Investigate the major networks violation of the FCC's "Equal-time rule"


Investigate the major networks violation of the FCC's "Equal-time rule"
The Issue
We, the signers of this petition, formally request that the FCC open a class action suit in our names and to investigate our allegations that all of the major networks are violating the FCC's "Equal-time rule. The major networks are considered to consist of, but not all inclusive of, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX, MSNBC, CNBC and any other network the FCC deems applicable. Anyone can see that the major news networks are grossly violating this rule and have been for quite some time.
The equal-time rule specifies that U.S. radio and television broadcast stations must provide an equivalent opportunity to any opposing political candidates who request it. This means, for example, that if a station gives one free minute to a candidate on the prime time, it must do the same for another candidate.
However, there are four exceptions: if the air-time was in a documentary, bona fide news interview, scheduled newscast or an on-the-spot news event the equal-time rule is not valid. Since 1983, political debates not hosted by the media station are considered news events, thus may include only major-party candidates without having to offer air time to minor-party or independent candidates. Talk shows and other regular news programming from syndicators, such as Entertainment Tonight, are declared exempt from the rule by the FCC on a case-on-case basis.[1]
This rule originated in § 18 of the Radio Act of 1927 [1]. It was later superseded by the Communications Act of 1934, where the Equal Time Rule is codified as § 315(a).
Another provision of § 315(a) prohibits stations from censoring campaign ads. A related provision, in § 315(b), requires that broadcasters offer time to candidates at the same rate as their "most favored advertiser".
The rule was created because the FCC thought the stations could easily manipulate the outcome of the elections.
The Equal Time rule should not be confused with the Fairness Doctrine, which deals with presenting balanced points of view on matters of public importance.

The Issue
We, the signers of this petition, formally request that the FCC open a class action suit in our names and to investigate our allegations that all of the major networks are violating the FCC's "Equal-time rule. The major networks are considered to consist of, but not all inclusive of, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX, MSNBC, CNBC and any other network the FCC deems applicable. Anyone can see that the major news networks are grossly violating this rule and have been for quite some time.
The equal-time rule specifies that U.S. radio and television broadcast stations must provide an equivalent opportunity to any opposing political candidates who request it. This means, for example, that if a station gives one free minute to a candidate on the prime time, it must do the same for another candidate.
However, there are four exceptions: if the air-time was in a documentary, bona fide news interview, scheduled newscast or an on-the-spot news event the equal-time rule is not valid. Since 1983, political debates not hosted by the media station are considered news events, thus may include only major-party candidates without having to offer air time to minor-party or independent candidates. Talk shows and other regular news programming from syndicators, such as Entertainment Tonight, are declared exempt from the rule by the FCC on a case-on-case basis.[1]
This rule originated in § 18 of the Radio Act of 1927 [1]. It was later superseded by the Communications Act of 1934, where the Equal Time Rule is codified as § 315(a).
Another provision of § 315(a) prohibits stations from censoring campaign ads. A related provision, in § 315(b), requires that broadcasters offer time to candidates at the same rate as their "most favored advertiser".
The rule was created because the FCC thought the stations could easily manipulate the outcome of the elections.
The Equal Time rule should not be confused with the Fairness Doctrine, which deals with presenting balanced points of view on matters of public importance.

Petition Closed
Share this petition
The Decision Makers
Share this petition
Petition created on February 7, 2012