Ban private prisons in Colorado!

The Issue

I am a Metropolitan State University student in Colorado; my name is Karina P. Ladrón de Guevara, and I have studied criminal justice since high school. Now, I am close to obtaining my bachelor's degree in the same major. I feel a strong connection to criminal justice because I believe in a system that should be fair and equal, one whose ultimate goal is to rehabilitate and reintegrate those who have made mistakes into society. However, this vision is undermined by the existence of private prisons, which operate under an entirely different philosophy—one focused on profit rather than justice.

Private prisons in the United States have expanded significantly since the 1980s, largely due to overcrowding caused by policies such as the war on drugs and three-strikes laws. These harsh sentencing measures filled federal and state prisons beyond capacity, forcing the government to seek alternatives. Rather than investing in rehabilitative efforts, the U.S. turned to privatized incarceration, outsourcing prison management to corporations in an effort to alleviate costs. However, this approach compromised the quality of incarceration, shifting the focus from justice and rehabilitation to profit-making.

While proponents argue that privatization reduces costs, studies show minimal financial benefits. For example, Colorado taxpayers spend $67 million annually to sustain the state's two privately owned correctional facilities—funds that could be better allocated toward education, community programs, and rehabilitation efforts. Despite the high costs, private prisons provide inferior conditions compared to federally managed facilities. Private prison inmates experience lower-quality healthcare, limited access to educational opportunities, and inadequate mental health resources. These institutions function more as business ventures than centers for rehabilitation, treating incarcerated individuals as commodities rather than people.

Beyond financial concerns, private prisons contribute to the cycle of recidivism rather than reducing it. Studies have shown that incarceration in private prisons increases the risk of recidivism by nearly 20%, meaning that individuals who serve time in these facilities are more likely to end up back behind bars. These corporations fail to prepare inmates for reintegration, as their primary objective is maximizing profit—not rehabilitation. Unlike federal correctional facilities, which provide educational and work programs, private prisons limit opportunities for self-improvement. When people exit the system without support or life skills, they are far more likely to reoffend, perpetuating a cycle that benefits corporations but damages communities.

Additionally, while some cost-saving measures have been cited as reasons to maintain private prisons, their overall financial advantage is questionable. A study from the University of Utah analyzed multiple private prisons across the country and found that privately managed facilities showed financial advantages only 50% of the time, while publicly managed ones were beneficial 25% of the time. However, the average cost savings across all studies was a mere 2.2% in favor of privately run prisons—an insignificant difference when compared to the human rights violations, lack of rehabilitation, and increased rates of recidivism in private facilities.

At its core, private incarceration places profits above people—a reality that directly contradicts the principles of fair and just punishment. We would never tolerate profit incentives for judges, public defenders, or prosecutors, yet we allow corporations to profit from human suffering in the prison system. The idea that justice should be bought and sold is a deep betrayal of our societal values, stripping away dignity, second chances, and opportunities for redemption.

If we truly believe in a just system, one that focuses on rehabilitation rather than perpetuating punishment, then we must abolish private prisons. The evidence is clear: these facilities do not serve the interests of the incarcerated, the public, or the justice system. They fail at rehabilitation, fail at cost-effectiveness, and fail to promote justice in any meaningful way. The criminal justice system should heal, correct, and restore, not warehouse human beings for corporate gain. We must fight for integrity and fairness, and that begins with ending private prisons once and for all.

References:

Dougherty, M. (2022, March 13). Opinion: End private prisons in Colorado. The Colorado Sun. https://coloradosun.com/2022/03/13/colorado-private-prisons-eliminate-department-corrections-opinion/

Lundahl, B. W., Van Vleet, R., Harris, N., Brownell, C., & Kunz, C. (2009, July). Prison privatization: A Meta-Analysis of Cost Effectiveness and Quality of Confinement Indicators. Research on Social Work Practice. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237447570_Prison_Privatization_A_Meta-Analysis_of_Cost_Effectiveness_and_Quality_of_Confinement_Indicators

Mamun, S., Li, X., Horn, B. P., & Chermak, J. M. (2020). Private vs. public prisons? A dynamic analysis of the long-term tradeoffs between cost-efficiency and recidivism in the US prison system. Applied Economics, 52(41), 4499–4511. https://doi-org.aurarialibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1736501

10

The Issue

I am a Metropolitan State University student in Colorado; my name is Karina P. Ladrón de Guevara, and I have studied criminal justice since high school. Now, I am close to obtaining my bachelor's degree in the same major. I feel a strong connection to criminal justice because I believe in a system that should be fair and equal, one whose ultimate goal is to rehabilitate and reintegrate those who have made mistakes into society. However, this vision is undermined by the existence of private prisons, which operate under an entirely different philosophy—one focused on profit rather than justice.

Private prisons in the United States have expanded significantly since the 1980s, largely due to overcrowding caused by policies such as the war on drugs and three-strikes laws. These harsh sentencing measures filled federal and state prisons beyond capacity, forcing the government to seek alternatives. Rather than investing in rehabilitative efforts, the U.S. turned to privatized incarceration, outsourcing prison management to corporations in an effort to alleviate costs. However, this approach compromised the quality of incarceration, shifting the focus from justice and rehabilitation to profit-making.

While proponents argue that privatization reduces costs, studies show minimal financial benefits. For example, Colorado taxpayers spend $67 million annually to sustain the state's two privately owned correctional facilities—funds that could be better allocated toward education, community programs, and rehabilitation efforts. Despite the high costs, private prisons provide inferior conditions compared to federally managed facilities. Private prison inmates experience lower-quality healthcare, limited access to educational opportunities, and inadequate mental health resources. These institutions function more as business ventures than centers for rehabilitation, treating incarcerated individuals as commodities rather than people.

Beyond financial concerns, private prisons contribute to the cycle of recidivism rather than reducing it. Studies have shown that incarceration in private prisons increases the risk of recidivism by nearly 20%, meaning that individuals who serve time in these facilities are more likely to end up back behind bars. These corporations fail to prepare inmates for reintegration, as their primary objective is maximizing profit—not rehabilitation. Unlike federal correctional facilities, which provide educational and work programs, private prisons limit opportunities for self-improvement. When people exit the system without support or life skills, they are far more likely to reoffend, perpetuating a cycle that benefits corporations but damages communities.

Additionally, while some cost-saving measures have been cited as reasons to maintain private prisons, their overall financial advantage is questionable. A study from the University of Utah analyzed multiple private prisons across the country and found that privately managed facilities showed financial advantages only 50% of the time, while publicly managed ones were beneficial 25% of the time. However, the average cost savings across all studies was a mere 2.2% in favor of privately run prisons—an insignificant difference when compared to the human rights violations, lack of rehabilitation, and increased rates of recidivism in private facilities.

At its core, private incarceration places profits above people—a reality that directly contradicts the principles of fair and just punishment. We would never tolerate profit incentives for judges, public defenders, or prosecutors, yet we allow corporations to profit from human suffering in the prison system. The idea that justice should be bought and sold is a deep betrayal of our societal values, stripping away dignity, second chances, and opportunities for redemption.

If we truly believe in a just system, one that focuses on rehabilitation rather than perpetuating punishment, then we must abolish private prisons. The evidence is clear: these facilities do not serve the interests of the incarcerated, the public, or the justice system. They fail at rehabilitation, fail at cost-effectiveness, and fail to promote justice in any meaningful way. The criminal justice system should heal, correct, and restore, not warehouse human beings for corporate gain. We must fight for integrity and fairness, and that begins with ending private prisons once and for all.

References:

Dougherty, M. (2022, March 13). Opinion: End private prisons in Colorado. The Colorado Sun. https://coloradosun.com/2022/03/13/colorado-private-prisons-eliminate-department-corrections-opinion/

Lundahl, B. W., Van Vleet, R., Harris, N., Brownell, C., & Kunz, C. (2009, July). Prison privatization: A Meta-Analysis of Cost Effectiveness and Quality of Confinement Indicators. Research on Social Work Practice. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237447570_Prison_Privatization_A_Meta-Analysis_of_Cost_Effectiveness_and_Quality_of_Confinement_Indicators

Mamun, S., Li, X., Horn, B. P., & Chermak, J. M. (2020). Private vs. public prisons? A dynamic analysis of the long-term tradeoffs between cost-efficiency and recidivism in the US prison system. Applied Economics, 52(41), 4499–4511. https://doi-org.aurarialibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1736501

The Decision Makers

John R. Dacey and Robert E. Craig
John R. Dacey and Robert E. Craig
www.abolishprivateprisons.org

Petition Updates

Share this petition

Petition created on May 1, 2025