End Speed Cameras in Greenwich – Prioritize Other Safety Measures

Recent signers:
TOYO 1515 and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

PLEASE DO NOT DONATE - JUST VOTE!

The Town of Greenwich, CT recently installed automated speed cameras near and around our school zones. These surveillance devices—now active at North Street School, Eagle Hill School, Brunswick Lower School, Greenwich Academy, Central Middle School (both locations), Glenville School, Greenwich High School (Hillside Road & East Putnam Avenue), and Parkway School— aim to reduce speeding near schools, but they fall short in delivering comprehensive safety.

Key Concerns:

  • Limited Effectiveness: The Selectmen and Police Chief and other proponents claim these cameras enhance road safety by reducing speeding. However, evidence on their overall effectiveness is mixed at best. Many traffic fatalities stem from factors these devices do not address, such as distracted driving, impaired driving, drowsy driving, or poor road design and maintenance—not merely speed. While some studies suggest localized reductions in speeding, they fail to prove broad, sustained improvements in overall safety or crash rates when other dangerous behaviors persist.
  • Lack of Transparency and Due Process: There is no transparency on data storage or data storage duration, who has access to captured images, or how appeals are fairly handled. Automated tickets deny real due process—no officer judgment, no immediate defense. Unlike interactions with human police officers—who exercise judgment and allow for immediate defense—automated tickets offer no real opportunity for contesting errors or context, undermining due process.
  • Privacy Intrusion: Cameras capture images of vehicles, license plates, and potentially drivers/passengers without consent, creating unnecessary surveillance on public roads.

Safety for our children and other pedestrians is essential, but these cameras aren't the only—or best—solution. Proven alternatives deliver real results while respecting residents:

  • Increased visible police patrols in school zones
  • Road redesigns (better signage, speed humps, pedestrian improvements)
  • Expanded education campaigns on safe driving
  • Targeted efforts against distracted/impaired driving

This petition demands that the Board of Selectman, as the traffic authority of the Town of Greenwich:

  • Halt all new citations from automated speed cameras.
  • Phase out and remove all existing installations.
  • Redirect resources to effective, community-supported safety measures.

Greenwich deserves safer roads through smart, fair enforcement—not reliance on automated systems that raise more questions than answers. Sign if you want better protection for kids and pedestrians without unnecessary fines or surveillance!

1,327

Recent signers:
TOYO 1515 and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

PLEASE DO NOT DONATE - JUST VOTE!

The Town of Greenwich, CT recently installed automated speed cameras near and around our school zones. These surveillance devices—now active at North Street School, Eagle Hill School, Brunswick Lower School, Greenwich Academy, Central Middle School (both locations), Glenville School, Greenwich High School (Hillside Road & East Putnam Avenue), and Parkway School— aim to reduce speeding near schools, but they fall short in delivering comprehensive safety.

Key Concerns:

  • Limited Effectiveness: The Selectmen and Police Chief and other proponents claim these cameras enhance road safety by reducing speeding. However, evidence on their overall effectiveness is mixed at best. Many traffic fatalities stem from factors these devices do not address, such as distracted driving, impaired driving, drowsy driving, or poor road design and maintenance—not merely speed. While some studies suggest localized reductions in speeding, they fail to prove broad, sustained improvements in overall safety or crash rates when other dangerous behaviors persist.
  • Lack of Transparency and Due Process: There is no transparency on data storage or data storage duration, who has access to captured images, or how appeals are fairly handled. Automated tickets deny real due process—no officer judgment, no immediate defense. Unlike interactions with human police officers—who exercise judgment and allow for immediate defense—automated tickets offer no real opportunity for contesting errors or context, undermining due process.
  • Privacy Intrusion: Cameras capture images of vehicles, license plates, and potentially drivers/passengers without consent, creating unnecessary surveillance on public roads.

Safety for our children and other pedestrians is essential, but these cameras aren't the only—or best—solution. Proven alternatives deliver real results while respecting residents:

  • Increased visible police patrols in school zones
  • Road redesigns (better signage, speed humps, pedestrian improvements)
  • Expanded education campaigns on safe driving
  • Targeted efforts against distracted/impaired driving

This petition demands that the Board of Selectman, as the traffic authority of the Town of Greenwich:

  • Halt all new citations from automated speed cameras.
  • Phase out and remove all existing installations.
  • Redirect resources to effective, community-supported safety measures.

Greenwich deserves safer roads through smart, fair enforcement—not reliance on automated systems that raise more questions than answers. Sign if you want better protection for kids and pedestrians without unnecessary fines or surveillance!

The Decision Makers

Lauren Rabin
Greenwich Town Selectman
Responded
Thank you to everyone who has shared concerns about the speed cameras in Greenwich. I want residents to know that I began hearing significant feedback about this issue earlier this week and am listening closely to what people are saying. At our recent Board of Selectmen meeting, I raised the fact that we have been receiving a large volume of feedback from the community. Many residents have asked important questions about why certain locations were selected, why an out-of-state vendor is involved in collecting fines, and whether the ticket amounts are appropriate. These are valid questions that deserve thoughtful discussion. It’s important to remember that this program was introduced as part of a broader safety effort. Greenwich received a Safe Streets for All grant, and the cameras were one component intended to address pedestrian safety. Unfortunately, we have experienced serious incidents in our community, including people being struck by vehicles and fatalities. Improving safety around schools and pedestrian areas was the original goal. At the same time, I understand that many residents are confused about how the program works. Some schools where cameras are installed do not have students crossing directly at those locations, which raises questions about whether the placements align with safety priorities. There is also confusion about when the cameras are active and how the speed thresholds are applied. Before tickets were issued, the town conducted a testing period of approximately 30 to 45 days during which drivers received warnings instead of fines. There is also an appeals process in place for those who wish to challenge a ticket. My priority now is to create an opportunity for the community to be heard. I am interested in holding one or more public forums so residents can share their concerns and ideas directly. I would like these discussions to include our Chief of Police, who is also aware of the concerns and has been receiving complaints from residents. The goal of these forums would be to better understand public concerns and determine how the program can best serve its intended purpose of improving safety. It’s possible that cameras may remain in some locations but not others, or that aspects of the program—such as ticket amounts or the appeals process—could be revisited. We also want to clarify misconceptions, including the perception that the program is simply a revenue generator. I understand that emotions are running high, and some of the feedback we’ve received has been very strong. I want residents to know that I am hearing you, thinking carefully about this issue, and working to determine how we can best meet the original goal: making our streets safer. We will be sharing additional information soon about upcoming opportunities for public input through our community communications channels. I encourage everyone to stay engaged and participate in those conversations. Lauren Rabin Selectwoman, Town of Greenwich
Fred Camillo
Greenwich Town First Selectman
Rachael Khanna
Rachael Khanna
Greenwich Town Selectman

Supporter Voices

Petition Updates