I need your support to seek justice in my child custody case. Due to malicious prosecutions by Child Protective Services [Redacted] and the San Bernardino County Juvenile Dependency Court, under Judge Steven Mapes, and a lack of due process as a result of ineffective counsel from Vincent W. Davis & Associates (Elizabeth Jacobo), my son was unjustly taken from my custody. This process has been marked by a blatant disregard for the truth and my civil rights.

My lawyer's failure to present key evidence allowed false allegations by my ex-husband to go unchallenged. Professionals involved in the case supported my son's recantation of the allegations and identified coaching by his father. Despite my son testifying in court and clearly being a victim of parental alienation, the court ignored these critical findings. Instead, they believed that as an LCSW, I had manipulated my son to recant the allegations. Despite evidence of coaching and planning of the allegations evidenced on Talking Parents by the father, my lawyer did not present this crucial information.

Additionally, the Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, of the California Court of Appeal misinterpreted key rules, such as rule 8.387(b)(2)(B), which should have extended the finality of the order summarily denying my habeas petition, the only avenue to appeal ineffective counsel. The Court of Appeal rejected my petition for rehearing, applying incorrect rules and failing to provide a thorough review of my case.

The California Supreme Court then denied my request for review, which was my last remedy for challenging the juvenile court's orders. Due to these procedural failings and the court's disregard for the truth, my son was unjustly removed from my custody and placed with his father. Consequently, I haven't seen my son since.

I am seeking the following remedies from the decision-makers involved:

Review and Reconsideration of My Case:

• Objective: To correct procedural errors, re-examine the evidence, and secure a fair hearing based on the merits of my case.
• Decision-makers: Judge Steven Mapes, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, of the California Court of Appeal, and the California Supreme Court.
• Desired Outcome: A thorough review of my case by the appropriate judicial authorities, leading to the recognition of procedural errors and a re-evaluation of all evidence presented. This should result in a new hearing that accurately reflects the merits of my case and the best interests of my child.
  

Restoration of Custody or Increased Visitation Rights

• Objective: To either regain primary custody of my son or secure significantly increased visitation rights, ensuring meaningful and regular contact.
• Decision-makers: Judge Steven Mapes and San Bernardino County Juvenile Dependency Court.
• Desired Outcome: Restoration of primary custody of my son, Noah, or alternatively, a court order granting significantly increased visitation rights. This would ensure Noah has regular and meaningful contact with me, his primary caregiver, thereby promoting his emotional and psychological well-being.

Investigation into Legal Misconduct

• Objective: To initiate a thorough investigation into the conduct of the legal professionals involved in my case, identifying and holding accountable those responsible for any misconduct or unethical practices.
• Decision-makers: California State Bar, Vincent W. Davis & Associates, and Elizabeth Jacobo.
• Desired Outcome: An official investigation by the California State Bar into the actions of Vincent W. Davis & Associates and Elizabeth Jacobo. This should identify any misconduct or unethical practices, leading to appropriate disciplinary action and ensuring accountability for those who compromised the integrity of my legal representation.

Judicial Reforms

• Objective: To implement changes that prevent similar injustices in the future, ensuring fair and impartial treatment for all parents involved in custody disputes. This includes establishing clear guidelines and oversight for CPS and family court proceedings.
• Decision-makers: California Legislature, California Judicial Council, and San Bernardino County CPS.
• Desired Outcome: Legislative and procedural reforms within the California judicial system and CPS, including the establishment of clear guidelines for investigations and family court proceedings. Regular audits and oversight should be instituted to ensure fair, consistent, and impartial treatment of all parties in custody disputes. These reforms should protect the rights of parents and children, preventing future injustices and fostering a more equitable system.

 

 

Review and Reconsideration of Your Case
Judge Steven Mapes - Judge at San Bernardino County Juvenile Dependency Court

Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, of the California Court of Appeal - Contact the Presiding Justice and the Clerk/Administrator

California Supreme Court - Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero and Associate Justices

Restoration of Custody or Increased Visitation Rights
Judge Steven Mapes - Judge at San Bernardino County Juvenile Dependency Court

San Bernardino County Juvenile Dependency Court - Presiding Judge and Court Administrators

Investigation into Legal Misconduct
California State Bar - Executive Director Leah Wilson and Chief Trial Counsel

Vincent W. Davis & Associates - Managing Partner Vincent W. Davis
Elizabeth Jacobo - 

Judicial Reforms
California Legislature - Members of the Assembly Judiciary Committee and Senate Judiciary Committee

California Judicial Council - Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero and Administrative Director Martin Hoshino

San Bernardino County CPS - Director of San Bernardino County Children and Family Services, along with relevant county supervisors

Judge Steven Mapes - San Bernardino County Juvenile Dependency Court

Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero - California Supreme Court

Leah Wilson - Executive Director, California State Bar

Martin Hoshino - Administrative Director, California Judicial Council