"The Claudes SEN Law" | Campaign


"The Claudes SEN Law" | Campaign
The Issue
The Claudes SEN Law ~ Mission is to deliver and execute "Inclusive equal world for Neurodivers, people with hidden, visable disabilities and the awareness of the #TheClaudesSENLaw
Society judges a individual by its appearance and abilities. Let's change the narrative. In up rooting the current system for inclusive, diverse world with equal opportunities in addressing low efficiency of representation in government and society.
The Claudes SEN Law New Vision of curriculum, educational and employment opportunities "The Claudes SEN Law Campaign."
1) • The Government could conduct a review to investigate the curriculum’s approach to Special Educational Needs. Including education and employment opportunities and the barriers for people with Special Educational Needs. To establish SEN Qualifications and Degree system. To increase more Job Opportunities with more Equality paticualy with regards to race.
2) • The Government should then consider ways of improving understanding of these needs, and supporting people with these needs. This could include revising and abolishing short fall areas of the national curriculum, and providing educational access of enabling the importance for choice of Personal Budget for Families, SEN Students including the importance of compliance with the golden thread. Who are EHCP plan holders. Equality for hidden and visual disabilities. Including the importance of "The Claudes SEN Week." Which highlights SEN awareness.
I am one of over a million students who have Special Educational Needs and have faced my own challenges and personal obstacles.
3) • SEN education requires financial support for productive, positive constructive, sufficient legitimately monitored with transparency of delivery in well spread executed investment. The Ability power for Families and Children to be able to call for the demanded of injunction Act against inadequate local authorities. The key element of national / international to be followed and not just misconducted for non delivery.
4) • The importance of enabling to extend studying 25 cut off age as for the ehcp plan holders to a 25 + Educational Base Support Funding and Plan base for all Neurodivers SEND Students and Young Adults. Their are massive fools within Child protection. Which require a Claudes SEN Law Childrens Act in rights for Parents and Families. The Children's Act is not fit for purpose in highlighting and strengthening the SEND Children's right and voice. We call immediately for an abolishment of Underperforming Constitutional race Courts and Not fit for purpose Court of Protections. Which do not have the Welfare of SEND Child.
5) • To abolish the current DLD system for replacing an payment benefit system for Hidden and Visible disabilities, with experienced assessor than the involvement of paramedic under qualified assessors. Investment for Creative Arts and music Education to be implemented for a level of Education. While ensuring everyone has the right to study as long as Individual would like to study. While having mathematics and Education delivered beyond 18+ in further and higher education.
6) • The importance of a New Vision for Education which includes a Funded, accessible, lifelong and democratised free education, without a commodity education and society for All. Special Educational Needs Families call for delivery of Compensation Act (1923), Compensation Act 2006 as result of the commodity systematic harm which has been inflicted.
7) • To abolish systemic not fit for purpose structures of multi agency in our society. Families and parenteral right to call for Non Molestation Order, Injunction against not fit for purpose local authorities and constitutional boards. Which can involve process for Investigation and Public Inquiries of not fit for purpose local authorities and public or independent constitutional boards. Which also brings not fit for purpose ombudsman's brought in to question for being called of Investigation of their abilities by parental or even family request and SEND Act UK legislation.
8) • Abolish The Old Education System for a new narrative of an open minded society with no obstacles and short falls in our education system. Regulator independent board for IOPC and Local Government Social Care Ombudsman and Housing Ombudsman to be brought in to swift effect.
9) • Abolish immigration judges which are allowed to head or be involved with SEN education tribunal hearings. Legal Aid must legitimately be resourced with professional independent qualified legal education representative lawyers and professional funding.
10) • To abolish the current Educational Health Care Plan which can not have involvement of health as education must be about education, because in many case studies and stories which have been shared. We are now required to make education be about education, then the misconduct of the miss used powers of Public Services time and resources in result of avoiding to fund for a individuals education of investment.
11) • The Important acknowledgement of transparency, consistency and respect for Duty of Candor. Also the immediate abolishment of the EHCP, "Educational Health Care Plan," for a Education only based plan. Which looks at the Needs of Special Educational Needs Student, without the involvement of Soical Care and other Public Sectors. In the ability of a Student's ability to grow with a successful educational journey with investment behind the individual student. Education plan which forces on delivery for Quality of Education and Neurodivsty, Hidden Disabilities, Visible Disabilities / SEND as a whole element.
12) • To abolish the idea of academics and mainstream local offer placement which are not appropriate for SEN Students. Why don't we create or bring back grammar school and acknowledge the importance of small size seven class specialist independent placements.
13) • To make sure that SEN Laws and the Family Act of the Families and student voices are respected to be heard and acknowledge within a choice of placement.
14) • To enable the importance of a Independent regulation board, which would included SEN families and students who are able to regulate over local authorities.
15) • Immediate Independent Investigation of Richmond Upon Thames, "Achieving For Children." Citizen / Family rights without to stop constitutional control of Hidden Agendas / Misconduct of NATO war Investment, for ability of Quality of Education.
16) • The importance of enabling an active independent qualified Neurodiverse Minister. Ablishment of EHCP to be Education Plan
17) • The Importance of a, "Independent Anti Corruption Money Laundering Task Force and independent board," for Government and Local Authorities. Freedom of Choice, Human Rights Act Parental / Children Rights to be respected, followed and strengthen.
18) • Deal with number youth homeless, sofa surfing and harassment behaviour of houesing local authorities due to deal rapidly with the short falls of SEN Departments of Local Authorities. Not fit for purpose Local Authorities, especially "Richmond Upon Thames Council," {Achieving for Children} powers sent back to Central Government.
19) • Implementation of an Independent Diversity Equity Inclusion Committee. With also key element of Disability & Inclusion Human Rights Citizen Bill.
People with learning difficulties should be supported to succeed in education and work.
Our Call to Action:
We are calling for key reforms in the UK Justice System to address the unprecedented backlog of 90 million unresolved cases and the ongoing Black Hole Crisis in legal proceedings.
Our vision is a system where:
Swift and Accountable Justice: All victims receive timely justice, without unnecessary delays, ensuring that the Rule of Law is fully upheld.
Implementation of Effective Enforcement Measures: Stronger mechanisms to enforce court rulings and punishments, ensuring accountability for all parties involved.
Jury Service Reform: Jury members must have full human rights protections, free from undue influence by HMCTS judges, guaranteeing independent and fair decision-making.
Global Support for Reform: We aim to gather 10,000 signatures worldwide to drive systemic change and amplify the call for a justice system that serves everyone equitably.
This campaign seeks to empower victims, strengthen accountability and restore faith in the justice system through reform, transparency and enforcement of the law.
° Background Additional information
{Public Statement}
The Claudes SEN Law Campaign, known as GCBR and TCSL Campaign.
Personal believe we are required to understand the important difference between Independent Placements, Specialist Education, Mainstream from Neurodiverse/Hidden Disabilities Educational placements, which would be known as Independent Specialist placements for example trained teachers assistances, 7 class size with support including for Neurodiverse students with additional exam support included. From Mainstream which has massive capacity class size and no exam support like additional support. Which would not be included & to High Specialist Placements, which individuals with disabilities would feel it’s right to be accepted into mainstream educational placements.
In this case I would say that local authorities have no obligation to over step their control to direct their opinion on Student, families and Young adults. When the law states in result to family act, SEND Act and Human Rights act and any other laws and acts which are in support of Students and families views and human rights to Education choice. In relation to Education. That individual are entitled to their choice of Education, especially in SEND, “Special Educational Needs. Which has not been practiced and been taken advantage of by local authorities who have fixed outlook of local offer and mainstream educational placements. Who believe they are the educators. In my personal opinion local authorities are and have not fit for purpose for years. In this case Achieving for Children, “Richmond Upon Thames.” Have short fall to follow laws and process which makes them not fit for purpose.
Independent Education: Private schools (also known as 'independent schools') charge fees to attend instead of being funded by the government. Pupils do not have to follow the national curriculum. All private schools must be registered with the government and are inspected regularly.
Special Education:
Currently, a child or young person is considered to have SEN if they have a disability or learning difficulty that means they need special educational provision. Special educational provision means that the child needs support that would not generally be provided to a child of the same age in a mainstream school. "Education setting care not health care." #educationmustbeabouteducation
Grammar Education:
Grammar schools are state-funded, academically selective senior schools. The education a child receives at grammar school is paid for by the state unlike at private schools which provide education for a fee. There are currently 163 located in 36 English local authorities, with around 167,000 pupils between them.
Mainstream Education:
School teaching pupils of a wide range of abilities and aptitudes. Mainstream schools are not special schools or pupil referral units.
Academy Education
Academic education is research-based and consists of academic bachelor's and master's programmes. For academic bachelor's programmes, the main aim is for students to continue their studies in a master's programme. Academic master's programmes are academically oriented but can also include a professional orientation. #endcommodityeducation
Academics are not Educational placements as their profitability placements , which were created to profit before students and young adults. I believe in my personal opinion these placements to be abolished. Which have massive investments in arms and fossil fuels included.
We are we creating Education or are we creating a Commodity society which is short falling the current and future generations of students and young adults.
Did you know that?
“How many children leave school unable to read or write?”
More than 200,000 pupils will leave primary school this year without being able to read, according to unpublished figures by the Government. The figures show that the number of students who struggle with literacy has risen by 30,000 over the past year during the pandemic, when schooling has been disrupted.
Sources: BBC, The Guardian and other news outlets #EnoughIsEnough Please all support, “The Claudes SEN Law Campaign.” To change the falling Education system which we currently have.
Transforming Education Report: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ottoq0gol8awujf/report_on_the_2022_transforming_education_summit.pdf?dl=0
▪︎ Special Educational Needs and Disability Act 2001
▪︎Human Rights Act 1998
▪︎ Special Educational Needs: Code of Practice
▪︎ The Mental Health Act (1983)
▪︎ The Sustainable Development Goals or Global Goals are a collection of seventeen interlinked objectives designed to serve as a "shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, now and into the future". Goal 4: Quality education - The Global Goals. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. #SDGs4
You're disabled under the Equality Act 2010 if you have a physical or mental impairment that has a 'substantial' and 'long-term' negative effect on your ability to do normal daily activities. The Equality Act 2010
▪︎ The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 was the first UK legislation protecting disabled people against various forms of discrimination. Years of campaigning and protests led up to the passing of the act, including incidents of civil disobedience.
Richmond Upon Thames Council and Achieving for Children are the Safeguarding threat who are required to be brought back into central Government.
~
Aquayemi-Claude (Claude)
Aquayemi-Claude Garnett Akinsanya
Activist / Campaigner, Student, Young Leader, Author CEO and Founder
Garnetts Clothing Brand & Range and "The Claudes SEN Law Campaign."
Source Ref: Of Evidence in call for urgent Systematic Change and Equity:
▪︎ Casey Review / Metropolitan Police Report
¤ Done and Investigated by: Louise Casey, Baroness Casey of Blackstock
▪︎ Child Q Report
¤ Done and Investigated by: Children's Commissioner, "Rachel de Souza."
"The Claudes SEN Law Campaign in Context."
It was discovered from, in depth self investigation and research that Aquayemi-Claude has been aware of the following context. Did you know that for years Special Educational Needs known as 'SEND' and Home Affairs has and continues to be neglected investment. Which has created a black hole which the government of Britain of previous and current. Especially the Cabinet and Leadership Conservative Government of David Cameron. Which was not smart in making poor decisions. There's an unlawful Interlink with Education and Health when Education is required to be about Education. To enable the cost saving cloud of links to deliver work Social Care, Social Workers. To avoid support for Quality Education to move children into care. Which is also DWP Department Work & Pensions are shared private Education. In result of having an interlink with Education to have the ability to surveillance a Student for the open the opportunity to save cost to move benefits from Student. 'To then enable a door of corruption.' Which enables the Local Authority to also spotlight the Families and the Child or Young Adult in the dangerous state of Social Care and infringement of data private information of education, life and their Educational journey of privacy which is a broken action of individuals Human Rights. To be open to a multi-agency viewpoint of non privacy brings massive mental capacity harm to individual students and their families. Which builds the corruption of Multi Agencies which is a wasteful investment of taxpayers money.
Why was this idea created by David Cameron?
1) Save Cost and 'to be cost cutting experiencement.'
2) No Accountability, development of confession. To enable goal post moving of responsibilities and to neglecte currently legislation, for avoidance. There has been a repeated pattern when the local authorities will say each budget annual year. They do not have the funds for local projects, youth and Special Educational Needs.
A - 2. • However the local authorities and the Government Profits Trillions. From Income and Council tax each annual year with additional income of investments equally as well. The money amount which could open the opportunity to at least a handful of Students receiving Quality Education. Would be more beneficial to implement time into Students Quality Development in Education for a successful career.
B - 2. • Rather than academy gas and oil funded academy school. Which is profiting fabrication and corruption. While Students are falling behind and being put behind profit. For Business Model performance.
Did you know of the following?
The Oil & Gas Academy of Scotland to receive funding boost - The Oil & Gas Academy of Scotland (OGAS) - in which the University of Aberdeen is a partner - was today (10 May 2013) given a cash boost by First Minister Alex Salmond to improve oil and gas training facilities and develop other energy sector skills courses
Link - https://www.abdn.ac.uk/news/2635/
Source: University of Aberdeen
The oil and gas industry is to set up a new academy to help secure a workforce to sustain the long-term future of the UK continental shelf (UKCS).
The academy will officially be known as the Offshore Petroleum Industry Training Organisation (OPITO), The Oil and Gas Academy.
Link - https://www.theengineer.co.uk/content/news/new-oil-and-gas-academy/
Source: The Engineer
3) Boost Income tax, for the Government's back pocket on the back of conduct control. To be greedy in the gain of profiting off Special Educational Needs Families and underprivileged communities. Who are being neglected by Quality Education which is a Human Right. In result for 'DWP' Department For Work & Pensions and the Local Authority to save money.
"The Claudes SEN Law Campaign and Petition. Was created to change the narrative of Quality Education, Social Inclusion Justice in Britain, National and on International Scale. It's time to end the commodity. Academy gas and oil funded interlink Business model of Education with Health. For Quality Education SDGs 4 of 17 Global Goals, where Quality Education is about Students before profit. Without cost cutting avoidance test Business models for Governments and the LA profiting spin while gaining greed. 'Let's Change the Narrative.'
Enforcement & Accountability Framework for Public Bodies – Policy Context & Implementation
Objective:
To introduce a robust, legally enforceable policy mechanism ensuring public bodies and elected officials are held accountable for non-adherence to policy obligations, breach of court judgements, misuse of public office, and violations under the Human Rights Act 1998, Victims' Code, Ministerial Code, and Public Sector Equality Duty.
Policy Objective:
To ensure individuals with Disabilities, Significant Disabilities, Complex Needs, and Special Educational Needs (SEN) are granted full entitlement to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) without the need for repeated re-assessments, and with backpayment and appropriate support guaranteed.
Policy Details In Relation to PIP:
Automatic Lifetime Award for Eligible Individuals
Persons with lifelong, medically documented Disabilities and SEN shall be awarded PIP on a lifetime basis without mandatory periodic reassessments, reducing the risk of stress, trauma, or administrative burden.
Backpayment of Missed Entitlements
Where evidence shows historic underpayment, wrongful denial, or suspension of PIP to individuals now deemed eligible under this policy, full backpayment must be processed immediately, with interest as applicable.
Recognition of Educational and Medical Records
EHCPs (Education, Health and Care Plans), clinical diagnoses, and specialist letters must be sufficient for evidence. These documents should automatically qualify individuals without the need for additional face-to-face assessments.
Support Framework and Advocacy Access
All eligible persons should be assigned a Disability Benefits Support Advocate to help manage the process, appeal wrongful past decisions, and access ongoing entitlements with dignity.
Review and Oversight Panel
An Independent SEN & Disability Panel should oversee all rejections and complaints, ensuring no bias, discrimination, or systemic negligence is present in PIP decisions.
Legal Enforceability and Protection
Denial or delay in compliance with this policy shall be legally actionable. Any discriminatory practice or failure to apply this policy may lead to legal redress, compensation, and penalties for the responsible department.
I. Key Policy Elements:
Scope of Enforcement:
Applies to:
Local Government and Councils
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)
Personal Independence Payment (PIP) Department
Local Authorities & Housing Providers
Local MPs and Members of Parliament
Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC)
Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO)
Public Services, Bodies including Social Work England and Achieving for Children
Government Contractors or Subcontracted Welfare Agencies
Penalties & Sanctions:
Financial Penalties: Tiered fines for each breach of court judgements, policy non-compliance, or procedural misconduct.
Arrest Warrants: Legal provisions to initiate arrest, corporal punishment and prosecution in cases of:
Money laundering
Hardship inflicted via negligence or systemic failure
Misuse of public office and power
Corruption or bribery within institutions
Corporal Punishment Clause (Subject to Human Rights Review): Symbolic language to underline severity, with actual enforcement requiring ethical and legal assessment.
Triggers for Action Without Consent:
Investigations and enforcement actions do not require consent of:
Victims or whistleblowers
Local Members of Parliament
Shadow Ministers or Independent Panels may provide authorisation, ensuring checks and balances.
Independent Oversight & Regulation:
Independent Regulator: New or extended powers to bodies like the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) to act in investigative and prosecutorial capacities.
Operational Autonomy: Regulators must act independently of government influence, with full legal access to records, decision-making authority, and enforcement powers.
Duty of Candour: Public bodies are legally bound to cooperate, disclose internal failures, and implement corrective actions without delay.
Legal Instruments and Framework Alignment:
Human Rights Act 1998
Equality Act 2010
Victims’ Code of Practice
Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
Ministerial Code and Nolan Principles on Public Life
Children’s Act 1989 & 2004 (where relevant)
Criminal Justice & Courts Act 2015 – s77 (Misconduct in Public Office)
II. Implementation Considerations:
Legislative Amendment: Introduce a Private Members’ Bill or secondary legislation for Parliamentary approval.
Pilot Scheme: Initiate in key boroughs with recorded systemic failures (e.g., Richmond Park, Wandsworth, Newham, Lambeth and London Councils).
Stakeholder Engagement: Consult with victims’ groups, legal professionals, watchdog organisations.
Funding & Resourcing: Establish budget lines for independent regulator and operational teams. "Law Sue Rights for British Citizens and Taxpayers against Public Authorities for Self Representation and Legal Aid Case."
Public Awareness Campaign: Inform public of rights, complaint mechanisms, and enforcement tools.
Annual Transparency Report: Mandatory public reporting of breaches, fines issued, return of corporal punishment and prosecutions arrest warrants.
(In Context of the Petition and Campaign)
Overview Summary – Why This Matters
The Claudes SEN Law Campaign is a national call to action to restore dignity, justice, and fairness for people with Disabilities, Significant Disabilities, Complex Needs, and Special Educational Needs (SEN).
Every day, thousands of vulnerable individuals face the dehumanising and repetitive process of reassessment for Personal Independence Payment (PIP)—despite having lifelong, documented conditions. Many are wrongly denied support, left without access to basic needs, or made to fight endless bureaucratic battles for the care and financial help they are legally entitled to.
This policy seeks to end the cycle of reassessment trauma, ensure lifetime PIP entitlement, and provide full backpayment for those unlawfully denied in the past. It’s time for a system that believes people the first time—and treats their lived experience with respect.
By backing this policy, you are standing for justice, equality, and protection of the rights of all people with disabilities in the UK. This is a fight for human rights, not just policy reform.
Policy Aims
Lifetime PIP Award – For all individuals with confirmed lifelong Disabilities and SEN.
No Re-assessments – Protection from invasive and unnecessary review processes.
Full Backpayment – Immediate compensation for historic underpayments and denial of PIP.
Recognition of Evidence – Acceptance of EHCPs, clinical records, and educational support plans as valid proof.
Disability Advocacy Access – Direct support from trained advocates for every eligible claimant.
Oversight Panel – Independent review of PIP denials to prevent future injustice.
Legal Accountability – Penalties and recourse for discrimination or systemic failure.
Join the Movement – Sign the Petition
Support the Claudes SEN Law Campaign by adding your name. With your signature, we will:
Bring this policy to Parliament.
Push for systemic reform at the DWP.
Hold decision-makers accountable.
Win justice for those failed by the current system.
This is not just about policy—this is about people. Help us change lives.
Please support me and Then Claudes SEN Law Campaign..
Thank You!
#GCBRandTCSL
#TheClaudesSENLaw

429
The Issue
The Claudes SEN Law ~ Mission is to deliver and execute "Inclusive equal world for Neurodivers, people with hidden, visable disabilities and the awareness of the #TheClaudesSENLaw
Society judges a individual by its appearance and abilities. Let's change the narrative. In up rooting the current system for inclusive, diverse world with equal opportunities in addressing low efficiency of representation in government and society.
The Claudes SEN Law New Vision of curriculum, educational and employment opportunities "The Claudes SEN Law Campaign."
1) • The Government could conduct a review to investigate the curriculum’s approach to Special Educational Needs. Including education and employment opportunities and the barriers for people with Special Educational Needs. To establish SEN Qualifications and Degree system. To increase more Job Opportunities with more Equality paticualy with regards to race.
2) • The Government should then consider ways of improving understanding of these needs, and supporting people with these needs. This could include revising and abolishing short fall areas of the national curriculum, and providing educational access of enabling the importance for choice of Personal Budget for Families, SEN Students including the importance of compliance with the golden thread. Who are EHCP plan holders. Equality for hidden and visual disabilities. Including the importance of "The Claudes SEN Week." Which highlights SEN awareness.
I am one of over a million students who have Special Educational Needs and have faced my own challenges and personal obstacles.
3) • SEN education requires financial support for productive, positive constructive, sufficient legitimately monitored with transparency of delivery in well spread executed investment. The Ability power for Families and Children to be able to call for the demanded of injunction Act against inadequate local authorities. The key element of national / international to be followed and not just misconducted for non delivery.
4) • The importance of enabling to extend studying 25 cut off age as for the ehcp plan holders to a 25 + Educational Base Support Funding and Plan base for all Neurodivers SEND Students and Young Adults. Their are massive fools within Child protection. Which require a Claudes SEN Law Childrens Act in rights for Parents and Families. The Children's Act is not fit for purpose in highlighting and strengthening the SEND Children's right and voice. We call immediately for an abolishment of Underperforming Constitutional race Courts and Not fit for purpose Court of Protections. Which do not have the Welfare of SEND Child.
5) • To abolish the current DLD system for replacing an payment benefit system for Hidden and Visible disabilities, with experienced assessor than the involvement of paramedic under qualified assessors. Investment for Creative Arts and music Education to be implemented for a level of Education. While ensuring everyone has the right to study as long as Individual would like to study. While having mathematics and Education delivered beyond 18+ in further and higher education.
6) • The importance of a New Vision for Education which includes a Funded, accessible, lifelong and democratised free education, without a commodity education and society for All. Special Educational Needs Families call for delivery of Compensation Act (1923), Compensation Act 2006 as result of the commodity systematic harm which has been inflicted.
7) • To abolish systemic not fit for purpose structures of multi agency in our society. Families and parenteral right to call for Non Molestation Order, Injunction against not fit for purpose local authorities and constitutional boards. Which can involve process for Investigation and Public Inquiries of not fit for purpose local authorities and public or independent constitutional boards. Which also brings not fit for purpose ombudsman's brought in to question for being called of Investigation of their abilities by parental or even family request and SEND Act UK legislation.
8) • Abolish The Old Education System for a new narrative of an open minded society with no obstacles and short falls in our education system. Regulator independent board for IOPC and Local Government Social Care Ombudsman and Housing Ombudsman to be brought in to swift effect.
9) • Abolish immigration judges which are allowed to head or be involved with SEN education tribunal hearings. Legal Aid must legitimately be resourced with professional independent qualified legal education representative lawyers and professional funding.
10) • To abolish the current Educational Health Care Plan which can not have involvement of health as education must be about education, because in many case studies and stories which have been shared. We are now required to make education be about education, then the misconduct of the miss used powers of Public Services time and resources in result of avoiding to fund for a individuals education of investment.
11) • The Important acknowledgement of transparency, consistency and respect for Duty of Candor. Also the immediate abolishment of the EHCP, "Educational Health Care Plan," for a Education only based plan. Which looks at the Needs of Special Educational Needs Student, without the involvement of Soical Care and other Public Sectors. In the ability of a Student's ability to grow with a successful educational journey with investment behind the individual student. Education plan which forces on delivery for Quality of Education and Neurodivsty, Hidden Disabilities, Visible Disabilities / SEND as a whole element.
12) • To abolish the idea of academics and mainstream local offer placement which are not appropriate for SEN Students. Why don't we create or bring back grammar school and acknowledge the importance of small size seven class specialist independent placements.
13) • To make sure that SEN Laws and the Family Act of the Families and student voices are respected to be heard and acknowledge within a choice of placement.
14) • To enable the importance of a Independent regulation board, which would included SEN families and students who are able to regulate over local authorities.
15) • Immediate Independent Investigation of Richmond Upon Thames, "Achieving For Children." Citizen / Family rights without to stop constitutional control of Hidden Agendas / Misconduct of NATO war Investment, for ability of Quality of Education.
16) • The importance of enabling an active independent qualified Neurodiverse Minister. Ablishment of EHCP to be Education Plan
17) • The Importance of a, "Independent Anti Corruption Money Laundering Task Force and independent board," for Government and Local Authorities. Freedom of Choice, Human Rights Act Parental / Children Rights to be respected, followed and strengthen.
18) • Deal with number youth homeless, sofa surfing and harassment behaviour of houesing local authorities due to deal rapidly with the short falls of SEN Departments of Local Authorities. Not fit for purpose Local Authorities, especially "Richmond Upon Thames Council," {Achieving for Children} powers sent back to Central Government.
19) • Implementation of an Independent Diversity Equity Inclusion Committee. With also key element of Disability & Inclusion Human Rights Citizen Bill.
People with learning difficulties should be supported to succeed in education and work.
Our Call to Action:
We are calling for key reforms in the UK Justice System to address the unprecedented backlog of 90 million unresolved cases and the ongoing Black Hole Crisis in legal proceedings.
Our vision is a system where:
Swift and Accountable Justice: All victims receive timely justice, without unnecessary delays, ensuring that the Rule of Law is fully upheld.
Implementation of Effective Enforcement Measures: Stronger mechanisms to enforce court rulings and punishments, ensuring accountability for all parties involved.
Jury Service Reform: Jury members must have full human rights protections, free from undue influence by HMCTS judges, guaranteeing independent and fair decision-making.
Global Support for Reform: We aim to gather 10,000 signatures worldwide to drive systemic change and amplify the call for a justice system that serves everyone equitably.
This campaign seeks to empower victims, strengthen accountability and restore faith in the justice system through reform, transparency and enforcement of the law.
° Background Additional information
{Public Statement}
The Claudes SEN Law Campaign, known as GCBR and TCSL Campaign.
Personal believe we are required to understand the important difference between Independent Placements, Specialist Education, Mainstream from Neurodiverse/Hidden Disabilities Educational placements, which would be known as Independent Specialist placements for example trained teachers assistances, 7 class size with support including for Neurodiverse students with additional exam support included. From Mainstream which has massive capacity class size and no exam support like additional support. Which would not be included & to High Specialist Placements, which individuals with disabilities would feel it’s right to be accepted into mainstream educational placements.
In this case I would say that local authorities have no obligation to over step their control to direct their opinion on Student, families and Young adults. When the law states in result to family act, SEND Act and Human Rights act and any other laws and acts which are in support of Students and families views and human rights to Education choice. In relation to Education. That individual are entitled to their choice of Education, especially in SEND, “Special Educational Needs. Which has not been practiced and been taken advantage of by local authorities who have fixed outlook of local offer and mainstream educational placements. Who believe they are the educators. In my personal opinion local authorities are and have not fit for purpose for years. In this case Achieving for Children, “Richmond Upon Thames.” Have short fall to follow laws and process which makes them not fit for purpose.
Independent Education: Private schools (also known as 'independent schools') charge fees to attend instead of being funded by the government. Pupils do not have to follow the national curriculum. All private schools must be registered with the government and are inspected regularly.
Special Education:
Currently, a child or young person is considered to have SEN if they have a disability or learning difficulty that means they need special educational provision. Special educational provision means that the child needs support that would not generally be provided to a child of the same age in a mainstream school. "Education setting care not health care." #educationmustbeabouteducation
Grammar Education:
Grammar schools are state-funded, academically selective senior schools. The education a child receives at grammar school is paid for by the state unlike at private schools which provide education for a fee. There are currently 163 located in 36 English local authorities, with around 167,000 pupils between them.
Mainstream Education:
School teaching pupils of a wide range of abilities and aptitudes. Mainstream schools are not special schools or pupil referral units.
Academy Education
Academic education is research-based and consists of academic bachelor's and master's programmes. For academic bachelor's programmes, the main aim is for students to continue their studies in a master's programme. Academic master's programmes are academically oriented but can also include a professional orientation. #endcommodityeducation
Academics are not Educational placements as their profitability placements , which were created to profit before students and young adults. I believe in my personal opinion these placements to be abolished. Which have massive investments in arms and fossil fuels included.
We are we creating Education or are we creating a Commodity society which is short falling the current and future generations of students and young adults.
Did you know that?
“How many children leave school unable to read or write?”
More than 200,000 pupils will leave primary school this year without being able to read, according to unpublished figures by the Government. The figures show that the number of students who struggle with literacy has risen by 30,000 over the past year during the pandemic, when schooling has been disrupted.
Sources: BBC, The Guardian and other news outlets #EnoughIsEnough Please all support, “The Claudes SEN Law Campaign.” To change the falling Education system which we currently have.
Transforming Education Report: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ottoq0gol8awujf/report_on_the_2022_transforming_education_summit.pdf?dl=0
▪︎ Special Educational Needs and Disability Act 2001
▪︎Human Rights Act 1998
▪︎ Special Educational Needs: Code of Practice
▪︎ The Mental Health Act (1983)
▪︎ The Sustainable Development Goals or Global Goals are a collection of seventeen interlinked objectives designed to serve as a "shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, now and into the future". Goal 4: Quality education - The Global Goals. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. #SDGs4
You're disabled under the Equality Act 2010 if you have a physical or mental impairment that has a 'substantial' and 'long-term' negative effect on your ability to do normal daily activities. The Equality Act 2010
▪︎ The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 was the first UK legislation protecting disabled people against various forms of discrimination. Years of campaigning and protests led up to the passing of the act, including incidents of civil disobedience.
Richmond Upon Thames Council and Achieving for Children are the Safeguarding threat who are required to be brought back into central Government.
~
Aquayemi-Claude (Claude)
Aquayemi-Claude Garnett Akinsanya
Activist / Campaigner, Student, Young Leader, Author CEO and Founder
Garnetts Clothing Brand & Range and "The Claudes SEN Law Campaign."
Source Ref: Of Evidence in call for urgent Systematic Change and Equity:
▪︎ Casey Review / Metropolitan Police Report
¤ Done and Investigated by: Louise Casey, Baroness Casey of Blackstock
▪︎ Child Q Report
¤ Done and Investigated by: Children's Commissioner, "Rachel de Souza."
"The Claudes SEN Law Campaign in Context."
It was discovered from, in depth self investigation and research that Aquayemi-Claude has been aware of the following context. Did you know that for years Special Educational Needs known as 'SEND' and Home Affairs has and continues to be neglected investment. Which has created a black hole which the government of Britain of previous and current. Especially the Cabinet and Leadership Conservative Government of David Cameron. Which was not smart in making poor decisions. There's an unlawful Interlink with Education and Health when Education is required to be about Education. To enable the cost saving cloud of links to deliver work Social Care, Social Workers. To avoid support for Quality Education to move children into care. Which is also DWP Department Work & Pensions are shared private Education. In result of having an interlink with Education to have the ability to surveillance a Student for the open the opportunity to save cost to move benefits from Student. 'To then enable a door of corruption.' Which enables the Local Authority to also spotlight the Families and the Child or Young Adult in the dangerous state of Social Care and infringement of data private information of education, life and their Educational journey of privacy which is a broken action of individuals Human Rights. To be open to a multi-agency viewpoint of non privacy brings massive mental capacity harm to individual students and their families. Which builds the corruption of Multi Agencies which is a wasteful investment of taxpayers money.
Why was this idea created by David Cameron?
1) Save Cost and 'to be cost cutting experiencement.'
2) No Accountability, development of confession. To enable goal post moving of responsibilities and to neglecte currently legislation, for avoidance. There has been a repeated pattern when the local authorities will say each budget annual year. They do not have the funds for local projects, youth and Special Educational Needs.
A - 2. • However the local authorities and the Government Profits Trillions. From Income and Council tax each annual year with additional income of investments equally as well. The money amount which could open the opportunity to at least a handful of Students receiving Quality Education. Would be more beneficial to implement time into Students Quality Development in Education for a successful career.
B - 2. • Rather than academy gas and oil funded academy school. Which is profiting fabrication and corruption. While Students are falling behind and being put behind profit. For Business Model performance.
Did you know of the following?
The Oil & Gas Academy of Scotland to receive funding boost - The Oil & Gas Academy of Scotland (OGAS) - in which the University of Aberdeen is a partner - was today (10 May 2013) given a cash boost by First Minister Alex Salmond to improve oil and gas training facilities and develop other energy sector skills courses
Link - https://www.abdn.ac.uk/news/2635/
Source: University of Aberdeen
The oil and gas industry is to set up a new academy to help secure a workforce to sustain the long-term future of the UK continental shelf (UKCS).
The academy will officially be known as the Offshore Petroleum Industry Training Organisation (OPITO), The Oil and Gas Academy.
Link - https://www.theengineer.co.uk/content/news/new-oil-and-gas-academy/
Source: The Engineer
3) Boost Income tax, for the Government's back pocket on the back of conduct control. To be greedy in the gain of profiting off Special Educational Needs Families and underprivileged communities. Who are being neglected by Quality Education which is a Human Right. In result for 'DWP' Department For Work & Pensions and the Local Authority to save money.
"The Claudes SEN Law Campaign and Petition. Was created to change the narrative of Quality Education, Social Inclusion Justice in Britain, National and on International Scale. It's time to end the commodity. Academy gas and oil funded interlink Business model of Education with Health. For Quality Education SDGs 4 of 17 Global Goals, where Quality Education is about Students before profit. Without cost cutting avoidance test Business models for Governments and the LA profiting spin while gaining greed. 'Let's Change the Narrative.'
Enforcement & Accountability Framework for Public Bodies – Policy Context & Implementation
Objective:
To introduce a robust, legally enforceable policy mechanism ensuring public bodies and elected officials are held accountable for non-adherence to policy obligations, breach of court judgements, misuse of public office, and violations under the Human Rights Act 1998, Victims' Code, Ministerial Code, and Public Sector Equality Duty.
Policy Objective:
To ensure individuals with Disabilities, Significant Disabilities, Complex Needs, and Special Educational Needs (SEN) are granted full entitlement to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) without the need for repeated re-assessments, and with backpayment and appropriate support guaranteed.
Policy Details In Relation to PIP:
Automatic Lifetime Award for Eligible Individuals
Persons with lifelong, medically documented Disabilities and SEN shall be awarded PIP on a lifetime basis without mandatory periodic reassessments, reducing the risk of stress, trauma, or administrative burden.
Backpayment of Missed Entitlements
Where evidence shows historic underpayment, wrongful denial, or suspension of PIP to individuals now deemed eligible under this policy, full backpayment must be processed immediately, with interest as applicable.
Recognition of Educational and Medical Records
EHCPs (Education, Health and Care Plans), clinical diagnoses, and specialist letters must be sufficient for evidence. These documents should automatically qualify individuals without the need for additional face-to-face assessments.
Support Framework and Advocacy Access
All eligible persons should be assigned a Disability Benefits Support Advocate to help manage the process, appeal wrongful past decisions, and access ongoing entitlements with dignity.
Review and Oversight Panel
An Independent SEN & Disability Panel should oversee all rejections and complaints, ensuring no bias, discrimination, or systemic negligence is present in PIP decisions.
Legal Enforceability and Protection
Denial or delay in compliance with this policy shall be legally actionable. Any discriminatory practice or failure to apply this policy may lead to legal redress, compensation, and penalties for the responsible department.
I. Key Policy Elements:
Scope of Enforcement:
Applies to:
Local Government and Councils
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)
Personal Independence Payment (PIP) Department
Local Authorities & Housing Providers
Local MPs and Members of Parliament
Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC)
Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO)
Public Services, Bodies including Social Work England and Achieving for Children
Government Contractors or Subcontracted Welfare Agencies
Penalties & Sanctions:
Financial Penalties: Tiered fines for each breach of court judgements, policy non-compliance, or procedural misconduct.
Arrest Warrants: Legal provisions to initiate arrest, corporal punishment and prosecution in cases of:
Money laundering
Hardship inflicted via negligence or systemic failure
Misuse of public office and power
Corruption or bribery within institutions
Corporal Punishment Clause (Subject to Human Rights Review): Symbolic language to underline severity, with actual enforcement requiring ethical and legal assessment.
Triggers for Action Without Consent:
Investigations and enforcement actions do not require consent of:
Victims or whistleblowers
Local Members of Parliament
Shadow Ministers or Independent Panels may provide authorisation, ensuring checks and balances.
Independent Oversight & Regulation:
Independent Regulator: New or extended powers to bodies like the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) to act in investigative and prosecutorial capacities.
Operational Autonomy: Regulators must act independently of government influence, with full legal access to records, decision-making authority, and enforcement powers.
Duty of Candour: Public bodies are legally bound to cooperate, disclose internal failures, and implement corrective actions without delay.
Legal Instruments and Framework Alignment:
Human Rights Act 1998
Equality Act 2010
Victims’ Code of Practice
Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
Ministerial Code and Nolan Principles on Public Life
Children’s Act 1989 & 2004 (where relevant)
Criminal Justice & Courts Act 2015 – s77 (Misconduct in Public Office)
II. Implementation Considerations:
Legislative Amendment: Introduce a Private Members’ Bill or secondary legislation for Parliamentary approval.
Pilot Scheme: Initiate in key boroughs with recorded systemic failures (e.g., Richmond Park, Wandsworth, Newham, Lambeth and London Councils).
Stakeholder Engagement: Consult with victims’ groups, legal professionals, watchdog organisations.
Funding & Resourcing: Establish budget lines for independent regulator and operational teams. "Law Sue Rights for British Citizens and Taxpayers against Public Authorities for Self Representation and Legal Aid Case."
Public Awareness Campaign: Inform public of rights, complaint mechanisms, and enforcement tools.
Annual Transparency Report: Mandatory public reporting of breaches, fines issued, return of corporal punishment and prosecutions arrest warrants.
(In Context of the Petition and Campaign)
Overview Summary – Why This Matters
The Claudes SEN Law Campaign is a national call to action to restore dignity, justice, and fairness for people with Disabilities, Significant Disabilities, Complex Needs, and Special Educational Needs (SEN).
Every day, thousands of vulnerable individuals face the dehumanising and repetitive process of reassessment for Personal Independence Payment (PIP)—despite having lifelong, documented conditions. Many are wrongly denied support, left without access to basic needs, or made to fight endless bureaucratic battles for the care and financial help they are legally entitled to.
This policy seeks to end the cycle of reassessment trauma, ensure lifetime PIP entitlement, and provide full backpayment for those unlawfully denied in the past. It’s time for a system that believes people the first time—and treats their lived experience with respect.
By backing this policy, you are standing for justice, equality, and protection of the rights of all people with disabilities in the UK. This is a fight for human rights, not just policy reform.
Policy Aims
Lifetime PIP Award – For all individuals with confirmed lifelong Disabilities and SEN.
No Re-assessments – Protection from invasive and unnecessary review processes.
Full Backpayment – Immediate compensation for historic underpayments and denial of PIP.
Recognition of Evidence – Acceptance of EHCPs, clinical records, and educational support plans as valid proof.
Disability Advocacy Access – Direct support from trained advocates for every eligible claimant.
Oversight Panel – Independent review of PIP denials to prevent future injustice.
Legal Accountability – Penalties and recourse for discrimination or systemic failure.
Join the Movement – Sign the Petition
Support the Claudes SEN Law Campaign by adding your name. With your signature, we will:
Bring this policy to Parliament.
Push for systemic reform at the DWP.
Hold decision-makers accountable.
Win justice for those failed by the current system.
This is not just about policy—this is about people. Help us change lives.
Please support me and Then Claudes SEN Law Campaign..
Thank You!
#GCBRandTCSL
#TheClaudesSENLaw

429
The Decision Makers
Supporter Voices
Share this petition
Petition created on 16 February 2020
