SUPPORT Holly's fundraiser for Ester; and petition for SAFETY for PETS on the Spirit!
The issue
Thanks to everyone! We now have 11,330 signatures.
Also, Holly is raising funds to help her continue the search for Ester: https://bit.ly/2N3GlBw
Today the TT Line's CEO responded to our letter. The team overseeing the letter is not sure that everything we asked to be addressed has been addressed. If you wish to comment, please write to: petition.ester@gmail.com
We have posted the response here and we'll see if the full PDF can be added.
The response was received on 12 April 2021:
Dear Dr Caney
petition.ester@gmail.com
Thank you for forwarding your petition regarding Spirit of Tasmania passenger Holly Alexander and her pet dog Ester.
I appreciate you sharing your concerns about the transport of pets on board Spirit of Tasmania and I will endeavour to respond to your questions and comments.
Firstly though, I would like to emphasise that we take our responsibility for the safe transport of pets very seriously and appreciate the seriousness of this issue. Our employees understand how important pets are to their owners. This is reflected in our approach to the welfare and safety of animals on board.
While I note you did not want me to provide long-term performance statistics when it comes to the safe transport of animals on board our vessels, it does provide important context to petitioners and the broader community.
Since July 2018, Spirit of Tasmania has safely transported more than 32,000 pets. This illustrates just how rarely incidents, like the one with Ester, actually occur.
TT-Line has invested considerable time, effort and internal resources to assist with search efforts and to support Holly.
Our General Manager Marine Operations and other senior staff have been in regular communication with Holly. In addition to speaking directly with our passengers via SMS, email and social media, the Company spoke to relevant local councils in Tasmania and Victoria, dog homes in both states and Victoria and Tasmania Police. We remain in contact with these organisations and will work with them in whatever way is appropriate going forward.
The Company has conducted a thorough investigation into the matter. A comprehensive risk assessment was also conducted – in fact, it is a normal standard operating procedure to regularly conduct risk assessments of all of our operations.
As to your queries around the pet accommodation rules and conditions on board our vessels, they are too detailed to provide in this correspondence, but are fully explained online at https://www.spiritoftasmania.com.au/terms-and-conditions/pets-and-kennels
In response to your questions regarding plans to improve pet accommodation on the current or new vessels, while we are still finalising contracts for the construction of new vessels, significant improvements regarding pet accommodation are well planned.
We have briefed and will work with the RSPCA in Tasmania on our plans and take account of its recommendations going forward.
In the meantime, we have been working – and will continue to work - with the RSPCA to keep improving our pet accommodation on the current Spirit of Tasmania vessels.
Finally, in relation to your query about pet owners leaving the vessel first in their vehicle, this would be both physically and logistically impossible and cannot be considered.
Once again, thank you for bringing this petition to my attention. Yours sincerely
Bernard Dwyer
Chief Executive Officer TT-Line Company Pty Ltd
_______________________________________________
Our letter to Mr Dwyer was sent on Sunday 21 March 2021.
The letter to Mr Dwyer is long and covers a lot of information. It has taken the lead quite some time to complete and finalise. In addition, a data analyst has put in a lot of time. And a small team has provided advice and proofing. Thank you to everyone. We will post the response here as soon as we can.
The letter is below and in the letter section of this platform, but I am not sure how much will show up. It may be too long.
Dear Mr Dwyer
RE: Petition relating to a pet that went missing on TT-Line’s Spirit of Tasmania
We are a small team of people who have been managing a petition about a beloved pet dog called Ester. Holly Alexander reported that her dearly loved Ester went missing on the Spirit of Tasmania when it travelled from Devonport to Hobart on the night of 25 January 2021.
Please note that this team is taking on the role of petition management as citizens of Tasmania and not as part of any businesses we may run, or any employment as professional people.
We are writing to present you with a petition signed by over 11 000 people who are concerned about the fact that a pet that went missing on the Spirit of Tasmania – that this is even possible on a well-run ship.
Figure 1
The petition platform “Change.Org” (which was used to collect the electronic signatures of the petitioners) provides a breakdown of the countries and suburbs of the signatories. Our volunteer analyst checked the figures and provided the pie chart in Figure 1. This chart was created when the petition had around 10 500 signatures. The petition has since been signed by over 11 000 people and our data analyst assures us that the trends at this level would be substantially the same.
We can advise that approximately 92 per cent of the signatories are from Australia.
The fact that so many Australians have signed this petition is noteworthy because the only other petition we have ever managed had a large number of international signatures because some significant lobbyists became involved. We cannot see any evidence of this in the petition being presented to you.
You will note that of that 92 per cent of signatures
· 32 per cent are from Tasmania
· 29 per cent are from Tasmania
· 14 per cent are from New South Wales
· 14 per cent are from Queensland
· Six per cent are from South Australia
· Four per cent are from Western Australia
· One per cent are from the Australian Capital Territory, and
· Less than one per cent are from the Northern Territory.
· Of note as well are one signature from an Australian Naval Vessel and one from Christmas Island.
We have removed the names of the signatories, but we have retained postcodes, suburbs, State or Territory, and Country.
The comments are attached but some have had to be redacted because some people have become overly impassioned. A summary of comments made can be found below in Figure 2.
Figure 2
Many of the comments include those who say they will boycott the Spirit in protest and/or will never travel with their pets on the ship. This is an unfortunate perception to be shadowing one of Tasmania’s principal tourist operators.
Overwhelmingly, petitioners would like to convey to the TT-Line is that in the Twenty First Century, people see their pets as members of families, not common animals. Many have mentioned legislation that enshrines the sentience of animals in law. Countries that have explicitly recognized animal sentience in legislation include France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden and Tanzania. While every state and territory in Australia does not have that legislation yet, New Zealand does, and it is only a matter of time before it is adopted nationally by Australia.
In an article published in 2019, “A Review of Australian Animal Welfare Legislation, Regulation, Codes of Practice, and Policy, and Their Influence on Stakeholders Caring for Wildlife and the Animals for Whom They Care”, written by Bruce Englefield, Simone A. Blackman, Melissa Starling, and Paul D. McGreevy, the authors note:
Australia is set to follow [countries in Africa] and Europe, [as well as] New Zealand, and Canada in recognising, for the first time in animal welfare legislation, that animals have sentience, i.e., the ability to have feelings such as pain and, pleasure and the ability to suffer. The ACT [Australian Capital Territory] is leading other states and territories in introducing this concept in the Animal Welfare Legislation Amendment Bill (ACT) 2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6616407/
For further information about the swiftly evolving public attitudes towards the sentience of animals, please see the following articles:
New Zealand
Australian Capital Territory
In the article linked above, published by The Conversation, the author notes:
The ACT is the first Australian jurisdiction to recognise animal sentience, but many other countries have already done so.
The European Union first recognised animal sentience in 1997 in the Treaty of Amsterdam. And it was recognised by New Zealand in 2015 in its Animal Welfare Act 1999, and by Quebec in a 2015 amendment to its Civil Code.
The international organisation World Animal Protection views animal sentience recognition as so important it’s the first indicator in its Animal Protection Index, which ranks 50 countries on the basis of their legal and policy commitments to animals.
For animals in Australia, legal recognition of their sentience is a small but important step forward because it indicates a shift in thinking about the relationships between humans and animals.
Although animals’ ability to feel emotions may seem self-evident, historically the law has categorised animals as property. In other words, a dog is no more a legal person than the bed she is lying on.
While recognising animal sentience does not mean animals are persons under the law, it does represent a shift away from categorising them as property.
This significant shift away from categorising them simply as property is essentially the reason why petitioners have bene so ardent in the comments that have accompanied their signatures of this petition.
The attitudes of both Australian and international travellers are most definitely changing towards their view of pets, and their requirement that pet accommodation and/or attitudes to pets be respectful whether pets are travelling on public transport or other modes of travel.
For instance, see these reports:
· Public Transport in Brisbane: https://www.mustdobrisbane.com/dogs/brisbane-buses-go-pet-friendly
· Dog and Pet Friendly ferries:
o https://dogfriendlytravel.com/dfds-dog-friendly-ferry-cabins/
o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwk9i9IPTFg&feature=youtu.be
o https://www.brittany-ferries.co.uk/information/pet-travel/onboard-kennels-and-pet-friendly-cabins
o https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#search/james/FMfcgxwLsSZhgpKznQwsCMSHvvnmqHQf?projector=1
In addition, there is currently another Change.Org petition about “Domestic Carry On Travel With Pets in Australia” - https://www.change.org/p/australian-parliament-domestic-carry-on-travel-with-pets-in-aus Clearly Australians are really focusing on their desire to ensure the safety of their pets when travelling.
We hope you have found this information useful but, as you’re aware, the primary focus of this letter and the petition is Holly Alexander and her pet dog, Ester. In addition, other petitioners have reported unwelcome outcomes in regard to their pets.
As well as finding out what the TT-Line might be able to do for Ester and her owner, and what the TT-Line might be willing to do to improve its pet accommodation, we think an important role of the petition is to inform over 11 000 signatories about some of the myths around this incident. We would like to be able to send an update to the petitioners once we receive your response.
What petitioners would like to know are answers to the following questions.
We have divided petitioners’ questions into three sections with a template provided for your replies.
Questions around assisting Holly Alexander and her pet, Ester
1. The petitioners believe that the TT-Line should assist Holly with offering a reward even if this is done as an anonymous donation. She believes the dog may have been stolen. Many petitioners believe that this is one logical conclusion. The calibre of person may be swayed by a reward and we would urge the TT-Line to show good faith by either donating publicly or anonymously. The fundraiser can be found at: https://bit.ly/2N3GlBw
Petitioners would like to know if the TT-Line would be willing to do this, and if not, why not.
2. Petitioners would like to know if all that can be done has been done to assist Holly in her investigations as to how Ester could possibly escape, and if not, why not.
Questions around understanding the current arrangements on the Spirit for pet accommodation
3. What are the options for transport of a pet on the ferry? Is one able to leave a pet locked inside one’s own car? Do Spirit staff provide a lock for cages, or is the pet owner expected to provide that, or are locks prohibited so as to enable ready access if a fire or other emergency occurs?
4. Are pet owners able to visit their pets during the voyage? If not, how often are pets visited by TT-Line staff?
5. Is there any closed-circuit television (CCTV) around the pet accommodation?
6. What steps has the Spirit taken in regard to ascertaining how Ester escaped her cage and how she remains unfound? Is it possible she escaped the zone where pets and cars are stored and leapt overboard?
7. Are any travellers/guests able to access the vehicle area during the voyage?
8. Has a robust risk assessment been conducted for the Spirit’s pet transport? If so, were the risks mitigated against, and is a risk register being maintained?
9. Has the TT-Line conducted a culture check of the attitudes of staff members towards pets to ensure that travellers can be assured that their pet will be treated with care and decency?
10. Is there a system that allows pet owners to exit the ship in their vehicle before other travellers to ensure that pets who may have been stressed by the journey can leave the ship swiftly to attend to the needs of their pet/s?
Questions around plans to improve pet accommodation on the Spirit and other TT-Line ships
The remaining queries are about improvements to pet accommodation.
11. Is it possible to install electronic locks for all pet cages with swipe cards for owners, along with an automated mechanism that enables all locks to release in the case of fire or emergency? If not, why not?
12. Has there been a study to ensure that there is no build-up of fumes in the area where pets are accommodated?
13. If there is no current CCTV trained 24/7 on the pet accommodation, can that be installed immediately? If not, why not?
14. Current technology would allow for pet owners to have WIFI access to each accommodation unit via a simply installed accommodation camera. Are there any plans for such a modification? If not, why not?
15. Is there a protocol that covers how to swiftly track any pet who escapes from its transit accommodation? If not, why not?
16. If a pet is lost or believed to be stolen, is there any current protocol or way to search traveller’s cars and caravans to seek out a stolen pet? If not, why not please?
17. Are there plans for the installation of safe pet accommodation in the future?
18. Are there plans to introduce the option for pet-friendly cabins in the future?
19. Are there decent pet-friendly exercise areas at both docking areas so that pet owners can take their pets for a run before and after the voyage?
People all around Australia and beyond have contacted the people managing the petition via email. They all report suffering vicariously because they understand how utterly unexpected and devastating this situation is for Holly and Ester. The comments attached with this letter clearly demonstrate how much anguish people are feeling.
We would appreciate a thorough response from the TT-Line.
So that the team managing the petition can inform the petitioners, please respond to these questions by close of business on Friday 9 April 2021.
Please let us know if you require any further information.
11,357
The issue
Thanks to everyone! We now have 11,330 signatures.
Also, Holly is raising funds to help her continue the search for Ester: https://bit.ly/2N3GlBw
Today the TT Line's CEO responded to our letter. The team overseeing the letter is not sure that everything we asked to be addressed has been addressed. If you wish to comment, please write to: petition.ester@gmail.com
We have posted the response here and we'll see if the full PDF can be added.
The response was received on 12 April 2021:
Dear Dr Caney
petition.ester@gmail.com
Thank you for forwarding your petition regarding Spirit of Tasmania passenger Holly Alexander and her pet dog Ester.
I appreciate you sharing your concerns about the transport of pets on board Spirit of Tasmania and I will endeavour to respond to your questions and comments.
Firstly though, I would like to emphasise that we take our responsibility for the safe transport of pets very seriously and appreciate the seriousness of this issue. Our employees understand how important pets are to their owners. This is reflected in our approach to the welfare and safety of animals on board.
While I note you did not want me to provide long-term performance statistics when it comes to the safe transport of animals on board our vessels, it does provide important context to petitioners and the broader community.
Since July 2018, Spirit of Tasmania has safely transported more than 32,000 pets. This illustrates just how rarely incidents, like the one with Ester, actually occur.
TT-Line has invested considerable time, effort and internal resources to assist with search efforts and to support Holly.
Our General Manager Marine Operations and other senior staff have been in regular communication with Holly. In addition to speaking directly with our passengers via SMS, email and social media, the Company spoke to relevant local councils in Tasmania and Victoria, dog homes in both states and Victoria and Tasmania Police. We remain in contact with these organisations and will work with them in whatever way is appropriate going forward.
The Company has conducted a thorough investigation into the matter. A comprehensive risk assessment was also conducted – in fact, it is a normal standard operating procedure to regularly conduct risk assessments of all of our operations.
As to your queries around the pet accommodation rules and conditions on board our vessels, they are too detailed to provide in this correspondence, but are fully explained online at https://www.spiritoftasmania.com.au/terms-and-conditions/pets-and-kennels
In response to your questions regarding plans to improve pet accommodation on the current or new vessels, while we are still finalising contracts for the construction of new vessels, significant improvements regarding pet accommodation are well planned.
We have briefed and will work with the RSPCA in Tasmania on our plans and take account of its recommendations going forward.
In the meantime, we have been working – and will continue to work - with the RSPCA to keep improving our pet accommodation on the current Spirit of Tasmania vessels.
Finally, in relation to your query about pet owners leaving the vessel first in their vehicle, this would be both physically and logistically impossible and cannot be considered.
Once again, thank you for bringing this petition to my attention. Yours sincerely
Bernard Dwyer
Chief Executive Officer TT-Line Company Pty Ltd
_______________________________________________
Our letter to Mr Dwyer was sent on Sunday 21 March 2021.
The letter to Mr Dwyer is long and covers a lot of information. It has taken the lead quite some time to complete and finalise. In addition, a data analyst has put in a lot of time. And a small team has provided advice and proofing. Thank you to everyone. We will post the response here as soon as we can.
The letter is below and in the letter section of this platform, but I am not sure how much will show up. It may be too long.
Dear Mr Dwyer
RE: Petition relating to a pet that went missing on TT-Line’s Spirit of Tasmania
We are a small team of people who have been managing a petition about a beloved pet dog called Ester. Holly Alexander reported that her dearly loved Ester went missing on the Spirit of Tasmania when it travelled from Devonport to Hobart on the night of 25 January 2021.
Please note that this team is taking on the role of petition management as citizens of Tasmania and not as part of any businesses we may run, or any employment as professional people.
We are writing to present you with a petition signed by over 11 000 people who are concerned about the fact that a pet that went missing on the Spirit of Tasmania – that this is even possible on a well-run ship.
Figure 1
The petition platform “Change.Org” (which was used to collect the electronic signatures of the petitioners) provides a breakdown of the countries and suburbs of the signatories. Our volunteer analyst checked the figures and provided the pie chart in Figure 1. This chart was created when the petition had around 10 500 signatures. The petition has since been signed by over 11 000 people and our data analyst assures us that the trends at this level would be substantially the same.
We can advise that approximately 92 per cent of the signatories are from Australia.
The fact that so many Australians have signed this petition is noteworthy because the only other petition we have ever managed had a large number of international signatures because some significant lobbyists became involved. We cannot see any evidence of this in the petition being presented to you.
You will note that of that 92 per cent of signatures
· 32 per cent are from Tasmania
· 29 per cent are from Tasmania
· 14 per cent are from New South Wales
· 14 per cent are from Queensland
· Six per cent are from South Australia
· Four per cent are from Western Australia
· One per cent are from the Australian Capital Territory, and
· Less than one per cent are from the Northern Territory.
· Of note as well are one signature from an Australian Naval Vessel and one from Christmas Island.
We have removed the names of the signatories, but we have retained postcodes, suburbs, State or Territory, and Country.
The comments are attached but some have had to be redacted because some people have become overly impassioned. A summary of comments made can be found below in Figure 2.
Figure 2
Many of the comments include those who say they will boycott the Spirit in protest and/or will never travel with their pets on the ship. This is an unfortunate perception to be shadowing one of Tasmania’s principal tourist operators.
Overwhelmingly, petitioners would like to convey to the TT-Line is that in the Twenty First Century, people see their pets as members of families, not common animals. Many have mentioned legislation that enshrines the sentience of animals in law. Countries that have explicitly recognized animal sentience in legislation include France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden and Tanzania. While every state and territory in Australia does not have that legislation yet, New Zealand does, and it is only a matter of time before it is adopted nationally by Australia.
In an article published in 2019, “A Review of Australian Animal Welfare Legislation, Regulation, Codes of Practice, and Policy, and Their Influence on Stakeholders Caring for Wildlife and the Animals for Whom They Care”, written by Bruce Englefield, Simone A. Blackman, Melissa Starling, and Paul D. McGreevy, the authors note:
Australia is set to follow [countries in Africa] and Europe, [as well as] New Zealand, and Canada in recognising, for the first time in animal welfare legislation, that animals have sentience, i.e., the ability to have feelings such as pain and, pleasure and the ability to suffer. The ACT [Australian Capital Territory] is leading other states and territories in introducing this concept in the Animal Welfare Legislation Amendment Bill (ACT) 2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6616407/
For further information about the swiftly evolving public attitudes towards the sentience of animals, please see the following articles:
New Zealand
Australian Capital Territory
In the article linked above, published by The Conversation, the author notes:
The ACT is the first Australian jurisdiction to recognise animal sentience, but many other countries have already done so.
The European Union first recognised animal sentience in 1997 in the Treaty of Amsterdam. And it was recognised by New Zealand in 2015 in its Animal Welfare Act 1999, and by Quebec in a 2015 amendment to its Civil Code.
The international organisation World Animal Protection views animal sentience recognition as so important it’s the first indicator in its Animal Protection Index, which ranks 50 countries on the basis of their legal and policy commitments to animals.
For animals in Australia, legal recognition of their sentience is a small but important step forward because it indicates a shift in thinking about the relationships between humans and animals.
Although animals’ ability to feel emotions may seem self-evident, historically the law has categorised animals as property. In other words, a dog is no more a legal person than the bed she is lying on.
While recognising animal sentience does not mean animals are persons under the law, it does represent a shift away from categorising them as property.
This significant shift away from categorising them simply as property is essentially the reason why petitioners have bene so ardent in the comments that have accompanied their signatures of this petition.
The attitudes of both Australian and international travellers are most definitely changing towards their view of pets, and their requirement that pet accommodation and/or attitudes to pets be respectful whether pets are travelling on public transport or other modes of travel.
For instance, see these reports:
· Public Transport in Brisbane: https://www.mustdobrisbane.com/dogs/brisbane-buses-go-pet-friendly
· Dog and Pet Friendly ferries:
o https://dogfriendlytravel.com/dfds-dog-friendly-ferry-cabins/
o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwk9i9IPTFg&feature=youtu.be
o https://www.brittany-ferries.co.uk/information/pet-travel/onboard-kennels-and-pet-friendly-cabins
o https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#search/james/FMfcgxwLsSZhgpKznQwsCMSHvvnmqHQf?projector=1
In addition, there is currently another Change.Org petition about “Domestic Carry On Travel With Pets in Australia” - https://www.change.org/p/australian-parliament-domestic-carry-on-travel-with-pets-in-aus Clearly Australians are really focusing on their desire to ensure the safety of their pets when travelling.
We hope you have found this information useful but, as you’re aware, the primary focus of this letter and the petition is Holly Alexander and her pet dog, Ester. In addition, other petitioners have reported unwelcome outcomes in regard to their pets.
As well as finding out what the TT-Line might be able to do for Ester and her owner, and what the TT-Line might be willing to do to improve its pet accommodation, we think an important role of the petition is to inform over 11 000 signatories about some of the myths around this incident. We would like to be able to send an update to the petitioners once we receive your response.
What petitioners would like to know are answers to the following questions.
We have divided petitioners’ questions into three sections with a template provided for your replies.
Questions around assisting Holly Alexander and her pet, Ester
1. The petitioners believe that the TT-Line should assist Holly with offering a reward even if this is done as an anonymous donation. She believes the dog may have been stolen. Many petitioners believe that this is one logical conclusion. The calibre of person may be swayed by a reward and we would urge the TT-Line to show good faith by either donating publicly or anonymously. The fundraiser can be found at: https://bit.ly/2N3GlBw
Petitioners would like to know if the TT-Line would be willing to do this, and if not, why not.
2. Petitioners would like to know if all that can be done has been done to assist Holly in her investigations as to how Ester could possibly escape, and if not, why not.
Questions around understanding the current arrangements on the Spirit for pet accommodation
3. What are the options for transport of a pet on the ferry? Is one able to leave a pet locked inside one’s own car? Do Spirit staff provide a lock for cages, or is the pet owner expected to provide that, or are locks prohibited so as to enable ready access if a fire or other emergency occurs?
4. Are pet owners able to visit their pets during the voyage? If not, how often are pets visited by TT-Line staff?
5. Is there any closed-circuit television (CCTV) around the pet accommodation?
6. What steps has the Spirit taken in regard to ascertaining how Ester escaped her cage and how she remains unfound? Is it possible she escaped the zone where pets and cars are stored and leapt overboard?
7. Are any travellers/guests able to access the vehicle area during the voyage?
8. Has a robust risk assessment been conducted for the Spirit’s pet transport? If so, were the risks mitigated against, and is a risk register being maintained?
9. Has the TT-Line conducted a culture check of the attitudes of staff members towards pets to ensure that travellers can be assured that their pet will be treated with care and decency?
10. Is there a system that allows pet owners to exit the ship in their vehicle before other travellers to ensure that pets who may have been stressed by the journey can leave the ship swiftly to attend to the needs of their pet/s?
Questions around plans to improve pet accommodation on the Spirit and other TT-Line ships
The remaining queries are about improvements to pet accommodation.
11. Is it possible to install electronic locks for all pet cages with swipe cards for owners, along with an automated mechanism that enables all locks to release in the case of fire or emergency? If not, why not?
12. Has there been a study to ensure that there is no build-up of fumes in the area where pets are accommodated?
13. If there is no current CCTV trained 24/7 on the pet accommodation, can that be installed immediately? If not, why not?
14. Current technology would allow for pet owners to have WIFI access to each accommodation unit via a simply installed accommodation camera. Are there any plans for such a modification? If not, why not?
15. Is there a protocol that covers how to swiftly track any pet who escapes from its transit accommodation? If not, why not?
16. If a pet is lost or believed to be stolen, is there any current protocol or way to search traveller’s cars and caravans to seek out a stolen pet? If not, why not please?
17. Are there plans for the installation of safe pet accommodation in the future?
18. Are there plans to introduce the option for pet-friendly cabins in the future?
19. Are there decent pet-friendly exercise areas at both docking areas so that pet owners can take their pets for a run before and after the voyage?
People all around Australia and beyond have contacted the people managing the petition via email. They all report suffering vicariously because they understand how utterly unexpected and devastating this situation is for Holly and Ester. The comments attached with this letter clearly demonstrate how much anguish people are feeling.
We would appreciate a thorough response from the TT-Line.
So that the team managing the petition can inform the petitioners, please respond to these questions by close of business on Friday 9 April 2021.
Please let us know if you require any further information.
The Decision Makers
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on 28 January 2021