

Close the Online Loophole Allowing Animal Cruelty Videos to Spread on Social Media
The Issue
Across the UK, a disturbing trend is emerging on social media: children are filming themselves provoking animals into screaming or crying “as quickly as possible” and sharing the footage for likes, views, and peer approval. These videos are part of a wider pattern of viral cruelty challenges that reward harm with online attention.
Animal cruelty is a criminal offence — yet these videos are circulating freely, and minors involved are often “let off” because they were “influenced by a trend.” This is not just an animal welfare issue. It is a safeguarding concern, a psychological red flag, and a failure of online safety enforcement.
Why this matters now
In 2024, the UK Animal Sentience Committee (ASC) published a report warning that the Online Safety Act does not adequately protect animals from online cruelty. See the full report here
Their findings highlight a serious loophole:
- Live-streamed animal cruelty must be removed, because it is clearly illegal.
- But pre-recorded cruelty videos are NOT automatically illegal, even when they show deliberate harm.
- Platforms may only be required to remove them if the content explicitly encourages others to commit similar acts.
- The ASC warned that this gap means harmful content can continue circulating, especially when minors are involved.
- They urged the Government to amend legislation to close this loophole — but no changes have yet been made.
This means social media platforms can legally host videos of animal suffering, even when the acts shown would be criminal if committed offline.
What we are calling for
We call on social media platforms operating in the UK to:
1 . Remove all content depicting deliberate harm or distress caused to animals, including viral “challenge” trends — not just live-streamed cruelty.
2. Automatically report accounts posting such content to the RSPCA and relevant authorities, especially when minors are involved.
3. Strengthen detection systems to identify emerging cruelty trends before they spread.
4. Collaborate with UK safeguarding bodies to educate young users and parents about the seriousness of animal harm and the risks of online challenge culture.
We call on the UK Government to:
5. Close the legal loophole identified by the Animal Sentience Committee, ensuring pre-recorded animal cruelty content is treated with the same seriousness as live-streamed harm.
6. Review how animal cruelty committed by minors is handled, ensuring Youth Offending Teams and safeguarding professionals are consistently involved.
7. Strengthen enforcement under the Online Safety Act, so platforms face consequences when harmful content involving minors is allowed to circulate — including content that currently falls outside the narrow definition of “illegal priority content.”
Why this matters to all of us
Animals deserve protection.
Children deserve safeguarding.
Communities deserve better than cruelty being normalised as entertainment.
By signing this petition, you are calling for urgent action to stop the spread of animal cruelty online and to ensure that both animals and young people are protected from the harms of viral challenge culture.
Together, we can push for the changes the Animal Sentience Committee has already warned are urgently needed — and make sure this issue is no longer ignored.

166
The Issue
Across the UK, a disturbing trend is emerging on social media: children are filming themselves provoking animals into screaming or crying “as quickly as possible” and sharing the footage for likes, views, and peer approval. These videos are part of a wider pattern of viral cruelty challenges that reward harm with online attention.
Animal cruelty is a criminal offence — yet these videos are circulating freely, and minors involved are often “let off” because they were “influenced by a trend.” This is not just an animal welfare issue. It is a safeguarding concern, a psychological red flag, and a failure of online safety enforcement.
Why this matters now
In 2024, the UK Animal Sentience Committee (ASC) published a report warning that the Online Safety Act does not adequately protect animals from online cruelty. See the full report here
Their findings highlight a serious loophole:
- Live-streamed animal cruelty must be removed, because it is clearly illegal.
- But pre-recorded cruelty videos are NOT automatically illegal, even when they show deliberate harm.
- Platforms may only be required to remove them if the content explicitly encourages others to commit similar acts.
- The ASC warned that this gap means harmful content can continue circulating, especially when minors are involved.
- They urged the Government to amend legislation to close this loophole — but no changes have yet been made.
This means social media platforms can legally host videos of animal suffering, even when the acts shown would be criminal if committed offline.
What we are calling for
We call on social media platforms operating in the UK to:
1 . Remove all content depicting deliberate harm or distress caused to animals, including viral “challenge” trends — not just live-streamed cruelty.
2. Automatically report accounts posting such content to the RSPCA and relevant authorities, especially when minors are involved.
3. Strengthen detection systems to identify emerging cruelty trends before they spread.
4. Collaborate with UK safeguarding bodies to educate young users and parents about the seriousness of animal harm and the risks of online challenge culture.
We call on the UK Government to:
5. Close the legal loophole identified by the Animal Sentience Committee, ensuring pre-recorded animal cruelty content is treated with the same seriousness as live-streamed harm.
6. Review how animal cruelty committed by minors is handled, ensuring Youth Offending Teams and safeguarding professionals are consistently involved.
7. Strengthen enforcement under the Online Safety Act, so platforms face consequences when harmful content involving minors is allowed to circulate — including content that currently falls outside the narrow definition of “illegal priority content.”
Why this matters to all of us
Animals deserve protection.
Children deserve safeguarding.
Communities deserve better than cruelty being normalised as entertainment.
By signing this petition, you are calling for urgent action to stop the spread of animal cruelty online and to ensure that both animals and young people are protected from the harms of viral challenge culture.
Together, we can push for the changes the Animal Sentience Committee has already warned are urgently needed — and make sure this issue is no longer ignored.

The Decision Makers
Supporter Voices
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on 8 July 2026