Petition for a Fair and Means-Tested Child Maintenance System

Recent signers:
Jenny Healey and 14 others have signed recently.

The Issue

Petition for a review and reform of the current child maintenance system to ensure that financial responsibility is fairly distributed between both parents and that maintenance payments are calculated based on a comprehensive means-tested approach. The current system does not adequately account for all sources of income or consider reasonable expenditures, leading to unjust outcomes for both paying and receiving parents.

 


Proposed Reforms:

1. Means-Tested Calculations

Child maintenance payments should be determined through a means-tested system that considers all income, regardless of source (e.g., employment, self-employment, investments, benefits, or any other financial gains). This would ensure that all parents contribute fairly based on their true financial capacity.

2. Fair Assessment of Income and Expenditure

A parent’s ability to pay should be assessed based on both income and reasonable living expenses. Essential costs such as rent/mortgage, utilities, and basic living expenses should be deducted before determining child maintenance contributions. This prevents undue financial hardship while ensuring children receive the support they need.

3. Both Parents Contribute Equitably

The financial responsibility for raising a child should not fall disproportionately on one parent. Both parents should be assessed for their financial contributions based on income and circumstances, ensuring that both parties are held accountable for their child’s welfare.

4. Exclusion of Non-Biological Children in Deductions

The current system often considers non-biological children in maintenance calculations. While stepchildren and other dependents may require financial support, this should not reduce the obligations owed to biological children. If a parent can afford to support a non-biological child, they should first fulfill their financial responsibility toward their own biological children.

5. Preventing Evasion of Child Maintenance Payments

Some individuals intentionally quit their jobs, reduce their working hours, or hide income sources to avoid paying child maintenance. The system should have safeguards in place to prevent this, including:

• Imposing sanctions on parents who voluntarily leave employment without valid reasons.

• Restricting their ability to claim benefits if it is determined that they left employment to avoid paying maintenance.

• Ensuring that imputed income (what a person should be earning based on their skills and experience) is used in maintenance calculations when there is evidence of deliberate job loss or income reduction.

6. Holding Employers Accountable for Facilitating Evasion

To further prevent the evasion of child maintenance payments, employers who knowingly assist employees in hiding income—such as paying off-the-books wages, misreporting earnings, or manipulating work hours—should face legal and financial consequences. Employers found complicit in such actions should be subject to penalties, including fines, restrictions on government contracts, and potential criminal liability for fraud. Strengthening enforcement mechanisms against employer-assisted evasion will ensure that child maintenance calculations reflect a parent’s true financial situation and that children receive the financial support they are entitled to.

 


Legal Basis for Reform:

 


The proposed reforms align with the fundamental principles of fairness and equality as outlined in existing laws, including:

• The Child Support Act 1991 – This legislation established the framework for child maintenance but does not currently account for all income sources or reasonable expenses, leading to unfair financial burdens.

• The Equality Act 2010 – Ensuring both parents contribute fairly aligns with the principles of non-discrimination and equal treatment.

• The Welfare Reform Act 2012 – Emphasizes personal responsibility and financial fairness, which should extend to child maintenance calculations.

 


Call to Action:

 


We urge the government to:

• Conduct a full review of child maintenance calculations to incorporate a means-tested system.

• Ensure all income sources are considered in maintenance assessments.

• Adjust deductions to prioritize biological children over non-biological dependents.

• Implement an equitable approach that holds both parents accountable for financial contributions.

 


The current system has led to financial strain on many parents, either through unfairly high payments or inadequate support for children. A reformed, means-tested approach will create a fair and balanced child maintenance system that ensures children receive the support they deserve without placing undue hardship on either parent.

30

Recent signers:
Jenny Healey and 14 others have signed recently.

The Issue

Petition for a review and reform of the current child maintenance system to ensure that financial responsibility is fairly distributed between both parents and that maintenance payments are calculated based on a comprehensive means-tested approach. The current system does not adequately account for all sources of income or consider reasonable expenditures, leading to unjust outcomes for both paying and receiving parents.

 


Proposed Reforms:

1. Means-Tested Calculations

Child maintenance payments should be determined through a means-tested system that considers all income, regardless of source (e.g., employment, self-employment, investments, benefits, or any other financial gains). This would ensure that all parents contribute fairly based on their true financial capacity.

2. Fair Assessment of Income and Expenditure

A parent’s ability to pay should be assessed based on both income and reasonable living expenses. Essential costs such as rent/mortgage, utilities, and basic living expenses should be deducted before determining child maintenance contributions. This prevents undue financial hardship while ensuring children receive the support they need.

3. Both Parents Contribute Equitably

The financial responsibility for raising a child should not fall disproportionately on one parent. Both parents should be assessed for their financial contributions based on income and circumstances, ensuring that both parties are held accountable for their child’s welfare.

4. Exclusion of Non-Biological Children in Deductions

The current system often considers non-biological children in maintenance calculations. While stepchildren and other dependents may require financial support, this should not reduce the obligations owed to biological children. If a parent can afford to support a non-biological child, they should first fulfill their financial responsibility toward their own biological children.

5. Preventing Evasion of Child Maintenance Payments

Some individuals intentionally quit their jobs, reduce their working hours, or hide income sources to avoid paying child maintenance. The system should have safeguards in place to prevent this, including:

• Imposing sanctions on parents who voluntarily leave employment without valid reasons.

• Restricting their ability to claim benefits if it is determined that they left employment to avoid paying maintenance.

• Ensuring that imputed income (what a person should be earning based on their skills and experience) is used in maintenance calculations when there is evidence of deliberate job loss or income reduction.

6. Holding Employers Accountable for Facilitating Evasion

To further prevent the evasion of child maintenance payments, employers who knowingly assist employees in hiding income—such as paying off-the-books wages, misreporting earnings, or manipulating work hours—should face legal and financial consequences. Employers found complicit in such actions should be subject to penalties, including fines, restrictions on government contracts, and potential criminal liability for fraud. Strengthening enforcement mechanisms against employer-assisted evasion will ensure that child maintenance calculations reflect a parent’s true financial situation and that children receive the financial support they are entitled to.

 


Legal Basis for Reform:

 


The proposed reforms align with the fundamental principles of fairness and equality as outlined in existing laws, including:

• The Child Support Act 1991 – This legislation established the framework for child maintenance but does not currently account for all income sources or reasonable expenses, leading to unfair financial burdens.

• The Equality Act 2010 – Ensuring both parents contribute fairly aligns with the principles of non-discrimination and equal treatment.

• The Welfare Reform Act 2012 – Emphasizes personal responsibility and financial fairness, which should extend to child maintenance calculations.

 


Call to Action:

 


We urge the government to:

• Conduct a full review of child maintenance calculations to incorporate a means-tested system.

• Ensure all income sources are considered in maintenance assessments.

• Adjust deductions to prioritize biological children over non-biological dependents.

• Implement an equitable approach that holds both parents accountable for financial contributions.

 


The current system has led to financial strain on many parents, either through unfairly high payments or inadequate support for children. A reformed, means-tested approach will create a fair and balanced child maintenance system that ensures children receive the support they deserve without placing undue hardship on either parent.

The Decision Makers

UK Government - Department for Work and Pensions
UK Government - Department for Work and Pensions

Supporter Voices

Petition Updates