This is a copy of the Pennsylvania Superior Court case that affirmed what the definition of the "applicable benefit year" was. These judges agreed with and supported what was found at 20 CFR 615.2(c)(2), because it was the EXACT SAME DEFINITION found in UIPL 23-08 Attachment A, the Implementing and Operating instructions for EUC08 (under definitions on page A-1). This again REFUTES the current Department of Labor/Robert Wagner MISTAKE, just like CUIAB Case A0-265448 did on 10/20/2011 (same definition as the Rashawn Lowe appeal case). They say MOST BENEFIT YEAR and RObert Wagner says THE INITIAL YEAR UNTIL FUNDS EXHAUST. He is WRONG and committing ARRA FRAUD to protect himself. http://s1359.beta.photobucket.com/user/corazonroto512/library/Rashawn%20Lowe%20Applicable%20Benefit%20Year%20Case