Why should West Virginias not be given the option to choose what toxins are injected into our children without being penalized?

A person would not normally contract 5 diseases at one time naturally, yet at 2, 4 and 6 month visits a baby is injected with five vaccines.
There is no proof that vaccines are responsible for the decline in certain diseases - improved sanitation, medical care and less crowding may also have contributed to the decline in certain diseases. Most diseases decreased by over 95% BEFORE the introduction of vaccines.
By vaccinating children, many cases of certain diseases (ex. measles, chicken pox) have now shifted to the adult population where the disease is often more serious and debilitating.
Many vaccines are cultured on mediums such as monkey kidneys, chick embryos and human diploid cells (cells from an aborted fetus) which raises moral concerns for me, but this also causes me concern as to what genetic material is being injected into a child's body along with the vaccine ingredients and what possible consequences that may carry.
(Taken from http://manarafoundation.org/essay/health/reasons-not-vaccinate)

Other informative sites:
http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2011/01/09/the-ten-reasons-to-say-no-to-vaccines/
http://pecangroup.org/educate-yourself/vaccination/50-reasons-not-to-vaccinate-infants
http://www.vaccinetruth.org/
http://www.wvve.info/