SAVE PENINA’S CHILDREN FROM THE COURT’S UNCONSTITIONAL USE OF RELIGION AS A WEAPON

Alert: FAMILY COURT TO SNATCH FOUR YOUNG BEAUTIFUL CHILDREN AWAY FROM PERRY, THEIR MOMMY, FOR NON-CONFORMITY WITH ANCIENT RELIGIOUS CUSTOMS (allegations include, gasp, failure to wear a wig, wearing pants outside the house and eating dairy products after eating chicken).

IS THIS A COURT SYSTEM THAT REMOTELY RESEMBLES THE PRINCIPLES OF THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE EXPRESSED IN THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?

HAVING ONE’S CHILDREN TORN AWAY FROM HOME IS MORE PAINFUL THAN DEATH –

CAN THIS REALLY BE THE CURRENT STATE OF THE LAW IN THE UNITED STATES?

PLEASE HELP BY JOINING – AND SPREADING OF -- THIS GROUP BEFORE RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION GAINS MOMENTUM.

THIS IS A REAL STORY. WITH REAL PEOPLE AND, MOST IMPORTANTLY, REAL CHILDREN

FULL DETAIL ABOUT THE HORRIFIC “LEGAL” CONSEQUENCES RESULTING FROM CHOOSING TO (SLIGHTLY!) DISTANTCE ONE’S SELF FROM RELIGIOUS RADICALS WILL BE POSTED AND DISCUSSED.

“Absent substantial harm to the child, the best interest standard is insufficient to support a compelling state interest that supersedes the parents’ fundamental rights. In other words, a finding of best interest does not constitutionally support a custody decision that infringes a parent’s fundamental right to freedom of religion or to parent the child. The prevalence of decisions in which judges attempt, sometimes successfully, to impose their own religious beliefs and codes of morality in the face of settled constitutional principles is tantamount to judicial nullification of constitutional principles in favor of a subjective application of the best interests standard.”

OH, AND BY THE WAY, THE NEW JERSEY TRIAL COURT JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THIS CASE IS A RIGHT-WING ORTHODOX MALE.