Vote “NO” on the DC Yoga & Gym Tax

The Issue

On May 29, 2014, DC Council passed a preliminary vote on the proposed FY 2015 budget which includes a new “gym tax.”  If passed under the final budget, DC exercisers will have to pay a 5.75% tax on all fitness centers and exercise classes beginning in January 2015. The final vote on this budget is scheduled for June 17. We still have time to convince Councilmembers to reject the idea.

#donttaxwellness

This tax means that whether you go to a large gym or a small yoga, Pilates or other specialty exercise studio, you’ll see an increase in your cost to exercise.  Here’s a breakdown of what you need to know:

  • You’ll pay more:  Yoga, fitness studios, and gyms will have no choice but to charge patrons the tax.  That means working out in the “fittest city in the U.S.” will cost you more money. 
  • Public health suffers:  Essentially, DC is opting to tax preventative health care. Less exercise equals greater risk for being overweight or obese or suffering from associated illnesses – all of which cost the city more money in healthcare.  DC does not tax essential healthcare services, including doctor’s visits and medications. So why apply a fee to preventative services that help to keep you healthy and reduce your risk of modern day epidemics like stress, depression and obesity? Yoga and fitness are proven to improve health. it only works if people are doing it.
  • Small businesses suffer:  New tax = higher cost = potentially lost business for small businesses.  If smaller specialty studios lose students as a result of higher costs, they may be forced to cut back on classes or hours.  Small businesses lose.  Those who enjoy those classes also lose.

The City Council has presented many flawed arguments for why this tax is appropriate or even justified.  Here’s the thing…

Claim:  The tax plan is based on the recommendations of a “Blue Ribbon” commission, which made its report public months ago, allowing plenty of time for public comment.

Reality:  The Council recommendations on the budget specifics were introduced only 18 hours before the vote was taken - hardly enough time to solicit or secure reasonable feedback from citizens. Clearly people are now speaking out and the sentiment is not positive.

Claim:  The overall impact of the tax package is a reduced tax burden for individuals and businesses.

Reality:  While that may be true (unclear), the likelihood of individuals considering the overall personal economic impact when making day-to-day purchasing decisions is small. It's about everyday cash flow and the everyday impact on our wallets. An increase in cost for services will make an impact on individuals and businesses.

Claim:  “The District, like many states, faces an eroding sales tax base as consumers shift their spending from goods to services.”  So, this makes practical sense to expand the tax base for the District.

Reality:  The new tax is being selectively applied to specific industries.  For example, hair salons and construction firms remain exempt. Are good hair days more valuable than physical fitness? DC also has a large budget surplus, and can afford the promised tax breaks without adding a tax on yoga and fitness.

The bottom line…

DC Council Finance Committee Chairman Jack Evans said the city can do without the taxes. "I thought it was a real mistake," he said. "The city doesn't need money. We have lots of money. We're producing record surpluses." 

There’s still time to take a stand against the Yoga and Gym Tax before the final budget vote.  Four years ago, those who value fitness in the District stood up to a similar proposal and were successful in getting the DC Council to drop the initiative. Let’s not put our city’s health at risk over a few dollars the city doesn’t need.

#donttaxwellness

This petition had 1,049 supporters

The Issue

On May 29, 2014, DC Council passed a preliminary vote on the proposed FY 2015 budget which includes a new “gym tax.”  If passed under the final budget, DC exercisers will have to pay a 5.75% tax on all fitness centers and exercise classes beginning in January 2015. The final vote on this budget is scheduled for June 17. We still have time to convince Councilmembers to reject the idea.

#donttaxwellness

This tax means that whether you go to a large gym or a small yoga, Pilates or other specialty exercise studio, you’ll see an increase in your cost to exercise.  Here’s a breakdown of what you need to know:

  • You’ll pay more:  Yoga, fitness studios, and gyms will have no choice but to charge patrons the tax.  That means working out in the “fittest city in the U.S.” will cost you more money. 
  • Public health suffers:  Essentially, DC is opting to tax preventative health care. Less exercise equals greater risk for being overweight or obese or suffering from associated illnesses – all of which cost the city more money in healthcare.  DC does not tax essential healthcare services, including doctor’s visits and medications. So why apply a fee to preventative services that help to keep you healthy and reduce your risk of modern day epidemics like stress, depression and obesity? Yoga and fitness are proven to improve health. it only works if people are doing it.
  • Small businesses suffer:  New tax = higher cost = potentially lost business for small businesses.  If smaller specialty studios lose students as a result of higher costs, they may be forced to cut back on classes or hours.  Small businesses lose.  Those who enjoy those classes also lose.

The City Council has presented many flawed arguments for why this tax is appropriate or even justified.  Here’s the thing…

Claim:  The tax plan is based on the recommendations of a “Blue Ribbon” commission, which made its report public months ago, allowing plenty of time for public comment.

Reality:  The Council recommendations on the budget specifics were introduced only 18 hours before the vote was taken - hardly enough time to solicit or secure reasonable feedback from citizens. Clearly people are now speaking out and the sentiment is not positive.

Claim:  The overall impact of the tax package is a reduced tax burden for individuals and businesses.

Reality:  While that may be true (unclear), the likelihood of individuals considering the overall personal economic impact when making day-to-day purchasing decisions is small. It's about everyday cash flow and the everyday impact on our wallets. An increase in cost for services will make an impact on individuals and businesses.

Claim:  “The District, like many states, faces an eroding sales tax base as consumers shift their spending from goods to services.”  So, this makes practical sense to expand the tax base for the District.

Reality:  The new tax is being selectively applied to specific industries.  For example, hair salons and construction firms remain exempt. Are good hair days more valuable than physical fitness? DC also has a large budget surplus, and can afford the promised tax breaks without adding a tax on yoga and fitness.

The bottom line…

DC Council Finance Committee Chairman Jack Evans said the city can do without the taxes. "I thought it was a real mistake," he said. "The city doesn't need money. We have lots of money. We're producing record surpluses." 

There’s still time to take a stand against the Yoga and Gym Tax before the final budget vote.  Four years ago, those who value fitness in the District stood up to a similar proposal and were successful in getting the DC Council to drop the initiative. Let’s not put our city’s health at risk over a few dollars the city doesn’t need.

#donttaxwellness

The Decision Makers

Former State Senate
7 Members
1 Responded
Phil Mendelson
Former State Senate - District of Columbia-E
I understand the argument that adding sales tax to a service has the effect of increasing the cost of that service, and that there are some services, e.g., health-related, that we ought to be favoring and, therefore, not taxing. The recommendation to expand the District’s sales tax to health clubs, work-out facilities, yoga studios, etc. came from the D.C. Tax Revision Commission chaired by former Mayor Anthony Williams. The recommendation was based on analyses by tax experts as to how to best structure the sales tax. It was also part of a package of proposed reforms that included revisions to the individual income tax. The goal of the Commission was to recommend an overall tax structure that is fair, equitable, and reduces the overall burden on District residents. If an individual’s health club membership is $75 per month, the tax will add $4.32 to the cost. On the other hand, the revised income tax (also part of the tax package) will save the average resident taxpayer in the $50,000-$75,000 adjusted gross income bracket about $36.33 per month ($436 per year). The following rationale is excerpted from the Tax Revision Commission’s final report (available at www.dctaxrevisioncommission.org): “The District’s general sales tax is 5.75 percent, lower than the 6 percent sales tax rate in Maryland and Northern Virginia. …In presenting a paper on sales taxes to the Commission, Professor William F. Fox, director of the Center for Business and Economic Research at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, noted that … the District, like many states, faces an eroding sales tax base as consumers shift their spending from goods to services. …The Commission recommended changes that will broaden the sales tax base without hurting the District’s competitiveness relative to neighboring jurisdictions. …While a broad tax base is optimal, Professor Fox cautioned that the District must carefully choose any new services to tax in order to minimize the economic effect.” Professor Fox recommended eight types of services be added to the sales tax, including “health clubs and tanning studios.” I want to emphasize that the goal is not to increase revenue. Indeed, when fully implemented the tax package will reduce annual revenue by about $165 million. The goal is to have a stronger tax structure. What has been adopted is a package of changes – some increases, but mostly cuts. For the District government, we will have a broader, and therefore better, sales tax base. For District residents, there will be a lower tax burden. I hope this explains what happened. I appreciate your taking the time to petition. -Phil Mendelson Enter your response here…
Anita Bonds
Former State Senate - District of Columbia-B
Jack Evans
Former State Senate - District of Columbia-2
Marion Barry
Marion Barry
State Senator
David Catania
David Catania
State Senator
Tommy Wells 5
Tommy Wells 5
State Senator
Muriel Bowser
Muriel Bowser
State Senator

Petition Updates

Share this petition

Petition created on May 30, 2014