Thank you for your letter acknowledging our meeting in October. I was very disappointed with the meeting for a number of reasons. Predominantly, WAPOL’s refusal to recognize the findings of the Honorable Michael Murray QC, specifically that Casino Control Act 1984 (WA) and the Criminal Investigation Act 2008 (WA) and especially s26 of the Act do not apply in my case, and his observation that there is no provision in the Criminal Investigation Act 2006 that would be likely to provide Messrs Ross and Gungor with a defence to a charge of assaulting me. It is also noted again that WAPOL’s own senior solicitor find WAPOL have a confused and lack of understanding of the law. It is a sad reflection that WAPOL are unable to take criticism or correct obvious errors. The police reports you mentioned are not based on a full understanding of the law, and in that regard are a waist of paper. As can clearly be seen I was not aggressive and reacted only after being assaulted three times and my friend was also assaulted. My defense of her was found lawful and in line with public opinion. The fact WAPOL question this is alarming. The notion that Gungor can claim he is making a citizens arrest after he has committed multiple unlawful assaults is a joke. I note that he has been allowed to make a new back dated statement that includes a citizens arrest clause. This confirms to me how much police are willing to manipulate the facts. There is no need to point out that he is not seen arresting me anywhere on the CCTV footage, and according to the law, he is required to arrest me before he applies the law. The idea that WAPOL think the outcome of a trial is based on the price of the defense lawyer I find disgusting and shows the total disrespect WAPOL have for the law. It does however confirm my belief that WAPOL operate similarly to third world police. I am disappointed to find this low level of policing in Perth. I find it interesting that you choose to protect Ross, who unquestionably acted unlawfully, given his total lack of respect for WAPOL (Shown in his comments directed at Prosecutor Lawlor). As seen I cooperated fully and respectfully with police at all times. Sadly, I now have the same disrespect for WAPOL as Ross showed. As you commented, Ross has offended again, and the fact that police are not prepared to arrest him in my case shows WAPOL do not have the safety of the public in mind, rather they have ulterior motives. The inference that I have to prove I said nothing to Ross is fundamentally wrong. He assaulted me and therefore the onus is on him to prove he was acting lawfully. This is a fundamental of our laws. Furthermore, Ross made no mention in his statement that he was so enraged by what I allegedly said to him he could not control himself. This would be a requirement if he was to take this absurd line as a defense. I note the requirements WAPOL have for arresting a person was not applied to me. WAPOL fell over themselves, ignoring CCTV and witnesses in a rush to arrest me. I believe WAPOL is completely at odds with the West Australian public and are rapidly losing the confidence of the people. I do thank you for your time however, as without having seen WAPOL’s attitude for myself, I would not have believed it possible in my home town. Please find attached a final video that I hope you take the time to watch. As pointed out by the Honorable Michael Murray QC, WAPOL have failed me. Being a law abiding citizen, I hope in the future not to cross paths with WAPOL as they have betrayed my trust. Yours Sincerely,