Petition to Uphold the City of Stirling’s Recommendation for Age-Restricted Social Housing

Recent signers:
Charlotte Weighell and 11 others have signed recently.

The issue

To: Nicole Alexander, State Development Assessment Unit (SDAU) & the Statutory Planning Committee, Western Australian Planning Commission 


We, the undersigned, demand that the SDAU uphold the City of Stirling’s lawful conditional recommendation (Resolution 0425/002, 1 April 2025) for the approval of the non-compliant development at 969-971 Beaufort Street, Inglewood. Approval must be contingent on a restrictive covenant legally binding the Department of Communities to restrict occupancy to residents aged 55+ (seniors).


1. The Department’s Unreliable Commitments

The Department’s public assurances about this being "seniors housing" are not legally enforceable, relying on vague terms such as:

2. Community Safety at Stake: Lessons from 157 Ninth Avenue

The failed management of 157 Ninth Avenue (700m from 969/971 Beaufort Street) proves the risks of unenforceable promises:

3. Legal and Planning Justifications

  • City of Stirling’s rejection cited non-compliance with Local Planning Policy 3.1A (character retention) and Draft LPS4 (Council Minutes, 1 April 2025).
  • WA Audit Office findings show the Department’s poor track record managing disruptive behaviour in social housing (Audit Report, 2018).

4. Demand: Restrictive Covenant or No Approval

A covenant is the only enforceable mechanism to ensure:

  • Compliance with the City’s conditions.
  • Prevention of another high-risk tenant crisis like 157 Ninth Avenue.
  • Accountability from the Department, which has refused to formalise its promises.

5. Community Impact

  • Businesses: Already suffering from crime linked to 157 Ninth Avenue.
  • Families: Many are leaving the area to avoid risking exposing their children to criminal and antisocial behaviour.
  • Seniors: The promised demographic deserves housing tailored to their needs, not mixed with high-needs tenants, and built to the Gold Standard for Senior Housing/Livable Housing Design Standards as recommended by the Disability Royal Commission (recommendation 7.35).
  • Depositions made to the City of Stirling about the extent of the community’s concerns about the management of 157 Ninth Avenue and the concurrent development at 969/971 Beaufort Street can be found in the City’s meeting minutes:

Supporting Documents

NEW Media Coverage since petition launch: 

avatar of the starter
Paris FitzpatrickPetition starter
Media enquiries

1,433

Recent signers:
Charlotte Weighell and 11 others have signed recently.

The issue

To: Nicole Alexander, State Development Assessment Unit (SDAU) & the Statutory Planning Committee, Western Australian Planning Commission 


We, the undersigned, demand that the SDAU uphold the City of Stirling’s lawful conditional recommendation (Resolution 0425/002, 1 April 2025) for the approval of the non-compliant development at 969-971 Beaufort Street, Inglewood. Approval must be contingent on a restrictive covenant legally binding the Department of Communities to restrict occupancy to residents aged 55+ (seniors).


1. The Department’s Unreliable Commitments

The Department’s public assurances about this being "seniors housing" are not legally enforceable, relying on vague terms such as:

2. Community Safety at Stake: Lessons from 157 Ninth Avenue

The failed management of 157 Ninth Avenue (700m from 969/971 Beaufort Street) proves the risks of unenforceable promises:

3. Legal and Planning Justifications

  • City of Stirling’s rejection cited non-compliance with Local Planning Policy 3.1A (character retention) and Draft LPS4 (Council Minutes, 1 April 2025).
  • WA Audit Office findings show the Department’s poor track record managing disruptive behaviour in social housing (Audit Report, 2018).

4. Demand: Restrictive Covenant or No Approval

A covenant is the only enforceable mechanism to ensure:

  • Compliance with the City’s conditions.
  • Prevention of another high-risk tenant crisis like 157 Ninth Avenue.
  • Accountability from the Department, which has refused to formalise its promises.

5. Community Impact

  • Businesses: Already suffering from crime linked to 157 Ninth Avenue.
  • Families: Many are leaving the area to avoid risking exposing their children to criminal and antisocial behaviour.
  • Seniors: The promised demographic deserves housing tailored to their needs, not mixed with high-needs tenants, and built to the Gold Standard for Senior Housing/Livable Housing Design Standards as recommended by the Disability Royal Commission (recommendation 7.35).
  • Depositions made to the City of Stirling about the extent of the community’s concerns about the management of 157 Ninth Avenue and the concurrent development at 969/971 Beaufort Street can be found in the City’s meeting minutes:

Supporting Documents

NEW Media Coverage since petition launch: 

avatar of the starter
Paris FitzpatrickPetition starter
Media enquiries

The Decision Makers

Statutory Planning Committee
Statutory Planning Committee
Nicole Alexander
Nicole Alexander
State Development Assessment Unit
State Development Assessment Unit

Supporter voices

Petition Updates

Share this petition

Petition created on 20 April 2025