The U.S. Constitution (Article II, Section 2) grants the president the power to “grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.”

This power was designed as a check on the judicial system—allowing mercy or correction of injustices—but over time it has raised serious ethical and political questions.

Potential for Abuse and Nepotism

Critics argue that the pardon power can be misused to favor political allies, friends, or family members.

Example: Joe Biden (2024) – President Biden stated he would not issue a pardon for his son, Hunter Biden.  Hunter Biden plead guilty in all nine charges of the federal tax case against him, and was convicted of was convicted of federal gun charges.  On December 1, 2024, President Biden reversed his statement and issued a pardon for his son.

Example: Bill Clinton (2001) – On his last day in office, Clinton pardoned his half-brother, Roger Clinton, who had served time for a cocaine conviction. Many saw this as a clear example of favoritism.

Example: Donald Trump (2020–2021) – Trump granted clemency to several close allies, including Michael Flynn, Roger Stone, and Paul Manafort, all of whom had been convicted of crimes connected to his administration or campaign. These decisions prompted accusations of self-protection and political retaliation.

These examples suggest that the pardon power can appear to shield the powerful rather than serve justice.

Congress should re-examine Article II, Section 2 to determine if the presidential pardon is no longer serving Justice and the interests of the American people. 

This petition is nonpartisan and your support would be greatly appreciated.