Protect Artistic Ownership: Unity Engine Under Scrutiny


Protect Artistic Ownership: Unity Engine Under Scrutiny
The Issue
Protect Artistic Ownership: Unity shouldn't charge people for what they create using their tools.
Hi, I'm Alle Jong. I firmly believe in protecting artists' rights to their creations. Unity shouldn't charge per install, regardless of team size. After all, paint companies don't charge artists for artworks years after selling the paint, do they?
In the evolving landscape of digital art and game development, the principle of artistic ownership remains paramount. Unity, a pioneering game development platform, currently levies fees on artists based on the number of game installs. This practice is troubling for several reasons:
1. **Against Artistic Ownership**: Once an artist publishes their work, they should have complete ownership of it. Just as a painter wouldn't be charged every time someone viewed their artwork in a gallery, a game developer shouldn't be penalized for the success of their game.
2. **Setting a Dangerous Precedent**: If we allow Unity to charge fees per installed game, what's to stop other platforms from following suit? Imagine a world where Adobe charged photographers every time a photograph edited in Photoshop was viewed. This model not only stifles creativity but also inhibits artists from sharing their work with a wider audience.
3. **Punishing Success**: Under Unity's model, the more popular a game becomes, the more the creator has to pay. Instead of celebrating and rewarding success, this system penalizes developers for creating engaging and popular content.
4. **Detrimental to Indie Developers**: Independent developers, who may not have substantial financial backing, could be deterred from creating innovative games. The looming threat of escalating fees could discourage many from pursuing their creative visions.
In conclusion, the sanctity of artistic ownership must be upheld. In a world brimming with creativity and innovation, we cannot allow corporate models to stifle the voices and visions of artists. Let's champion a system that supports, not penalizes, the creators who bring joy, thought, and innovation to our lives.
672
The Issue
Protect Artistic Ownership: Unity shouldn't charge people for what they create using their tools.
Hi, I'm Alle Jong. I firmly believe in protecting artists' rights to their creations. Unity shouldn't charge per install, regardless of team size. After all, paint companies don't charge artists for artworks years after selling the paint, do they?
In the evolving landscape of digital art and game development, the principle of artistic ownership remains paramount. Unity, a pioneering game development platform, currently levies fees on artists based on the number of game installs. This practice is troubling for several reasons:
1. **Against Artistic Ownership**: Once an artist publishes their work, they should have complete ownership of it. Just as a painter wouldn't be charged every time someone viewed their artwork in a gallery, a game developer shouldn't be penalized for the success of their game.
2. **Setting a Dangerous Precedent**: If we allow Unity to charge fees per installed game, what's to stop other platforms from following suit? Imagine a world where Adobe charged photographers every time a photograph edited in Photoshop was viewed. This model not only stifles creativity but also inhibits artists from sharing their work with a wider audience.
3. **Punishing Success**: Under Unity's model, the more popular a game becomes, the more the creator has to pay. Instead of celebrating and rewarding success, this system penalizes developers for creating engaging and popular content.
4. **Detrimental to Indie Developers**: Independent developers, who may not have substantial financial backing, could be deterred from creating innovative games. The looming threat of escalating fees could discourage many from pursuing their creative visions.
In conclusion, the sanctity of artistic ownership must be upheld. In a world brimming with creativity and innovation, we cannot allow corporate models to stifle the voices and visions of artists. Let's champion a system that supports, not penalizes, the creators who bring joy, thought, and innovation to our lives.
672
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on September 13, 2023