BAAQMD - DO NOT BAN Natural Gas

Recent signers:
Erin Benford and 15 others have signed recently.

The Issue

🚨 They’re coming for your gas appliances — and your wallet.

A financial storm is brewing for working families, and I’m not exempt — I’ll be impacted too. Most homes with 100-amp service will require an upgrade to 200 amps to comply with electrification mandates. It’s a significant cost and logistical hurdle, especially for older homes. 

Consider a complete retrenching and panel upgrade project for your home that will be very expensive. In the Bay Area, PG&E upgrades can take months or even years, and panel upgrades may require transformer upgrades—especially in older neighborhoods. 

In short: BAAQMD needs to rescind Rules 9.4 & 9.6

It’s time to stand up. Join me in fighting back against this expensive ill-conceived mandate.

Our voices matter. Let’s make them heard.

——-DETAILS——-

Let me be blunt: A sweeping ban is coming to every Bay Area (9 counties) household. Starting in 2027, natural gas water heaters and furnaces will be outlawed. Soon after, perhaps your gas stove, oven, and dryer. 

This isn’t a warning — it’s already passed. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) has passed a sweeping regulation....

If your gas equipment breaks, you won’t be allowed to replace it. You’ll be forced to switch to electric — whether your home is ready or not.

And most aren’t.

This policy is quietly triggering a financial crisis for working families. The required electrical upgrades—rewiring homes, upgrading panels, trenching new lines—can cost anywhere from $30,000 to over $100,000 per home. That’s outrageous. That’s unaffordable. And that’s unacceptable.

Many families simply won’t be able to afford it. Some will be left without hot water or heat.

This isn’t just bad policy — it’s economic cruelty.  A mandate forcing gas-to-electric conversions would be catastrophic, imposing enormous costs on homeowners, renters, small businesses, and housing providers. A 2021 study estimated that replacing appliances and upgrading electrical systems could cost thousands to hundreds of thousands per property—costs that have likely increased due to inflation. Housing providers would struggle to absorb these expenses and would have no choice but to raise rents, further burdening tenants. 

If we don’t act now, thousands of Bay Area homeowners, renters, and small businesses will be forced into costly, disruptive retrofits. 

We support clean energy. But we must transition the right way—with incentives, infrastructure upgrades, and real planning, not mandates that ignore the realities families face, along with the cost and complexity of electrification upgrades.

We cannot stay silent. We must defend our right to choose what works for our homes and our families. I’m calling on all Bay Area residents—share your stories on NextDoor on Whatsapp on WeChat, speak up, and join us. Let’s show the BAAQMD that we are not against clean energy, but we are against unfair, extreme policies that hurt people.

We need collaboration, not coercion. We need solutions, not punishments.

Let’s build a better, more affordable future—together.

🗳 Join the movement

📣 Your voice matters. Let’s make it heard.

Sign the petition now and spread the word before it's too late.

Conclusion from the Document: "Electrification Case Study – August 31, 2021 https://www.samcar.org/posts/electrification-case-study/

This case study provides a detailed cost estimate for converting a home from gas to all-electric in San Mateo County. It outlines a potential cost range between $134,500 and $293,000 depending on the scope of upgrades required.

 
🔍 Key Takeaways
Massive Potential Costs:
Converting to an all-electric home can range from $134,500 to $293,000, factoring in:

Appliance upgrades (HVAC, water heater, stove, dryer)
Electrical service work (rewiring, panel upgrades, trenching, asbestos removal)
Infrastructure improvements (PG&E capping gas lines, driveway pipe replacements)
Optional/triggered upgrades (solar panels, roofing, fire sprinklers, sewer laterals)

Electric Panel Upgrade Alone:
Just upgrading a panel from 100 to 200 amps can cost $4,000 to $6,000, not including additional rewiring or utility trenching, which can add $10,000 to $30,000+ more.

Wide Range Based on Home Type:
This cost is not one-size-fits-all—it depends on the existing infrastructure and what must be replaced or upgraded. Some homes may require only a few upgrades; others may need everything listed.

Labor Is a Major Variable:
Labor costs are listed as the "most significant unknown" in the estimate, which could drive costs even higher depending on market conditions and availability of contractors.
 
🧾 Bottom Line
Home electrification mandates could place an extreme financial burden on homeowners, potentially costing up to $293,000. These costs make such mandates a serious concern for middle-class and fixed-income residents, especially if not offset by incentives or subsidies.

Rather than imposing mandates, the better path forward is a voluntary, incentive-based approach with tax credits and subsidies to support electrification in existing buildings.

avatar of the starter
Rishi KumarPetition StarterLaunched by RIshi Kumar, Saratoga CA

1,360

Recent signers:
Erin Benford and 15 others have signed recently.

The Issue

🚨 They’re coming for your gas appliances — and your wallet.

A financial storm is brewing for working families, and I’m not exempt — I’ll be impacted too. Most homes with 100-amp service will require an upgrade to 200 amps to comply with electrification mandates. It’s a significant cost and logistical hurdle, especially for older homes. 

Consider a complete retrenching and panel upgrade project for your home that will be very expensive. In the Bay Area, PG&E upgrades can take months or even years, and panel upgrades may require transformer upgrades—especially in older neighborhoods. 

In short: BAAQMD needs to rescind Rules 9.4 & 9.6

It’s time to stand up. Join me in fighting back against this expensive ill-conceived mandate.

Our voices matter. Let’s make them heard.

——-DETAILS——-

Let me be blunt: A sweeping ban is coming to every Bay Area (9 counties) household. Starting in 2027, natural gas water heaters and furnaces will be outlawed. Soon after, perhaps your gas stove, oven, and dryer. 

This isn’t a warning — it’s already passed. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) has passed a sweeping regulation....

If your gas equipment breaks, you won’t be allowed to replace it. You’ll be forced to switch to electric — whether your home is ready or not.

And most aren’t.

This policy is quietly triggering a financial crisis for working families. The required electrical upgrades—rewiring homes, upgrading panels, trenching new lines—can cost anywhere from $30,000 to over $100,000 per home. That’s outrageous. That’s unaffordable. And that’s unacceptable.

Many families simply won’t be able to afford it. Some will be left without hot water or heat.

This isn’t just bad policy — it’s economic cruelty.  A mandate forcing gas-to-electric conversions would be catastrophic, imposing enormous costs on homeowners, renters, small businesses, and housing providers. A 2021 study estimated that replacing appliances and upgrading electrical systems could cost thousands to hundreds of thousands per property—costs that have likely increased due to inflation. Housing providers would struggle to absorb these expenses and would have no choice but to raise rents, further burdening tenants. 

If we don’t act now, thousands of Bay Area homeowners, renters, and small businesses will be forced into costly, disruptive retrofits. 

We support clean energy. But we must transition the right way—with incentives, infrastructure upgrades, and real planning, not mandates that ignore the realities families face, along with the cost and complexity of electrification upgrades.

We cannot stay silent. We must defend our right to choose what works for our homes and our families. I’m calling on all Bay Area residents—share your stories on NextDoor on Whatsapp on WeChat, speak up, and join us. Let’s show the BAAQMD that we are not against clean energy, but we are against unfair, extreme policies that hurt people.

We need collaboration, not coercion. We need solutions, not punishments.

Let’s build a better, more affordable future—together.

🗳 Join the movement

📣 Your voice matters. Let’s make it heard.

Sign the petition now and spread the word before it's too late.

Conclusion from the Document: "Electrification Case Study – August 31, 2021 https://www.samcar.org/posts/electrification-case-study/

This case study provides a detailed cost estimate for converting a home from gas to all-electric in San Mateo County. It outlines a potential cost range between $134,500 and $293,000 depending on the scope of upgrades required.

 
🔍 Key Takeaways
Massive Potential Costs:
Converting to an all-electric home can range from $134,500 to $293,000, factoring in:

Appliance upgrades (HVAC, water heater, stove, dryer)
Electrical service work (rewiring, panel upgrades, trenching, asbestos removal)
Infrastructure improvements (PG&E capping gas lines, driveway pipe replacements)
Optional/triggered upgrades (solar panels, roofing, fire sprinklers, sewer laterals)

Electric Panel Upgrade Alone:
Just upgrading a panel from 100 to 200 amps can cost $4,000 to $6,000, not including additional rewiring or utility trenching, which can add $10,000 to $30,000+ more.

Wide Range Based on Home Type:
This cost is not one-size-fits-all—it depends on the existing infrastructure and what must be replaced or upgraded. Some homes may require only a few upgrades; others may need everything listed.

Labor Is a Major Variable:
Labor costs are listed as the "most significant unknown" in the estimate, which could drive costs even higher depending on market conditions and availability of contractors.
 
🧾 Bottom Line
Home electrification mandates could place an extreme financial burden on homeowners, potentially costing up to $293,000. These costs make such mandates a serious concern for middle-class and fixed-income residents, especially if not offset by incentives or subsidies.

Rather than imposing mandates, the better path forward is a voluntary, incentive-based approach with tax credits and subsidies to support electrification in existing buildings.

avatar of the starter
Rishi KumarPetition StarterLaunched by RIshi Kumar, Saratoga CA

Supporter Voices

Petition Updates

Share this petition

Petition created on July 26, 2025