Free Kristopher Love: Innocent Father put on Death Row by jury infected by racism


Free Kristopher Love: Innocent Father put on Death Row by jury infected by racism
The Issue
Kristopher Love has been wrongfully convicted of murder and sentenced to death. He was accused of killing a Dallas dentist, Kendra Hatcher, in 2015. However, there is no concrete evidence that proves his involvement in the crime.
The prosecution's case against Kristopher Love relied heavily on the testimony of Crystal Cortes, who admitted to being involved in the murder and testified against him as part of a plea deal. However, her testimony was inconsistent and unreliable.
Furthermore, there were several inconsistencies and contradictions in the evidence presented by the prosecution. The gun used to kill Kendra Hatcher was never found, and there were no fingerprints or DNA evidence linking Kristopher Love to the crime scene.
Despite this lack of concrete evidence against him, Kristopher Love was convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole. This is a grave injustice that must be rectified.
We urge Governor Greg Abbott and the court system to review this case carefully and take a second look at Kristopher Love's case. It is time for justice to be served properly by freeing an innocent man from wrongful imprisonment.
Love has consistently maintained that he was not the shooter. Defense counsel had an affirmative duty to investigate the State's ballistics evidence because it tended to contradict Love's position.
Defense counsel neither hired nor attempted to discredit the State's ballistic evidence through cross examination. The State's ballistic expert overstated her findings in her written report and on the witness stand to Love's detriment. The bullet casing found at the scene of Hatcher's death did NOT, in fact come from Love's gun. Alleged co-conspirator Crystal Cortes's in court identification of Love as the shooter was tainted by her prior positive out of court identification of Leroy Broadway as the shooter and by her willingness to implicate an innocent person in order to avoid the death penalty herself as to violate his rights to due process, due course of law,a fair trial. Requiring trial counsel to exercise or withhold Love's peremptory challenges after each individual member of the jury was interviewed compromised their ability to exercise those challenges intelligently.
At a minimum sequential jury selection procedure deprived Love of the benefit of procedures the Texas legislature enacted for his benefit and further deprived Love of any reasonable opportunity to protect himself against the racial prejudices that his trial counsel reasonably believed were held by Juror 12 against African American Blacks. To add insult to injury the trial court refused Habeas counsel's request for funds to hire a Private Investigator to locate and interview the jurors regrading racial prejudices or external influences either during or prior to Love's trial. The nationwide media coverage made it almost impossible not to have been influenced.
The punishment phase jury instructions were inadequate in that they did not instruct the jury as to all of the law regrading punishment in a capital case. Because the jury was not advised that a hung jury was in the punishment phase of a capital case would result in a automatic life sentence rather than a retrial on punishment, it unfairly tips the scales of towards a death sentence involving a black defendant. It is no longer enough for the courts to acknowledge the existence of structural discrimination based on race, but sidestep the issue by means of a judicial construct that operates as a de facto bar to any remedy the integrity of the judicial system requires the court to take action on Love's behalf. Trial and Appellate Counsel were INEFFECTIVE to the extent they either failed to raise or raised but inadequately briefed or argued, solid meritorious claims which would otherwise have entitled Love to relief. Thus, whether the Court reviews any such claims independently or within the context of a ineffective assistance analysis,Kristopher Love on Texas Death is entitled to relief... I need your help attorney's,Law students, regular people,anyone that's tired of the injustice taking place in our country.You can help not only me but my children who are out there without a father,you can help the next unfortunate person in this injustice system by contacting your local heads of state and voting the ones with Jim crow intentions out. Donate funds,sign petitions,share this with everyone, do anything but something negative or nothing at all.If you've gotten this far you are interested so help me not get executed by the state of Texas, help me get back to my family. Thank you for your time
You may contact Kristopher Love on securus email TDCJ Number: 00999614 or through US Mail: Allan B. Polunsky Unit 3872 FM 350 South; Livingston, TX 77351 Support can be made on paypal to queenvea@gmail.com

870
The Issue
Kristopher Love has been wrongfully convicted of murder and sentenced to death. He was accused of killing a Dallas dentist, Kendra Hatcher, in 2015. However, there is no concrete evidence that proves his involvement in the crime.
The prosecution's case against Kristopher Love relied heavily on the testimony of Crystal Cortes, who admitted to being involved in the murder and testified against him as part of a plea deal. However, her testimony was inconsistent and unreliable.
Furthermore, there were several inconsistencies and contradictions in the evidence presented by the prosecution. The gun used to kill Kendra Hatcher was never found, and there were no fingerprints or DNA evidence linking Kristopher Love to the crime scene.
Despite this lack of concrete evidence against him, Kristopher Love was convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole. This is a grave injustice that must be rectified.
We urge Governor Greg Abbott and the court system to review this case carefully and take a second look at Kristopher Love's case. It is time for justice to be served properly by freeing an innocent man from wrongful imprisonment.
Love has consistently maintained that he was not the shooter. Defense counsel had an affirmative duty to investigate the State's ballistics evidence because it tended to contradict Love's position.
Defense counsel neither hired nor attempted to discredit the State's ballistic evidence through cross examination. The State's ballistic expert overstated her findings in her written report and on the witness stand to Love's detriment. The bullet casing found at the scene of Hatcher's death did NOT, in fact come from Love's gun. Alleged co-conspirator Crystal Cortes's in court identification of Love as the shooter was tainted by her prior positive out of court identification of Leroy Broadway as the shooter and by her willingness to implicate an innocent person in order to avoid the death penalty herself as to violate his rights to due process, due course of law,a fair trial. Requiring trial counsel to exercise or withhold Love's peremptory challenges after each individual member of the jury was interviewed compromised their ability to exercise those challenges intelligently.
At a minimum sequential jury selection procedure deprived Love of the benefit of procedures the Texas legislature enacted for his benefit and further deprived Love of any reasonable opportunity to protect himself against the racial prejudices that his trial counsel reasonably believed were held by Juror 12 against African American Blacks. To add insult to injury the trial court refused Habeas counsel's request for funds to hire a Private Investigator to locate and interview the jurors regrading racial prejudices or external influences either during or prior to Love's trial. The nationwide media coverage made it almost impossible not to have been influenced.
The punishment phase jury instructions were inadequate in that they did not instruct the jury as to all of the law regrading punishment in a capital case. Because the jury was not advised that a hung jury was in the punishment phase of a capital case would result in a automatic life sentence rather than a retrial on punishment, it unfairly tips the scales of towards a death sentence involving a black defendant. It is no longer enough for the courts to acknowledge the existence of structural discrimination based on race, but sidestep the issue by means of a judicial construct that operates as a de facto bar to any remedy the integrity of the judicial system requires the court to take action on Love's behalf. Trial and Appellate Counsel were INEFFECTIVE to the extent they either failed to raise or raised but inadequately briefed or argued, solid meritorious claims which would otherwise have entitled Love to relief. Thus, whether the Court reviews any such claims independently or within the context of a ineffective assistance analysis,Kristopher Love on Texas Death is entitled to relief... I need your help attorney's,Law students, regular people,anyone that's tired of the injustice taking place in our country.You can help not only me but my children who are out there without a father,you can help the next unfortunate person in this injustice system by contacting your local heads of state and voting the ones with Jim crow intentions out. Donate funds,sign petitions,share this with everyone, do anything but something negative or nothing at all.If you've gotten this far you are interested so help me not get executed by the state of Texas, help me get back to my family. Thank you for your time
You may contact Kristopher Love on securus email TDCJ Number: 00999614 or through US Mail: Allan B. Polunsky Unit 3872 FM 350 South; Livingston, TX 77351 Support can be made on paypal to queenvea@gmail.com

870
Supporter Voices
Petition created on June 16, 2023