An answer for the question of “Which came first, the …”

I recently received a question that I am calling the proverbial “Which came first, the ...”.

Below is a short answer for that curious individual interested in learning more about the Orchard Lakes Subdivision. I have also expanded my answer to address those who think individual living adjacent to an interstate should stop complaining.

The Start of the Orchard Lakes Subdivision 

The state and federal transportation agencies started building I-244 in 1958. The completion of the first Orchard Lakes Subdivision home adjoining I-244 was in 1961. I-244 in 1961 was a two-lane freeway (in each direction) with traffic flowing north and south. The Orchard Lakes subdivision predates the current I-270 six-lane freeway. Interstate Highway 270 came into existence in 1974 with the renaming of I-244. See pictures of I-244 and I-270 on Facebook (1966 and 2024).

Abatement Policy of MoDOT

This statement is a quote from the Missouri Department of Transportation's Traffic Noise Policy, "There may be extenuating circumstances where unique or unusual conditions (such as extremely noise-sensitive areas, Section 4(f) resources, etc.) warrant special consideration of highway traffic noise impacts and/or implementation of noise abatement measures. Extenuating circumstances will be considered on an individual case-by-case basis. 

Type II Projects  

Noise abatement will be considered along existing highways if all of the following criteria are met:  

(a)      The noise abatement will only be considered on an existing highway that was built or expanded after the adjacent development which is to be protected, had occurred or for adjacent land use which was in existence prior to May 14, 1976.  

(b)      The noise abatement must meet all of the criteria of the Type I Noise Abatement Policy. 

(c)      Existing highest sound levels must approach or exceed the NAC. 

The Type II noise abatement project must be eligible for federal funds and must be requested by a local government entity. The majority of the affected habitants (primary and benefited receptors) must concur that a noise wall is desired."

I respectfully ask that those of you who are not sympathetic to the harm caused by noise pollution understand that "noise is the second-largest environmental cause of physical and mental health problems" (the World Health Organization).