I am one of many who have been personally victimized by the misapplication of driver's license rules and regulations across various States, Counties, Cities, and Townships in our Union. This misuse is not only abusive and tyrannical but has proven deadly in some instances.

Departmental employees with alleged "qualified immunities" have become a public nuisance to men, women, and children alike. They are heavily armed, often misinformed about the laws they enforce, and pose a significant danger to the general public as they chase down and seize individuals exercising their right to travel.

The current system is flawed; it infringes upon our basic human rights - the freedom of movement being paramount among them. The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that "Everyone has the right to freedom of movement," yet we find ourselves bound by regulations that contradict this fundamental principle (United Nations General Assembly).

Additionally, I direct your attention to the following cases:

Driver: "One employed" See Davis v. Petrinovich, 112 Ala. 654, 21 South. 344, 36 L. R. A.615; Gen. St. Conn. 1902,

Employed: This signifies both the act of doing a thing and the being under contractor orders to do it. U. S. v. Morris, 14 Pet. 475, 10 L. Ed.

Letter of former Senator Wayne H. Stump wherein he wrote: 

"It has come to my attention that numerous individuals in our state have rescinded all of their contracts with the United States federal government, the State of Arizona, and each of its political subdivisions, establishing themselves as freemen under the organic national Constitution of the Republic of the United States of America. Consequently, they may be driving without auto registration, driver's license, or any other evidence of contract.

"Because many law enforcement personnel may be unaware of the contractual nature of auto registration and driver's licenses, it is conceivable that this situation may lead to confrontation between these individuals and law enforcement personnel.

"I urge you to inform yourself and your personnel about this matter as soon as possible. If you would like to be briefed by someone knowledgeable on this subject, please contact me.

"In the meantime, inasmuch as this procedure is entirely appropriate when properly carried out, I would like to be personally notified of every such instance of confrontation in order that the persons involved and the public officials involved may be apprised of the correct procedure and the appropriateness of their actions on the part of each concerned."

If one is NOT engaged in public for-hire commerce, then the State cannot regulate it, period. Therefore, it is obvious that a motor-vehicle license plate, registration, inspection, nor drivers' license is not required to exercise one's right to travel. This Senator knew it, the Supreme Court knew and publicly stated it in no uncertain terms. It is clear that the driver's license is evidence of a contract between a person and the state, and make no mistake, both fictitious persons represented be real living people.

The State issued DRIVERS LICENSE is limited to COMMERCE and nothing more. Breaking a vehicle and traffic law deemed a crime in common english means breaching a contract in commerce and the fictitious state has been offended, meaning you breached a contract which was misapplied to you. That deemed contract fraud against the People of every state in the Union

Yet no employee of any department charged with the enforcement of those rules, regulations and codes under the color of law are trained to know this fact of law.

It's time we address this issue head-on. We need your support in calling for an end to these oppressive driver's license requirements that restrict our right to travel freely within all states of our Union.

Please sign this petition today – let us reclaim our rights from those who seek to limit them unjustly!