Decision Maker

European Commission


Does European Commission have the power to decide or influence something you want to change? Start a petition to this decision maker.Start a petition
Petitioning European Commission

Für ein EU-weites Verbot von Wildtieren im Zirkus

Am Ostermontag kam es in Spanien zu einem Verkehrsunfall mit fünf Zirkuselefanten. Der Unfall führte zum Tod eines Elefanten und zwei weitere wurden schwer verletzt. Nur durch Zufall wurden keine Menschen verletzt. Diese Tragödie hätte verhindert werden können - deshalb fordere ich ein Verbot des Einsatzes von Wildtieren in Zirkussen in der Europäischen Union. Aktuelle Berichte belegen schockierende Zwischenfälle mit der Bevölkerung und wilden Tieren in Zirkussen in ganz Europa. Nicht selten sind dabei  Zirkusunternehmen  und deren Tiere beteiligt, welche auf dem ganzen Kontinent unterwegs sind und so die Gesundheit sowie Sicherheit der europäischen Bürger gefährden. So ist in Spanien vor einigen Wochen bereits zum fünften Mal in Folge der Ausbruch eines Flußpferds dokumentiert worden. Die Elefanten, die bei dem jüngsten Unfall beteiligt waren, waren auf dem Weg zu ihrem nächsten Aufführungsort mit dem spanischen Circus Gottani. Die Tiere wurden vor Jahren illegal  aus Deutschland geschmuggelt und in der Folge u.a. durch Frankreich, Lettland, Litauen, Irland und schließlich Spanien transportiert. Die Familie, der die Elefanten gehören, ist in der Vergangenheit schon durch fahrlässiges Verhalten aufgefallen, welches zu mehreren Vorkommnissen geführt hat. Die große Mehrheit der EU-Mitgliedstaaten hat den Einsatz von Wildtieren in Zirkussen bereits verboten oder stark eingeschränkt. Die Europäische Tierärztevereinigung  hat die europäischen wie auch die zuständigen Behörden der Mitgliedsstaaten bereits aufgefordert, den Einsatz von Säugetieren wild lebender Arten in Wanderzirkussen zu verbieten. Auch ich fordere das Ende dieser Praxis. Es ist an der Zeit, dass die Europäische Union handelt. Nur so können die physischen und psychischen Leiden von Wildtieren in Zirkussen beendet und die damit verbundenen Risiken für die öffentliche Sicherheit verringert werden. Bitte unterschreiben und teilen.

Infocircos .org
589,649 supporters
Petitioning Council of the European Union, European Commission, European Parliament, Ban Ki-moon (Secretary-General of the United Nations), United Nations

Nobel Prize of Peace for Jordi Sanchez and Jordi Cuixart

Pedimos el Premio Nobel de la Paz para los JORDIS que han colaborado con la REVOLUCIO DELS SOMRIURES.

Rita Bocca
91,430 supporters
Closed
Petitioning Président de la République française + Assemblée nationale + Commission européenne, European Commission

JEAN-CLAUDE JUNCKER DOIT PARTIR !

Le journal britannique The Guardian vient de faire de nouvelles révélations. Elles émanent du Consortium international des journalistes d’investigation (ICIJ) qui étaient déjà à l’origine des LuxLeaks. Cette fois-ci c’est le président de la Commission européenne, Jean-Claude Juncker, ancien ministre des Finances puis Premier ministre du Luxembourg entre 1995 et 2013 qui est visé. Le Luxembourg Leaks est un gigantesque scandale financier concernant plusieurs centaines d'accords entre le fisc du Grand-duché et des cabinets d'audit pour le compte de firmes multinationales. Le but est de faire baisser les impôts de ces sociétés. Jean-Claude Juncker, jusqu’à présent, a prétendu qu’il ignorait tout de cette fraude. Or le Guardian publie des câbles diplomatiques allemands qui montrent que les dirigeants luxembourgeois agissaient pour empêcher la lutte contre le dumping fiscal. Et ceci au moment où les politiques de l’Union européenne, avec Monsieur Juncker à leur tête, applique une austérité dramatique pour les peuples. Par conséquent Monsieur Juncker doit quitter son poste de président de la Commission européenne. Soit il démissionne de lui-même s’il lui reste un peu de décence, soit les commissaires européens nomment un autre président. C’est d’ailleurs ce qu’avait fait la Commission européenne en 1999 qui avait démissionné le président de l’époque, Jacques Santer. Il était accusé d’avoir couvert des fraudes et du népotisme. Le Parlement européen peut également censurer la Commission, l’obligeant ainsi à faire le ménage. Le gouvernement français doit se prononcer publiquement pour le départ de Monsieur Juncker.

Jacques NIKONOFF
86,426 supporters
Petitioning European Parliament

Respect, promote and protect freedom of informed vaccination consent throughout Europe

Français  Italiano  Español  Deutsch  Polskie   Hrvatski  Português  Norsk  Slovene   Svenska  Magyar  Česky  Slovensky The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union states clearly: ‘Free and informed consent must be respected in the fields of medicine and biology’[1].   Approximately 40% of EU citizens[2] do not however have this basic right when faced with the medical act of vaccination.  This is a breach of our Universal Human Rights.  In 2011, the US Supreme Court ruled that vaccines are ‘unavoidably unsafe’[3], so mandatory vaccination as imposed on these citizens is not medically or ethically acceptable, especially where medical, religious or philosophical exemptions are not allowed. The EFVV (http://www.efvv.eu), a group representing some 20 European countries (both EU member states and non-EU members) is therefore demanding: 1.     That compulsory vaccination be abolished throughout Europe as it is a breach of our Universal Human Rights, 2.   That mandatory vaccination never be introduced in any country where vaccines are only recommended at present. 3.     That the Precautionary Principle be applied in the case of vaccination in Europe, 4.     That European citizens benefit from freedom of fully informed vaccination choice and consent, 5.     That an effective, independent European Vaccine Adverse Effect Reporting (VAER) system be established to monitor vaccine safety. One million signatures from at least seven EU countries will guarantee a debate in Brussels.  Whatever your own government’s policy, please unite by signing and then sharing this petition far and wide. In 2016, it is estimated that nearly 400 million Europeans in EU member countries enjoy freedom of informed vaccination choice but approximately 258 million do not [4].  Vaccinations are mandatory in Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia[5] and potentially other countries if new members, e.g. Albania, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia or others join the European Union.  We therefore call on all Europeans to stand together in a demand for a united vaccination policy based on freedom of informed choice and consent.  We also demand the formation of an independent and effective vaccino-vigilance unit with transparency and public availability of results.  We believe that mandatory vaccination must be abolished and an effective Vaccine Adverse Effect Reporting (VAER) system established because: Any involuntary or enforced medical treatment is a breach of:        o   the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights,       o   the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,       o   the UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child,       o   the European Council’s Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine,       o   the European Charter of Patients’ Rights,       o   the UN’s International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,        o   and even the Nuremberg Code (a set of research ethics principles for medical experimentation on humans set as a result of the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials at the end of the Second World War). In detail: The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union states clearly: ‘Everyone has the right to respect for his or her physical and mental integrity’[6].  It also states: ‘Free and informed consent must be respected in the fields of medicine and biology’[7] and lastly: ‘The prohibition of eugenic practices and of making the human body and its parts as such a source of financial gain must be respected’[8].The European Council’s Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine states clearly: ‘The interests and welfare of the human being shall prevail over the sole interest of society or science’[9].  It also states: ‘An intervention in the health field may only be carried out after the person concerned has given free and informed consent to it.  This person shall beforehand be given appropriate information as to the purpose and nature of the intervention as well as on its consequences and risks.  The person concerned may freely withdraw consent at any time.’[10]The European Charter of Patients’ Rights states clearly: ‘Every individual has the right of access to all information that might enable him or her to actively participate in the decisions regarding his or her health; this information is a prerequisite for any procedure and treatment, including the participation in scientific research (4 – Right to Consent)[11]’.  It also states:  ‘Each individual has the right to freely choose from among different treatment procedures and providers on the basis of adequate information (5 – Right to Free Choice)’[12] and also ‘Each individual has the right to be free from harm caused by the poor functioning of health services, medical malpractice and errors, and the right of access to health services and treatments that meet high safety standards (9 – Right to Safety)’[13].The UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child states clearly: ‘Parents … have the primary responsibility for the upbringing and development of the child. The best interests of the child will be their basic concern’[14].The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights states clearly: ‘Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes… freedom … to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance’[15].The Nuremberg Code states clearly: ‘The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.’[16]Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), which would include Vaccine Adverse Effects (VAEs), are reported to be the fifth-leading cause of hospital death in the EU[17] but this could be even higher since there is gross under-reporting of these events, as acknowledged by David Kessler, head of the FDA during most of the 90s[18], and in the case of vaccines, failure to acknowledge a causal link is a further problem.The US Supreme Court has ruled that vaccines are ‘unavoidably unsafe’[19].According to the German Criminal Code [20], vaccination is an invasive medical act causing bodily harm and as such, it requires the informed consent of either the individual being vaccinated or his/her carers.  It has however been acknowledged officially that there are still enormous gaps in current scientific knowledge regarding vaccination, so the provision of full and comprehensive prior information is simply not possible.  Vaccine package inserts[21] list many possible adverse effects, sometimes including death.  As long as there is risk involved in a medical procedure, if safety cannot be guaranteed and if comprehensive prior information cannot be given, the Precautionary Principle must be applied.It has been shown in regions with freedom of informed vaccination choice that high WHO-recommended levels of vaccine uptake are achieved without mandatory vaccination [22].Each European country sees legal responsibility for vaccine damage differently but in the main, medical and political authorities as well as the vaccine manufacturers are not fully accountable, leaving victims with no compensation or support.No significant research has yet been done to compare the health of vaccinated vs unvaccinated children but there are an increasing number of studies suggesting that unvaccinated children enjoy far greater health than their vaccinated peers[23].  This is an area where further research is needed. Given all of the above, we demand: 1.  That mandatory vaccination be abolished in all European countries, 2.  That mandatory vaccination never be introduced in any country where vaccines are only recommended at present, 3.  That the Precautionary Principle be applied in the case of vaccination in Europe, 4.  That European citizens benefit from freedom of fully informed vaccination choice and consent, a universal human right, 5.  And that an independent vaccino-vigilance unit be established where Vaccine Adverse Effects (VAEs) will be reported and the number and severity of VAEs in Europe will be easily accessible to all.  Footnotes: [1] http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf, Article 3, page 9 [2] Calculated using http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_European_countries_by_population and http://www.eurosurveillance.org/images/dynamic/EE/V17N22/DAncona_tab1.jpg [3] Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC, 131 S. Ct. 1068, 179 L.Ed.2d 1 (2011), http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf [4] Calculated using http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_European_countries_by_population and http://www.eurosurveillance.org/images/dynamic/EE/V17N22/DAncona_tab1.jpg[5] http://www.eurosurveillance.org/images/dynamic/EE/V17N22/DAncona_tab1.jpg[6] http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf, Article 3, page 9[7] http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf, Article 3, page 9[8] http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf, Article 3, page 9.[9] http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/164.htm, Article 2 – Primacy of the Human Being[10] http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/164.htm, Article 5 – General Rule[11]http://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_overview/co_operation/mobility/docs/health_services_co108_en.pdf, page 5[12]http://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_overview/co_operation/mobility/docs/health_services_co108_en.pdf, page 5[13]http://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_overview/co_operation/mobility/docs/health_services_co108_en.pdf, page 6[14] http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx, Article 18[15] https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20999/volume-999-I-14668-English.pdf, Article 18, page 8.[16] http://history.nih.gov/research/downloads/nuremberg.pdf, Item 1, page 1[17] Arlett, Dr. Peter, Setting the Scene: New European Union Pharmacovigilance Legislation, November 2012, slide 6 - (http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Presentation/2013/01/WC500137839.pdf) and also https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4412588/ [18] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16689555 [19] Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC, 131 S. Ct. 1068, 179 L.Ed.2d 1 (2011), http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf [20]http://www.impfkritik.de/upload/pdf/Koerperverletzung/Koerperverletzung-IfSG-Erdle.pdf: §§ 20-22 (§ 223 in the German Criminal Code)[21] http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/package_inserts.htm [22] For example, uptake is at 97% in Scotland: http://www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/Child-Health/publications/index.asp [23] http://www.vaxchoicevt.com/science/studies-comparing-vaccinated-to-unvaccinated-populations/, http://www.efi-online.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/VaccineFreeChildrenHealthier.pdf,  http://www.rescuepost.com/files/mawson-et-al-2017-vax-unvax-jnl-translational-science.pdf and  http://vaccineinjury.info/survey/comparison-of-the-state-of-health-of-unvaccinated-and-vaccinated-children.html

Secretary European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance (EFVV)
184,695 supporters
Victory
Petitioning DG Mobility and Transport of the European Commission

Fair treatment for musicians traveling on planes with their instruments

Musicians can’t work if they can’t travel! Musicians who travel on planes for professional purposes are confronted with huge difficulties when it comes to being allowed to carry their instrument on board as cabin luggage, even when they have paid an extra-seat. For a professional musician, not being allowed to travel with his/her instrument in safe conditions means losing a job. This is a concern not just for EU performers but also for all non-EU performers flying from a EU airport or traveling from abroad with a EU-based airline. There is this year a unique opportunity to amend EU regulation 261/2004 on air passenger rights and redress this acute problem. Why you should sign and share this petition Only a broad mobilization will convince European Commissioner Siim Kallas to address this issue within the review of regulation 261/2004. Such mobilization will help him resist the lobbying of enormously powerful airline companies. What musicians report about this issue Watch Dave Caroll's video "United breaks guitars": http://youtu.be/5YGc4zOqozo Watch Liu Tao's video "Airchina broke my guitar": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osur6neQyOU Read Paul Katz's scary story about his trip from Calgary to LA with WestJet. Although he had bought a second seat for his Andrea Guarneri cello (1669), he was not allowed to keep it in the cabin: http://articles.boston.com/2012-08-20/lifestyle/33281126_1_cello-flight-attendant-westjet “My guitar was allowed on board but I couldn’t take any other piece of personal luggage, not even a small handbag.” “The Easyjet staff at check-in requested me to buy an extra-seat for my instrument just because its case was in aluminum. My colleague whose case was covered with fabric did not have any such problem.” “My viola fits in the overhead lockers but I had to buy an extra-seat anyway.” “I had bought an extra-seat for my cello but was told to put it flat on 3 seats in the same row, then eventually to put it in the overhead lockers. The whole procedure delayed departure by about 30 minutes as 3 passengers and their luggage had to switch places as we were trying the second option.” “I bought an extra-seat when flying Alitalia with my viola da gamba. That extra-seat was charged twice the price!” “I was traveling for a concert with both a lute and guitar. Vueling wouldn’t allow me to buy a second extra-seat for my second instrument.” “I had bought an extra seat for my cello, but was asked by the company to strap it into a bulkhead seat. Unfortunately, none of the passengers sitting in bulkhead seats was willing to switch and I could not keep it in the cabin.” “Booking the extra-seat online was not possible.” “Due to overbooking, the extra-seat I had bought was allocated by Air France to another passenger and I couldn’t keep my instrument with me in the cabin.” “I was allowed to put my instrument on an extra-seat at departure but that was refused for the flight back. I therefore had to take another flight.”  “I was asked by Alitalia to buy 3 extra-seats for my cello, although it easily fits one.” What the petition says 1. Without their own instruments, musicians are unable to perform and properly execute their jobs. Musicians have a very special relationship with their instrument(s). Without their own instruments – the tools of their trade on which they rehearse and perform – musicians are unable to execute their profession. Except in very rare and specific cases, substituting instruments upon arrival at a new destination is simply not an option. 2. Many instruments, even when put in appropriate travel cases (flight-cases), cannot be left in the cargo part of the plane without being subject to a high risk of unrecoverable damage. It is common knowledge that violins and similar instruments can be of immense monetary value. But this is not the sole reason for which they need special care. A musician may spend months or years before he / she finds the adequate instrument. Several hours of daily practice make the relationship between the performer and his / her instrument a symbiotic one. 3. Restrictions applying to the carrying of instruments on planes have become a serious hindrance to the mobility of artists, either because it is impossible to take the instrument on board or because the additional price to pay makes the travel too expensive to be covered by the performer's revenues or small art businesses. 4. There is no industry-wide policy. One of the main problems confronting musicians who travel with their instruments is that there is no consistent policy across the EU applicable to airlines to rely upon. When an individual airline does have a policy, it is often applied inconsistently, which results in great uncertainty as to whether instruments may be carried on board and under which conditions. 5. The update of Regulation (EC) no. 261/2004 on air passenger rights is the appropriate framework for the inclusion of provisions that take proper account of the problems encountered by musicians travelling on planes for professional purposes. The United States’ FAA Air Transportation Modernization and Safety Improvement Act - SEC. 403 § 41724, adopted by the US Congress on 6 February 2012, gives an example of what could be done at European level. What the US FAA regulation says H.R.658 - FAA Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2011 SEC. 403. MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS. (a) In General- Subchapter I of chapter 417 is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘Sec. 41724. Musical instruments ‘(a) In General- ‘(1) SMALL INSTRUMENTS AS CARRY-ON BAGGAGE- An air carrier providing air transportation shall permit a passenger to carry a (B) information provided to correct a condition that compromises safety, if that condition continues uncorrected; or (C) information provided to carry out a criminal investigation or prosecution. violin, guitar, or other musical instrument in the aircraft cabin, without charging the passenger a fee in addition to any standard fee that carrier may require for comparable carry-on baggage, if-- ‘(A) the instrument can be stowed safely in a suitable baggage compartment in the aircraft cabin or under a passenger seat, in accordance with the requirements for carriage of carry-on baggage or cargo established by the Administrator; and ‘(B) there is space for such stowage at the time the passenger boards the aircraft. ‘(2) LARGER INSTRUMENTS AS CARRY-ON BAGGAGE- An air carrier providing air transportation shall permit a passenger to carry a musical instrument that is too large to meet the requirements of paragraph (1) in the aircraft cabin, without charging the passenger a fee in addition to the cost of the additional ticket described in subparagraph (E), if-- ‘(A) the instrument is contained in a case or covered so as to avoid injury to other passengers; ‘(B) the weight of the instrument, including the case or covering, does not exceed 165 pounds or the applicable weight restrictions for the aircraft; ‘(C) the instrument can be stowed in accordance with the requirements for carriage of carry-on baggage or cargo established by the Administrator; ‘(D) neither the instrument nor the case contains any object not otherwise permitted to be carried in an aircraft cabin because of a law or regulation of the United States; and ‘(E) the passenger wishing to carry the instrument in the aircraft cabin has purchased an additional seat to accommodate the instrument. ‘(3) LARGE INSTRUMENTS AS CHECKED BAGGAGE- An air carrier shall transport as baggage a musical instrument that is the property of a passenger traveling in air transportation that may not be carried in the aircraft cabin if-- ‘(A) the sum of the length, width, and height measured in inches of the outside linear dimensions of the instrument (including the case) does not exceed 150 inches or the applicable size restrictions for the aircraft; ‘(B) the weight of the instrument does not exceed 165 pounds or the applicable weight restrictions for the aircraft; and ‘(C) the instrument can be stowed in accordance with the requirements for carriage of carry-on baggage or cargo established by the Administrator. ‘(b) Regulations- Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall issue final regulations to carry out subsection (a). ‘(c) Effective Date- The requirements of this section shall become effective on the date of issuance of the final regulations under subsection (b).’. (b) Conforming Amendment- The analysis for such subchapter is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘41724. Musical instruments.’.

International Federation of Musicians
43,099 supporters
Petitioning Ayudas a las victimas, O.N.U. , Miguel Angel Revilla, Ximo Puig, Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad, Casa de Su Majestad el Rey, Pedro Sánchez, Defensor del Pueblo, Ministerio de ...

¡¡CASI 5 AÑOS SIN MIS NIÑOS¡¡ (POR FAVOR FIRMA PARA QUE CARLES I LAIA VUELVAN A CASA)

PIDO POR FAVOR SE IMPLIQUEN, HAN SEPARADO A MIS NIÑOS DE SU MADRE Y VICEVERSA, CUANDO NO HAY EN REALIDAD MOTIVOS REALES NI DE PESO ALGUNO. SOMOS VICTIMAS DE LAS ACCIONES VIOLENTAS Y LAS TRAMAS DE UNA PERSONA SIN CORAZON, QUE MEDIANTE INJURIAS HIZO QUE NOS SEPARASEN.  HACE YA PARA 5 AÑOS QUE SE LLEVARON A CARLES I A LAIA CON LA ARGUMENTACIÓN DE QUE LOS NIÑOS NO TENIAN SUPLIDAS LAS NECESIDADES BÁSICAS, APRECIACION FALSA Y DESDE UN SILLON QUE SE ESTA MUY COMODO!!! YA QUE NO SOLO TENIAN LAS BASICAS SI NO MÁS!!! TODAS LAS PERSONAS DE MI ALREDEDOR LO PUEDEN CORROBORAR, DESDE ENTONCES HASTA HE PODIDO VERLOS EN CONTADAS OCASIONES EN UN PUNTO DE ENCUENTRO, EL CUAL NO RESPETABAN TRAERLES A LAS VISITAS A CASTELLÓN, COMO NO SE TOMABAN ACCIONES LEGALES ANTE DICHO INCUMPLIMIENTO, TOME LA DECISION DE DESPLAZARME A CASI 300 KM, ACCEDIENDO PARA PODER VERLOS EN ALICANTE, HASTA EL DIA 25 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2.015 QUE VOY A VISITARLES Y NO LOS LLEVAN, SIN TENER NOTIFICACION ALGUNA, TRAS RECLAMAR, VUELVEN A ACTIVAR LAS VISITAS EL 9 DE DECIEMBRE, QUEDAMOS Y ME ENTREGAN ANOTACIÓN DE LA PROXIMA VISITA EL 23 DE DICIEMBRE DE 2015, LA MISMA MAÑANA CUANDO YA ESTAMOS PREPARADOS PARA SALIR CON LA ILUSION DE VERLES Y ENTREGARLES SU PAPA NOEL Y SIENDO VISPERA DE NOCHE BUENA, NOS LLAMAN 2 HORAS ANTES DICIENDO QUE NO VALLAMOS QUE LAS VISITAS QUEDAN ANULADAS POR TIEMPO INDEFINIDO!!! PIDO HABLAR CON LA TECNICO QUE LLEVA EL CASO Y ME DICEN QUE LA HAN CAMBIADO DE SECCION QUE YA NO LLEVA MI CASO, LE DIGO PUES PASAME CON QUIEN SEA EL TECNICO ENCARGADO PARA YO HACER LAS RECLAMACIONES PERTINENTES Y LA CONTESTACIÓN: NINGUN TECNICO LLEVA TU CASO. HEMOS HECHO UN RECURSO CONTRA DICHA RESOLUCION, Y SEGUIMOS ESPERANDO, TANTO LA RESOLUCION DEL CESE BRUTAL Y TAJANTE DE LAS VISITAS, COMO EL RECURSO DE APELACION, JUICIO, CONTRA CONSELLERÍA, CUYA CUESTION ES ¿PORQUE NO SE ME INQUIRIO POR LA PARTE DEMANDADA PARA TESTIFICAR, ESTANDO ALLI JUSTO DELANTE, SENTADA DE QUE TENIAN MIEDO? TAMPOCO SE SABE EL TIEMPO YA VAN  MESES DEL RECURSO, ME DIJERON LETRADOS Y PROCURADOR@S QUE POR LA FECHA QUE SE PRESENTO, LO NORMAL ERA QUE ESTUVIESE PARA ESTE MES DE JUNIO COMO MUCHO, SE HIZO EL ACTO DE PRESENCIA SE ADMITIO Y ASIGNO EL JUEZ. DESDE ABRIL, PERO ESTAMOS YA EN NOVIEMBRE......!!! YO LLEVO YA MAS DE 2 AÑOS Y MEDIO SIN QUE SE ME DEN VISITAS, NI SI QUIERA SE NADQA DE ELLOS, NI OPCION HA LLAMADA TELEFONICA, NI A NADA QUE PECADO HE COMETIDO YO Y MIS HIJOS? QUE DENUNCIE LOS MALOS TRATOS? DONDE ESTA LA LEY DE PROTECCION DE MENORES? Y LA DE PROTECCION DE LOS MALOS TRATOS? DONDE ESTAN LAS AYUDAS A PERSONAS CON ESTOS PROBLEMAS, DESDE AGOSTO DE 2015 SE APRUEBA LA LEY DEL MENOR MODIFICANDO QUE NO SERA OBJETO DE SEPARACION DE UNOS HIJOS DE SU PROGENITOR/A, POR MOTIVO DE DISCAPACIDAD, SE HA DEMOSTRADO EN EL JUICIO QUE LO QUE DIJERON LOS S. SOCIALES DE LOS NIÑOS NO ES CIERTO, LAS PROFESORAS LO CORRABORARON, ASI COMO LA PSICOLÓGA DE CARLES POR SU TDHA QUE LE ATENDÍA EN CASA Y TRATABA DESDE QUE EL NIÑO IBA A LA GUARDERÍA, TAMBIÉN LA PERSONA QUE YO TENIA EN CASA PARA AYUDAR, TODO QUEDÓ DESMENTIDO! INCLUSO HAN APORTADO UN INFORME FALSO EL CUAL AL ENTERARSE LA PEDIATRA ESTA HA QUEDADO MUY DISGUSTADA! PUES NI SI QUIERA FUERON AL CENTRO DE SALUD HA INFORMARSE Y ES MÁS NUNCA SE LE PIDIO NI HIZO NINGÚN INFORME. SIN EMBARGO S. SOCIALES ARGUMENTARON QUE LES INFORMO DE TAL FALSEDAD. SIN HABER REDACTADO NI SER REQUERIDO EL MISMO A LA PEDIATRA DE MIS HIJOS. PILLADOS EN TODO Y TODO DESMONTADO PARA NO RECONOCER SU ERROR AHORA EL CONTRA - ATAQUE ES TRATAR DE ARGUMENTAR CON QUE TENGO UNAS ETIOLOGIAS PSIQUICAS QUE SE HAN SACADO DEL BOLSILLO, FALSAS E IMPOSIBLES!!! NO CONSTAN EN NINGÚN INFORME,ES MAS ELLOS ME HACEN ASISTIR A LA UNIDAD DE SALUD MENTAL DE ELLOS Y EL PSIQUIATRA QUE ME ESTÁ ATENDIENDO NO ENTIENDE NADA!!! SE HACE CRUCES!!! LO ÚNICO QUE DETECTA ES DEPRESIÓN ¿Y? QUE QUIEREN QUE ESTE PARA TIRAR COHETES SI ME HAN QUITADO LO QUE MÁS AMO? MÁS QUE A MI VIDA MISMA!!! POR CORPORATIVISMO DE CONSELLERIA Y SERVICIOS SOCIALES DE VALL DE UXÓ AL HABER COMETIDO UN JUICIO DE VALORES TAN GRAVE GRATUITAMENTE, SIN HABER COMPROBADO NADA, PERO SERVICIOS SOCIALES SON CULPABLES DIRECTOS EN CONSELLERIA SUPONEN Y CONFIAN EN SU ¿PROFESIONALIDAD? PUES ERROR!!! PUES SINCERAMENTE A LO MEJOR TENDRIAN QUE REVISAR A ALGUIEN DEL S.E.A.F.I DE MI LOCALIDAD Y PASARLE UNOS TEST, SEGUIR LLENDO AL PSIQUIATRA ELLA BUENO QUIZA LO ESTA HACIENDO SABEN ES QUE MI CIUDAD ES COMO UN PUEBLO PEQUEÑO Y UNO SE ENTERA DE TODO, HAY LO DEJO...SE ENTIENDE? O LO EXPLICO MEJOR? QUIZA HAY ALGUIEN QUE PSIQUICAMENTE NO ESTE CAPACITADA PARA ESA RESPONSABILIDAD. EN MAS DE DOS AÑOS Y MEDIO QUE MIS HIJOS NO ESTÁN EN CASA NI ANTERIORMENTE A QUE SE LOS LLEVASEN NO ACUDIERON JAMÁS A CASA A COMPROBAR NADA DE NADA, NI LA INTERACCIÓN, NADA!!! Y LES PREGUNTA LA JUEZ SI HA ESTADO ALGUNA VEZ EN MI CASA AL EDUCADOR SOCIAL JUAN JOSE BROCH Y SU CONTESTACION FUE NO LO RECUERDO CREO QUE UNA... DIOS MIO!!! NUNCA VINO!!! AL DOMICILIO PARA HACER UN SEGUIMIENTO NI PARA “ORIENTAR” O “DOTAR” DE PAUTAS DE CRIANZA, HAN PREFERIDO COGER EL TESTIMONIO DEL PROGENITOR, QUE NUNCA SE OCUPO DE ELLOS Y QUE INCLUSO HA LLEGADO A LEVANTAR LA MANO A MÍ Y A MIS HIJOS, VARIOS AÑOS DEMASIADOS CANSADA Y ANTE AQUEL ULTIMO DIA HORRIBLE... MIEDO, GOLPES, GRITOS, INSULTOS, E INTENTAR ASFIXIAR A MI HIJO MAYOR DENUNCIÉ POR FIN!!! Y PARA QUE??? DE ELLO TENGO PARTE DE LESIONES DE MIS HIJOS Y MIO CON LA DENUNCIA CORRESPONDIENTE. YO TENGO UNA MINUSVALIA, BIEN Y QUE? PARA LO FISICO HE TENIDO LAS 24H, UNA PERSONA EN CASA, JAMAS HE PEGADO, GRITADO, O INSULTADO A MIS HIJOS HE AMADO, AMO Y AMARÉ PROFUNDAMENTE A MIS HIJOS HE SIDO PAPÁ Y MAMÁ. PROPORCIONADO TODO TIPO DE NECESIDADES, EDUCADO, JUGADO, TODA MI VIDA PARA Y POR ELLOS, SOY BUENA MADRE Y NO PUEDO MAS. LA PSICOLOGA DEL JUZGADO DIJO QUE IBA A SER OBJETIVA? SOY SINCERA TENGO SECUELAS FISICAS A RAIZ DE UN ACCIDENTE DE TRAFICO, PROBLEMA DE SALUD CRONICO, DE AHÍ MI MINUSVALÍA PERO SE HA DEMOSTRADO EN EL JUICIO QUE LO QUE DIJERON LOS S. SOCIALES DE LOS NIÑOS NO ES CIERTO, CUANTO TIEMPO MÁS TENEMOS QUE AGUANTAR ESTA SITUACIÓN? POR FAVOR FIRMA PARA QUE LOS NIÑOS VUELVAN A CASA, YA ESTA BIEN DE ESTA INJUSTICIA. SI TENEIS HIJOS Y LOS AMAIS DE CORAZON POR FAVOR FIRMAR, YO TAMBIEN LOS NECESITO, SIN ELLOS NADA TIENE SENTIDO.

TODOS CON CARLES I LAIA!!!!
37,245 supporters
Petitioning European Commission, Council of the European Union, Commissione Europea, European Parliament, Europe

Law against animal cruelty in all European countries

We need to stop animal cruelty in all countries - Let's start in Europe!!!The European Parlament needs to make a law in all the European countries - there are countries which are members of the European Union that don't have a law against animal cruelty - We need to have a law together which applies to all countries. The new organization KARLA will do anything to make this happen!!! We will get the best lawyers to make this happen!!!We need to get over 1.000.000 supporters!!!SIGN FOR ALL COUNTRIES - SIGN FOR ALL ANIMALS@Karla - www.karla.life - www.facebook.com/karla.life

Karla
34,316 supporters
Victory
Petitioning Претседател на Република Македонија, Влада на Република Македонија, Собрание на Репулбика Македонија, President of the Republic of Macedonia, Government of the Republic of Macedonia, Assembly of th...

Декларација #НиеСмеМакедонија Доста беше / Declaration #WeAreMacedonia Enough is Enough

Македонска Декларација Macedonian Declaration Ние, Македонците од Дијаспората и Македонци ширум светот и во татковината, како и пријатели на Македонија и Македонскиот народ, го известуваме Македонскиот народ во Република Македонија, дека во недела, 14ти Јануари, 2018 година, пред Амбасадата на Република Македонија во САД, протестиравме против Владата на Република Македонија и пратениците на Собранието на Република Македонија, и ги известуваме дека дијаспората започнува масовно движење на Македонците во светот, #НиеСмеМакедонија #НашетоИмеЕМакедонија, со единствена цел зачувување на засебноста на Македонецот како рамноправен и почитуван член во светското семејство, без нарушување на македонскиот иденитет, јазик и култура, и унитарноста на државата. We, the Macedonians from the Diaspora and Macedonians throughout the world within and outside of Macedonia and allies of Macedonia and the Macedonian diaspora, inform the Macedonian people in the Republic of Macedonia that on Sunday, January 14, 2018 in front of the Embassy of the Republic of Macedonia in the United States, we protested against the Government of the Republic of Macedonia and the MPs of the Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, and we informing them that the Diaspora has started a massive global movement of the Macedonians in the world, #WeAreMacedonia #OurNameisMacedonia, with the sole purpose of preserving the individuality of the Macedonian people as an equal and respected member of the world family of nations, without hindrance upon our Macedonian name, identity, language, culture, and unitary territorial integrity of Macedonia. Ние Македонците во светот, We Macedonians in the world, најостро ги осудуваме тековните разговори со Грција околу името на Република Македонија. најостро го осудуваме неодговорниот и незаконски чин на пратениците во Собранието со изгласувањето на неуставниот закон за јазици. најостро го осудуваме разнебитувањето на унитарноста и суверенитетот на матичната држава. најостро го осудуваме редефинирањето на историјата на Република Македонија постигнато со потпишување на така наречениот договор за "добрососедски односи" со Бугарија.   strongly condemn the ongoing talks with Greece over the name of the Republic of Macedonia. strongly condemn the irresponsible and unlawful act of the MPs in the Macedonian Assembly by passing the unconstitutional law on languages. strongly condemn the constant attacks upon the unitary territorial integrity and the sovereignty of Macedonia. strongly condemn the redefining of Macedonia's history by signing the so-called “good-neighborly relations” agreement with Bulgaria. Декларативно, користејќи ги сите алатки кои ни се на располагање, како и уставно загарантираното право на глас како Македонски граѓани и горди Македонци јавно изјавуваме дека дијаспората цврсто стои во одбрана на вековното македонско битие што ни е оставено во наследство од минатите генерации Македонци. Нашата цел e одбрана на идеалот за кој низ историјата го положија својот живот многу патриоти и бранители на Македонија.- суверена и независна Македонска држава на Македонците и сите малцинства што живеат во државата, а не федерализација или бинационализација на единствената држава ширум светот што Македонците ја нарекуваат своја татковина. Declaratively, using all the tools available to us, as well as the constitutionally guaranteed voting right as Macedonian citizens and proud Macedonians, we declare publicly that the diaspora firmly stands in defense of the centuries-old Macedonian struggle that has been left to us by the legacy of the past generations of Macedonians. Our goal is to defend the ideas by which many patriots and defenders of Macedonia have laid their lives in history for a sovereign and independent Macedonian state of Macedonians and all minorities living in the country, not the forced federalization or binationalization of the only nation-state in the world that Macedonians call their homeland. Притоа бараме: We demand the following: Итен прекин на разговорите околу името на државата што Владата на Република Македонија ги води во тајност под покровитество на ОН, и неменување на уставното име – Република Македонија, и поднесување резолуцијата во Генералното Собрание на ОН за признавање на истото, Повлекување на противуставниот закон за јазици од понатамошнен процес во Собранието на РМ, Oрганизирање попис под мониторинг на реномирана меѓународна организација на територијата на Република Македонија во период не подолг од 6 месеци од приемот на оваа декларација, Неменување на историјата на Македонија, статусот на МПЦ – ОА и интензивирање на грижата за Македонците во соседните држави. Доколку Владата на Република Македонија не е способна да го стори горенаведеното, тогаш повикуваме на итно самораспуштање на Собранието на Република Македонија и организирање на непосредни избори каде што и на македонските граѓани од дијаспората ќе им бидат овозможени свои претставници во новиот парламентарен состав, според принципот на пропорционалност.   Immediate withdrawing of the talks on the name of Macedonia that the Government of the Republic of Macedonia are conducting secretly under the auspices of the United Nations, and no change to the constitutional name - the Republic of Macedonia, and submitting a resolution to the UN General Assembly for its recognition under such name, Withdrawal of the unconstitutional law on languages from further process in the Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Organizing a Census, under strict monitoring of a reputable international organization, of the entire population in Macedonia within a period not longer than six months from the receipt of this declaration, No change to the history of Macedonia, the status of the Macedonian Orthodox Church, and intensifying the fight for equal human rights for the Macedonians in the neighboring countries. If the Government of the Republic of Macedonia is not capable of doing the above, then we call for immediate self-dissolution of the Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia and organizing elections where the Macedonian citizens from the Diaspora will be able to exercise their right to elect their own representatives in the new parliamentary composition, according to the principle of proportionality. Движењето #НиеСмеМакедонија #НашетоИмеЕМакедонија под кое се застанати Македонски организации и здруженија од светот, АКТИВНО и ЈАСНО ја изразува својата декларативна заложба дека активно ќе ги искористи сите средства со цел да го оневозможи најголемото разбитување на Македонскиот народ и понатомашното уништување на унитарноста на државата. The Global Movement #WeAreMacedonia #OurNameisMacedonia, under which the Macedonian organizations and associations, and all Macedonians throughout the world stand by, ACTIVELY and UNEQUIVOCALLY express their declarative commitment to actively use all means in order to prevent the biggest human rights attack upon the Macedonian people and the further destruction of Macedonia’s unitary territorial integrity.

United Macedonian Diaspora
29,280 supporters
Petitioning European, European Commission, European Parliament

Stop the European Commission's action against Poland

Stop the European Commission's action against Poland The opposition and the government in Poland agree on the need to reform the judiciary system. The government is undertaking reforms. The opposition criticizes them. However, the opposition does not have a parliamentary majority to stop the reforms. The entire process follows democratic rules. The opposition can organize demonstrations. It also has access to the media, including such powerful centers shaping the European opinion as the Springer publishing house. Over–interpreting the Article 7 of the Lisbon Treaty The European Commission is now of the opinion that it can intervene in this process by using their strongest weapon: denying Poland the voting right. A judiciary system emerges over decades by resolution of conflicts while respecting different opinions. By intervening and enforcing certain solutions, the Commission blocks this necessary process which should lead to the development of norms and rules of an independent Polish judiciary within the framework of European law. We ask you to stop the action of the European Commission. We oppose the Commission, which exceeds its prerogative. Supporting Poland, you support a European Union of free and sovereign nations. Stop the democratic deficit of the European institutions. Today, Poland is fighting for pluralism and democratic rules, in which voters’ voice counts and national parliaments do not degenerate into ‘zombi' institutions. Support us in this fight and vote for "Stop the European Commission's action against Poland".   Stopp dem Vorgehen der Europäischen Kommission gegen Polen Die Opposition und die Regierung in Polen sind sich einig über die Notwendigkeit, das Justizsystem reformieren zu müssen. Die Regierung unternimmt Reformen. Die Opposition kritisiert diese, besitzt jedoch keine parlamentarische Mehrheit, um sie zu stoppen. Der gesamte Prozess verläuft nach demokratischen Spielregeln. Die Opposition kann Demonstrationen organisieren. Sie hat auch Zugang zu den Medien, darunter zu so mächtigen Zentren der europäischen Meinungsbildung wie der Springer-Verlag. Die Europäische Kommission ist nun der Meinung–der Art. 7 des Lissabon Vertrages  überinterpretierend–in diesen Prozess eingreifen zu können durch Anwendung ihrer stärksten Waffe: Stimmentzug für Polen. Ein Justizwesen entsteht über Jahrzehnte durch Lösung von Konfliktsituationen und unter Beachtung andersartiger Meinungen. Durch das Eingreifen und Aufzwingen von bestimmten Lösungen blockiert die Kommission diesen notwendigen Prozess, der zur Ausarbeitung von Normen und Regeln eines unabhängigen polnischen Justizwesens im Rahmen des europäischen Rechts führt. Wir bitten, das Vorgehen der EU-Kommission zu stoppen. Wir widersetzen uns der Kommission, die ihre Prärogative überschreitet. Wenn Sie jetzt Polen unterstützen, unterstützen Sie eine Europäische Union freier und souveräner Nationen. Schluss mit demokratischem Defizit in den europäischen Institutionen. Heute kämpft Polen um Pluralismus und demokratische Regeln, in denen Wählerstimmen zählen und nationale Parlamente nicht zu Zombi-Institutionen verkommen. Unterstützen Sie uns in diesem Kampf und stimmen Sie für: „Stopp dem Vorgehen der Europäischen Kommission gegen Polen“. Stop dla poczynań Komisji Europejskiej przeciwko Polsce Opozycja i rząd w Polsce są zgodne co do konieczności reformy sądownictwa. Rząd podejmuje próby reform. Opozycja je krytykuje. Nie posiada ona jednak większości parlamentarnej, aby reformy zastopować. Cały proces odbywa się w ramach demokratycznych reguł.  Opozycja ma możliwość organizacji demonstracji oraz dostęp do środków przekazu, w tym do tak potężnych ośrodków kształtowania europejskiej opinii publicznej jak wydawnictwo Springer. Nadinterpretując Art. 7 Komisja Europejska uważa, że może ingerować w ten proces używając najsilniejszej broni: odebrania Polsce prawa głosu. System sądowniczy wypracowywany jest latami poprzez rozwiązywanie sytuacji konflikowych z poszanowaniem odrębnych zdań. Komisja poprzez ingerencję i narzucanie swoich rozwiązań blokuje ten konieczny proces służący do wypracowania norm i reguł polskiego niezależnego sądownictwa w ramach prawa unijnego.   Zwracamy się z prośbą o zastopowanie poczynań Komisji. Sprzeciwiamy się działaniom Komisji, które wychodzą poza jej prerogatywy. Wspierając Polskę wspierasz ideę Unii Europejskiej wolnych, suwerennych narodów. Koniec z deficytem demokracji w instytucjach europejskich. Dzisiaj Polacy walczą o zasady demokratyczne i pluralizm, w których liczy się głos wyborców, a parlamenty narodowe nie są wydmuszkami. Wspomóż nas w tej walce głosując na „stop dla poczynań Komisji Europejskiej przeciwko Polsce”.  

Jan Korab Zelazny
28,043 supporters
Petitioning European, European Commission, European Parliament

Stop the European Commission's action against Poland

Stop the European Commission's action against Poland The opposition and the government in Poland agree on the need to reform the judiciary system. The government is undertaking reforms. The opposition criticizes them. However, the opposition does not have a parliamentary majority to stop the reforms. The entire process follows democratic rules. The opposition can organize demonstrations. It also has access to the media, including such powerful centers shaping the European opinion as the Springer publishing house. Over–interpreting the Article 7 of the Lisbon Treaty The European Commission is now of the opinion that it can intervene in this process by using their strongest weapon: denying Poland the voting right. A judiciary system emerges over decades by resolution of conflicts while respecting different opinions. By intervening and enforcing certain solutions, the Commission blocks this necessary process which should lead to the development of norms and rules of an independent Polish judiciary within the framework of European law. We ask you to stop the action of the European Commission. We oppose the Commission, which exceeds its prerogative. Supporting Poland, you support a European Union of free and sovereign nations. Stop the democratic deficit of the European institutions. Today, Poland is fighting for pluralism and democratic rules, in which voters’ voice counts and national parliaments do not degenerate into ‘zombi' institutions. Support us in this fight and vote for "Stop the European Commission's action against Poland".   Stopp dem Vorgehen der Europäischen Kommission gegen Polen Die Opposition und die Regierung in Polen sind sich einig über die Notwendigkeit, das Justizsystem reformieren zu müssen. Die Regierung unternimmt Reformen. Die Opposition kritisiert diese, besitzt jedoch keine parlamentarische Mehrheit, um sie zu stoppen. Der gesamte Prozess verläuft nach demokratischen Spielregeln. Die Opposition kann Demonstrationen organisieren. Sie hat auch Zugang zu den Medien, darunter zu so mächtigen Zentren der europäischen Meinungsbildung wie der Springer-Verlag. Die Europäische Kommission ist nun der Meinung–der Art. 7 des Lissabon Vertrages  überinterpretierend–in diesen Prozess eingreifen zu können durch Anwendung ihrer stärksten Waffe: Stimmentzug für Polen. Ein Justizwesen entsteht über Jahrzehnte durch Lösung von Konfliktsituationen und unter Beachtung andersartiger Meinungen. Durch das Eingreifen und Aufzwingen von bestimmten Lösungen blockiert die Kommission diesen notwendigen Prozess, der zur Ausarbeitung von Normen und Regeln eines unabhängigen polnischen Justizwesens im Rahmen des europäischen Rechts führt. Wir bitten, das Vorgehen der EU-Kommission zu stoppen. Wir widersetzen uns der Kommission, die ihre Prärogative überschreitet. Wenn Sie jetzt Polen unterstützen, unterstützen Sie eine Europäische Union freier und souveräner Nationen. Schluss mit demokratischem Defizit in den europäischen Institutionen. Heute kämpft Polen um Pluralismus und demokratische Regeln, in denen Wählerstimmen zählen und nationale Parlamente nicht zu Zombi-Institutionen verkommen. Unterstützen Sie uns in diesem Kampf und stimmen Sie für: „Stopp dem Vorgehen der Europäischen Kommission gegen Polen“. Stop dla poczynań Komisji Europejskiej przeciwko Polsce Opozycja i rząd w Polsce są zgodne co do konieczności reformy sądownictwa. Rząd podejmuje próby reform. Opozycja je krytykuje. Nie posiada ona jednak większości parlamentarnej, aby reformy zastopować. Cały proces odbywa się w ramach demokratycznych reguł.  Opozycja ma możliwość organizacji demonstracji oraz dostęp do środków przekazu, w tym do tak potężnych ośrodków kształtowania europejskiej opinii publicznej jak wydawnictwo Springer. Nadinterpretując Art. 7 Komisja Europejska uważa, że może ingerować w ten proces używając najsilniejszej broni: odebrania Polsce prawa głosu. System sądowniczy wypracowywany jest latami poprzez rozwiązywanie sytuacji konflikowych z poszanowaniem odrębnych zdań. Komisja poprzez ingerencję i narzucanie swoich rozwiązań blokuje ten konieczny proces służący do wypracowania norm i reguł polskiego niezależnego sądownictwa w ramach prawa unijnego.   Zwracamy się z prośbą o zastopowanie poczynań Komisji. Sprzeciwiamy się działaniom Komisji, które wychodzą poza jej prerogatywy. Wspierając Polskę wspierasz ideę Unii Europejskiej wolnych, suwerennych narodów. Koniec z deficytem demokracji w instytucjach europejskich. Dzisiaj Polacy walczą o zasady demokratyczne i pluralizm, w których liczy się głos wyborców, a parlamenty narodowe nie są wydmuszkami. Wspomóż nas w tej walce głosując na „stop dla poczynań Komisji Europejskiej przeciwko Polsce”.  

Jan Korab Zelazny
28,043 supporters