US Visa for Tragic 1993 Fire Survivor from Waco, TX (Livingstone Fagan)


US Visa for Tragic 1993 Fire Survivor from Waco, TX (Livingstone Fagan)
The Issue
The tragic events of the Waco siege in 1993 left an indelible mark on all those who experienced its horrors, and Livingstone Fagan, a British national, is one of its many victims. The aftermath of the 51-day standoff between the Branch Davidians and federal agents led to catastrophic consequences for those involved. Now, 30 years later, we must confront the wrongs that transpired and seek justice and mercy for those still suffering.
Livingstone Fagan was punished much more extremely, 16 years and banishment, after being identified by an ATF agent based on his race as one of the Davidians’ lethal shooters during their self-defense, while automatic weapons were fired en masse towards his family and friends.
He’s not asking to start a church, draw benefits, or make a political spectacle—he’s asking for a U.S. visa to reunite with remaining survivors and close a wound that never healed.
25 Reasons for the Immediate Readmission of Livingstone Fagan
- Humanitarian purpose: The request is for a peaceful travel or relocation for a humanitarian reunion and closure after more than three decades.
- Specific U.S. ties for reunion: There are unquestionably law-abiding survivors and longtime acquaintances (chosen family) in the United States who have not seen him in over three decades and want to see and support him.
- This includes Sheila Martin, the other remaining survivor who lost their entire family, who would like to see and help him.
- Low risk: With decades elapsed since 1993 and his present age, his current risk profile is near zero.
- No pattern of violence: There is no known ongoing involvement in violence; the conduct at issue was event-specific to an extraordinary confrontation in 1993.
- Post-release rehabilitation: Since release and return to the United Kingdom, he has maintained good behavior and reintegrated into civilian life.
- He can document stable reintegration with community ties, work history, and character references.
- He has the approval/support of his government’s national law enforcement for his conduct since release (as available/if provided), supporting rehabilitation.
- Willingness to accept conditions: He can agree to conditions such as no firearms, charitable work, and regular check-ins if requested.
- Punishment already served: He served over 16 years in U.S. custody.
- He completed his sentence and accepted deportation/removal, demonstrating compliance with legal process even while disputing aspects of the incident.
- Not convicted of murder: His Waco-related conviction was not murder; it was voluntary manslaughter (as a lesser offense), still unjust, and a firearms count, not a finding of murder.
- Unquestionable self-defense in the face of fatal governmental overreach: It is a matter of record (including acknowledgments by federal officials such as FBI negotiator Gary Noesner and ATF agents such as Jesse Rodriguez) that ATF agents were firing into/at the residence during the raid, and that Mr. Fagan returned fire believing it was necessary to defend himself and others, including his family.
- Presence of noncombatants: The exchange of gunfire occurred at a residence with women and children present, intensifying a perceived need to protect family members. Everyone in the home was under fire from ATF agents, with gunfire directed at the residence where his wife and children were present.
- Several of his fellow church members had already been shot to death, and further unprovoked governmental killings (or murders) would have likely resulted without self-defense.
- Equal responsibility and uneven outcomes: From a common-sense perspective, responsibility for the February 28, 1993 gun battle was equal among all adult participants other than Koresh, yet legal outcomes and long-term consequences among survivors were highly uneven.
- Many Branch Davidian participants faced little or no jail time, while he faced some of the most severe non-judicial and long-term judicial consequences.
- Given the number of agents shot (and agents killed) during the raid, multiple individuals inside the residence fired at ATF agents; what made Mr. Fagan different is that he was more honest.
- Although he acknowledges he could have fired a fatal shot, it is not realistically possible for him to know in that chaotic exchange which rounds caused death versus injury.
- Identification concerns: He was, in significant part, identified by race in court, despite the fact that there were other individuals of African descent present—raising concerns about the reliability and fairness of eyewitness attribution under extreme, fast-moving conditions.
- Coercive, high-control environment: The Branch Davidians operated as an intense, highly religous movement under David Koresh: well over 100 people at Mount Carmel (and almost as many off-site) were persuaded of Koresh’s end-times prophecy, and the unfolding confrontation appeared—inside the group—to be confirming Koresh’s predictions, impairing independent judgment and escalating compliance with the group’s worldview.
- In that environment, many members were effectively “brainwashed” or coerced by ideology, authority, and group pressures, diminishing independent decision-making. Catastrophic personal loss: He lost close family in the April 19, 1993 fire—an irreparable, lifelong penalty beyond incarceration.
- He lost the lives of his family in what many view as a catastrophic, preventable event tied to government misconduct and/or an unlawful or mishandled assault.
- No public-safety benefit to permanent exclusion: Continued exclusion after imprisonment, deportation, and decades of lawful conduct can be viewed as purely punitive rather than protective, given rehabilitation and the passage of time.
- The collateral consequences he has already borne—incarceration, deportation, intense media scrutiny, and lifelong stigma—are extraordinary and support a mercy-and justice-based discretionary decision.

32
The Issue
The tragic events of the Waco siege in 1993 left an indelible mark on all those who experienced its horrors, and Livingstone Fagan, a British national, is one of its many victims. The aftermath of the 51-day standoff between the Branch Davidians and federal agents led to catastrophic consequences for those involved. Now, 30 years later, we must confront the wrongs that transpired and seek justice and mercy for those still suffering.
Livingstone Fagan was punished much more extremely, 16 years and banishment, after being identified by an ATF agent based on his race as one of the Davidians’ lethal shooters during their self-defense, while automatic weapons were fired en masse towards his family and friends.
He’s not asking to start a church, draw benefits, or make a political spectacle—he’s asking for a U.S. visa to reunite with remaining survivors and close a wound that never healed.
25 Reasons for the Immediate Readmission of Livingstone Fagan
- Humanitarian purpose: The request is for a peaceful travel or relocation for a humanitarian reunion and closure after more than three decades.
- Specific U.S. ties for reunion: There are unquestionably law-abiding survivors and longtime acquaintances (chosen family) in the United States who have not seen him in over three decades and want to see and support him.
- This includes Sheila Martin, the other remaining survivor who lost their entire family, who would like to see and help him.
- Low risk: With decades elapsed since 1993 and his present age, his current risk profile is near zero.
- No pattern of violence: There is no known ongoing involvement in violence; the conduct at issue was event-specific to an extraordinary confrontation in 1993.
- Post-release rehabilitation: Since release and return to the United Kingdom, he has maintained good behavior and reintegrated into civilian life.
- He can document stable reintegration with community ties, work history, and character references.
- He has the approval/support of his government’s national law enforcement for his conduct since release (as available/if provided), supporting rehabilitation.
- Willingness to accept conditions: He can agree to conditions such as no firearms, charitable work, and regular check-ins if requested.
- Punishment already served: He served over 16 years in U.S. custody.
- He completed his sentence and accepted deportation/removal, demonstrating compliance with legal process even while disputing aspects of the incident.
- Not convicted of murder: His Waco-related conviction was not murder; it was voluntary manslaughter (as a lesser offense), still unjust, and a firearms count, not a finding of murder.
- Unquestionable self-defense in the face of fatal governmental overreach: It is a matter of record (including acknowledgments by federal officials such as FBI negotiator Gary Noesner and ATF agents such as Jesse Rodriguez) that ATF agents were firing into/at the residence during the raid, and that Mr. Fagan returned fire believing it was necessary to defend himself and others, including his family.
- Presence of noncombatants: The exchange of gunfire occurred at a residence with women and children present, intensifying a perceived need to protect family members. Everyone in the home was under fire from ATF agents, with gunfire directed at the residence where his wife and children were present.
- Several of his fellow church members had already been shot to death, and further unprovoked governmental killings (or murders) would have likely resulted without self-defense.
- Equal responsibility and uneven outcomes: From a common-sense perspective, responsibility for the February 28, 1993 gun battle was equal among all adult participants other than Koresh, yet legal outcomes and long-term consequences among survivors were highly uneven.
- Many Branch Davidian participants faced little or no jail time, while he faced some of the most severe non-judicial and long-term judicial consequences.
- Given the number of agents shot (and agents killed) during the raid, multiple individuals inside the residence fired at ATF agents; what made Mr. Fagan different is that he was more honest.
- Although he acknowledges he could have fired a fatal shot, it is not realistically possible for him to know in that chaotic exchange which rounds caused death versus injury.
- Identification concerns: He was, in significant part, identified by race in court, despite the fact that there were other individuals of African descent present—raising concerns about the reliability and fairness of eyewitness attribution under extreme, fast-moving conditions.
- Coercive, high-control environment: The Branch Davidians operated as an intense, highly religous movement under David Koresh: well over 100 people at Mount Carmel (and almost as many off-site) were persuaded of Koresh’s end-times prophecy, and the unfolding confrontation appeared—inside the group—to be confirming Koresh’s predictions, impairing independent judgment and escalating compliance with the group’s worldview.
- In that environment, many members were effectively “brainwashed” or coerced by ideology, authority, and group pressures, diminishing independent decision-making. Catastrophic personal loss: He lost close family in the April 19, 1993 fire—an irreparable, lifelong penalty beyond incarceration.
- He lost the lives of his family in what many view as a catastrophic, preventable event tied to government misconduct and/or an unlawful or mishandled assault.
- No public-safety benefit to permanent exclusion: Continued exclusion after imprisonment, deportation, and decades of lawful conduct can be viewed as purely punitive rather than protective, given rehabilitation and the passage of time.
- The collateral consequences he has already borne—incarceration, deportation, intense media scrutiny, and lifelong stigma—are extraordinary and support a mercy-and justice-based discretionary decision.

32
The Decision Makers
Share this petition
Petition created on February 26, 2026
