The Oregon Election Modernization Act
The Oregon Election Modernization Act
The Issue
Oregon Election Modernization Act
Fellow Oregonians, Our democracy works best when every voice is heard and every vote counts. Today, we have an opportunity to make Oregon a national leader in systematic election modernizing, while preserving what already works well in our voting system.
The Oregon Election Modernization Act aims to revolutionize the state's voting system, combining traditional methods with cutting-edge technology to enhance security, accessibility, and civic engagement. Here's a comprehensive highlight of the proposed measure:
Key Features
Dual Paper-Digital Voting System
- Preserves paper ballots as the primary voting method
- Introduces digital scanning for encrypted backups
- Enhances security while maintaining familiarity
Multi-Channel Voting Options
- Mail-in voting
- Mobile voting exclusively for voters with recognized disabilities
Enhanced Security Measures
- Two-factor authentication for digital voting
- End-to-end encryption for data transmission and storage
- Regular security audits and testing
Transparent Tallying
- Public vote counting with real-time digital updates
- Open-source software for public scrutiny
Voter Empowerment
- Digital voter profiles for easy registration and updates
- Ability to verify recorded votes
- Enhanced accessibility features
- Multilingual support
Civic Engagement Initiatives
- Online voter education portal
- Digital candidate information hub
- Interactive platform for constituent-representative communication
- Integration with social media for increased outreach
Youth Involvement
- School-based civic education programs
- Mock election systems for educational institutions
- Youth advisory board for system improvement
Benefits to Society
1. **Increased Voter Participation**: By offering multiple voting channels and enhancing accessibility, the act aims to make voting easier for all Oregonians, potentially increasing turnout.
2. **Enhanced Election Integrity**: The combination of paper ballots and digital backups provides a robust system for verifying election results and preventing fraud.
3. **Greater Transparency**: Real-time vote tallying and open-source software allow for unprecedented public oversight of the election process.
4. **Improved Accessibility**: The act prioritizes making voting more accessible for people with disabilities and non-English speakers.
5. **Civic Education**: By incorporating youth involvement and providing comprehensive voter education resources, the act aims to create a more informed and engaged citizenry.
6. **Environmental Consideration**: The gradual reduction of paper usage aligns with Oregon's commitment to sustainability.
7. **Cost Efficiency**: While initial implementation costs may be significant, the act includes measures for long-term cost savings through improved efficiency and shared resources.
Forward-Thinking Aspects
1. **Adaptability**: The system is designed to accommodate potential future changes in legislative representation, ensuring its relevance for years to come.
2. **Continuous Improvement**: Regular audits, public feedback mechanisms, and annual reviews ensure the system evolves with technological advancements and changing needs.
3. **Cybersecurity Preparedness**: By implementing state-of-the-art security measures and regular audits, the system is better equipped to handle emerging cyber threats.
4. **Demographic Shifts**: The focus on youth engagement and multilingual support prepares Oregon for an increasingly diverse electorate.
5. **Technological Integration**: The act positions Oregon at the forefront of election technology, ready to incorporate future innovations as they emerge.
6. **Transparency and Trust**: In an era of increasing concern about election integrity, the act's emphasis on transparency can help build and maintain public trust in the democratic process.
7. **Civic Engagement in the Digital Age**: By integrating digital platforms and social media, the act acknowledges and leverages changing patterns of public engagement.
8. **Data Privacy Considerations**: With strict data protection measures and regular privacy assessments, the act anticipates growing concerns about data privacy and security.
By implementing this forward-thinking election system, Oregon positions itself to address current challenges in election administration while also preparing for future developments in technology, demographics, and civic engagement. This proactive approach can serve as a model for other states, potentially influencing national standards for election modernization.
This isn't about replacing our current system - it's about strengthening it. The initiative includes a careful, 4 year, phased implementation starting the first year after passing, with pilot programs to ensure everything works smoothly before statewide rollout. Your signature helps put this important measure on the ballot, giving Oregonians the chance to vote on modernizing our election system while maintaining its integrity. Together, we can make Oregon's democracy even stronger for future generations, and incorporate structure into our current system, that attempts to plan for problems we may encounter, down the road.
Joel Gonzalez, Chief Petitioner
Sign now to help put this measure on the ballot and make Oregon a leader in election integrity and accessibility.
The Oregon Election Modernization Act
Caption
(15 words) Establishes cutting-edge, secure voting system; enhances election integrity, accessibility, and civic engagement.
Question
(20 words) Should Oregon implement a modernized election system combining paper ballots, digital technology, and enhanced civic engagement to strengthen democratic processes?
Summary
(175 words) Measure establishes the Oregon Secure and Transparent Election System (OSTES) to revolutionize voting processes. Key components:
Dual paper-digital voting: Paper ballots remain primary; digital backups via scanning
Multi-channel voting: In-person, mail-in, and mobile options for disabled voters
Enhanced security: Two-factor authentication, end-to-end encryption
Transparent tallying: Public counting, real-time digital updates
Voter empowerment: Digital profiles, vote verification, accessibility features
Civic engagement: Online education portal, candidate information hub
Youth involvement: School-based civic education programs
Continuous improvement: Regular audits, public feedback mechanisms
Environmental consideration: Reduced paper usage over time
Establishes oversight committee for implementation and improvement. Requires Secretary of State to set operational rules. Allocates funding for development, implementation, and public education. Prepares for potential future expansion of representation while maintaining current legislative structure.
Full Text of the Proposed Law
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Oregon:
SECTION 1. TITLE
This Act shall be known and may be cited as the "Oregon Election Modernization Act."
SECTION 2. FINDINGS AND DECLARATIONS
The People of Oregon find and declare that:
(a) A secure, transparent, and accessible voting system is fundamental to a thriving democracy.
(b) Modernizing the election system can significantly enhance voter participation, confidence, and civic engagement.
(c) Combining traditional paper ballots with advanced digital technology can increase both security and transparency.
(d) An updated election system will better serve all Oregonians and prepare for future democratic needs.
SECTION 3. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE OREGON SECURE AND TRANSPARENT ELECTION SYSTEM (OSTES)
(a) The Oregon Secure and Transparent Election System (OSTES) is hereby established.
(b) The Secretary of State shall oversee the implementation and operation of OSTES.
SECTION 4. COMPONENTS OF OSTES
OSTES shall include the following components: (a) Dual Paper-Digital Voting:
Paper ballots remain the primary voting method
Digital scanning creates encrypted backup of each ballot
(b) Multi-Channel Voting:
In-person voting at polling stations
Mail-in voting
Mobile voting options exclusively for voters with recognized disabilities
(c) Enhanced Security Measures:
Two-factor authentication for digital voting
End-to-end encryption for all data transmission and storage
Regular security audits and penetration testing
(d) Transparent Tallying:
Public vote counting with real-time digital updates
Open-source software for public scrutiny
(e) Voter Empowerment:
Digital voter profiles for streamlined registration and updates
Ability to verify recorded votes
Enhanced accessibility features for voters with disabilities
Multilingual support for voting materials and interfaces
(f) Civic Engagement:
Online voter education portal with comprehensive voting information
Digital candidate information hub with standardized profiles
Interactive platform for constituent-representative communication
Integration with social media for increased voter outreach
(g) Youth Involvement:
School-based civic education programs
Mock election systems for educational institutions
Youth advisory board for continuous system improvement
(h) Continuous Improvement:
Regular audits of both paper and digital records
Public feedback mechanisms for system enhancement
Annual review and update of security protocols
(i) Environmental Consideration:
Gradual reduction of paper usage through increased digital adoption
Use of recycled materials for necessary paper products
Carbon-neutral data centers for digital infrastructure
(j) Independent Oversight:
Creation of an Independent Election Commission (IEC) to oversee OSTES implementation and operation
IEC members appointed jointly by the Governor, Secretary of State, and State Legislature
SECTION 5. IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE
Establishes implementation timeline:
1st year after passing: Planning and development phase
2nd year after passing: Pilot program in select counties
3rd year after passing: Evaluation and system refinement
4th year after passing: Statewide implementation
(a) 1st year: Planning and development phase
Detailed system design
Stakeholder consultations
Initial public education campaign
(b) 2nd year: Pilot program in select counties
Implementation in 3-5 diverse counties
Extensive testing and feedback collection
(c) 3rd year: Evaluation and system refinement
Comprehensive review of pilot program results
System adjustments based on feedback and performance
Expanded public education and training
(d) 4th year: Statewide implementation
Full rollout across all Oregon counties
Ongoing monitoring and support
SECTION 6. OVERSIGHT AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
(a) The Independent Election Commission (IEC) is established, composed of:
Three members appointed by the Governor
Three members appointed by the Secretary of State
Three members appointed by the State Legislature (one by Senate President, one by House Speaker, one jointly)
(b) The Committee shall review system performance annually and recommend improvements.
(c) The Committee shall ensure the system remains adaptable to future needs, including potential changes in legislative representation.
(d) The IEC shall have the power to audit, investigate, and report on all aspects of OSTES implementation and operation.
SECTION 7. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
The Secretary of State shall establish rules for the operation of OSTES, in consultation with the IEC.
SECTION 8. FUNDING AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION
(a) Appropriate funds shall be allocated from the state budget for:
Development and implementation of OSTES
Ongoing maintenance and security upgrades
Public education and outreach programs
Civic education initiatives in schools
(b) The Secretary of State shall provide an annual budget report to ensure transparency in resource allocation. (c) The IEC shall review and approve the annual budget before submission to the State Legislature.
SECTION 9. VOTER EDUCATION AND OUTREACH
(a) A comprehensive public education campaign shall be developed to inform voters about OSTES.
(b) The campaign shall utilize diverse media channels, including digital platforms, to reach all demographics.
(c) Special emphasis shall be placed on engaging younger voters and underrepresented communities.
SECTION 10. ACCESSIBILITY AND INCLUSIVITY
(a) OSTES shall comply with all federal and state accessibility requirements.
(b) Continuous efforts shall be made to enhance system accessibility for voters with disabilities.
(c) Multilingual support shall be provided to ensure equal access for all eligible voters.
(d) Mobile voting options shall be available exclusively for voters with recognized disabilities, subject to verification of eligibility.
SECTION 11. DATA PRIVACY AND SECURITY
(a) Strict data protection measures shall be implemented to safeguard voter information.
(b) Regular privacy impact assessments shall be conducted.
(c) Voters shall have the right to access and correct their personal data.
(d) The IEC shall conduct annual privacy and security audits, with results made public.
SECTION 12. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Act is held invalid, the remainder of the Act shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 13. FUTURE ADAPTABILITY
While this Act does not change the current structure of the legislature, OSTES shall be designed with the flexibility to accommodate potential future changes in legislative representation.
SECTION 14. RESTRICTED OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE ACCESS
(a) The Oregon Secure and Transparent Election System (OSTES) shall utilize software with restricted open source access to enhance security, transparency, and public trust in the election process while maintaining necessary safeguards.
(b) Access to the source code for all software utilized in OSTES shall be restricted to:
Oregon residents
Individuals with demonstrable expertise in fields directly related to election systems, software development, cybersecurity, or other relevant areas as determined by the Secretary of State and the IEC
(c) Eligible individuals seeking access to the source code must:
Provide proof of Oregon residency
Submit credentials demonstrating their relevant expertise
Sign a non-disclosure agreement and adhere to a code of ethics
Undergo a background check
(d) The Secretary of State and the IEC, in consultation with the OSTES Oversight Committee, shall establish and maintain:
A formal application and vetting process for individuals seeking source code access
A secure environment for reviewing the source code
A system for tracking and managing authorized access
(e) Authorized individuals may review the source code for the purposes of:
Identifying potential vulnerabilities or security risks
Suggesting improvements to the system's functionality or efficiency
Verifying the integrity of the election process
(f) A formal process shall be established for:
Responsible vulnerability disclosure
Submitting suggestions for system improvements
Reviewing and implementing proposed changes
(g) The Secretary of State shall ensure that all software used in the election system complies with industry best practices and standards for security and reliability.
(h) Regular security audits shall be conducted by independent third-party firms, selected through a rigorous vetting process.
SECTION 15. COMPREHENSIVE FUNDING FRAMEWORK
(a) Primary Funding Sources:
Annual allocation from the state's General Fund not to exceed 0.5% of the total state budget
Technology modernization fees applied to business entity filings with the Secretary of State
Federal election security and modernization grants
Dedicated lottery revenue allocation of 1% from existing funds
(b) Cost Distribution Model:
Initial implementation costs shall be distributed over five years
Counties shall receive proportional funding based on population and implementation needs
Maintenance costs shall be shared between state (70%) and counties (30%)
(c) Cost Reduction Mechanisms:
Bulk purchasing agreements for hardware and software licenses
Shared resources between counties where feasible
Progressive implementation to distribute costs over time
Partnership programs with Oregon universities for research and development
(d) Sustainable Revenue Generation:
Creation of an Election System Modernization Fund
Investment of fund reserves through the Oregon State Treasury
Annual audit of fund performance and expenditures
Reinvestment of cost savings from reduced paper usage and improved efficiency
(e) Fiscal Oversight:
Establishment of a Financial Oversight Subcommittee within the IEC
Quarterly financial reports to the Legislature and the IEC
Annual public reporting of expenditures and savings
Independent fiscal audits conducted by the State Auditor's Office
SECTION 16. ANTI-CORRUPTION AND ETHICS
Establishment of an Ethics Review Board within the IEC to:
(a) Develop and enforce a code of ethics for all OSTES personnel
Investigate allegations of misconduct or corruption
Provide annual ethics training for all OSTES staff and contractors
(b) Whistleblower Protection:
Creation of secure channels for reporting potential violations
Legal protections for individuals reporting misconduct in good faith
(c) Conflict of Interest Provisions:
Mandatory disclosure of potential conflicts of interest for all OSTES staff, contractors, and IEC members
Recusal requirements for decision-making in cases of potential conflicts
(d) Transparency Measures:
Public disclosure of all contracts and procurement processes
Open meetings for IEC deliberations, with limited exceptions for sensitive security matters
Regular public forums for citizen input and questions
(e) Term Limits and Rotation:
IEC members limited to two 4-year terms
Staggered appointments to ensure continuity and fresh perspectives
(f) Accountability Mechanisms:
Annual performance reviews of OSTES leadership by the IEC
Legislative oversight hearings at least twice per year
Public release of all audit reports within 30 days of completion
25
The Issue
Oregon Election Modernization Act
Fellow Oregonians, Our democracy works best when every voice is heard and every vote counts. Today, we have an opportunity to make Oregon a national leader in systematic election modernizing, while preserving what already works well in our voting system.
The Oregon Election Modernization Act aims to revolutionize the state's voting system, combining traditional methods with cutting-edge technology to enhance security, accessibility, and civic engagement. Here's a comprehensive highlight of the proposed measure:
Key Features
Dual Paper-Digital Voting System
- Preserves paper ballots as the primary voting method
- Introduces digital scanning for encrypted backups
- Enhances security while maintaining familiarity
Multi-Channel Voting Options
- Mail-in voting
- Mobile voting exclusively for voters with recognized disabilities
Enhanced Security Measures
- Two-factor authentication for digital voting
- End-to-end encryption for data transmission and storage
- Regular security audits and testing
Transparent Tallying
- Public vote counting with real-time digital updates
- Open-source software for public scrutiny
Voter Empowerment
- Digital voter profiles for easy registration and updates
- Ability to verify recorded votes
- Enhanced accessibility features
- Multilingual support
Civic Engagement Initiatives
- Online voter education portal
- Digital candidate information hub
- Interactive platform for constituent-representative communication
- Integration with social media for increased outreach
Youth Involvement
- School-based civic education programs
- Mock election systems for educational institutions
- Youth advisory board for system improvement
Benefits to Society
1. **Increased Voter Participation**: By offering multiple voting channels and enhancing accessibility, the act aims to make voting easier for all Oregonians, potentially increasing turnout.
2. **Enhanced Election Integrity**: The combination of paper ballots and digital backups provides a robust system for verifying election results and preventing fraud.
3. **Greater Transparency**: Real-time vote tallying and open-source software allow for unprecedented public oversight of the election process.
4. **Improved Accessibility**: The act prioritizes making voting more accessible for people with disabilities and non-English speakers.
5. **Civic Education**: By incorporating youth involvement and providing comprehensive voter education resources, the act aims to create a more informed and engaged citizenry.
6. **Environmental Consideration**: The gradual reduction of paper usage aligns with Oregon's commitment to sustainability.
7. **Cost Efficiency**: While initial implementation costs may be significant, the act includes measures for long-term cost savings through improved efficiency and shared resources.
Forward-Thinking Aspects
1. **Adaptability**: The system is designed to accommodate potential future changes in legislative representation, ensuring its relevance for years to come.
2. **Continuous Improvement**: Regular audits, public feedback mechanisms, and annual reviews ensure the system evolves with technological advancements and changing needs.
3. **Cybersecurity Preparedness**: By implementing state-of-the-art security measures and regular audits, the system is better equipped to handle emerging cyber threats.
4. **Demographic Shifts**: The focus on youth engagement and multilingual support prepares Oregon for an increasingly diverse electorate.
5. **Technological Integration**: The act positions Oregon at the forefront of election technology, ready to incorporate future innovations as they emerge.
6. **Transparency and Trust**: In an era of increasing concern about election integrity, the act's emphasis on transparency can help build and maintain public trust in the democratic process.
7. **Civic Engagement in the Digital Age**: By integrating digital platforms and social media, the act acknowledges and leverages changing patterns of public engagement.
8. **Data Privacy Considerations**: With strict data protection measures and regular privacy assessments, the act anticipates growing concerns about data privacy and security.
By implementing this forward-thinking election system, Oregon positions itself to address current challenges in election administration while also preparing for future developments in technology, demographics, and civic engagement. This proactive approach can serve as a model for other states, potentially influencing national standards for election modernization.
This isn't about replacing our current system - it's about strengthening it. The initiative includes a careful, 4 year, phased implementation starting the first year after passing, with pilot programs to ensure everything works smoothly before statewide rollout. Your signature helps put this important measure on the ballot, giving Oregonians the chance to vote on modernizing our election system while maintaining its integrity. Together, we can make Oregon's democracy even stronger for future generations, and incorporate structure into our current system, that attempts to plan for problems we may encounter, down the road.
Joel Gonzalez, Chief Petitioner
Sign now to help put this measure on the ballot and make Oregon a leader in election integrity and accessibility.
The Oregon Election Modernization Act
Caption
(15 words) Establishes cutting-edge, secure voting system; enhances election integrity, accessibility, and civic engagement.
Question
(20 words) Should Oregon implement a modernized election system combining paper ballots, digital technology, and enhanced civic engagement to strengthen democratic processes?
Summary
(175 words) Measure establishes the Oregon Secure and Transparent Election System (OSTES) to revolutionize voting processes. Key components:
Dual paper-digital voting: Paper ballots remain primary; digital backups via scanning
Multi-channel voting: In-person, mail-in, and mobile options for disabled voters
Enhanced security: Two-factor authentication, end-to-end encryption
Transparent tallying: Public counting, real-time digital updates
Voter empowerment: Digital profiles, vote verification, accessibility features
Civic engagement: Online education portal, candidate information hub
Youth involvement: School-based civic education programs
Continuous improvement: Regular audits, public feedback mechanisms
Environmental consideration: Reduced paper usage over time
Establishes oversight committee for implementation and improvement. Requires Secretary of State to set operational rules. Allocates funding for development, implementation, and public education. Prepares for potential future expansion of representation while maintaining current legislative structure.
Full Text of the Proposed Law
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Oregon:
SECTION 1. TITLE
This Act shall be known and may be cited as the "Oregon Election Modernization Act."
SECTION 2. FINDINGS AND DECLARATIONS
The People of Oregon find and declare that:
(a) A secure, transparent, and accessible voting system is fundamental to a thriving democracy.
(b) Modernizing the election system can significantly enhance voter participation, confidence, and civic engagement.
(c) Combining traditional paper ballots with advanced digital technology can increase both security and transparency.
(d) An updated election system will better serve all Oregonians and prepare for future democratic needs.
SECTION 3. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE OREGON SECURE AND TRANSPARENT ELECTION SYSTEM (OSTES)
(a) The Oregon Secure and Transparent Election System (OSTES) is hereby established.
(b) The Secretary of State shall oversee the implementation and operation of OSTES.
SECTION 4. COMPONENTS OF OSTES
OSTES shall include the following components: (a) Dual Paper-Digital Voting:
Paper ballots remain the primary voting method
Digital scanning creates encrypted backup of each ballot
(b) Multi-Channel Voting:
In-person voting at polling stations
Mail-in voting
Mobile voting options exclusively for voters with recognized disabilities
(c) Enhanced Security Measures:
Two-factor authentication for digital voting
End-to-end encryption for all data transmission and storage
Regular security audits and penetration testing
(d) Transparent Tallying:
Public vote counting with real-time digital updates
Open-source software for public scrutiny
(e) Voter Empowerment:
Digital voter profiles for streamlined registration and updates
Ability to verify recorded votes
Enhanced accessibility features for voters with disabilities
Multilingual support for voting materials and interfaces
(f) Civic Engagement:
Online voter education portal with comprehensive voting information
Digital candidate information hub with standardized profiles
Interactive platform for constituent-representative communication
Integration with social media for increased voter outreach
(g) Youth Involvement:
School-based civic education programs
Mock election systems for educational institutions
Youth advisory board for continuous system improvement
(h) Continuous Improvement:
Regular audits of both paper and digital records
Public feedback mechanisms for system enhancement
Annual review and update of security protocols
(i) Environmental Consideration:
Gradual reduction of paper usage through increased digital adoption
Use of recycled materials for necessary paper products
Carbon-neutral data centers for digital infrastructure
(j) Independent Oversight:
Creation of an Independent Election Commission (IEC) to oversee OSTES implementation and operation
IEC members appointed jointly by the Governor, Secretary of State, and State Legislature
SECTION 5. IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE
Establishes implementation timeline:
1st year after passing: Planning and development phase
2nd year after passing: Pilot program in select counties
3rd year after passing: Evaluation and system refinement
4th year after passing: Statewide implementation
(a) 1st year: Planning and development phase
Detailed system design
Stakeholder consultations
Initial public education campaign
(b) 2nd year: Pilot program in select counties
Implementation in 3-5 diverse counties
Extensive testing and feedback collection
(c) 3rd year: Evaluation and system refinement
Comprehensive review of pilot program results
System adjustments based on feedback and performance
Expanded public education and training
(d) 4th year: Statewide implementation
Full rollout across all Oregon counties
Ongoing monitoring and support
SECTION 6. OVERSIGHT AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
(a) The Independent Election Commission (IEC) is established, composed of:
Three members appointed by the Governor
Three members appointed by the Secretary of State
Three members appointed by the State Legislature (one by Senate President, one by House Speaker, one jointly)
(b) The Committee shall review system performance annually and recommend improvements.
(c) The Committee shall ensure the system remains adaptable to future needs, including potential changes in legislative representation.
(d) The IEC shall have the power to audit, investigate, and report on all aspects of OSTES implementation and operation.
SECTION 7. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
The Secretary of State shall establish rules for the operation of OSTES, in consultation with the IEC.
SECTION 8. FUNDING AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION
(a) Appropriate funds shall be allocated from the state budget for:
Development and implementation of OSTES
Ongoing maintenance and security upgrades
Public education and outreach programs
Civic education initiatives in schools
(b) The Secretary of State shall provide an annual budget report to ensure transparency in resource allocation. (c) The IEC shall review and approve the annual budget before submission to the State Legislature.
SECTION 9. VOTER EDUCATION AND OUTREACH
(a) A comprehensive public education campaign shall be developed to inform voters about OSTES.
(b) The campaign shall utilize diverse media channels, including digital platforms, to reach all demographics.
(c) Special emphasis shall be placed on engaging younger voters and underrepresented communities.
SECTION 10. ACCESSIBILITY AND INCLUSIVITY
(a) OSTES shall comply with all federal and state accessibility requirements.
(b) Continuous efforts shall be made to enhance system accessibility for voters with disabilities.
(c) Multilingual support shall be provided to ensure equal access for all eligible voters.
(d) Mobile voting options shall be available exclusively for voters with recognized disabilities, subject to verification of eligibility.
SECTION 11. DATA PRIVACY AND SECURITY
(a) Strict data protection measures shall be implemented to safeguard voter information.
(b) Regular privacy impact assessments shall be conducted.
(c) Voters shall have the right to access and correct their personal data.
(d) The IEC shall conduct annual privacy and security audits, with results made public.
SECTION 12. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Act is held invalid, the remainder of the Act shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 13. FUTURE ADAPTABILITY
While this Act does not change the current structure of the legislature, OSTES shall be designed with the flexibility to accommodate potential future changes in legislative representation.
SECTION 14. RESTRICTED OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE ACCESS
(a) The Oregon Secure and Transparent Election System (OSTES) shall utilize software with restricted open source access to enhance security, transparency, and public trust in the election process while maintaining necessary safeguards.
(b) Access to the source code for all software utilized in OSTES shall be restricted to:
Oregon residents
Individuals with demonstrable expertise in fields directly related to election systems, software development, cybersecurity, or other relevant areas as determined by the Secretary of State and the IEC
(c) Eligible individuals seeking access to the source code must:
Provide proof of Oregon residency
Submit credentials demonstrating their relevant expertise
Sign a non-disclosure agreement and adhere to a code of ethics
Undergo a background check
(d) The Secretary of State and the IEC, in consultation with the OSTES Oversight Committee, shall establish and maintain:
A formal application and vetting process for individuals seeking source code access
A secure environment for reviewing the source code
A system for tracking and managing authorized access
(e) Authorized individuals may review the source code for the purposes of:
Identifying potential vulnerabilities or security risks
Suggesting improvements to the system's functionality or efficiency
Verifying the integrity of the election process
(f) A formal process shall be established for:
Responsible vulnerability disclosure
Submitting suggestions for system improvements
Reviewing and implementing proposed changes
(g) The Secretary of State shall ensure that all software used in the election system complies with industry best practices and standards for security and reliability.
(h) Regular security audits shall be conducted by independent third-party firms, selected through a rigorous vetting process.
SECTION 15. COMPREHENSIVE FUNDING FRAMEWORK
(a) Primary Funding Sources:
Annual allocation from the state's General Fund not to exceed 0.5% of the total state budget
Technology modernization fees applied to business entity filings with the Secretary of State
Federal election security and modernization grants
Dedicated lottery revenue allocation of 1% from existing funds
(b) Cost Distribution Model:
Initial implementation costs shall be distributed over five years
Counties shall receive proportional funding based on population and implementation needs
Maintenance costs shall be shared between state (70%) and counties (30%)
(c) Cost Reduction Mechanisms:
Bulk purchasing agreements for hardware and software licenses
Shared resources between counties where feasible
Progressive implementation to distribute costs over time
Partnership programs with Oregon universities for research and development
(d) Sustainable Revenue Generation:
Creation of an Election System Modernization Fund
Investment of fund reserves through the Oregon State Treasury
Annual audit of fund performance and expenditures
Reinvestment of cost savings from reduced paper usage and improved efficiency
(e) Fiscal Oversight:
Establishment of a Financial Oversight Subcommittee within the IEC
Quarterly financial reports to the Legislature and the IEC
Annual public reporting of expenditures and savings
Independent fiscal audits conducted by the State Auditor's Office
SECTION 16. ANTI-CORRUPTION AND ETHICS
Establishment of an Ethics Review Board within the IEC to:
(a) Develop and enforce a code of ethics for all OSTES personnel
Investigate allegations of misconduct or corruption
Provide annual ethics training for all OSTES staff and contractors
(b) Whistleblower Protection:
Creation of secure channels for reporting potential violations
Legal protections for individuals reporting misconduct in good faith
(c) Conflict of Interest Provisions:
Mandatory disclosure of potential conflicts of interest for all OSTES staff, contractors, and IEC members
Recusal requirements for decision-making in cases of potential conflicts
(d) Transparency Measures:
Public disclosure of all contracts and procurement processes
Open meetings for IEC deliberations, with limited exceptions for sensitive security matters
Regular public forums for citizen input and questions
(e) Term Limits and Rotation:
IEC members limited to two 4-year terms
Staggered appointments to ensure continuity and fresh perspectives
(f) Accountability Mechanisms:
Annual performance reviews of OSTES leadership by the IEC
Legislative oversight hearings at least twice per year
Public release of all audit reports within 30 days of completion
25
The Decision Makers
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on November 2, 2024