Actualización sobre la peticiónOpen Cases that Hid Evidence in Public Interest Immunity (PII) Ex Parte & O​.​S​.​AThe systemic cover-up of paedophilia gangs U.K exposed .
Louise PughReino Unido
4 jul 2025

One of the questions that is regularly asked is: 

‘Why is the child abuse only being talked about and exposed now?’

For years, whistleblowers of child abuse have bravely come forward but have been systematically silenced for decades. 

Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, Swansea - all places where decades of abuse were covered up. 

Those in power knew about what was going on but were willing to go to any lengths to cover it up to protect themselves and their political reputation.

And it’s still going on. 

This attached video below explains why information regarding child abuse and grooming is not investigated properly. In my case, it was reported as early as 1997, but not investigated properly by the police or social services. .This is despite ALL those in authority having FULL access to ALL THE EVIDENCE AND FACTS. 

What happened before and after June 1999, (and it’s still going on today), shows that abusers deflect blame away from themselves. They usually spin a rumour mill about those they want to silence calling them attention seekers or conspiracy theorists. Character assassinations towards victims of child abuse or those trying to expose it, is common.

But dig a bit deeper and you’ll find that those who are obsessive in their plight to blame victims, usually are abusive themselves and have their own agenda.  

It is still going on today. 

In 2025, there was suppressed evidence and significant information deliberately withheld at a Swansea court.

Instead, misinformation was deliberately presented at a Swansea court. The prosecution barrister presented key information outside the court room which if this information had not been withheld from the court, could have resulted in a very long stretch in prison for the defendant for attempted murder. This information was never presented in the public court arena. This resulting in a minor sentence of 2 years 4 months.  

Digging around the background of this case, revealed suspected grooming in an education setting was a central theme.

Yet the media in 2025, explained that they were not allowed to print evidence about suspected grooming in education as there was a ban in the media. This legal ban prevented the media from reporting factual evidence which pointed to suspected grooming within a Welsh educational setting. 

Cleaning up toxic unhealthy cultures which have been established on the backdrop of decades of abuse of power require bold hard conversations. Together with the combined commitment for real change in actions, not empty words. 

The cover-up at the Swansea court in 2025 shows that the political landscape in Welsh society is not ready or willing to change its ways. We need to address these serious public interest issues that affect us all! 

Please watch the video below.

Andrew Norfolk, mentioned in the video, is the Times journalist who exposed the Rotherham child abuse grooming gangs with Jayne Senior in 2013.

Dominic Cummings provides the evidence of the corruption that he observed as a senior advisor to the Government. He is now a key witness who holds insider information that backs up my experience of systematic abuse. 

https://youtube.com/shorts/TqIBAkR-adI?si=3rRyCeRlAVz2tF1r

Wales has a lot of catching-up to do! 

Everyone has a part to play.

If standing up, speaking out and drawing attention to the abuse of children makes a person an attention seeker, then what do we call a person who goes out of their way to stop child abuse victims telling their story to push for a public inquiry? 

Which side of the fence are you sitting on? 

Because with the issue of child abuse, there is no middle ground. 

We are either part of the problem of systematic abuse towards victims that Dominic Cummings is exposing or part of the solution. 

We need to choose our side very carefully because we will be defined by our words and actions. 

Please keep sharing this petition…

 Let’s get transparency to open up unlawful PIIs that only served to protect the political and system’s reputation through preventing grooming gangs and child abuse from being exposed. In my opinion, Jeremy Bamber and David Morris cases share this similar theme. Both these cases have similar-fact evidence hidden in unlawful public interest immunity clauses that need to be opened up so the public can scrutinise them. 

Transparency of all available evidence is the key to having a fair trial. Opening up the PIIs will restore public confidence in the justice system. I’m happy to have my opinion challenged but this can only happen through opening up the PIIs to reveal what’s been hidden in them. Hidden withheld evidence which was kept from the jury  in both J.N. Bamber and D.G. Morris cases resulted in unfair trials and unsafe convictions.

Apoyá la petición ahora
Firmá esta petición
Copiar enlace
WhatsApp
Facebook
Nextdoor
Email
X