Recent events have again demonstrated the consent codes referred to in my Charter Challenge and their effect on the Canadian judiciary, especially in Newfoundland and Labrador. It was revealed that a city councilman engaged in loan sharking, offering a local real estate agent a loan at a criminal interest rate. While evidence of this nature would normally trigger criminal charges, this charge also carries a consent code. The AG of Newfoundland's response has effectively said that they'll allow people to charge criminal rates of interest, provided no one complains about it. They're allowing usury, plain and simple. How can one have faith in the due process of justice when public officials turn blind eyes to evidence of blatant corruption? My suspended charter challenge that addressed these lengthy inconsistencies in the Criminal Code was supposed to take place on April 9th, 2015. Two days prior to that I was detained without charge or diagnosis and denied the ability to appear before the Supreme Court Justice to argue my case. It's less than two weeks until my appeal of my denied habeas corpus goes before the Appeal Courts of NL.