Saving Pets =Killing?! Saving Pets - Significant Mental Harm to People


Saving Pets =Killing?! Saving Pets - Significant Mental Harm to People
The issue
We, the undersigned, call for an urgent review of the laws granting the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) extensive authority to enter private properties across Australia. While protecting animals from abuse and neglect is crucial, the current regulations allow RSPCA officers to enter homes with less legal oversight than the police, often based only on neighbor complaints rather than concrete evidence of harm. This has led to unjustified property invasions, emotional distress, and, in some cases, tragic mistakes. We urge the government to implement the following reforms:
1) Stricter Requirements for Obtaining Entry Warrants
RSPCA officers should only be allowed to enter private properties when there is clear and immediate danger to an animal’s life (e.g., visible injuries, abuse, fire). Entry should not be granted solely based on neighbor reports or assumptions. The legal process should be aligned with police warrant procedures to ensure fairness and accountability.
2) Establishment of an Independent Oversight Body
Complaints against RSPCA actions should not be handled internally by RSPCA itself but by an independent government-appointed organization. This will ensure transparency, fairness, and prevent potential abuses of power.
3) Reassessment of Euthanasia Policies
Elderly pets should not be euthanized without the explicit consent of their owners. Owners must be given the right to provide palliative care and dignity in aging for their pets.
Recognition of the Mental Health Impact on Owners
Forced entry and the removal of pets can have devastating effects on owners, especially children, the elderly, and individuals with mental health conditions. Laws should be amended to ensure that RSPCA’s actions do not cause psychological harm and that alternative solutions are explored before drastic measures are taken.
The current laws, while designed to protect animals, have also resulted in harm to innocent pet owners. We call upon the Australian government to reform RSPCA’s powers to ensure that both animals and people are protected from injustice.
We urge Parliament to take immediate action to amend the existing laws and establish fair and humane animal welfare enforcement policies across Australia.
By law in Australia, the animal welfare organization RSPCA has the right to break into private property similarly to the police, but for them, it is much easier to obtain permission. In our case, the reason was simply that our dog was sleeping on the floor.
If children are home and someone breaks a window or door, what impact does this have on their mental health? What if an elderly person does not hear them knocking? Even stress-resistant individuals can suffer heart attacks from such an invasion.
This happened recently in Sydney, in the Oyster Bay area.https://youtu.be/1Qs4rsLeyro?si=RpqkDJzhRVM25VlC
On February 7, 2025, RSPCA came to check, but I was not home. They left an orange notice at the door. I called them back, and they informed me of the complaint. I tried to explain (despite my imperfect English) that my dog was just elderly. Officer Lauren (job number 00335105) responded: "Especially if the dog is old, we have to check—she might be suffering, and we have to put her down."
These words deeply upset me. Killing a living being just for being old is a nightmare.
Ellie, my dog, still had a strong appetite, wagged her tail, and went outside by herself, even managing the stairs. I only helped her return because they were too high. I emotionally expressed my opposition to euthanasia and said I did not wish to see them in my home. My neighbors' complaints were unfounded. The officer told me, "We will talk later."
However, she never called back. I attempted to contact her every day, along with social workers, neighbors, and even my son's school secretary. Nobody received a response. Instead, on February 10, 2025, she returned with another individual, broke our veranda door, jumped through our window, and took our dog. When my husband returned, he found that he could not even enter his own house.
On February 13, 2025, I went to the Yagoona shelter with a neighbor but could not find Ellie. We saw many suffering dogs in cages—dogs that had shelter but had lost their families. Such conditions are unbearable for an elderly dog like Ellie, who needed warmth, nappies, massages, and special care.
Finally, on February 14, 2025, officer Lauren called me back, inviting me to an RSPCA meeting. On February 17, we arrived, expecting a discussion. Instead, it was an interrogation—recorded on video—with no legal advocate present. When my friends attempted to defend me, they were not allowed to speak.
I asked why they obtained a warrant to break into my home. She replied, "Because the dog was sleeping on the floor." Does this mean every sleeping dog is at risk of being "saved"—and killed?
They did not allow me to see my dog. Perhaps she was already gone.
RSPCA realized their mistake but did not want to admit it. They gave me two impossible options:
Surrender my dog and pay nothing.
Fight for her life but pay - possibly over $17,000 (per each day in shelter and medical fees it might be $350).
I initially chose to fight, but my husband said we could not afford it. I signed the surrender form, but they claimed they never received it. On February 24, 2025, officer Lauren called again, stating, "Unfortunately, we discovered your dog had kidney disease and had to put her down immediately."
I knew they would kill her anyway. She was old and never had a chance.
This experience was devastating. What if our child had been home when strangers broke in? We always teach him never to open the door to strangers—yet "dog savers" invaded our home. My child is heartbroken—Ellie had been with us since before he was born.
While euthanasia may be beneficial for owners who cannot handle the challenges of elderly pets, it should not be forced upon loving families who provide the best possible care. I do not want my taxes funding such tragic mistakes.
This law, which allows RSPCA to enter homes based only on neighbor complaints, is harmful to people and must be changed before more families suffer.
Children, the elderly, and people with mental health conditions are especially vulnerable. Sudden home invasions can lead to severe trauma, strokes, and emotional distress. Protecting animals is important, but it should not come at the cost of harming innocent people.
This petition also will be submitted to the Australian Parliament
Sincerely, Svetlana Zara (Zaharova)

1,386
The issue
We, the undersigned, call for an urgent review of the laws granting the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) extensive authority to enter private properties across Australia. While protecting animals from abuse and neglect is crucial, the current regulations allow RSPCA officers to enter homes with less legal oversight than the police, often based only on neighbor complaints rather than concrete evidence of harm. This has led to unjustified property invasions, emotional distress, and, in some cases, tragic mistakes. We urge the government to implement the following reforms:
1) Stricter Requirements for Obtaining Entry Warrants
RSPCA officers should only be allowed to enter private properties when there is clear and immediate danger to an animal’s life (e.g., visible injuries, abuse, fire). Entry should not be granted solely based on neighbor reports or assumptions. The legal process should be aligned with police warrant procedures to ensure fairness and accountability.
2) Establishment of an Independent Oversight Body
Complaints against RSPCA actions should not be handled internally by RSPCA itself but by an independent government-appointed organization. This will ensure transparency, fairness, and prevent potential abuses of power.
3) Reassessment of Euthanasia Policies
Elderly pets should not be euthanized without the explicit consent of their owners. Owners must be given the right to provide palliative care and dignity in aging for their pets.
Recognition of the Mental Health Impact on Owners
Forced entry and the removal of pets can have devastating effects on owners, especially children, the elderly, and individuals with mental health conditions. Laws should be amended to ensure that RSPCA’s actions do not cause psychological harm and that alternative solutions are explored before drastic measures are taken.
The current laws, while designed to protect animals, have also resulted in harm to innocent pet owners. We call upon the Australian government to reform RSPCA’s powers to ensure that both animals and people are protected from injustice.
We urge Parliament to take immediate action to amend the existing laws and establish fair and humane animal welfare enforcement policies across Australia.
By law in Australia, the animal welfare organization RSPCA has the right to break into private property similarly to the police, but for them, it is much easier to obtain permission. In our case, the reason was simply that our dog was sleeping on the floor.
If children are home and someone breaks a window or door, what impact does this have on their mental health? What if an elderly person does not hear them knocking? Even stress-resistant individuals can suffer heart attacks from such an invasion.
This happened recently in Sydney, in the Oyster Bay area.https://youtu.be/1Qs4rsLeyro?si=RpqkDJzhRVM25VlC
On February 7, 2025, RSPCA came to check, but I was not home. They left an orange notice at the door. I called them back, and they informed me of the complaint. I tried to explain (despite my imperfect English) that my dog was just elderly. Officer Lauren (job number 00335105) responded: "Especially if the dog is old, we have to check—she might be suffering, and we have to put her down."
These words deeply upset me. Killing a living being just for being old is a nightmare.
Ellie, my dog, still had a strong appetite, wagged her tail, and went outside by herself, even managing the stairs. I only helped her return because they were too high. I emotionally expressed my opposition to euthanasia and said I did not wish to see them in my home. My neighbors' complaints were unfounded. The officer told me, "We will talk later."
However, she never called back. I attempted to contact her every day, along with social workers, neighbors, and even my son's school secretary. Nobody received a response. Instead, on February 10, 2025, she returned with another individual, broke our veranda door, jumped through our window, and took our dog. When my husband returned, he found that he could not even enter his own house.
On February 13, 2025, I went to the Yagoona shelter with a neighbor but could not find Ellie. We saw many suffering dogs in cages—dogs that had shelter but had lost their families. Such conditions are unbearable for an elderly dog like Ellie, who needed warmth, nappies, massages, and special care.
Finally, on February 14, 2025, officer Lauren called me back, inviting me to an RSPCA meeting. On February 17, we arrived, expecting a discussion. Instead, it was an interrogation—recorded on video—with no legal advocate present. When my friends attempted to defend me, they were not allowed to speak.
I asked why they obtained a warrant to break into my home. She replied, "Because the dog was sleeping on the floor." Does this mean every sleeping dog is at risk of being "saved"—and killed?
They did not allow me to see my dog. Perhaps she was already gone.
RSPCA realized their mistake but did not want to admit it. They gave me two impossible options:
Surrender my dog and pay nothing.
Fight for her life but pay - possibly over $17,000 (per each day in shelter and medical fees it might be $350).
I initially chose to fight, but my husband said we could not afford it. I signed the surrender form, but they claimed they never received it. On February 24, 2025, officer Lauren called again, stating, "Unfortunately, we discovered your dog had kidney disease and had to put her down immediately."
I knew they would kill her anyway. She was old and never had a chance.
This experience was devastating. What if our child had been home when strangers broke in? We always teach him never to open the door to strangers—yet "dog savers" invaded our home. My child is heartbroken—Ellie had been with us since before he was born.
While euthanasia may be beneficial for owners who cannot handle the challenges of elderly pets, it should not be forced upon loving families who provide the best possible care. I do not want my taxes funding such tragic mistakes.
This law, which allows RSPCA to enter homes based only on neighbor complaints, is harmful to people and must be changed before more families suffer.
Children, the elderly, and people with mental health conditions are especially vulnerable. Sudden home invasions can lead to severe trauma, strokes, and emotional distress. Protecting animals is important, but it should not come at the cost of harming innocent people.
This petition also will be submitted to the Australian Parliament
Sincerely, Svetlana Zara (Zaharova)

1,386
Supporter voices
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on 12 March 2025