STOP THE DUMPING OF TOXIC DREDGE SLUDGE CLOSE TO NEW ZEALAND'S AOTEA/GREAT BARRIER ISLAND

0 have signed. Let’s get to 15,000!


PLEASE NOTE: NO NEED TO CHIP IN - It has come to our attention that once people are signing this petition, change.org is asking people 'chip in' money. Please be aware that this money is used by change.org to promote the petition, which helps it reach more people (they don't allow advertisers); but we have NOT asked anyone to donate money. We simply ask you to sign your name and if you want to help us reach more people then please share it on your social media or share it with all your contacts. Thank you.

We are appalled to read the news today, 12 March 2019, on https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/382563/green-light-to-dump-more-sludge-near-great-barrier-island (and other news outlets), that confirms a marine consent has been granted to dump more than 8 million cubic metres of sediment dredged from Auckland Harbour over the next 35 years onto the "Northern Disposal Area", which is only 25 kilometres east of New Zealand's precious taonga, Aotea/Great Barrier Island.

The news report states:

"The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has granted Coastal Resources Limited a 35-year marine consent to dispose of 250,000 cubic metres of dredged sediment each year.

The company already has permission to dump 50,000 cubic metres of sediment at the disposal site - known as the Northern Disposal Area - which is 25 kilometres east of Great Barrier Island.

In June last year, it applied to expand its operation.

Coastal Resources Limited dredges material from sites around Auckland and Waikato, including marinas.

The EPA received 76 submissions about the application and the vast majority of them opposed the granting of consent.

But in its final decision, the EPA's decision-making committee said that any potential adverse effects on the environment of any disposal would be restricted to the disposal area and negligible beyond the boundary.

Further, any potential adverse effects on existing interests, like commercial fishing, would also be negligible beyond the boundary.

Great Barrier Island Local Board chair Izzy Fordham said they were disappointed by the EPA's decision.

"We're no scientists by any sense of the word, our concerns were for the environmental impact of it, the effect on mammals and sea life, and the whole biosecurity risk that goes with it."

The local board does not have the resources to be able to appeal the decision, Ms Fordham said.

"I just sincerely hope that it doesn't impact on our ocean environment - in 2019 we really need to be doing better for our oceans."

Local iwi also opposed the consent application.

Its member and marine scientists Andrew Jeffs said Coastal Resources never addressed their concerns about the impact of vessel noise on marine mammals.

"It can stop them feeding, it can mess up social groupings, it can stop them from communicating with one another and create difficulties for them in finding food."

Dr Jeffs said it was surprising the EPA gave Coastal Resources the go-ahead, despite rigorous scientific evidence about the problems underwater sound can cause.

The Hauraki Gulf was recognised internationally as one of the most pristine habitats for marine mammals, he said.

While it was more expensive, Dr Jeffs said other options for dumping sediment on-land should be considered.

"Many of the people who own boats in marinas around Auckland are people who love the Hauraki Gulf, they love the fact that they see marine mammals when they're out on their boats and they'd probably be prepared to pay a bit more for their marina space in order to protect what they love about the Gulf."

Coastal Resources did not respond to requests for comment."

This is unacceptable - we, the undersigned, demand that this marine consent is revoked and Great Barrier Island waters and vicinity are safely preserved for future generations. 

Regardless of the official statement that any disposal "would be restricted to the disposal area and negligible beyond the boundary", in line with the precautionary principle we call for this decision to be reversed immediately.

Further information:

https://www.epa.govt.nz/public-consultations/decided/coastal-resources-limited/decision-makers-and-procedures/

https://www.epa.govt.nz/public-consultations/decided/coastal-resources-limited/

https://epa.cwp.govt.nz/assets/FileAPI/proposal/EEZ100015/External-advice-and-reports-External-reports/DMC-s56-Information-to-Auckland-Council-s56-31-08-2018.pdf

https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/384504/appalled-and-disgusted-great-barrier-island-residents-head-to-high-court-to-stop-dumping

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12211954