjur in the court of law to protect Child Abuser's. I believe no matter your stature in this Country you should be held accountable, now this does not mean you do not have the right to make decisions on the evidence. But it does mean the decisions you make are backed by evidence that reasonably justify the decision. This if held correctly keeps everyone accountable and true and does not allow ones stature to be used as they please without consequence. I beleive our Canadian Justice system must be held accountable for their decisions that they make without evidence in front of the court. Justices that fabricate evidence, Lie on there orders and go against court rules and case law to help Child Abusers should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. These are some of the Justices in my case that have helped a Child Abuser and falsified evidence. Which in turn is corrupting our court and abusing our children.

1- G.V Goebels - Does not even look at my sons Child Abuse when she orders the Child Custody and Access Assessment. G.V Goebels had the time dated pictures doctors notes showing the bruises and abuse on my son. G.V Goebels as a Queen's Bench Justice then tried to overule an Appeal's Court ruling not once but twice in Favour of my ex-wife that was abusing my son. This all occured as her husband Craig Goebels was the head of Legal Aid Saskatchewan. My former lawyer Johnathan Stockdale previously worked for  legal Aid. He sent withdrawl papers to Richard Gibbings and it was stated that Johnathan Stockdale was told by Social Services that Richard Gibbons Represented Leah Barth. This was when Robert Feist  represented the Ministry of Social Services in there case against Leah Barth. Richard Gibbons and Robert Feist are from the same law firm , thus by this statement they were Dual Representing as they were representing both sides of the same case. This is against all Law Society Rules and is a Breach of Confidentiality, this was all done to protect a Child Abuser. G.v Goebels is also sister to Grant Scharfstein of Scharfstein Gibbings Walen and Fisher and Aunty to Samanatha Neil my ex wife's lawyer at the time.

2-Justice Wilkinson- Falsifying evidence on Child Custody Order. Going against time dated pictures of my sons abuse and doctors notes. Going against the very noted abuse in the Social Services own sworn affidavit, backing a Child Abuser. Justice Wilkinson stated that I had to wright to here directly in regards to having supervised access to my son from March 9th 2020. I applied to Justice Wilkinson many times to see my son. Justice Wilkinson than states she is not seized in regards to the provisions for me to see my son. It is stated on December 16th by a fellow Justice on his order that Justice Wilkinson was seized by the matter. Justice Wilkinson also had before her evidence such as the three different explanations for my son's bruises. These three different explanations were sworn under oath. Justice Wilkinson also states that I needed supervised access because I was not worried about any abuse after the first two incidences in late 2018. Then goes onto state in her order that I took my son in because I was worried about abuse from Leah Barth onto Levi Barth on August 3rd 2019. Justice Wilkinson also states that Tim Barth showed the nurse a picture of his sons genitals and bum which where of his badly bruised bum from his mother and were abuse pictures. The doctors note states right on it that Tim Barth  had shown the nurse pictures of his sons face as Tim Barth was concerned about bruises around his sons eyes. Justice Wilkinson even states Tim Barths son was apprehended Sept 4th 2019 when form states Sept 3rd 2019 same day as Child in Need of protection hearing was adjourned due to Ministrybof Social Services not giving disclosure. It is then also stated by Jenna Straub that the bruises were substantial on Levi Barths face and Justice Wilkinsin on her Child Custody Order states they are minor. Jenna Straub also states that Levi Barth is apprehended on the 6th of September 2019. Justice Wilkinson also worked at Sanderson Law Firm in Prince Albert Saskatchewan.

1- My son was stated to be jumping on the bed at his grandparents hit his head on a cousins knee then ran into the wall.

2- Then was stated to the RCMP that he ran into another kid at another daycare.

3- In my ex-wife's own sworn affidavit then states my son did not have bruises on him on November 20th 2018 when she picked him up and just as she had been told it was all alleged.

This all being said when Love and Laughter daycare themselves state they saw the bruises on my son on November 8th 2018. They made an incident report and my ex told the daycare that she had hit my son. For which evidence in the Child Custody and Access Assessment by Marla Rauser stated she was being investigated by the RCMP and Social Services for that very incident. The Child Custody and Access Assessment by Marla Rauser is shown to be blatantly biased in favour for the Child Abuser and contains many falsified facts which favour the Child Abuser. If you have had Marla Rauser do an assessment or know someone that has and it does not seem right I would have it checked. I have heard of other cases also in regards to false misleading reports put into the court from Marla Rauser. The only way to prove these accusations is to write in about it to the head Social Services regulating branch. Those cases i have heard about are just statements heard from people and ussually some truth is always hidden in what's said. Even if they are just statements they are highly disturbing and should be looked into. But mine i can and know it was done with bias to help my ex the Child Abuser as facts in the document itself shows this fact. The RCMP that investigated it was Shannon Haggarty, who was on the daycare board at Love and Laughter with my ex-wife at the time when she investigating the incident. How do you investigate an incident at Love and Laughter daycare when you are a board member and how do you investigate a fellow board member. As stated by RCMP themselves in there own report it was not investigated correctly under Child Abuse Protocol by David Sanderson head of Division.  Instead Justice Wilkinson falsify's evidence on her court order and by doing so puts my son at risk and backs a Child Abuser. Even though within the RCMP Commission reports themselves show Cst Park falsified evidence in regard to my sons abuse to cover up the incident. If you are familiar with Cst Park's name, yes he is the same RCMP involved in the Colten Boushie case for which the RCMP Commission reports is still pending. If Cst Park falsified evidence in my case leads me to believe he did in that case also by showing of actions. There is also one other interesting thing that I have heard about RCMP Cst Park his Uncle is said to be Chief Justice M.D Popescul the Justice on the Colten Boushie case. i have written Justice M.D Popescul  many times regarding my case and he won't do anything as stated in his letters i have received from him. This was all done to protect a Child Abuser and Justin Trudeau wonders why Canadians are unhappy with there Justice System and the RCMP. When Trudeau has these facts and does nothing himself to stop our Children from being abused.

3- Justice Crooks- Ruled on her previous ruling, to uphold her previous ruling which was against the rules of the court. Ruled against my rights as a father under section 15-(1) of the Canadian Rights and Freedoms act. All to help out a Child Abuser and help Social Services give my son to the abusive mother. Social Services also gave my son to Leah Barth on September 17th 2019 and as stated in the Social Services affidavit of Leslie Malo, Leah Barth was being investigated by Social Services and the RCMP Until Dec 3rd 2019. As stated in the Social services Act itself the Child Can only be given back if Social Services has no concern with the Parent. Being that my ex-wife was being investigated until Dec 3rd 2019 by Social Services and the Rcmp, Social Services had concerns with Leah Barth. Social Services went against there own Child and Family Act when they gave my son to Leah Barth.

4- Justice Smith- Ruling and making orders infront of the court without any evidence infront of the court to make such orders. When it was stated to him he must rule off of the evidence infront of the court "he stated if I say it is it is". He then let opposing counsel right up the Court Order. This is all done to protect a Child Abuser and Counsel representing a Child Abuser. The Counsel representing is Scharfstein Gibbings Walen and Fisher when by facts they know my ex-wife was abusing my son. Justice Smith is also the Uncle of Jenna Straub the Social Services worker that was friends with my ex Leah Barth and the Social Worker that apprehended my son without any evidence. Social Services is now stating that the Child in Need of protection was given on July 26th 2019. The form states June 26th 2019 and the Ministry of Social Services is now trying to change the date it was given. As there is no evidence in the Ministry of Social Services affidavit when it was given. The first hearing was scheduled August 20th 2019 which is within 30 days of July 26th 2019. The form itself states a hearing can only be booked after 30 days from when the Child in Need of protection can be served so even if they try to change the date it still shows the Ministry of Social Services was not following the Child and Family Act.

5- The Court of Queen's Bench- Lying in there court documents when i missed my hearing with Justice Dufour because my car broke down on the road. I phoned in around 9:05 stating I would be late they said they would tell the Justice as hearing started at 10:00 o'clock, Phone call is recorded and in court evidence, the Court then stated in other orders that they found out afterwards that I had missed due to car trouble. All so a Justice could rule in favour of the Child Abuser and allow my son to continually be abused.

6- The Court of Queens Bench- Itself has falsified documents on my behalf in regards to my babysitter. There is documents submitted in court that I did not submitt that have been written and falsely signed by someone else with my signature. These documents were used in a ruling to give back my babysitter's son to an abusive father. I went and checked my court records there is nothing in them in this regard and I know I did not wright them. My babysitter is sick with Covid and this is how the Justices and Courts look out for our Children in a Pandemic. Take a Child from his loving grandmother and give him back to the abusive father. On evidence that the Court itself falsified on my behalf, so please speak up for our children and those that can't because of Covid 19. Tell the Justices and Justice Minister our Children have rights and our sick have rights. I have written David lametti, Bill Blair in regards to the falsified documents on my behalf. Wrote an affidavit sworn to the Supreme Court of Canada and given copy to Queen's Bench in regard to the falsification of such documents on my behalf. Yet I have received no response as an integral Court of this country would do. If we all write in our Children will have a voice and be heard.

7- Justice Lorna Dyck-Ruled on four seperate cases regarding myself and my ex-wife. Each case affected the other that she had ruled on all to protect a Child Abuser and fix the outcome of the case. Since she gave my son to the ex that was abusing him without a child in need of protection hearing. Based on a falsified affidavit from the Ministry of Social Services by Leslie Malo as all documents show it was falsified. Which i did not receive a copy until feb 4th 2020 from of  who represented the Ministry of Social Services and hearing was on Sept 17th 2019. The disclosure when it was originaly sent to my lawyer Johnathan Stockdale on August 29th 2019 it stated on it 125 pages Ministry Social Services against my ex-wife that was abusing my son. I also was working so never saw the disclosure at all at the time I just received the E-Mail that my lawyer sent me stating the disclosure was 125 pages  against my ex- wife and it was from  of . The disclosure was sent back or destroyed as it had conditions on it so i never saw it and only knew it was sent by the E-Mail that stated from my lawyer 125 pages Ministry Social Services vs my ex-wife. This is again against Canadian Rights and Freedoms Act as all disclosure must be made to the one being accused when they are accused. Justice Lorna Dyck also ruled on my 8-10 as a warrant was put out on me by Sgt Shannon Haggarty without any evidence she is not only a friend of Leah Barth's but actually a relative. Disclosure was not given to Tim Barth when he was arrested  and Lorna Dyck did not give disclosure to Tim Barth for three to 4 months. During this time there was a no contact put on Tim Barth and the time missed by Tim Barth to see his son was used to vary the Child Custody Order by Justice Wilkinson. Justice Wilkinson varied Justice Lorna Dycks order with the time that Tim Barth missed seeing his son because of Lorna Dyck not giving the disclosure. This is illegal as Lorna Dyck affective set the Child Custody case. Lorna Dyck is also Grant Scharfsteins sister and is my ex wife's law firm Scharfstein Gibbings Walen and Fisher.

8- Murray Pelletier -Out of North Battleford Provincial Court ruled on two of the cases with Lorna Dyck. They directly affected the outcome of the Previous case, this was all done to protect a Child Abuser and to fix the outcome of the case in favour of the child abuser. Murray Pelletier is also brother to Justice Crooks of Queen's Bench that ruled on my case in Queen's Bench.

9- Justice Scherman- States in his FIAT of January 3rd 2020 that my son was taken under section 11 and 37 which both require a protection hearing for which Lorna Dyck did not have when making her interim order. Justice Wilkinson then on her March 9th FIAT now states he was taken under section 17 because it does not require a protection hearing. He was also taken by Jenna Straub the Social Worker who states that the bruises and abuse occured on my son during my ex-wifes week. Jenna Straub also was accompanied by two RCMP that went into my babysitters house and helped her kidnapp my son. As there was no evidence or reason for him being taken, the only evidence was my ex-wife was abusing my son. Justice Scherman allows  to continue to represent the Ministry even though the facts in the Leslie Malo affidavit prove it is falsified. After they breached my confidentiality and allows Scharfstein Gibbings Walen and Fisher to continue representing my ex-wife even though they breached my confidentiality and know My ex-wife was abusing my son. Just as Justice Scherman from the evidence knows my ex-wife is abusing my son. All this is done to protect a Child Abuser and give my son to the abusive mother.  of   is now threatening to charge me more fee's for appealing the decisions. When it is shown that the Ministry of Social Services had no Cause for taking my son. This is an infringement of rights as a parent and infringement on the rights of a Child to withhold him from the parent for no reason.  quotes section 79 in regard to his beleif that he cannot be sued for his involvement as he states it falls underneath the Child and Family Act. But had he followed section 11, section 35 pursuant to 34 and 16. Had he given my son to my ex as required by section 17 and not when she is being investigated by RCMP and Social Services and had he followed section 24. Then he would be covered by section 79 as he would have followed the Child and Family Act. A  did not follow the Child And Family Act, did not give me disclosure the Leslie Malo affidavit until February 4th 2020. Also has not given me the right as a parent to protect my child, the right of my son to see his father. He has breached and infringed on my Charter Rights Under the Canadian Rights and Freedoms Act. He has also infringed on my sons rights underneath the UN Rights of a Child.  and  should be disbarred from representing in the Court Room for our Childrens safety. In the February 5th hearing  stated that the Provincial Order Statorily was the same as the Queen's Bench Federal order but in my argument as stated if that was the case. The Child and Family Act would not state in section 37(8) that if there is an existing supremacy order the lower Court order must be taken to the supremacy court and varied.  and  still stand behind the Ministry of Sicial Services Leslie Malo affidavit as Leslie Malo keeps stating it is true. Leslie Malo states that the orders for the Child in need of Pritection are directly based off of The Sept 17th 2019 affidavit. Even though the Child in Need of Protection was given June 26th 2019 and the only alleged incident of abuse from Tim Barth onto his son was on July 11th 2019. Two weeks after Child in Need of Protection was given. This alleged incident on Tim Barth is dispensed of in the December 16th FIAT of Justice Scherman. Tim Barth's son is also said to be Apprehended on Sept 3rd 2019 by Social Services in regard to section 17 by Justice Wilkinson and he was given back to Leah Barth. Section 17 a Child may not be given back to the parent if there is any concerns with the parent. As the sworn affidavit of Leslie Malo states Leah Barth was being investigated until Dec 3rd 2019 by Social Services and RCMP. So my son could not be given back to his mother by Social Services.  would know by these facts and the Ministry of Social Services would know by these facts that the Ministry of Social Services is misrepresenting the information. By law society regulations and act he cannot represent them and he cannot help facilitate there misrepresentation.

Cara Haaf- Cara Haaf signed an affidavit regarding a confidentiality protocol, Cara Haaf was the lawyer from Scharfstein Gibbings Walen and Fisher that was the head of Scharfstein Gibbings Walen and Fishers conflicts policy. Brent Barilla represented my old lawyer and told Justice Elson that the conflicts policy was signed. These two lawyers then went on to sign an affidavit stating that the conflicts policy was signed. There signatures were taken in place of Valerie Watsons Signature. They are a party to the act so cannot attest to if the conflicts policy was signed. Cara Haaf also worked at Scharfstein Gibbings Walen and Fisher and her husband Chad Haaf worked at McDougal Gauley and had access to my file as I had Sherry Fitzsimmons her partner. They did not have a confidentiality protocol in place that needed to be in place otherwise it is a breach of confidentiality by law. My son gets abused Cara Haaf lies to the court and falsified evidence then gets promoted to a Justice of Queen's Bench. If this does not show how dire our Judicial System is and how little they protect our childrens rights nothing will. This was all done to protect a Child Abuser.

Ministry of Justice- I now have received a notice for Drivers License Suspension within 30 days for allegibly not paying my Child Support for December 2020 and January 2021. But as I stated to Charmaine M the family support officer that wrote me the letter it has been paid, the checks cleared my account January 5 of 2021. This is the same Charmaine M that was over ruling my Queen's Bench order with the Provincial Order that was made falsely by Justice Lorna Dyck. I have been dealing with Charmaine M and the Ministry of Justice for a year and a half. This is all done to protect a Child Abuser.

JUSTICE THOLL Appeal Court Saskatchewan- ruled on previous order Appealed to Supreme Court Canada and then ruled on the FIAT of March 19th 2021. Justices on the appeal for the hearing misrepresent facts in regard to that appeal. Have all documents to prove it. Justice Tholl would also have the evidence before him and know how he ruled so illegaly misrepresented on FIAT.

SUPREME COURT CANADA

The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed my appeal in 39328 and by doing so ruled exactly opposite to McDonald Estate c. Martin. Thus affective changing case law, so I have appealed such matter under section 73 form 47 rare circumstances. It is very rare occurrence as the Supreme Court will never rule against it in it's entirety,  there mane case law in regard to the appeal before them. As they know Canadian Law is based on precedence so there for changes the Law. The Supreme Court of Canada has also ruled against Mcdonald Estate c. Martin, Paylove vs Paylove, R. v Sheppard and Young vs Young in its entirety. These case laws have been affectively replaced by my case before the court as the Supreme Court just ruled 100% opposit to these cases. Thus affectively changing the law before the court.

Just as the Supreme Court of Canada put 4 appeals under one Appeal even though they are different case files to illegally infringe on my rights and not give me and my son a fair hearing. JUNE 26th 2019 is the day of the Child in Need of protection given. After my son was coming home from ex abused reported it then the Ministry of Social Services without cause gave Tim Barth Child in Need of protection. As it is stated and sworn to this day the Leslie Malo affidavit is stated to be true. That the Child in Need of protection was given because of the evidence in such affidavit. Only problem is July 11th 2019 first and only alleged incident cleared by a Justice of the court. So being that the Child in Need of Protection was given 15 days prior to any allegations means Ministry of Social Services is lying on affidavit. Appeals Court and Supreme Court still can't figure it out and are abusing my son by not seeing the hard facts of it is impossible for the affidavit to be true. NORSASK Law also still represents the Ministry even though they know this evidence. Wether a Justice rules against this fact does not mean it did not occur just that the Justice is corrupt.

 

JUSTICE SYSTEM 

Have infringed on my rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Section 1, 7, 10,11 and 15. The Supreme Court of Canada allowed such infringement on my Charter Rights. So therefor broke the highest ACT in Canadian Law to protect a Child Abuser.

Social Services- a Child in need of protection was given June 26th 2019 and there is only one alleged incident against Tim Barth that was said to have occured July 11th 2019. It was then  dismissed by Justice Scherman on December 16th 2020, Leslie Malo still states the affidavit is true. How can it be when the one alleged incident was not until July 11th 2019 and the Child in Need of protection was stated to be given off of the Sept 17th 2019 affidavit. This shows that Social Services is misrepresenting as June 26th 2019 was over two weeks prior to alleged incident so at the time the Child in Need was given there was zero evidence to give it. So therefor means could not be given and therefore means the rest of the affidavit is false as it relies on a misrepresented statement and anyone knows the dates don't line up and by the dates Social Services illegaly kidnapped Tim Barth's son. Now Social Services is trying to change the date on the Child in Need of Protection hearing from June 26th to July 26th 2019. But as stated on the form after 30 days a Child in Need of protection can be scheduled. The first hearing was booked August 20th 2019 so was within the 30 days so shows Ministry of Social Services also was not following the Child and Family Act. The August 20th hearing was also adjourned to September 3rd 2019 and that was the day my son was apprehended when the hearing was adjourned again as the Ministry of Social Services did not give disclosure.

Justice Leurer- in his Appeal where Tim Barth appealed the order of justice Wilkinson as Justice Wilkinson was not setting a hearing for Tim Barths supervised visit's. So therefor Justice Wilkinson was withholding Levi Barth from his father Tim Barth. Justice Leurer took the word of Justice Wilkinson that she was not seized by the matter when in the December 16th 2020 order of Justice Scherman it is stated by Justice Scherman that Justice Wilkinson was seized by the matter. So therefor Justice Wilkinson was withholding Levi Barth from his father. Never in court has the Justice themselves withheld the parent from the Child in the court of law.

JUSTICE Caldwell- in the Appeal Court ruling of March 19th 2021 completely misrepresented on the FIAT.

Justice Barrington Foote- ruled illegally in the first Court of Appeal ruling as in the FIAT he took Richard Gibbons affidavit as evidence that Richard Gibbons Himself did not represent Leah Barth in Court. This goes against Mcdonald Estate c. Martin and Paylove vs Paylove Supreme Court Canada primary cases on the subject of conflict of interest. It was also stated in the FIAT by the Justices that the Ministry of Social Services stated that Richard Gibbons was representing Leah Barth. Therefor means  must be disqualifies by Supreme Court Case Law and stated by the own Appeal Court Justices that allowed  to Continue representing the Ministry of Social Services. He then rules on the case of March 19th 2021 wich is a conflict of interest as he ruled on first ruling and could not rule on the second FIAT. As he even stated himself in the hearing but does illegally contrary to the facts before the court.

Justice Jackson-Also rules on the hearing in regards to Justice Wilkinsons FIAT. The FIAT that has so many contradictions within it and even goes as far as defaming Tim Barth. Justice Jackson agrees with Justice Wilkinsons ruling even though it is completely incorrect. Social Services themselves brought in cases that involved Justice Jackson and Justice Wilkinson ruling on appeals court orders that they both ruled on at Appeal Court of Saskatchewan. So these two Justices had worked togeither and Justice Jackson could not rule on Justice Wilkinsons FIAT but does and rules contrary to the best interest of the child

Appeals Court- On the Appeals Court FIAT it is also stated that Tim Barth had made no attempt to perfect his appeals. Even though three Appeals had been bound and were sitting at the Court of Appeal for 2 months or more. Since the Justices misrepresented on the FIAT Appeals Court is now sending my perfected Appeals back. Had they not been accepted before the FIAT of the Justices they would have been sent back before the misrepresented ruling of March 19th 2021.

Robert G Richards Chief Justice Appeals Court- ruled on appeal in regards to  being able to continue representing Ministry of Social Services. Affidavit of Richard Gibbons was taken as evidence that Richard Gibbons was not representing Leah Barth. By Mcdonald Estate c. Martin affidavits of lawyers cannot be taken as evidence to state a lawyer did or did not do something. The Justices had the case law before them and the time dated pictures and doctor's notes and Ministry affidavit stating abuse on Levi Barth from Leah Barth. Schafstein Gibbings Walen and Fisherband Leah Barth have also put in affidavits from Love and Laughter daycare. This is the daycare that never reported the incident and they are government run and legally must report it. In the affidavits it is stated Tim Barths son started having issues in September of 2018 and it escalated in November of 2018 around the exact same time as the first abuse incident. It is also stated that it was still escalating in December of 2018 around the second abuse incident when my sons bum was so badly bruised he could not sit. He was suffering from trauma as he was sitting and passing the bed when he was with his father because of the trauma he endured under his mother's abuse. It was then stated by Stacey Cheyne of ECIP on January 31st 2019 that Levi Barth had no issues at his father's but was having issues at Leah Barths and was acting out. All the evidence before this court is negated by the Chief Justice of Appeals Court and even deems Tim Barth Vexatious litigant for protecting his son. This is what occures when as stated the Chief Justice gets paid off as Richards was a Harvard Grad protecting a Child Abuser and abusing my son.

Martel D popescul- also has been written in court in regards  to Glen Metivier and I have received letters regarding such letters and nothing has been done. I have documents in my court file that are stated on event report to be in the file and are not in file. I was asking Chief Justice Popescul  why the event report and file are not the exact same as they must be. I wanted it looked into thoroughly as they should be the same and are not the same.

Judge Shannon Metivier- Was in the court of Queen's Bench as a Justice when my case was before the court and Glen Metivier the Registrar was her husband 

These Justices as I have listed all have protected a Child Abuser, some in many cases either by falsifying evidence, ruling without evidence in front of the court but on there own accord. This has become a cancer in our Justice System these Justices as listed are abbeding Child Abuse therefore are Child Abusers themselves. When will the government take Child Abuse serious and protect our Children and stop protecting the Justices from abusing our children. Now as I stated there is good Justices ones that go by evidence and rule on it as they see fit by the evidence, but for those such as these that I have listed. If the evidence shows that they  committed a criminal act without a doubt they should be prosecuted because as being a Justice they have Broke there Oath and the trust of the public as the public trusts them to keep our most precious safe our children. The Justices are worse then the Abusers because they have the ability to stop Child Abuse but they help it and side with those that abuse children. Please write into David Lametti and Justin Trudeau if you have similar circumstances or know someone who does as the more we are heard the more things will change for our children.

More about my case is in the following petition"keeping governments  accountable during Covid brightening the outlook face it together" my case i am using for awareness so please if it strikes a chord and you know someone who has similar circumstances have them sign and wright in. This is for our Children and we must always start with one story. Please check out my other petition as it will fill in more of the details.

I would ask you? Should Law Firms such as Scharfstein Gibbings Walen and Fisher be allowed to represent a Child Abuser. When all the facts in front of the court show such Child Abuse. Such as time dated pictures, Doctors notes and statement from there client herself stating such abuse. Yet the firm itself still perjures in the court of law and defends such a Child Abuser. This is against all moral ethics of a law firm and that of a lawyer Anna Singer and Samantha Neil. Grant Scharfstein and Greg Walen also taught at University of Saskatchewan would this not go against the code of ethics of the University itself and the Law Society? I would ask you to help spread the word on lawfirms that help Abuse our Children.

 of  LLP- Was my family lawyer when she was opposing counsel to Samantha Neil of Scharfstein Gibbings Walen and Fisher. had Brent Barilla represent her in regards to my family case when Samantha Neil was representing my ex-wife on the exact same family case. This is a Breach of Confidentiality and Breach of Contract by law. When my ex-wife falsely accused me through Shannon Haggarty,   represented me even though she states she is not a "criminal lawyer" herself. So admits to committing malpractice and purjers on her court affidavit by stating she did not represent me when all the evidence shows she did. This is because she did not do as she was instructed too and my son was abused later and if she had done her job. My ex-wife would have not gotten away with the abuse. I believe lawyers should be held accountable for lying in court just as  of  should be when he states that was not representing me. He puts the exact same document into appeals court and Queens Bench to state he represents . He has the same signed documents in his evidence showing   is representing me. So by that fact alone  knows he is lying to the court of Appeal when he states   did not represent me.  also calls her husband who is a crown lawyer in regards to my case which you cannot legally do as  even states could be a conflict problem. She states in one Appeal Court factum that she does not remember calling him and she believed that she didn't. Then in the Appeal Court factum directly filed after now states she called him while I was there but didn't discuss any confidential information. These are both sworn by  in regards to the same court proceedings.  once again committs perjury in the court of law, so does   when he states   did not represent me in criminal case once again. THE names of the lawyers are left out as Change.org made me pull them out as it speaks the truth.

For those of us that have gone through it and and those that have seen it happen to there loved ones or friends. You feel helpless alone almost overwhelmed but togeither we can as parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, guardians we can unite and have a voice for our children.

please spread the word and together we can make a change for our children. Just as it starts with one voice as when I saw a young indigenous lady lose her children for no reason. I reported it as it is wrong no matter who it has been done too, our Children are what we must stand up for, our children are the future and we must unite to protect our biggest asset and the most vulnerable our children. The Justice system, RCMP and Legal Firms must be held accountable to protect   our Children and keep our Justice system great so in the future it will still protect them and there Children. so please sign and share it with others as together we have the power to Create Change.

I would ask one question? When is it time to stand up for our children, when is it time for them to be heard. Think about it, if you feel the time is now please sign the petition and share it. Our children will thank you for giving them a voice to take there quiet whisper and make it a voice to be reconciled with.

Justin Trudeau knows about all these injustices that are occurring to our children as I have written him. He has responded but done nothing to protect our children, he speaks of how important they are to all of us Canadians as a Nation but does not support or protect them where it is needed the most and protect there right and safety in there best interest.

The diagram you see shows some of the reasons why cases go as they do in the courts. The lines show ties in my case and show as to why things occured as they did. This is a start to the whole connection and will show to be true If looked into it for yourself. It started with me connecting people togiether as my cases were being ruled on in the courts. I could not figure out how they were ruling the way they were as it was against all Supreme Court Case law and the Justices themselves were falsifying evidence to make there rulings. So after many cases and digging what you see started to form and links started to show leaving eventually what you see based off of evidence I gathered.

There is one interesting fact about all this and that is Grant Scharfstein of Scharfstein Gibbings Walen and Fisher is connected to Kenneth Sinclair Mcdonald and Trudeau's mom involved in the WE scandals name is Margaret Sinclair Trudeau. Then Sinclair in the name also ties Robertson Stromberg to Scharfstein Gibbings Walen and Fisher. Grant Scharfstein was a partner at Robertson Stromberg before in the 80's then started his own firm. Robertson Stromberg  is the same firm that was involved in the Colten Bouschie case when Justice Popescul ruled on this case when he legally couldn't as he was Cst Park's Uncle. Now what questions does that bring in regards to the Judicial System in Canada? If the middle names look similar they are more than similar and same family line. William Sinclair Fitzsimmons you will see these family lines run throughout our Judicial System and Government. Just as if you look every King or Queen in the world is related back to Queen Elizabeth as they are all off one family branch it is true if you look. G.V Goebels, R.W Elson, Lorna Dyck, Samantha Neil, Brent Barilla and Grant Scharfstein also have one thing in Common they are all family.

Just as Barth has a family tree so does The Glendinning Family and some trees are larger than others.

I appreciate the support and we will get there as one, as history shows it starts with one story and the will to persevere for what is right. Then turns to the story of many as we unite and proceed forward for one cause.

The Government of Canada such as Justin Trudeau and David lametti should look as our own Judicial System before scolding others on there's. As it stands the Canadian Government is actively Supporting a Child Abuser my ex and supporting the RCMP and Supreme Court of Canada who have supported a Child Abuser. If Justin Trudeau wants to talk transparency in a Justice System and Rights it would be well informed of him to fix such faults in his own Court System. I beleive Canada's system is failing worse than others that Trudeau holds himself above as it is in regards to not protecting our Children the most vulnerable. I am a Canadian to the Core but beleive that Canadians and every nation know our Children are our future and must be protected.

The Courts are now trying to block me out take away my rights that are under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. All so they can take my child and protect a Child Abuser, if you beleive we need to make a change please call the Supreme Court of Canada and Justin Trudeau. 

If you would like send me your stories and we can talk as I would like to help our children as much as possible and it will help us unite and move forward. If you are reading this please know that this is how Trudeaus Liberal Government treats are children. If you want to protect our children please think about this when you vote.

I am also on tik tok justiceforrchildren please go view my videos as the documents show exactly as I have stated thanks for the support.

 

Thank You 

Tim Barth

 

 

 

0 have signed. Let’s get to 15,000!
At 15,000 signatures, this petition becomes one of the top signed on Change.org!