STEP 1: 

This online petition is the first step in a two-step process. Please read the petition in its entirety and sign it online before proceeding to step two at the bottom of this page.

By signing this petition, you are taking an important first action in holding your county officials accountable and asserting your constitutional rights. Step two will guide you through printing, signing, and mailing a hard copy to your county sheriff for formal submission and lawful recognition.

___________________________________________________________________________________

IMPORTANT NOTICE!

The constitutional violations in this petition are occurring daily in all 83 county sheriff departments across the state of Michigan. The reason these violations continue is not because sheriffs or their departments possess lawful authority to commit them—it is because too few citizens are aware of the law and the truth behind it. Ignorance among the public has created an environment where abuse of power can go unchecked.

A core purpose of this petition is to help the people of Michigan learn and understand the constitutional violations being committed, and to recognize that the sheriff and their deputies do not have the lawful right to infringe upon the constitutional rights of the people. These infringements persist only because the system believes it can get away with them—largely due to a lack of informed resistance from the public.

When a critical mass of people becomes educated on these issues and realizes that their constitutional rights are being trampled daily, the tide will begin to turn. By standing up and sending this petition to their sheriff’s department as a formal demand for redress of grievances, citizens will collectively assert their authority and call their elected sheriffs to account.

We have reached a turning point where silence is no longer an option. The more people who understand their constitutional rights and take action, the more powerful our movement becomes. This petition is not just a document—it's a declaration that the people are awake, aware, and ready to restore constitutional accountability in every county across Michigan.

___________________________________________________________________________________

MOBILIZING THE PEOPLE: WHY MASS PETITIONING MATTERS

Since We the People hold the power, and since the authority of the sheriff’s badge originates from that very power granted by the people, it stands to reason that when enough people in a county send in these petitions to their county sheriff, the sheriff will be compelled to respond. They will not be able to ignore the unified voice of the people.

That being said, while we do possess this inherent authority, isolated efforts—such as one, five, ten, or even twenty-five people sending in the petition—will likely not be sufficient to provoke a meaningful response. The unfortunate reality is that such small numbers are often overlooked. However, if 1,000, 5,000, or even 10,000 to 20,000 patriots of a single county each submit this petition, the collective pressure will be undeniable. The sheriff and their department will have no choice but to acknowledge and address the concerns raised. Our power is absolute, but that power becomes amplified and enforced through unity and numbers.

This is why it is critical that we aim to have at least 10%, 15%, or ideally 20% of each county’s population participate by sending in these petitions. The greater the participation, the stronger the message—and the more likely it is that we will see action and accountability from those who have sworn an oath to serve the people.

As I’ve mentioned before, I’ve done all the legwork. I’ve conducted the research, documented the relevant constitutional violations, and compiled everything into a ready-to-use petition. All that is left for people to do is download it, print it, sign it, and send it to their county sheriff via certified mail. The process is simple, but the impact can be monumental—if enough people rise up together.

Please share this petition widely—with your neighbors, friends, coworkers, fellow assembly members, and those you worship with. Share it with anyone who cherishes liberty and wants to live without fear of unconstitutional harassment from law enforcement, particularly in regard to free travel and unjustified traffic stops. Our rights are not granted by government—they are protected by it. It’s time the sheriffs are reminded of that truth.

___________________________________________________________________________________

PETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES

REGARDING UNLAWFUL SEARCH AND SEIZURE THROUGH TRAFFIC STOPS CONDUCTED WITHOUT REASONABLE ARTICULABLE SUSPICION AND MISUSE OF EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT

To The County Sheriff

We, the undersigned citizens and lawful inhabitants of the Free State of Michigan, hereby submit this formal Petition for Redress of Grievances pursuant to our unalienable right, as secured by the First Amendment to The Constitution for the united States of America (Circa 1787). This sacred right, rooted in our nation's founding principles and reaffirmed through centuries of jurisprudence, empowers the People to hold their public servants accountable for violations of law, liberty, and trust.

We remind you, our elected Sheriff, that your primary duty is not to enforce administrative statutes or regulatory codes, but to uphold, defend, and protect the rights of the People as secured by the Constitution, Common Law, and Natural Law. Your oath binds you not to the state legislature, but to the Constitution and to the People of your county. You were not elected to serve the interests of a corporate government structure, but to stand as a constitutional officer and guardian of liberty.

___________________________________________________________________________________

I. NATURE OF THE COMPLAINT

We bring forth this formal petition in response to a pattern of conduct by County Sheriffs across Michigan’s 83 counties involving:

1. Traffic stops executed without reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime;
2. Improper and unlawful activation of emergency lights and sirens in the absence of a legally defined emergency; and
3. Violation of constitutionally protected rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.

These practices constitute ongoing and systemic violations of federal constitutional law by established U.S. Supreme Court precedents.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Lack of Injured Party Nullifies Probable Cause

It is a fundamental principle of law that for a crime to exist, there must be an injured party—one who has suffered harm, loss, or damage to person or property. If an individual has not injured another individual, has not damaged another individual’s property, and has not stolen the property of another, then no crime has been committed, and thus no injured party exists. In such instances, a law enforcement officer does not have probable cause, does not possess Reasonable Articulable Suspicion (RAS), and cannot assert even a Single Articulable Fact (SAF) indicating a crime has occurred. Without these essential elements, the officer has no lawful basis to initiate a traffic stop, no justification for a seizure under the Fourth Amendment, and no authority to detain or question the individual. Any stop under such circumstances is inherently unlawful and unconstitutional, amounting to an abuse of power and a violation of the individual’s rights.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Definition of a Crime Under Constitutional Law

It is a fundamental principle of American constitutional law—rooted in both common law and natural law—that for a crime to exist, there must be an injured party. A true crime involves a violation of natural rights, meaning there must be evidence of harm, loss, or damage to another individual or their property. The elements that define a crime under constitutional standards include:

1. A harmed individual (corpus delicti);
2. An act or omission by another person that directly caused the harm;
3. Intent or negligence leading to that harm.

If an individual has not injured another individual, has not damaged another individual’s property, and has not stolen the property of another, then no actual crime has occurred. In such circumstances, there is no victim, and therefore no probable cause, no Reasonable Articulable Suspicion (RAS), and no Single Articulable Fact (SAF) on which to lawfully initiate a stop or investigation.

Any law enforcement officer acting without these constitutional prerequisites is operating outside the bounds of lawful authority. A traffic stop based solely on statutory or code enforcement, absent an actual crime and an injured party, is a violation of the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures, and undermines the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of due process.

Such actions are not only unconstitutional, but constitute an abuse of power and a direct infringement upon the liberties of the People. We the People demand that our county sheriffs recognize and uphold this definition of a crime and refuse to enforce administrative codes that do not rise to the level of a true crime under the Constitution.

___________________________________________________________________________________

II. LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK

A. Traffic Stops as Seizures Under the Fourth Amendment

Under the Fourth Amendment, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.” A traffic stop is a “seizure” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, triggering the full protection of constitutional scrutiny.

The Supreme Court has firmly established in:

• Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), that law enforcement may only stop an individual when there exists a “reasonable articulable suspicion” that a crime is being committed, has been committed, or is about to be committed.

• Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (1979), that random or suspicionless stops of motorists are unconstitutional and violate the Fourth Amendment.

• Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996), that even pretextual stops require a lawful basis under either probable cause or reasonable suspicion.

Any deviation from these requirements is unlawful and renders the resulting detention constitutionally void ab initio.

___________________________________________________________________________________

B. Improper Use of Emergency Equipment Constitutes Misrepresentation and Unlawful Seizure

The improper use of emergency lights and sirens outside the scope of a true emergency constitutes an abuse of power and a deceptive act that misleads the public. In Michigan, this misuse violates MCL 257.603, which restricts the use of emergency equipment to situations involving:

• Immediate threats to life, health, or property,

• Active crime in progress or pursuit of a fleeing suspect, or

• Genuine emergencies involving serious injury, death, or catastrophic interference.

Absent any such emergency, activation of police emergency equipment amounts to a false signal of lawful authority, constituting a seizure without lawful justification. This deception renders the stop unconstitutional, and all derivative actions—citations, searches, arrests, or seizures—become “fruit of the poisonous tree” under Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1963).

___________________________________________________________________________________

C. Violation of Due Process Rights Under the Fourteenth Amendment

The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees due process of law, which requires that all governmental actions be conducted within constitutional bounds from the inception of any interaction. This includes:

• Lawful justification for any seizure or detention,

• Proper use of government-issued authority (e.g., emergency signals),

• Respect for the citizen’s civil rights and liberties throughout the encounter.

When a traffic stop originates from an unlawful pretense or absence of probable cause or reasonable suspicion, due process is denied from the outset. This delegitimizes the entire process—including any citation issued—and subjects the officer and department involved to potential civil liability under 42 U.S. Code § 1983 for deprivation of rights under color of law.

___________________________________________________________________________________

III. PETITIONER’S DEMANDS

In light of the foregoing, we hereby demand the following:

1. That County Sheriffs and all law enforcement personnel across Michigan’s 83 counties be immediately instructed and retrained to:

• Cease conducting traffic stops without clearly articulated and documentable reasonable suspicion;
• Refrain from using emergency lights and sirens in non-emergency scenarios contrary to state law and constitutional standards.

2. That all citations and arrests stemming from such unconstitutional stops be subject to immediate independent review and dismissal if found lacking lacking lawful foundation, probable cause, reasonable articulable suspicion (RAS), or any single articulable fact (SAF).

3. That civil liability be pursued where Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment violations are proven, including:

• Suppression of all evidence resulting from unconstitutional seizures;

• Compensatory relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for aggrieved individuals.

That an official public statement be issued by each County Sheriff affirming their oath to the Constitution and disavowing unlawful traffic enforcement practices.

___________________________________________________________________________________

IV. CONCLUSION

We affirm that liberty is not a privilege granted by the state, but a birthright given to us by the Creator and secured by the Constitution. The misuse of emergency authority, lack of lawful suspicion, and arbitrary detentions are not mere technical violations—they are direct assaults on the rights of the People.

We respectfully submit this petition not merely as a grievance, but as a declaration of our insistence that constitutional governance be restored and preserved in all traffic enforcement actions undertaken by public officers.

___________________________________________________________________________________

STEP 2: 

Please visit the link below to download the petition in PDF format. Pages 1 through 5 of the document contain clear and detailed instructions to guide you through the process of printing, autographing, and mailing a hard copy to your county sheriff for formal submission and lawful recognition.

It is important that you follow the instructions exactly as provided to ensure your petition is properly received and acknowledged. By mailing an autographed copy directly to your sheriff’s office, you are taking a lawful and constitutionally protected step toward redress of grievances and accountability within your county.

Please click the link below to download the petition, (PDF):

https://constitutionallawcoalition.com/documents/PETITION-FOR-REDRESS-OF-GRIEVANCES-COUNTY-SHERIFF.pdf

___________________________________________________________________________________

Thank you for taking the time to read and sign this petition online, and for sending a hard-signed copy to your county sheriff via U.S. Mail in order to formally petition for a redress of grievances. Your participation in this important civic action plays a vital role in holding your county sheriff accountable to the people and to the Constitution.

By lending your voice to this petition, you are helping to restore lawful governance and reaffirm the principle that elected officials must answer to the people they serve. Every signature strengthens the collective demand for transparency, integrity, and adherence to the rule of law in your county.