Invite the Green Party to the 2012 Presidential Debates
Invite the Green Party to the 2012 Presidential Debates
The Issue
As an American, I am deeply troubled with the state of our country. Aside from the economic issues we are facing, we also have social and cultural issues to contend with. That is why I am writing this petition on change.org. The only way our government will stabilize and begin to work for the people again is if we elect a President with our best interests in mind. The only way to be sure we are selecting the right one is to give all candidates equal and fair exposure. How can we possibly know where the candidates stand and who the best candidate is if there aren’t more than two options?
Below is an excerpt from The Commission on Presidential Debates, outlining the candidate application and candidate selection criteria.
No Copyright intended, this is purely for educational and reference purposes.
Commission on Presidential Debates' Nonpartisan Candidate Selection Criteria For 2012 General Election Debate Participation
A. INTRODUCTION
The mission of the nonpartisan Commission on Presidential Debates (the "CPD") is to ensure, for the benefit of the American electorate, that general election debates are held every four years between the leading candidates for the offices of President and Vice President of the United States. The CPD sponsored a series of such debates in each of the past six general elections, and has begun the planning, preparation, and organization of a series of nonpartisan debates among leading candidates for the Presidency and Vice Presidency in the 2012 general election. As in prior years, the CPD's voter educational activities will be conducted in accordance with all applicable legal requirements, including regulations of the Federal Election Commission that require that debate sponsors extend invitations to debate based on the application of "pre-established, objective" criteria.
The goal of the CPD's debates is to afford the members of the public an opportunity to sharpen their views, in a focused debate format, of those candidates from among whom the next President and Vice President will be selected. In each of the last six elections, there were scores of declared candidates for the Presidency, excluding those seeking the nomination of one of the major parties. During the course of the campaign, the candidates are afforded many opportunities in a great variety of forums to advance their candidacies. In order most fully and fairly to achieve the educational purposes of its debates, the CPD has developed nonpartisan, objective criteria upon which it will base its decisions regarding selection of the candidates to participate in its 2012 debates. The purpose of the criteria is to identify those candidates who have achieved a level of electoral support such that they realistically are considered to be among the principal rivals for the Presidency.
In connection with the 2012 general election, the CPD will apply three criteria to each declared candidate to determine whether that candidate qualifies for inclusion in one or more of the CPD's debates. The criteria are (1) constitutional eligibility, (2) ballot access, and (3) electoral support. All three criteria shall be satisfied before a candidate will be invited to debate.
B. 2012 NONPARTISAN SELECTION CRITERIA
The CPD's nonpartisan criteria for selecting candidates to participate in the 2012 general election presidential debates are:
1. EVIDENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL ELIGIBILITY
The CPD's first criterion requires satisfaction of the eligibility requirements of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution. The requirements are satisfied if the candidate:
a. is at least 35 years of age;
b. is a Natural Born Citizen of the United States and a resident of the United States for fourteen years; and
c. is otherwise eligible under the Constitution.
2. EVIDENCE OF BALLOT ACCESS
The CPD's second criterion requires that the candidate qualify to have his/her name appear on enough state ballots to have at least a mathematical chance of securing an Electoral College majority in the 2012 general election. Under the Constitution, the candidate who receives a majority of votes in the Electoral College, at least 270 votes, is elected President regardless of the popular vote.
3. INDICATORS OF ELECTORAL SUPPORT
The CPD's third criterion requires that the candidate have a level of support of at least 15% (fifteen percent) of the national electorate as determined by five selected national public opinion polling organizations, using the average of those organizations' most recent publicly-reported results at the time of the determination.
C. APPLICATION OF CRITERIA
The CPD's determination with respect to participation in the CPD's first-scheduled debate will be made after Labor Day 2012, but sufficiently in advance of the first-scheduled debate to allow for orderly planning. Invitations to participate in the vice-presidential debate will be extended to the running mates of each of the presidential candidates qualifying for participation in the CPD's first presidential debate. Invitations to participate in the second and third of the CPD's scheduled presidential debates will be based upon satisfaction of the same multiple criteria prior to each debate.
Adopted: October 20, 2011
(http://www.debates.org/index.php?page=candidate-selection-process)
By mandating that candidates have so much support before the debates, it limits our choices as American voters and therefore continues the perpetual cycle of Republican vs Democrat. The Green Party should be invited to the televised debates and should be given equivalent screen time to reach out to the audience. By doing so, Americans can have a clearer picture of what they want in a candidate. If you are reading this and you are a Republican or Democrat supporter, please sign this petition for your friends, neighbors and family members that might not have their hearts set on a Republican or Democrat candidate. Everyone deserves representation they trust and all Americans deserve to have a choice they feel good about on Election Day.
Thank you!
Sincerely, Amanda Boerwinkle

The Issue
As an American, I am deeply troubled with the state of our country. Aside from the economic issues we are facing, we also have social and cultural issues to contend with. That is why I am writing this petition on change.org. The only way our government will stabilize and begin to work for the people again is if we elect a President with our best interests in mind. The only way to be sure we are selecting the right one is to give all candidates equal and fair exposure. How can we possibly know where the candidates stand and who the best candidate is if there aren’t more than two options?
Below is an excerpt from The Commission on Presidential Debates, outlining the candidate application and candidate selection criteria.
No Copyright intended, this is purely for educational and reference purposes.
Commission on Presidential Debates' Nonpartisan Candidate Selection Criteria For 2012 General Election Debate Participation
A. INTRODUCTION
The mission of the nonpartisan Commission on Presidential Debates (the "CPD") is to ensure, for the benefit of the American electorate, that general election debates are held every four years between the leading candidates for the offices of President and Vice President of the United States. The CPD sponsored a series of such debates in each of the past six general elections, and has begun the planning, preparation, and organization of a series of nonpartisan debates among leading candidates for the Presidency and Vice Presidency in the 2012 general election. As in prior years, the CPD's voter educational activities will be conducted in accordance with all applicable legal requirements, including regulations of the Federal Election Commission that require that debate sponsors extend invitations to debate based on the application of "pre-established, objective" criteria.
The goal of the CPD's debates is to afford the members of the public an opportunity to sharpen their views, in a focused debate format, of those candidates from among whom the next President and Vice President will be selected. In each of the last six elections, there were scores of declared candidates for the Presidency, excluding those seeking the nomination of one of the major parties. During the course of the campaign, the candidates are afforded many opportunities in a great variety of forums to advance their candidacies. In order most fully and fairly to achieve the educational purposes of its debates, the CPD has developed nonpartisan, objective criteria upon which it will base its decisions regarding selection of the candidates to participate in its 2012 debates. The purpose of the criteria is to identify those candidates who have achieved a level of electoral support such that they realistically are considered to be among the principal rivals for the Presidency.
In connection with the 2012 general election, the CPD will apply three criteria to each declared candidate to determine whether that candidate qualifies for inclusion in one or more of the CPD's debates. The criteria are (1) constitutional eligibility, (2) ballot access, and (3) electoral support. All three criteria shall be satisfied before a candidate will be invited to debate.
B. 2012 NONPARTISAN SELECTION CRITERIA
The CPD's nonpartisan criteria for selecting candidates to participate in the 2012 general election presidential debates are:
1. EVIDENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL ELIGIBILITY
The CPD's first criterion requires satisfaction of the eligibility requirements of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution. The requirements are satisfied if the candidate:
a. is at least 35 years of age;
b. is a Natural Born Citizen of the United States and a resident of the United States for fourteen years; and
c. is otherwise eligible under the Constitution.
2. EVIDENCE OF BALLOT ACCESS
The CPD's second criterion requires that the candidate qualify to have his/her name appear on enough state ballots to have at least a mathematical chance of securing an Electoral College majority in the 2012 general election. Under the Constitution, the candidate who receives a majority of votes in the Electoral College, at least 270 votes, is elected President regardless of the popular vote.
3. INDICATORS OF ELECTORAL SUPPORT
The CPD's third criterion requires that the candidate have a level of support of at least 15% (fifteen percent) of the national electorate as determined by five selected national public opinion polling organizations, using the average of those organizations' most recent publicly-reported results at the time of the determination.
C. APPLICATION OF CRITERIA
The CPD's determination with respect to participation in the CPD's first-scheduled debate will be made after Labor Day 2012, but sufficiently in advance of the first-scheduled debate to allow for orderly planning. Invitations to participate in the vice-presidential debate will be extended to the running mates of each of the presidential candidates qualifying for participation in the CPD's first presidential debate. Invitations to participate in the second and third of the CPD's scheduled presidential debates will be based upon satisfaction of the same multiple criteria prior to each debate.
Adopted: October 20, 2011
(http://www.debates.org/index.php?page=candidate-selection-process)
By mandating that candidates have so much support before the debates, it limits our choices as American voters and therefore continues the perpetual cycle of Republican vs Democrat. The Green Party should be invited to the televised debates and should be given equivalent screen time to reach out to the audience. By doing so, Americans can have a clearer picture of what they want in a candidate. If you are reading this and you are a Republican or Democrat supporter, please sign this petition for your friends, neighbors and family members that might not have their hearts set on a Republican or Democrat candidate. Everyone deserves representation they trust and all Americans deserve to have a choice they feel good about on Election Day.
Thank you!
Sincerely, Amanda Boerwinkle

Petition Closed
Share this petition
The Decision Makers
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on March 3, 2012