No One Is Above the Constitution — Congress & Courts, Honor Your Oath and Act Now!

Recent signers:
David Ligon and 11 others have signed recently.

The Issue

We Demand Immediate Congressional Enforcement of Constitutional War Powers/Preservation of Judicial Review! CHECKS AND BALANCES MUST PREVAIL/BE ENFORCED!


We, the undersigned, assert that recent U.S. military strikes raise grave constitutional concerns under Article I, Section 8 and the separation-of-powers doctrine affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States.

 

The authority to declare war and authorize sustained military hostilities is vested exclusively in Congress. The President’s role as Commander in Chief under Article II does not grant unilateral authority to initiate or continue hostilities absent clear statutory authorization.

 

The Supreme Court has consistently rejected unchecked executive action:

 

In Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, the Court held that presidential power is at its lowest ebb when acting without or against congressional authorization.
In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, the Court declared that war is not a “blank check” for executive authority.
In Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, the Court reaffirmed that the Executive must comply with statutory limitations enacted by Congress even during armed conflict.

 

 

Under the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1548), continued hostilities absent specific congressional authorization violate statutory mandates requiring notification and termination within prescribed time limits.

 


Failure by Congress to act risks:


Constitutional injury to the separation of powers.

Unlawful expenditure of appropriated funds.
Entrenchment of executive precedent that erodes legislative war authority.
Foreclosure of meaningful judicial review due to political question defenses strengthened by legislative inaction.

 

 

We therefore demand that Congress:

Publicly determine whether current military operations exceed statutory authorization.

Introduce and vote upon a joint resolution pursuant to 50 U.S.C. § 1544(c) if authorization is lacking.
Condition or restrict appropriations for any continued unauthorized hostilities.
Create a formal congressional record sufficient to preserve standing and facilitate judicial review if necessary.

 

 


Unchecked executive war-making constitutes not merely a policy dispute, but a structural constitutional violation.

 


Congress must act immediately to prevent the normalization of unilateral war powers and to preserve the constitutional balance affirmed by the Supreme Court.

avatar of the starter
Jane DoePetition Starter

45

Recent signers:
David Ligon and 11 others have signed recently.

The Issue

We Demand Immediate Congressional Enforcement of Constitutional War Powers/Preservation of Judicial Review! CHECKS AND BALANCES MUST PREVAIL/BE ENFORCED!


We, the undersigned, assert that recent U.S. military strikes raise grave constitutional concerns under Article I, Section 8 and the separation-of-powers doctrine affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States.

 

The authority to declare war and authorize sustained military hostilities is vested exclusively in Congress. The President’s role as Commander in Chief under Article II does not grant unilateral authority to initiate or continue hostilities absent clear statutory authorization.

 

The Supreme Court has consistently rejected unchecked executive action:

 

In Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, the Court held that presidential power is at its lowest ebb when acting without or against congressional authorization.
In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, the Court declared that war is not a “blank check” for executive authority.
In Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, the Court reaffirmed that the Executive must comply with statutory limitations enacted by Congress even during armed conflict.

 

 

Under the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1548), continued hostilities absent specific congressional authorization violate statutory mandates requiring notification and termination within prescribed time limits.

 


Failure by Congress to act risks:


Constitutional injury to the separation of powers.

Unlawful expenditure of appropriated funds.
Entrenchment of executive precedent that erodes legislative war authority.
Foreclosure of meaningful judicial review due to political question defenses strengthened by legislative inaction.

 

 

We therefore demand that Congress:

Publicly determine whether current military operations exceed statutory authorization.

Introduce and vote upon a joint resolution pursuant to 50 U.S.C. § 1544(c) if authorization is lacking.
Condition or restrict appropriations for any continued unauthorized hostilities.
Create a formal congressional record sufficient to preserve standing and facilitate judicial review if necessary.

 

 


Unchecked executive war-making constitutes not merely a policy dispute, but a structural constitutional violation.

 


Congress must act immediately to prevent the normalization of unilateral war powers and to preserve the constitutional balance affirmed by the Supreme Court.

avatar of the starter
Jane DoePetition Starter

The Decision Makers

Donald Trump
President of the United States

Supporter Voices

Petition updates