Civil society advocacy group SAHARI, said the application process is an added obstacle and places a further burden on an unequal health care system.

“There is nothing compassionate about the knowingly ridiculous expectation that medical practitioners must fill out 11-page forms, worry 24 hours, and still expect to be declined access to ivermectin,” said spokesperson, Shabnam Palesa Mohamed.

Similarly, Parker says: “The problem that I have with this section 21 application is that this is only accessible for people who have money and who are able to go to a medical practitioner and pay for the service. What happens to the vulnerable and marginalised?”

Read More: https://www.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/western-cape/the-ivermectin-application-process-is-a-paperwork-nightmare-941722a7-38f9-479e-878f-387a92c3ebcc

Additional Reading: PCR TEST FRAUD: 

1.“This misuse of RT-PCR technique is used as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governments, supported by scientific safety councils and by the dominant media, to justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights, the destruction of the economy with the bankruptcy of entire active sectors of society, the degradation of living conditions for a large number of ordinary citizens, under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients.” Dr. Pascal Sacré.

2. A landmark court case in Portugal had ruled that the polymerase chain reaction test (PCR) used worldwide to diagnose COVID-19 was not fit for purpose.  Most importantly, the judges ruled that a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection.

As Off-Guardian.org reported at the time: “In their ruling, judges Margarida Ramos de Almeida and Ana Paramés referred to several scientific studies. Most notably this study by Jaafar et al., which found that – when running PCR tests with 35 cycles or more – the accuracy dropped to 3%, meaning up to 97% of positive results could be false positives. The ruling goes on to conclude that, based on the science they read, any PCR test using over 25 cycles is totally unreliable. Governments and private labs have been very tight-lipped about the exact number of cycles they run when PCR testing, but it is known to sometimes be as high as 45. 

3. WHO Statement on PCR testing 20 January 2021: https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05