Petition to Revoke Croquet’s “Best Outdoor Game” Title
Petition to Revoke Croquet’s “Best Outdoor Game” Title
The Issue
Petition Description
Whereas:
The undersigned participants in the Best Outdoor Group Game Vote recognize the seriousness of recreational excellence and the need for objective standards for judging such excellence in recreational group games.
Whereas:
Croquet is a charming, dignified pastime involving precision, etiquette, and an admirable tolerance for suspense measured in geological time.
Therefore, we present the following affirmations:
AFFIRMATIONS
Article I — On Excitement & Spectator Appeal
- We affirm that croquet is typically classified as a low-intensity leisure activity relative to vigorous sports.
Source: Compendium of Physical Activities (croquet ≈ 3.3 METs)
https://sites.google.com/site/compendiumofphysicalactivities/ - We affirm that sports such as basketball and competitive volleyball generate substantially higher physiological intensity, a proxy often correlated with spectator excitement.
Source: Compendium listings (basketball ≈ 8.0 METs; competitive volleyball ≈ 6.0 METs)
https://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/Fulltext/2011/08000/2011_Compendium_of_Physical_Activities__A_Second.25.aspx - We affirm that basketball and volleyball are the subjects of extensive spectator-motivation and attendance research, implying robust fan engagement ecosystems.
Example research themes: spectator motives, attendance drivers
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=basketball+spectator+motives
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=volleyball+attendance+research - We affirm that croquet has a comparatively limited spectator research footprint and minimal broadcast presence.
Article II — On Participation & Cultural Footprint - We affirm that croquet participation is numerically small relative to mainstream sports.
Example governing body estimates / membership surveys:
Croquet Association (UK): https://www.croquet.org.uk/
Croquet America (USCA): https://www.croquetamerica.com/ - We affirm that basketball and volleyball report millions of participants globally, with deep amateur, collegiate, and professional infrastructures.
Example participation industry reporting:
Sports & Fitness Industry Association (SFIA): https://sfia.org/ - We affirm that dodgeball maintains strong cultural presence in school PE and recreational leagues, accompanied by academic debate and perception studies.
Example topics: student perceptions of dodgeball
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=dodgeball+physical+education+perceptions - We affirm that cornhole, once a humble backyard diversion, now enjoys professional leagues and national broadcasts.
Example coverage:
https://www.espn.com/search/_/q/cornhole
Article III — On Emotional & Social Engagement - We affirm that dynamic, fast-paced games (basketball, volleyball, dodgeball) generate higher observable arousal, unpredictability, and collective emotional investment than croquet.
- We affirm that cornhole’s rise demonstrates that even lawn games can achieve televised drama, provided something unpredictable occasionally happens.
- We affirm that croquet’s pacing encourages reflection, patience, and polite conversation — virtues admirable in philosophy seminars but contested in competitive outdoor voting.
Article IV — On Democratic Recalibration - We affirm that voters elevating croquet above basketball, volleyball, dodgeball, and cornhole may be temporarily experiencing a Reality-Perception Drift Event (RPDE).
Therefore, we request:
- A deduction of points from croquet’s vote total
- A ceremonial review of ballot sanity
- A recount conducted at a pace faster than a croquet final
We propose reassignment of the title Best Outdoor Game to a contender exhibiting:
- Broad participation
- Demonstrable spectator appeal
- At least occasional cardiovascular activity

The Issue
Petition Description
Whereas:
The undersigned participants in the Best Outdoor Group Game Vote recognize the seriousness of recreational excellence and the need for objective standards for judging such excellence in recreational group games.
Whereas:
Croquet is a charming, dignified pastime involving precision, etiquette, and an admirable tolerance for suspense measured in geological time.
Therefore, we present the following affirmations:
AFFIRMATIONS
Article I — On Excitement & Spectator Appeal
- We affirm that croquet is typically classified as a low-intensity leisure activity relative to vigorous sports.
Source: Compendium of Physical Activities (croquet ≈ 3.3 METs)
https://sites.google.com/site/compendiumofphysicalactivities/ - We affirm that sports such as basketball and competitive volleyball generate substantially higher physiological intensity, a proxy often correlated with spectator excitement.
Source: Compendium listings (basketball ≈ 8.0 METs; competitive volleyball ≈ 6.0 METs)
https://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/Fulltext/2011/08000/2011_Compendium_of_Physical_Activities__A_Second.25.aspx - We affirm that basketball and volleyball are the subjects of extensive spectator-motivation and attendance research, implying robust fan engagement ecosystems.
Example research themes: spectator motives, attendance drivers
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=basketball+spectator+motives
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=volleyball+attendance+research - We affirm that croquet has a comparatively limited spectator research footprint and minimal broadcast presence.
Article II — On Participation & Cultural Footprint - We affirm that croquet participation is numerically small relative to mainstream sports.
Example governing body estimates / membership surveys:
Croquet Association (UK): https://www.croquet.org.uk/
Croquet America (USCA): https://www.croquetamerica.com/ - We affirm that basketball and volleyball report millions of participants globally, with deep amateur, collegiate, and professional infrastructures.
Example participation industry reporting:
Sports & Fitness Industry Association (SFIA): https://sfia.org/ - We affirm that dodgeball maintains strong cultural presence in school PE and recreational leagues, accompanied by academic debate and perception studies.
Example topics: student perceptions of dodgeball
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=dodgeball+physical+education+perceptions - We affirm that cornhole, once a humble backyard diversion, now enjoys professional leagues and national broadcasts.
Example coverage:
https://www.espn.com/search/_/q/cornhole
Article III — On Emotional & Social Engagement - We affirm that dynamic, fast-paced games (basketball, volleyball, dodgeball) generate higher observable arousal, unpredictability, and collective emotional investment than croquet.
- We affirm that cornhole’s rise demonstrates that even lawn games can achieve televised drama, provided something unpredictable occasionally happens.
- We affirm that croquet’s pacing encourages reflection, patience, and polite conversation — virtues admirable in philosophy seminars but contested in competitive outdoor voting.
Article IV — On Democratic Recalibration - We affirm that voters elevating croquet above basketball, volleyball, dodgeball, and cornhole may be temporarily experiencing a Reality-Perception Drift Event (RPDE).
Therefore, we request:
- A deduction of points from croquet’s vote total
- A ceremonial review of ballot sanity
- A recount conducted at a pace faster than a croquet final
We propose reassignment of the title Best Outdoor Game to a contender exhibiting:
- Broad participation
- Demonstrable spectator appeal
- At least occasional cardiovascular activity

Victory
Share this petition
Supporter Voices
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on February 24, 2026