

Petition for Convening of International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Genocide.
The Issue
This Petition acknowledges the attacks of October 7, 2023, in which Hamas militants killed approximately 1,200 Israeli civilians and took approximately 250 hostages — acts which the undersigned Petitioners condemn without reservation and which do not, under the Nuremberg Principles or the Genocide Convention, alter the individual criminal liability of the named Defendants for the conduct alleged herein.
In the Matter of the Petition of
THE UNDERSIGNED CITIZENS AND NATIONALS
OF GENOCIDE CONVENTION SIGNATORY STATES,
On Behalf of Themselves and All Similarly Situated, Petitioners,
v.
BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, ITAMAR BEN GVIR,
and BEZALEL SMOTRICH,
and UNNAMED CO-CONSPIRATORS,
Respondents / Defendants.
PETITION FOR CONVENING OF INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL
FOR THE PROSECUTION OF GENOCIDE
I. Parties
A. Petitioners
1.The Petitioners are citizens and nationals of states signatory to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948), appearing individually and as representatives of all similarly situated persons who share standing under the erga omnes obligation to oppose genocide. Petitioners include American citizens whose names, reputations, and livelihoods have been defamed and defrauded by the conduct of the Defendants and by the apparatus of foreign influence that has enabled and sustained that conduct, including taxpayers whose sovereign resources have been fraudulently procured and deployed in furtherance of the genocidal campaign alleged herein; members of the Palestinian people who have been subjected to the acts of genocide described herein; nationals of other Genocide Convention signatory states asserting standing under the erga omnes obligation; and legal, medical, humanitarian, and journalistic professionals with personal knowledge of the facts alleged. The full signatory list will be filed with this Petition upon transmittal.
B. Defendants / Respondents
2.BENJAMIN NETANYAHU is the Prime Minister of the State of Israel and Commander-in-Chief of the Israel Defense Forces, bearing individual criminal responsibility under the command responsibility doctrine, the Nuremberg Principles, and Articles II and III of the Genocide Convention.
3.ITAMAR BEN GVIR is the National Security Minister of the State of Israel, bearing individual criminal responsibility for direct and public incitement to genocide, arming of settler militias, and systematic obstruction of humanitarian aid to the civilian population of Gaza.
4.BEZALEL SMOTRICH is the Finance Minister of the State of Israel and a minister within the Ministry of Defense, bearing individual criminal responsibility for the deliberate destruction of conditions of life of the Palestinian people through the weaponization of starvation.
5.UNNAMED CO-CONSPIRATORS include all persons, natural or juridical, domestic or foreign, who have materially aided, abetted, financed, facilitated, or actively promoted the genocidal campaign alleged herein; who have operated as unregistered agents of a foreign power within the political, media, financial, or intelligence institutions of the United States in furtherance of the conduct alleged; or who have worked to subvert the diplomatic efforts of the President of the United States to establish peace, thereby prolonging the conditions of genocide for their own political, financial, or ideological benefit.
II. Jurisdiction
6.The prohibition of genocide is a peremptory norm of international law — jus cogens — binding all states and all persons regardless of treaty ratification, constituting an obligation erga omnes owed to the international community as a whole, as affirmed by the International Court of Justice in Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Ltd. (Belgium v. Spain, 1970). Every person has both the legal right and the legal duty to oppose genocide regardless of nationality or connection to the parties.
7.The Nuremberg Principles, affirmed by the United Nations General Assembly in Resolution 95(I) (1946) and codified by the International Law Commission in 1950, constitute persuasive authority under customary international law establishing that any person who commits a crime under international law is personally liable therefor, and that official position — including head of state or responsible government official — does not exempt any person from such responsibility.
8.Subject matter jurisdiction derives from the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948), ratified by the United States on November 25, 1988. Article I's obligation to prevent and punish genocide is unconditional and binding upon the President of the United States as chief executive of a signatory state. Additional jurisdiction derives from the customary international law of crimes against humanity and the universal jurisdiction doctrine authorizing any state — and supporting the standing of any individual — to seek prosecution of genocide wherever committed and by whomever committed.
9.The procedural mechanism is United Nations General Assembly Resolution 377(V) (Uniting for Peace, 1950), which empowers the General Assembly to convene in Emergency Special Session and recommend collective measures — including referral to the International Criminal Court or the establishment of an ad hoc tribunal on the model of the ICTY and ICTR — when the Security Council fails to act due to lack of unanimity among permanent members. A presidential directive to the United States Ambassador to the United Nations to support such a session requires no act of Congress, no Security Council vote, and no treaty amendment.
III. Statement of Facts
A. The Scale and Character of the Killing
10.Since October 7, 2023, the State of Israel, under the direction and command of the Defendants, has conducted a military campaign against the Gaza Strip resulting in UN-certified excess deaths exceeding 180,000 Palestinians — more than two percent of the entire population, a proportion of dead exceeding the proportional casualties of any European nation in the Second World War. The dead are not primarily combatants. United Nations agencies, Médecins Sans Frontières, and the World Health Organization have consistently documented that the majority of casualties are women and children. The killing has been systematic, sustained over more than thirty months, and accompanied throughout by public statements of genocidal intent by the named Defendants.
B. The Starvation Campaign
11.Beginning in October 2023, the Defendants imposed a comprehensive blockade on the Gaza Strip, restricting and periodically eliminating the entry of food, water, medicine, and fuel. The United Nations World Food Programme declared famine conditions in northern Gaza in March 2024. Defendant SMOTRICH publicly stated that blocking humanitarian aid was justified and that starvation was a legitimate instrument of the campaign — direct evidence of genocidal intent under Article II(c) of the Genocide Convention. Defendant BEN GVIR organized and celebrated the obstruction of United Nations aid convoys, publicly characterizing the provision of food and medicine to the civilian population as contrary to Israeli security interests.
C. Public Statements of Genocidal Intent
12.Defendant NETANYAHU, on October 28, 2023, publicly invoked the Biblical passage of Amalek — a scriptural mandate of total annihilation — in direct reference to the military campaign against Gaza, constituting direct evidence of specific genocidal intent — dolus specialis — under the standard established in Prosecutor v. Akayesu (ICTR-96-4-T, 1998) and affirmed by the International Court of Justice in its Provisional Measures Order in South Africa v. Israel (January 26, 2024). Defendant SMOTRICH stated publicly that the Palestinian people do not exist as a people and have no right to exist as such. Defendant BEN GVIR repeatedly and publicly called for the killing of Palestinian prisoners, the forced expulsion of the Palestinian population from Gaza, and resettlement of Gaza by Israeli citizens.
D. The Nuremberg Parallel
13.The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg established, and the United Nations General Assembly affirmed in Resolution 95(I) (1946), that no state authority and no official position shields an individual from personal criminal responsibility for crimes against humanity and genocide. The named Defendants occupy the same structural position — head of government, senior minister, commander — as those prosecuted at Nuremberg. By operation of the Nuremberg Principles, their official positions provide no shelter.
E. American Sovereignty and the Foreign Influence Apparatus
14.The Defendants and their agents, operating through lobbying organizations, political action committees, and affiliated media enterprises within the United States, have systematically subverted American sovereign authority — defaming American citizens who reported truthfully on the conduct alleged herein, fraudulently procuring approximately $3.8 billion in annual military assistance through misrepresentations to Congress concealing the genocidal character of the campaign, and actively working to undermine the diplomatic authority of the President of the United States to establish peace in the region. This subversion of American sovereignty constitutes a direct and particular injury to American citizen Petitioners and to the constitutional order of the United States.
F. Targeting of Protected Persons: Journalists, Medical Personnel, and Humanitarian Aid Workers
15.More journalists have been killed in Gaza since October 7, 2023 than in any armed conflict in a comparable period in recorded history, as documented by the Committee to Protect Journalists and Reporters Without Borders — the systematic elimination of the witness class. The World Health Organization has documented the killing of more than 600 health workers in Gaza, and every major hospital in northern Gaza has been destroyed, besieged, or rendered non-functional. On April 1, 2024, the Israel Defense Forces struck a World Central Kitchen convoy — deconflicted with Israeli military command, its route, timing, and markings affirmatively acknowledged by Israeli military authorities prior to the strike — killing seven aid workers of multiple nationalities, including an American citizen. No prosecution of responsible commanders has been initiated. These acts constitute independent war crimes under Geneva Convention Protocol I (1977), Articles 15, 70, and 79, and corroborating evidence of the specific genocidal intent alleged herein — the intent not merely to kill, but to kill without witness, without care, and without relief.
IV. Charges
16.COUNT ONE — GENOCIDE (All Named Defendants): In violation of Articles II and III of the Genocide Convention, 78 U.N.T.S. 277 (1948), the Defendants, individually and in concert as members of a joint criminal enterprise, have committed acts of genocide against the Palestinian people including: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily and mental harm; deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction in whole or in part; and directly and publicly inciting genocide.
17.COUNT TWO — CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND WAR CRIMES (All Named Defendants): In violation of Nuremberg Principle VI and Geneva Convention Protocol I (1977), Articles 15, 70, and 79, the Defendants have committed crimes against humanity and war crimes including: extermination; persecution on political, racial, and religious grounds; deliberate targeting and killing of journalists; deliberate targeting and killing of medical personnel and systematic destruction of medical infrastructure; and deliberate targeting and killing of humanitarian aid workers operating under deconfliction agreements with Israeli military command.
18.COUNT THREE — COMMAND RESPONSIBILITY (Defendant Netanyahu): As supreme political and military authority over all conduct alleged herein, Defendant Netanyahu knew or had reason to know that forces under his effective command were committing the acts described herein and failed to take all necessary and reasonable measures to prevent those acts or to punish the perpetrators, in violation of the command responsibility doctrine established in In re Yamashita (U.S. 1946) and codified in Rome Statute Article 28.
19.COUNT FOUR — DIRECT AND PUBLIC INCITEMENT TO GENOCIDE (Defendant Ben Gvir): By his public statements calling for the killing and expulsion of the Palestinian people, by his organization and arming of settler militias, and by his systematic obstruction of humanitarian assistance, Defendant Ben Gvir directly and publicly incited the commission of genocide within the meaning of Article III(c) of the Genocide Convention.
20.COUNT FIVE — DELIBERATE INFLICTION OF CONDITIONS OF LIFE CALCULATED TO DESTROY (Defendant Smotrich): By his public endorsement of starvation as an instrument of state policy, his exercise of administrative authority to deny food, water, and medicine to the civilian population, and his public statements denying the existence and rights of the Palestinian people as such, Defendant Smotrich committed the act of genocide defined in Article II(c) of the Genocide Convention.
A. Sentencing Exposure
21.The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg imposed sentences up to and including capital punishment upon conviction for crimes against humanity — twelve of twenty-two defendants sentenced to death by hanging. Petitioners submit that any tribunal convened pursuant to this Petition should be vested with sentencing authority commensurate with the gravity of the crimes alleged, including capital punishment consistent with the Nuremberg precedent. The sentence appropriate to the specific conduct established by the evidence is committed to the sound discretion of the tribunal. The named Defendants are on notice. That precedent stands today.
V. Reservation of Rights to Join Additional Defendants
22.Petitioners expressly reserve the right to amend this Petition to join as additional named defendants any political figure, media figure, financial institution, lobbying organization, intelligence operative, or other natural or juridical person who: (a) has materially aided, financed, facilitated, or provided political cover for the genocidal campaign alleged herein; (b) has operated as a registered or unregistered agent of a foreign power within the political, media, or intelligence institutions of the United States in furtherance of the conduct alleged; (c) has actively suppressed, defamed, or retaliated against American citizens who reported truthfully on the conduct alleged; or (d) has worked through institutional channels to subvert the diplomatic authority of the President of the United States to achieve a peaceful resolution of the conflict. This Petition constitutes formal notice to all such persons. The window for cooperation is not indefinite. This Petition is the notice. What follows is the record.
VI. Prayer for Relief
WHEREFORE, Petitioners respectfully pray that the President of the United States:
(a) Direct the United States Ambassador to the United Nations to support the immediate convening of an Emergency Special Session of the United Nations General Assembly pursuant to Resolution 377(V) (Uniting for Peace, 1950), for the purpose of recommending referral of this matter to the International Criminal Court or the establishment of an international ad hoc tribunal on the model of the ICTY and ICTR, to initiate international legal proceedings against the named Defendants for the crimes alleged herein;
(b) Direct the United States to transmit this Petition to the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court as a supplementary submission in support of the Court's existing investigation into the Situation in the State of Palestine (ICC-01/18);
(c) Immediately suspend all military assistance, weapons transfers, munitions deliveries, and diplomatic protection extended to the State of Israel until such time as the named Defendants have been removed from office and the conduct alleged herein has permanently ceased;
(d) Direct appropriate United States law enforcement and intelligence authorities to investigate and, where the evidence warrants, prosecute all persons identified as unnamed co-conspirators who have operated as agents of a foreign power within the political, media, or intelligence institutions of the United States;
(e) Publicly affirm the obligations of the United States under the Genocide Convention as binding legal commitments of the United States government, not subject to qualification by alliance, strategic interest, or domestic political consideration; and
(f) Grant such other and further relief as justice, the obligations of international law, and the conscience of the human community require.
Respectfully submitted this 6th day of July, 2026.
Signed by the undersigned Petitioners, whose names, standing, and attestations appear in the Declarations filed herewith and incorporated herein by reference.
To add your name to this Petition as a signatory of record, proceed to the Sign the Declaration tab.

126
The Issue
This Petition acknowledges the attacks of October 7, 2023, in which Hamas militants killed approximately 1,200 Israeli civilians and took approximately 250 hostages — acts which the undersigned Petitioners condemn without reservation and which do not, under the Nuremberg Principles or the Genocide Convention, alter the individual criminal liability of the named Defendants for the conduct alleged herein.
In the Matter of the Petition of
THE UNDERSIGNED CITIZENS AND NATIONALS
OF GENOCIDE CONVENTION SIGNATORY STATES,
On Behalf of Themselves and All Similarly Situated, Petitioners,
v.
BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, ITAMAR BEN GVIR,
and BEZALEL SMOTRICH,
and UNNAMED CO-CONSPIRATORS,
Respondents / Defendants.
PETITION FOR CONVENING OF INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL
FOR THE PROSECUTION OF GENOCIDE
I. Parties
A. Petitioners
1.The Petitioners are citizens and nationals of states signatory to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948), appearing individually and as representatives of all similarly situated persons who share standing under the erga omnes obligation to oppose genocide. Petitioners include American citizens whose names, reputations, and livelihoods have been defamed and defrauded by the conduct of the Defendants and by the apparatus of foreign influence that has enabled and sustained that conduct, including taxpayers whose sovereign resources have been fraudulently procured and deployed in furtherance of the genocidal campaign alleged herein; members of the Palestinian people who have been subjected to the acts of genocide described herein; nationals of other Genocide Convention signatory states asserting standing under the erga omnes obligation; and legal, medical, humanitarian, and journalistic professionals with personal knowledge of the facts alleged. The full signatory list will be filed with this Petition upon transmittal.
B. Defendants / Respondents
2.BENJAMIN NETANYAHU is the Prime Minister of the State of Israel and Commander-in-Chief of the Israel Defense Forces, bearing individual criminal responsibility under the command responsibility doctrine, the Nuremberg Principles, and Articles II and III of the Genocide Convention.
3.ITAMAR BEN GVIR is the National Security Minister of the State of Israel, bearing individual criminal responsibility for direct and public incitement to genocide, arming of settler militias, and systematic obstruction of humanitarian aid to the civilian population of Gaza.
4.BEZALEL SMOTRICH is the Finance Minister of the State of Israel and a minister within the Ministry of Defense, bearing individual criminal responsibility for the deliberate destruction of conditions of life of the Palestinian people through the weaponization of starvation.
5.UNNAMED CO-CONSPIRATORS include all persons, natural or juridical, domestic or foreign, who have materially aided, abetted, financed, facilitated, or actively promoted the genocidal campaign alleged herein; who have operated as unregistered agents of a foreign power within the political, media, financial, or intelligence institutions of the United States in furtherance of the conduct alleged; or who have worked to subvert the diplomatic efforts of the President of the United States to establish peace, thereby prolonging the conditions of genocide for their own political, financial, or ideological benefit.
II. Jurisdiction
6.The prohibition of genocide is a peremptory norm of international law — jus cogens — binding all states and all persons regardless of treaty ratification, constituting an obligation erga omnes owed to the international community as a whole, as affirmed by the International Court of Justice in Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Ltd. (Belgium v. Spain, 1970). Every person has both the legal right and the legal duty to oppose genocide regardless of nationality or connection to the parties.
7.The Nuremberg Principles, affirmed by the United Nations General Assembly in Resolution 95(I) (1946) and codified by the International Law Commission in 1950, constitute persuasive authority under customary international law establishing that any person who commits a crime under international law is personally liable therefor, and that official position — including head of state or responsible government official — does not exempt any person from such responsibility.
8.Subject matter jurisdiction derives from the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948), ratified by the United States on November 25, 1988. Article I's obligation to prevent and punish genocide is unconditional and binding upon the President of the United States as chief executive of a signatory state. Additional jurisdiction derives from the customary international law of crimes against humanity and the universal jurisdiction doctrine authorizing any state — and supporting the standing of any individual — to seek prosecution of genocide wherever committed and by whomever committed.
9.The procedural mechanism is United Nations General Assembly Resolution 377(V) (Uniting for Peace, 1950), which empowers the General Assembly to convene in Emergency Special Session and recommend collective measures — including referral to the International Criminal Court or the establishment of an ad hoc tribunal on the model of the ICTY and ICTR — when the Security Council fails to act due to lack of unanimity among permanent members. A presidential directive to the United States Ambassador to the United Nations to support such a session requires no act of Congress, no Security Council vote, and no treaty amendment.
III. Statement of Facts
A. The Scale and Character of the Killing
10.Since October 7, 2023, the State of Israel, under the direction and command of the Defendants, has conducted a military campaign against the Gaza Strip resulting in UN-certified excess deaths exceeding 180,000 Palestinians — more than two percent of the entire population, a proportion of dead exceeding the proportional casualties of any European nation in the Second World War. The dead are not primarily combatants. United Nations agencies, Médecins Sans Frontières, and the World Health Organization have consistently documented that the majority of casualties are women and children. The killing has been systematic, sustained over more than thirty months, and accompanied throughout by public statements of genocidal intent by the named Defendants.
B. The Starvation Campaign
11.Beginning in October 2023, the Defendants imposed a comprehensive blockade on the Gaza Strip, restricting and periodically eliminating the entry of food, water, medicine, and fuel. The United Nations World Food Programme declared famine conditions in northern Gaza in March 2024. Defendant SMOTRICH publicly stated that blocking humanitarian aid was justified and that starvation was a legitimate instrument of the campaign — direct evidence of genocidal intent under Article II(c) of the Genocide Convention. Defendant BEN GVIR organized and celebrated the obstruction of United Nations aid convoys, publicly characterizing the provision of food and medicine to the civilian population as contrary to Israeli security interests.
C. Public Statements of Genocidal Intent
12.Defendant NETANYAHU, on October 28, 2023, publicly invoked the Biblical passage of Amalek — a scriptural mandate of total annihilation — in direct reference to the military campaign against Gaza, constituting direct evidence of specific genocidal intent — dolus specialis — under the standard established in Prosecutor v. Akayesu (ICTR-96-4-T, 1998) and affirmed by the International Court of Justice in its Provisional Measures Order in South Africa v. Israel (January 26, 2024). Defendant SMOTRICH stated publicly that the Palestinian people do not exist as a people and have no right to exist as such. Defendant BEN GVIR repeatedly and publicly called for the killing of Palestinian prisoners, the forced expulsion of the Palestinian population from Gaza, and resettlement of Gaza by Israeli citizens.
D. The Nuremberg Parallel
13.The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg established, and the United Nations General Assembly affirmed in Resolution 95(I) (1946), that no state authority and no official position shields an individual from personal criminal responsibility for crimes against humanity and genocide. The named Defendants occupy the same structural position — head of government, senior minister, commander — as those prosecuted at Nuremberg. By operation of the Nuremberg Principles, their official positions provide no shelter.
E. American Sovereignty and the Foreign Influence Apparatus
14.The Defendants and their agents, operating through lobbying organizations, political action committees, and affiliated media enterprises within the United States, have systematically subverted American sovereign authority — defaming American citizens who reported truthfully on the conduct alleged herein, fraudulently procuring approximately $3.8 billion in annual military assistance through misrepresentations to Congress concealing the genocidal character of the campaign, and actively working to undermine the diplomatic authority of the President of the United States to establish peace in the region. This subversion of American sovereignty constitutes a direct and particular injury to American citizen Petitioners and to the constitutional order of the United States.
F. Targeting of Protected Persons: Journalists, Medical Personnel, and Humanitarian Aid Workers
15.More journalists have been killed in Gaza since October 7, 2023 than in any armed conflict in a comparable period in recorded history, as documented by the Committee to Protect Journalists and Reporters Without Borders — the systematic elimination of the witness class. The World Health Organization has documented the killing of more than 600 health workers in Gaza, and every major hospital in northern Gaza has been destroyed, besieged, or rendered non-functional. On April 1, 2024, the Israel Defense Forces struck a World Central Kitchen convoy — deconflicted with Israeli military command, its route, timing, and markings affirmatively acknowledged by Israeli military authorities prior to the strike — killing seven aid workers of multiple nationalities, including an American citizen. No prosecution of responsible commanders has been initiated. These acts constitute independent war crimes under Geneva Convention Protocol I (1977), Articles 15, 70, and 79, and corroborating evidence of the specific genocidal intent alleged herein — the intent not merely to kill, but to kill without witness, without care, and without relief.
IV. Charges
16.COUNT ONE — GENOCIDE (All Named Defendants): In violation of Articles II and III of the Genocide Convention, 78 U.N.T.S. 277 (1948), the Defendants, individually and in concert as members of a joint criminal enterprise, have committed acts of genocide against the Palestinian people including: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily and mental harm; deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction in whole or in part; and directly and publicly inciting genocide.
17.COUNT TWO — CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND WAR CRIMES (All Named Defendants): In violation of Nuremberg Principle VI and Geneva Convention Protocol I (1977), Articles 15, 70, and 79, the Defendants have committed crimes against humanity and war crimes including: extermination; persecution on political, racial, and religious grounds; deliberate targeting and killing of journalists; deliberate targeting and killing of medical personnel and systematic destruction of medical infrastructure; and deliberate targeting and killing of humanitarian aid workers operating under deconfliction agreements with Israeli military command.
18.COUNT THREE — COMMAND RESPONSIBILITY (Defendant Netanyahu): As supreme political and military authority over all conduct alleged herein, Defendant Netanyahu knew or had reason to know that forces under his effective command were committing the acts described herein and failed to take all necessary and reasonable measures to prevent those acts or to punish the perpetrators, in violation of the command responsibility doctrine established in In re Yamashita (U.S. 1946) and codified in Rome Statute Article 28.
19.COUNT FOUR — DIRECT AND PUBLIC INCITEMENT TO GENOCIDE (Defendant Ben Gvir): By his public statements calling for the killing and expulsion of the Palestinian people, by his organization and arming of settler militias, and by his systematic obstruction of humanitarian assistance, Defendant Ben Gvir directly and publicly incited the commission of genocide within the meaning of Article III(c) of the Genocide Convention.
20.COUNT FIVE — DELIBERATE INFLICTION OF CONDITIONS OF LIFE CALCULATED TO DESTROY (Defendant Smotrich): By his public endorsement of starvation as an instrument of state policy, his exercise of administrative authority to deny food, water, and medicine to the civilian population, and his public statements denying the existence and rights of the Palestinian people as such, Defendant Smotrich committed the act of genocide defined in Article II(c) of the Genocide Convention.
A. Sentencing Exposure
21.The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg imposed sentences up to and including capital punishment upon conviction for crimes against humanity — twelve of twenty-two defendants sentenced to death by hanging. Petitioners submit that any tribunal convened pursuant to this Petition should be vested with sentencing authority commensurate with the gravity of the crimes alleged, including capital punishment consistent with the Nuremberg precedent. The sentence appropriate to the specific conduct established by the evidence is committed to the sound discretion of the tribunal. The named Defendants are on notice. That precedent stands today.
V. Reservation of Rights to Join Additional Defendants
22.Petitioners expressly reserve the right to amend this Petition to join as additional named defendants any political figure, media figure, financial institution, lobbying organization, intelligence operative, or other natural or juridical person who: (a) has materially aided, financed, facilitated, or provided political cover for the genocidal campaign alleged herein; (b) has operated as a registered or unregistered agent of a foreign power within the political, media, or intelligence institutions of the United States in furtherance of the conduct alleged; (c) has actively suppressed, defamed, or retaliated against American citizens who reported truthfully on the conduct alleged; or (d) has worked through institutional channels to subvert the diplomatic authority of the President of the United States to achieve a peaceful resolution of the conflict. This Petition constitutes formal notice to all such persons. The window for cooperation is not indefinite. This Petition is the notice. What follows is the record.
VI. Prayer for Relief
WHEREFORE, Petitioners respectfully pray that the President of the United States:
(a) Direct the United States Ambassador to the United Nations to support the immediate convening of an Emergency Special Session of the United Nations General Assembly pursuant to Resolution 377(V) (Uniting for Peace, 1950), for the purpose of recommending referral of this matter to the International Criminal Court or the establishment of an international ad hoc tribunal on the model of the ICTY and ICTR, to initiate international legal proceedings against the named Defendants for the crimes alleged herein;
(b) Direct the United States to transmit this Petition to the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court as a supplementary submission in support of the Court's existing investigation into the Situation in the State of Palestine (ICC-01/18);
(c) Immediately suspend all military assistance, weapons transfers, munitions deliveries, and diplomatic protection extended to the State of Israel until such time as the named Defendants have been removed from office and the conduct alleged herein has permanently ceased;
(d) Direct appropriate United States law enforcement and intelligence authorities to investigate and, where the evidence warrants, prosecute all persons identified as unnamed co-conspirators who have operated as agents of a foreign power within the political, media, or intelligence institutions of the United States;
(e) Publicly affirm the obligations of the United States under the Genocide Convention as binding legal commitments of the United States government, not subject to qualification by alliance, strategic interest, or domestic political consideration; and
(f) Grant such other and further relief as justice, the obligations of international law, and the conscience of the human community require.
Respectfully submitted this 6th day of July, 2026.
Signed by the undersigned Petitioners, whose names, standing, and attestations appear in the Declarations filed herewith and incorporated herein by reference.
To add your name to this Petition as a signatory of record, proceed to the Sign the Declaration tab.

Supporter Voices
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on July 6, 2026