Petition to Reform Rules on Therapist/Client Relationships post care.

The Issue

Why Can't We Love Who We Love? Petition to Reform Rules on Therapist/ Client Relationships post care

 

To the American Counseling Association and the National Association of Social Workers, 

We the undersigned, are writing to propose a reform of the current rules in place regarding therapist/client relationships post care. While we recognize and appreciate the intent behind these rules-to-protect both parties from potential harm and conflicts of interest we believe that a more nuanced approach is necessary.

 

Proposal for Change:

1. Establishment of a review committee: 

We propose the creation of a dedicated committee within the ACA/ NASW that would review cases individually, by request and on a case by case basis. This committee would consider the specific circumstances and dynamics of each therapist/client relationship post-care to determine whether continued contact or a different type of relationship solution is appropriate and beneficial for both parties.

2. Waiver and Mutual Agreement:

In cases where both the therapist and the client express a desire to maintain a relationship post-therapy, We propose the option for both parties to sign a waiver. This waiver would outline the potential risks and acknowledge that both parties are entering the relationship willingly and with informed consent.

3. Counseling and Mediation:

To ensure that the transition from a professional to a personal relationship is handled with care, we would suggest in some cases that the parties undergo joint counseling sessions. These sessions would be facilitated by a neutral third-party therapist to help navigate and address any concerns.

 

Rationale:

Individual Circumstances:
Each therapeutic relationship  is unique, and a one-size-fits-all rule may not be appropriate. By assessing each case individually, we can ensure that the needs and the well-being of both the therapist and the client are prioritized.

Emotional Well-being:

In some cases, the abrupt end of a relationship that has developed trust and understanding can be more detrimental than transitioning to a different type of relationship. Allowing the possibility for continued contact can provide emotional stability and support for those parties involved in these situations.

Respect for Autonomy:

Both therapists and clients are capable of making informed decisions about their personal relationships. By allowing for mutual agreements and informed consent, we respect the autonomy and agency of both parties.

Conclusion:

We believe that things like Love, Friendship, and Personal Connections  should not be bound by rigid rules, especially when both parties are willing to navigate the complexities of a relationship post-therapy with care and consideration. We urge the ACA/ NASW to consider this proposal and take steps towards a much more flexible and individualized approach to post-care relationships.

Why are we still telling people who they can love? 

Thank You for your attention to this important matter.

175

The Issue

Why Can't We Love Who We Love? Petition to Reform Rules on Therapist/ Client Relationships post care

 

To the American Counseling Association and the National Association of Social Workers, 

We the undersigned, are writing to propose a reform of the current rules in place regarding therapist/client relationships post care. While we recognize and appreciate the intent behind these rules-to-protect both parties from potential harm and conflicts of interest we believe that a more nuanced approach is necessary.

 

Proposal for Change:

1. Establishment of a review committee: 

We propose the creation of a dedicated committee within the ACA/ NASW that would review cases individually, by request and on a case by case basis. This committee would consider the specific circumstances and dynamics of each therapist/client relationship post-care to determine whether continued contact or a different type of relationship solution is appropriate and beneficial for both parties.

2. Waiver and Mutual Agreement:

In cases where both the therapist and the client express a desire to maintain a relationship post-therapy, We propose the option for both parties to sign a waiver. This waiver would outline the potential risks and acknowledge that both parties are entering the relationship willingly and with informed consent.

3. Counseling and Mediation:

To ensure that the transition from a professional to a personal relationship is handled with care, we would suggest in some cases that the parties undergo joint counseling sessions. These sessions would be facilitated by a neutral third-party therapist to help navigate and address any concerns.

 

Rationale:

Individual Circumstances:
Each therapeutic relationship  is unique, and a one-size-fits-all rule may not be appropriate. By assessing each case individually, we can ensure that the needs and the well-being of both the therapist and the client are prioritized.

Emotional Well-being:

In some cases, the abrupt end of a relationship that has developed trust and understanding can be more detrimental than transitioning to a different type of relationship. Allowing the possibility for continued contact can provide emotional stability and support for those parties involved in these situations.

Respect for Autonomy:

Both therapists and clients are capable of making informed decisions about their personal relationships. By allowing for mutual agreements and informed consent, we respect the autonomy and agency of both parties.

Conclusion:

We believe that things like Love, Friendship, and Personal Connections  should not be bound by rigid rules, especially when both parties are willing to navigate the complexities of a relationship post-therapy with care and consideration. We urge the ACA/ NASW to consider this proposal and take steps towards a much more flexible and individualized approach to post-care relationships.

Why are we still telling people who they can love? 

Thank You for your attention to this important matter.

Petition updates