TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
Since 2023, racism and hatred against a Muslim Canadian woman who wears the niqab have been worsening. Despite seeking justice through the Canadian courts, the issue continues to be ignored by officials. This ongoing discrimination highlights the urgent need for accountability and protection of human rights.
Hello,
I am a Canadian Citizen who lives in London, Ontario, with her two kids, a Canadian citizen of First Generation, and her little daughter, who has been an applicant for PR since 2021.
Write this email in my capacity as a Canadian citizen, having sworn to respect the law and to defend the law of our country, Canada, and its honorable King. The reason for this email is to draw attention to numerous errors in my file at the Superior Court of Justice, which has increased my concerns about ensuring adequate safety for my children, Canadian citizens of the first generation in Canada, and the safety of my daughter, due to the mistakes being made by officials of the Canadian Court of Justice. Whether these are mistakes or deliberate misrepresentations by the court staff and the professionals in this case.
Background:
I have explained the many acts of racism and falsifications that have occurred and are still occurring in my ‘family’ case file before the Superior Court of Justice in London, Ontario, either through the petition ( https://www.change.org/p/stop-officials-misusing-power-every-child-matters-respecting-religions-must-be-deeds/dashboard?source_location=user_profile_started or through the complaints submitted to the honorable government of our just country, Canada.
Certain judges, demonstrating bias and hostility toward my religion and faith, continue to disregard compelling evidence that clearly establishes the serious danger my ex-husband poses to our safety — both my children’s and my own — even within Canada. They have failed to recognize final rulings issued in Kuwait, all of which are consistent with Canadian law, and which affirm our right to protection from him and our lawful relocation to Canada under the safeguard of the Canadian federal government. Moreover, in my case file, the protective decisions of the Canadian federal government have been diminished and disrespected. The judges have persisted in delaying the proceedings without any valid legal basis, with the apparent objective of enabling continued attempts to remove my children from me through deceptive means, manipulating the law, and misusing their authority within the Canadian legal system.
Current Concerns:
ِ A. Concerning the the Superior Court of Justice Staff "Have been IGNORING" my URGENT motion filed on October 15, 2025, without any sense or legal reasons. In addition to ignoring them my multiple formal requests to provide me with any applications filed in my file in the court.
Concerns related to the improper service from the other party.
B. Concerns that there is a court process in the court without my knowledge.
C. Concerning regarding ignoring the court staff in London, Ontario, my multiple requests to update me and confirm my file record in the court.
1. Consequences of Not Responding or Not Attending
“Under Rule 25(19) of the Family Law Rules, if a person who has been served does not attend or respond, the court may proceed without them and make any order it considers appropriate. This is precisely why the Respondent’s use of false or obsolete service addresses is so dangerous — it can cause orders to be made against me or my children without our knowledge or opportunity to respond.”
Under the Family Law Rules, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 114, section Rule 25(19) states:
Rule 25(19) – Failure to Respond or Attend:
If a person who has been served with a document or notice under these rules does not file the required documents or does not come to court, the court may deal with the case without that person being present and may make any order that the court considers appropriate.
Refusing to grant a Canadian Muslim Woman her right in the Superior Court of Justice and exposing her with three children to serious risks inside Canada is a (sham in Canadian History).
Ignoring the honorable organization to my complaints and continued concerns since 2023 is a (sham in Canadian History).
Please see the attached "FINAL form 14B- Motion with EXHIBITS _ Aldahleh v. Zayed-FC-22-1068_ Applicant. L. Aldahleh- October 15, 2025 " to elaborate on some urgent and serious current concerns.
Hopefully, our esteemed Canadian government will stop the hatred against Muslims in the Justice System ASAP.
The very truly,
A Free Muslim Canadian Woman,
The Applicant Mother-Ms. Lubna Aldahleh
**************************************************
Procedural, uncomplicated, or unopposed order that you want the court to make:
1. Confirmation of Any Filings Involving the Applicant and/or Her Children after July 11, 2025:
That court staff “must” confirm in writing whether or not any new applications, motions, or appeals have been filed after July 11, 2025, against the Applicant or involving any of her three minor children — Baraa Zayed (born October 21, 2010), Lujain Zayed (born November 6, 2012), and Mariam Zayed (born October 11, 2018) — and provide the Applicant with copies of all such materials via her official email (aldahleh.mother@gmail.com).
This confirmation is urgently required to ensure that no proceedings are being conducted without proper service or notice via my official contact information, given the Respondent’s established pattern of false service and concealment of filings in prior jurisdictions (Kuwait, Jordan, and Canada).
2. Procedural Fairness, Proper Service, and Protection of Canadian Family Rights
That all current and future filings, notices, or documents in this matter be served only to the Applicant’s official contact information on the Court record: 803 – 724 Fanshawe Park Rd E, Apt 803, London ON N5X 2L8, and email address aldahleh.mother@gmail.com. Unless she will file Form 4- changing representation information. Furthermore, all of my communications with the Court have been consistently conducted through this same verified email address, which is clearly shown under my name by the end of each email and contact details in every email I send. Therefore, under the law, no other address or email used by opposing parties can be treated as valid for service or official communication.
3. Disclosure of All Existing Orders:
That court staff provide the Applicant with copies of all sealed, signed, and entered orders in this matter, including the long-motion order and cost order dated September 16, 2025, and any subsequent endorsements or directions of the Court. However, the court staff have refused to collaborate with the Applicant Muslim Canadian Woman.
4. Verification of Authenticity of Sealed Order
That the Court review and confirm the authenticity and validity of the recently issued sealed order that bears no judge’s or clerk’s name in the signature and, if required, issue a properly signed version. (attached schedule #8)
5. Recognition of Misuse of Expired Order
That the Court record that the Respondent continues to rely on Justice Korpan’s March 2023 order, terminated by Justice Tobin’s February 16, 2024, judgment, and that such reliance constitutes procedural abuse and misrepresentation. In the second page of the (attached schedule #4), it is confirmed that the Respondent started recently to call for the parenting time based on the previous order since 2023 not of the current order dated July 18, 2025, and the Judgment dated February 16, 2024, which ended any order before the judgment of trial.
6. Protection Against Fraudulent or Improper Filings
That any new proceeding or motion filed by the Respondent using incorrect contact information be struck as invalid and that no order be issued in the Applicant’s absence due to the proven history of the fraud from the Respondent side.
The Applicant has serious concern that there may already be ongoing processes in the Court without her knowledge or service specially after receiving a notification that there is a new application was uploaded to the case centre (attached schedule #9, but the link was locked to prevent any access to the applicant for “TWO new unnamed Bundles”_ (attached schedule #10. Multi requests were emailed to the court staff, but all of them were ignored (attached schedule #11). My concerns that the Respondent is repeating the similar to his conduct in Kuwait and Jordan, where he secured orders in my absence through false service information. Specially that his respond to my formal request to the court staff in the (attached schedule #11) – by the end of page 3 and the beginning of page 4 is confirm that he incited the court staff to avoid any providing of any information, and he did not denied any submission from his side and that rises suspicious!
Because the Respondent resides outside Canada and is not subject to domestic sanctions for fraud committed in Canada while he lives in Kuwait, there is a real risk he could repeat the same abuse of process here without consequence.
7. Restoration of Case Centre Access
That the Court direct courthouse staff to restore the Applicant’s full Case Centre permissions (“Upload Files” and “Update Bundles”) for case FC-22-00001068-0000 so she may file and organize materials directly as a self-represented litigant, pursuant to Family Law Rules r. 1, 2(2), 14(10), 14(12) and Courts of Justice Act ss. 96, 101. (Attached schedule #12) confirmed that the court staff prevent me from my right based on the previous provided rules.
8. Removal of Former Counsel from Case Centre Access
That the Court order courthouse staff to remove all lawyers and representatives who are no longer involved in this case from Case Centre access.
Despite repeated written requests for over a year, (Attached schedule #13), the Applicant’s file still shows access now by more than seven former lawyers who were removed by court order or by the parties and who have no continuing role. Their access to confidential records constitutes a serious breach of privacy. Both parties (Applicant and Respondent) are now self-represented.
9. Any Further Relief Deemed Just
Such further or other relief as the Court considers appropriate to ensure fairness, transparency, and protection of the Applicant and her children.
Why the court should make this order:
10. Consequences of Not Responding or Not Attending
“Under Rule 25(19) of the Family Law Rules, if a person who has been served does not attend or respond, the court may proceed without them and make any order it considers appropriate. This is precisely why the Respondent’s use of false or obsolete service addresses is so dangerous — it can cause orders to be made against me or my children without our knowledge or opportunity to respond.”
Under the Family Law Rules, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 114, section Rule 25(19) states:
Rule 25(19) – Failure to Respond or Attend:
If a person who has been served with a document or notice under these rules does not file the required documents or does not come to court, the court may deal with the case without that person being present and may make any order that the court considers appropriate.
11. Because the Respondent continuously threatens and misuses court process to intimidate me.
The Respondent has continuously threatened to have me imprisoned and to take my children away from me since 2019 from Kuwait. He has filed and attempted to pursue multiple criminal allegations, one of them the abduction trial before the Superior Court of Justice; the judgment was released on February 16, 2024, confirms my innocence from the abduction claim Aldahleh v. Zayed, 2024 ONSC 547 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/k3bl0>; however, the respondent is still claim the same abduction matter and he continues harassment me about this. Also, he filed on February 17, 2025, motions to seeking contempt order against me intended not to seek justice but to punish, intimidate, and silence me as a mother.
Although that contempt motion was dismissed, I have serious concern that the Respondent has appealed or attempted to revive that dismissed motion without notifying me, using the same false service methods and misleading information as before. These threats and repeated filings are part of an ongoing campaign to destroy my relationship with my children and to misuse Canadian courts to achieve what court have already rejected by initiate a new process without my knowledge or/and appearance to have a contempt order and enforce it without granting me the rights of defending myself.
12. These are the official contact details registered in the Court record through the Applicant’s filed Form 4 – Notice of Change of Representation (dated August 2023 – attached schedule #1) and (October 2024 – attached schedule #2).
* Despite this, the Respondent has repeatedly ignored the official record and continues to use unofficial and obsole the email addresses, even after being told many times to stop misleading the legal process by using unofficial email address. (attached schedule #3)
* In an email dated September 22, 2025 (attached as (attached schedule #4)), the Respondent stated that he “will continue using addresses that were used in Kuwait and Jordan,” even though those addresses are years old and have not been accessed by the Applicant for a long time. This shows a deliberate intent to bypass Canadian court procedures and create false claims of service. Also, he mentioned, when I requested to provide me with the application that he submitted in the court, that “Send me the claim you’re referring to, nothing has been submitted to the courts”. How can I know the claim number and type if he avoid serving me with it?!
* The Applicant is a Canadian citizen, and her two eldest children, Baraa and Lujain, are first-generation Canadians. Her youngest child, Mariam (age 7), is at real risk of being removed from her loving family in Canada due to the Respondent’s misleading conduct before the courts and in immigration processes. Her passport and visitor visa in Canada have been expired, and her PR application did not complete due to the court process and the father’s manipulation.
This Honourable Court’s intervention is urgently required to protect the integrity of service, ensure the safety of the children, and uphold the rights of a Canadian citizen mother and her Canadian-born children under Canadian law.
13. * It has come to my attention that the affidavit of service Form 6B filed by the OCL, dated July 21, 2025, contains incorrect of my contact information, including an address and email not belong to me, (attached schedule #5) Approval of Draft Order (Form 25), containing D-Tab #65 from the Case Centre for Aldahleh v. Zayed (July 18, 2025), Submitted by the appellant on July 31, 2025, for issuance of the signed order after serving her via her official email at the same date (aldahleh.mother@gmail.com) . However, in (attached schedule #6) confirmed that on August 26, 2025, OCL submitted on the case centre the affidavit of service including wrong contact information and that they served me on July 21, 2025, on that wrong address and wrong email address, which I was not receiving anything from them. But rather, I asked the OCL about the draft order when they mentioned that through the email with my ex-husband; (attached schedule #7) confirmed that OCL forwarded the draft order to me on my official email mentioned above, and I confirm to them to stop using unofficial emails or address and they confirmed that immediately; however, they submitted false information in their affidavit of service.
I have repeatedly informed all parties of my official contact details as registered with the Court, yet the errors persist. This creates a serious risk that new proceedings could be initiated without my knowledge or proper service by claiming to serve at the wrong address, which would be contrary to law and fundamental fairness.
14. To prevent injustice and protect my family’s safety and rights.
I am a Canadian citizen and a self-represented mother of three children: Baraa (born 2010), Lujain (born 2012), and Mariam (born 2018). My two eldest children are first-generation Canadians, and my youngest child is only seven years old. Because of my ex-husband’s continued use of false information, improper service, and misleading filings, there is a real danger that orders or actions could be issued without my knowledge or participation, which may separate my children from me and cause irreversible harm to our family.
15. The Appellant has discovered repeated improper service by the Respondent and other parties, including the use of an incorrect email address and residential address despite the Appellant having filed a Notice of Change of Representation in 2023 and 2024 confirming the correct address and email. (Attached schedule #1, 2).
16. The Respondent’s conduct goes beyond error — it is deliberate and fraudulent. He filed an Affidavit of Service claiming “special service” and that the Appellant personally received documents, which is not true (Attached schedule #14). He also submitted cost receipts dated August 6, 2025 for alleged filings after the hearing, which were never served on the Appellant (Attached schedule #15).
17. The February 16, 2024 judgment (Attached schedule #16) further found that the Respondent lacked credibility and confirmed the serious risk of harm to the children if returned to Kuwait. Despite these findings, the Respondent continues to weaponize legal processes, including threats of criminal process, to attempt to imprison the Appellant and oppose her custody rights.
18. The Appellant has a reasonable concern that the Respondent may have filed an appeal, motion, or stay application without her knowledge using false service, and could seek orders permitting the removal of the children from Canada.
19. Interpol and International Risk: The Respondent has escalated matters internationally and has sought to use criminal complaints and potential INTERPOL actions against the Appellant. If successful, this could lead to her wrongful arrest or detention abroad, resulting in catastrophic harm to the children, including the loss of their legal status in Canada and forced relocation.
20. The cumulative effect of these actions — fraudulent service, court inaction, false case law, misuse of criminal process, and international threats — represents a serious public security concern requiring this Honourable Court’s urgent intervention.
21. Serious safety concern that there is a process in the court without her knowledge aiming to issue an order against her by misleading the judges and preventing her from her right to defend herself.
22. To stop fraudulent and misleading practices that have already occurred abroad.
My ex-husband, Zakaria Zayed, has a long pattern of using foreign courts (Kuwait and Jordan) to obtain orders by falsely claiming I was served when I was not. He has now attempted similar tactics in Canada by using old, unofficial email addresses and ignoring the official contact information that has been on record in this Court since 2023.
He wrote to me on September 22, 2025 (Attached schedule #4) confirming that he “will continue using addresses that were used in Kuwait and Jordan,” even though those addresses are years old and have not been used by me for a long time. His intention is clear: to manipulate court procedures and claim that I was notified when I was not.
23. Because there are signs that proceedings may already be happening without my knowledge.
I have repeatedly written to the Court (Attached schedule #11) requesting confirmation of any new filings, but my emails have been ignored. The Respondent’s own communications and actions suggest that he may have initiated new motions or appeals without proper service, as he has done in other jurisdictions. The lack of response from courthouse staff, combined with the Respondent’s overseas residence, creates a serious procedural and security risk for me and my children.
24. To restore transparency and my right to participate equally as a self-represented Canadian citizen.
In July 2025, my access to the Case Centre was removed without judicial order, preventing me from uploading materials for my case (Attached schedule #12). Meanwhile, more than seven former lawyers who are no longer involved in this case still have access to my private and confidential records through the Case Centre. I have requested for over a year that their access be removed, but I have been ignored.
As a self-represented party, I depend on the Case Centre to participate fully and fairly in my proceedings. Denying me access while allowing unrelated individuals to view my family’s private information violates the principles of procedural fairness and privacy protection.
25. Because my family’s safety and immigration status are at real risk.
The Respondent does not live in Canada and faces no consequences for filing false information here. He has used court and immigration processes to try to discredit me and separate my children from me. His actions could lead to immigration errors or wrongful orders being made based on false facts. If my youngest daughter, Mariam (age 7), were removed from my care due to such deception, it would cause catastrophic emotional harm and violate her rights as a child growing up safely in Canada.
26. Because my religious background has made me vulnerable to discrimination and bias.
As a Muslim Canadian woman who wears the niqab, I have experienced discrimination and hostility in some of my interactions with court staff and opposing counsel. This has made it more difficult for me to access justice, and I fear that these biases may have contributed to the ongoing refusal to provide me with updates, signed orders, or access to my own file. I raise this with deep respect for the Court, but with a sincere belief that equality before the law must be protected for all Canadians, regardless of faith or appearance.
27. Because the Court has the jurisdiction and duty to ensure justice and integrity.
Under the Family Law Rules and Courts of Justice Act, this Honourable Court has both the power and the responsibility to correct procedural unfairness, ensure proper service, and make any order necessary to prevent harm to a child or miscarriage of justice.
The relief I seek is not excessive — it is the minimum required to restore fairness, safety, and transparency in a case where I have faced persistent procedural abuse, fraudulent conduct, and institutional inaction.
Laws and rules on which you are relying, in addition to rule 14(10): (Give name of statute and sections; name of regulation and section numbers; and rule numbers.)
1. Family Law Rules r. 1, 2(2), 14(10), 14(12), 19, 25(19);
2. Courts of Justice Act ss. 96, 101;
3. Children’s Law Reform Act ss. 22, 41–42, 73;
4. Aldahleh v. Zayed (2024 ONSC 547); Aldahleh v. Zayed, 2024 ONSC 547 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/k3bl0>
5. The Court Authority for such further order this Honourable Court deem just.
This Form is filed by: Applicant Mother, Lubna Aldahleh.