The following findings from the Bella Estancia case study illustrate the critical need for systemic reform in how landlords manage pet-related fees and safety: • Failure of Basic Maintenance: Despite pet-accessible areas being a paid amenity, a hazardous environment featuring black algae and stagnant water was allowed to persist for over 116 days. This represents a severe failure to provide the safe, habitable environment that residents pay for through specialized pet fees. • Opaque and Excessive Fee Structures: Management enforced a high financial barrier to pet ownership, including a $450 refundable deposit and a $150 non-refundable fee, while failing to provide clear disclosure regarding monthly pet rent costs. • The Accountability Gap: There is currently a documented disconnect between the collection of pet-related revenue and the fulfillment of maintenance obligations. If a landlord collects "Pet Rent," those funds must be legally tied to the upkeep and safety of pet-specific infrastructure. Our Demand: We call for legislation that mandates transparency in pet-related leasing costs and establishes a "Right to Repair" for pet-accessible common areas. Landlords must be held to the same habitability standards for dog parks and pet relief areas as they are for the interior of a dwelling.