Pet Insurers Pre-Existing Condition Unfair Exclusions

The Issue

Too many people take out pet insurance to safeguard their pets against illness or accident, only to find that insurance companies avoid payment by deeming unrelated incidents involving the same limb/body part as a pre-existing condition.  This blanket exclusion is unfair and is opinion based not evidence based.  The burden of proof should rest with the insurer and not the customer.  

This petition had 172 supporters

The Issue

Too many people take out pet insurance to safeguard their pets against illness or accident, only to find that insurance companies avoid payment by deeming unrelated incidents involving the same limb/body part as a pre-existing condition.  This blanket exclusion is unfair and is opinion based not evidence based.  The burden of proof should rest with the insurer and not the customer.  

The Decision Makers

Prudential Regulatory Authority
Prudential Regulatory Authority
Petition updates
Share this petition
Petition created on 30 July 2020